Introduction
Protein phosphorylation is a tightly regulated posttranslational modification that impacts nearly all cellular processes. A balance is normally maintained through the actions of multiple kinases and phosphatases. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a ubiquitously expressed conserved enzyme, with its catalytic C subunit constituting up to 1% of total cellular proteins, and accounts for the majority of serine/threonine phosphatase activity in the brain. In neuronal cells, most of the C subunit is associated with a conserved scaffold‐like A subunit, and one of several different regulatory B subunits that confer different substrate specificities on the resulting trimeric holoenzymes. The binding of different B subunits to the AC dimer is regulated by reversible carboxyl methylation of the C subunit. Thus, PP2A methylation is critical for its selective phosphatase activity toward different phospho‐protein substrates. The methylation status of PP2A is governed by the opposing activities of a PP2A‐specific leucine carboxyl methyltransferase (LCMT‐1) and a PP2A‐specific methylesterase (PME‐1).
α‐Synuclein is an abundant protein in the brain that misfolds and polymerizes into fibrillar form in Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, which are pathologic hallmarks of α‐synucleinopathies such as Parkinson disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). α‐Synuclein is extensively phosphorylated at Ser129 in PD and DLB brains. Additionally, hyperphosphorylated and misfolded α‐synuclein accumulates in neurons of transgenic mice that express human α‐synuclein, and hyperphosphorylation exacerbates α‐synuclein toxicity in Drosophila. In vitro, phosphorylation of α‐synuclein at Ser129 promotes its oligomerization and fibrillization.
We demonstrated previously in in vitro experiments and in cultured neuroblastoma cells that the main enzyme that dephosphorylates α‐synuclein is the B55α containing isoform of PP2A. We also identified a naturally occurring serotonin derivative in coffee, eicosanoyl‐5‐hydroxytryptamide (EHT), that inhibits PME‐1‐dependent PP2A demethylation, thereby stabilizing the PP2A heterotrimeric holoenzyme AB55αC that dephosphorylates α‐synuclein. α‐Synuclein transgenic mice maintained on a diet supplemented with EHT exhibited dramatically reduced α‐synuclein phosphorylation and aggregation in the brain, accompanied with enhanced neuronal integrity and reduced neuroinflammation as well as improved motor performance.
Based on these preclinical observations, we hypothesized that alterations in PP2A methylation may contribute to the pathology of human α‐synucleinopathies., particularly in light of decreased PP2A activity reported in the brains of individuals with DLB and α‐synuclein triplication. Abnormal regulation of PP2A has been noted in another neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer's disease (AD), with decreased phosphatase activity and reduced PP2A methylation in postmortem brains. Furthermore, PP2A has been shown to be the major phosphatase acting on phospho‐tau, and EHT ameliorates the neurodegenerative phenotype in a rat model of AD.
This study examines the state of PP2A methylation in postmortem brains of patients with PD and DLB as well as the expression of the two enzymes that control PP2A methylation, LCMT‐1, and PME‐1. The results show robust abnormalities compared to control brains consistent with compromised PP2A activity that can contribute to an abnormally elevated phosphorylation state of α‐synuclein in these disorders.
Materials and Methods
Brain samples
Human postmortem brain tissue sections that were fully characterized clinically and neuropathologically were obtained from the Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program of Sun City, Arizona. Deidentified samples from eight subjects in each of the diagnostic groups consisting of Parkinson disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and non‐neurological controls (Controls) were studied (Table ). The three groups were age‐matched with mean age at death of 79 ± 2.8 years for PD cases, 82 ± 2.6 years for DLB, and 84 ± 2.1 years for Controls (not significant). Gender distribution was equal for both PD and DLB cases, while the Control group included five males and three females. Only one PD case had a positive family history of tremor. Family history among DLB cases included two AD, two others dementia, and one tremor. All PD cases were tested for glucocerebrosidase (GBA) and LRRK2 mutations; three were found to have GBA mutations, and one had LRRK2 mutation. None of these GBA or LRRK2 mutants had positive family history. Postmortem interval (PMI) was ≤3 h in all but one PD subject. United Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores in the “practically‐defined off state” in all but three subjects were 39.4 ± 8.5 for PD, 35.7 ± 11.4 for DLB, and 10.4 ± 4.3 for Controls (P < 0.05 for difference between PD and Controls). Mean Mini‐Mental State Examination scores were 18 ± 3.6 in the PD group, 8.8 ± 3.1 in DLB and 27.1 ± 0.8 in Controls (P < 0.01 for difference between DLB and Controls). Lewy bodies were detected in PD and DLB brains but in none of the Controls. Neuropathological stage of α‐synucleinopathy assigned according to the Unified Staging System for Lewy Body Disorders showed all DLB cases to be in stage 4, PD cases ranged from stages 2 to 4, and all the Controls were in stage zero. All PD‐affected brains had severe depigmentation of the substantia nigra, while those with DLB had mild to moderate depigmentation, and all but one Control had no or mild depigmentation. Concomitant Alzheimer pathology was also present. Mean neuritic plaque density determined according to the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) was 1.0 ± 0.3 for PD, 2.8 ± 0.2 for DLB, and 1.0 ± 0 for Controls (P = 0.001 for difference between DLB and Controls, and P < 0.01 for PD vs. DLB), and neurofibrillary tangles assessed using Braak staging showed mean scores of 2.9 ± 0.4 for PD, 4.5 ± 0.3 for DLB, and 2.8 ± 0.2 for Controls (P = 0.01 for difference between DLB and Controls, and P < 0.05 for PD vs. DLB). Demographic and neuropathological details are provided in Table .
Postmortem brain tissue samples, and the clinical and neuropathologic profile of study subjectsGroup | Gender | Age at Death | PMI | Motor UPDRS | MMSE Score | Unified LB Stage | SN depigmentation | Plaque density | Braak score |
Non‐neurological Controls | |||||||||
1 | Male | 81 | 2.75 | 6.5 | 25 | 0 | None | 1 | III |
2 | Female | 90 | 3 | 13 | 27 | 0 | Moderate | 1 | III |
3 | Male | 85 | 1.83 | 6 | 30 | 0 | None | 1 | II |
4 | Male | 82 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 0 | Mild | 1 | III |
5 | Male | 82 | 2.16 | 28 | 0 | Mild | 1 | III | |
6 | Male | 73 | 2.5 | 4 | 30 | 0 | Mild | 1 | II |
7 | Female | 88 | 2 | 34.5 | 24 | 0 | None | 1 | III |
8 | Female | 91 | 2.5 | 9 | 27 | 0 | None | 1 | III |
Parkinson's Disease | |||||||||
1 | Female | 73 | 2.16 | 78 | 19 | 4 | Severe | 1 | III |
2 | Male | 70 | 1.83 | 30.5 | 8 | 3 | Severe | 0 | III |
3 | Male | 85 | 2 | 12 | 28 | 3 | Severe | 2 | IV |
4 | Female | 82 | 3 | 38 | 16 | 3 | Severe | 1 | III |
5 | Male | 78 | 2.5 | 37 | 19 | 2 | Severe | 0 | III |
6 | Male | 69 | 2.25 | 74 | 0 | 4 | Severe | 1 | II |
7 | Female | 87 | 2.16 | 24 | 28 | 3 | Severe | 1 | I |
8 | Female | 89 | 3.66 | 22 | 27 | 2 | 2 | IV | |
Dementia with Lewy Bodies | |||||||||
1 | Female | 76 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 4 | Moderate | 2 | IV |
2 | Female | 80 | 2.33 | 0 | 4 | Moderate | 2 | III | |
3 | Male | 69 | 2.5 | 79 | 0 | 4 | Moderate | 3 | V |
4 | Male | 86 | 2.83 | 47 | 10 | 4 | Moderate | 3 | IV |
5 | Male | 88 | 2.16 | 8 | 26 | 4 | Mild | 3 | IV |
6 | Female | 82 | 2.66 | 72 | 5 | 4 | Moderate | 3 | V |
7 | Female | 92 | 2.5 | 12 | 15 | 4 | Mild | 3 | VI |
8 | Male | 86 | 2.3 | 22 | 10 | 4 | Moderate | 3 | V |
PMI, postmortem interval; UPDRS, United Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, Motor subscale; MMSE, Mini‐Mental State Examination; Unified LB Stage, Unified Staging System for Lewy Body Disorders: 0 = stage 0 (no Lewy bodies); 2 = Stage IIa (Brainstem predominant) and Stage IIb (Limbic predominant); 3 = Stage III (Brainstem and Limbic); and 4 = Stage IV (Neocortical). SN = substantia nigra pars compacta. CERAD neuritic Plaque Density scores are 0 = none; 1 = sparse; 2 = moderate; 3 = frequent. Braak score staging is for neurofibrillary tangles.
4These subjects were evaluated with the Motor UPDRS in the “ON” state; all other subjects were evaluated off antiparkinson drugs.
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical analysis, 40 μm free‐floating formalin‐fixed sections of the substantia nigra and middle frontal gyrus of the cerebral cortex stored at 4°C were used. After washing with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS), tissue sections were incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min to inhibit endogenous peroxidase activity. To enhance epitope antigenicity, samples were incubated in preheated sodium citrate (pH 6.0) for 30 min at 75°C. Sections were then blocked using 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: antibody for LCMT‐1 (also known as PPMT) (1:100, a kind gift from Egon Ogris); 07‐095 for PME‐1 (1:500, Millipore); 6A3 for methylated‐PP2A (1:200, generated at Princeton University); 1D6 for demethylated‐PP2A (1:1000; Millipore); 06‐222 for total PP2A C subunit (1:500, Millipore); and 2G9 for total B55α subunit of PP2A (1:500, Millipore). Sections were washed with PBS‐Tween (PBS‐T) three times and incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody for 1 h. After washing again with PBS‐T, sections were incubated with biotinylated HRP complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB) for color development. Hematoxylin‐stained adjacent sections of the substantia nigra (SN) were used to count neuromelanin‐containing neurons. All samples across different diagnostic groups were stained under the same conditions. For image analysis, tissue sections were observed under a Nikon Eclipse 55i light microscope, images were captured using NIS‐Elements D software (Nikon), and the area occupied by immunoreaction in each image was quantified using the thresholding tool in ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). The mean areas for each disease group were then compared to that of the Control group. Signals in the SN were normalized against the density of residual neuromelan‐containing neurons.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) was used for statistical analysis and graphic representation. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Differences among the three groups in the levels of LCMT‐1, PME‐1, methylated PP2A, demethylated PP2A, total PP2A, and B55α were analyzed using one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Differences in clinical and demographic characteristics (age, Mini‐Mental State Examination, postmortem interval, motor UPDRS, Braak stage, and neuritic plaque density) were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with post hoc Dunn's multiple comparison test. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
A marked decrease in the area occupied by immunoreaction for the PP2A methylating enzyme LCMT‐1 was found in the SN of both PD and DLB brains, and a lesser, but still significant, decrease was detected in the cortex of both diseases in comparison to Controls (Fig. ). In SN, LCMT‐1 immunoreaction was decreased by 63% in PD (P < 0.0001) and 55% in DLB (P < 0.0001), while in the cortex, this was reduced by 30% in PD (P < 0.01) and by 28% in DLB (P < 0.01) compared to Controls. Conversely, the demethylating enzyme PME‐1 was elevated in the SN in PD (P < 0.01) but not in DLB, and a trend to increased levels was noted in cortex in both disease groups (P = 0.05 for a 76% increase in PD vs. Controls; P = 0.17 for a 60% increase in DLB vs. Controls) (Fig. ). As LCMT‐1 and PME‐1 signals were normalized against the number of residual melanized neurons, and PME‐1 expression is increased in the SN, these findings indicate that the observed decrease in LCMT‐1 expression in SN (Fig. ) is not explained by the loss of dopaminergic neurons. Additionally, the marked decrease in LCMT‐1 in the SN of both PD and DLB, despite only mild to moderate depigmentation in the latter, also suggests that neuronal loss cannot adequately account for the decrease in LCMT‐1 expression in these conditions.
In agreement with the robust decrease in LCMT‐1 expression in the SN of both PD and DLB brains, and increased PME‐1 expression in PD, methylated PP2A expression was markedly down‐regulated in SN in both conditions compared to Controls (Fig. ). Methyl‐PP2A was reduced by 70% in PD (P < 0.001) and by 73% in DLB (P < 0.0001) (Fig. A–D), while no significant differences were detected in the levels of demethylated PP2A (Fig. E–H). Total PP2A expression (Fig. J–M), and total B55α subunit levels were no different among the three groups (Fig. N–Q). The finding that the proportion of methylated PP2A out of total PP2A is decreased by 60% in PD (P < 0.01) and by 65% in DLB SN (P < 0.001) compared to Controls (Fig. D) indicates that the catalytically active form of PP2A is diminished due to a decrease in its methylating enzyme LCMT‐1 (Fig. ), with contribution from increased expression of the methylesterase PME‐1 (Fig. ). As all these analyses are normalized against the number of neuromelanin‐containing neurons, the decrease in LCMT‐1 expression represents a pathologic marker and not a reflection of dopaminergic neuronal loss in these conditions. Furthermore, the pathologic imbalance of the methylation state of PP2A is evident from the marked decrease in the ratio between methylated PP2A and demethylated PP2A in the SN in both PD and DLB brains (Fig. I). Interestingly, a case with PD and homozygous N370S GBA mutation had the lowest level of methylated PP2A. However, the small numbers of cases analyzed in this study preclude making conclusions about a possible link between genetic background and PP2A dysregulation.
In frontal cortical tissue, the decline in methyl‐PP2A expression was significant only in DLB brains but not in PD brains (Fig. A–D). The immunoreactive signal of methyl‐PP2A was decreased by 31% in DLB (P < 0.05), but not significantly in PD (P = 0.18) compared to Controls. Demethylated PP2A, on the other hand, was increased in PD cortex by 147% (P < 0.01) and not in DLB (P = 0.34) (Fig. E–H). Similar trends were found with the ratios of methyl‐PP2A and demethyl‐PP2A to total PP2A (Fig. D, H). As a result, the ratio of methyl‐PP2A over demethyl‐PP2A was significantly decreased in both PD (67%, P < 0.0001) and DLB cortices (57%, P < 0.0001) (Fig. I). No changes were noted in total PP2A or total B55α in either disease condition compared to Controls. These findings suggest that there is proportionately less enzymatically active methylated PP2A relative to the inactive demethylated form in cortical tissue of both advanced PD and DLB.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that in the brains of individuals with the α‐synucleinopathies PD and DLB, PP2A is in a state that does not favor its assembly into an enzymatically active AB55αC heterotrimeric form. Since the main dephosphorylating enzyme of α‐synuclein is the B55α containing heterotrimeric isoform of PP2A, and methylation of the C subunit of PP2A enhances the incorporation of the regulatory B55α subunit into the catalytically active holoenzyme, the markedly decreased expression of the methylating enzyme LCMT‐1 in these conditions, and increased expression of the demethylating enzyme PME‐1, lead to a striking decrease in the methylated form of PP2A. These dysregulatory changes are not only particularly prominent in the substantia nigra pars compacta but also present in the cortex.
The impact of these maladaptive changes in the brain is profound considering that PP2A is the master regulator of the cellular phospho‐regulatory network and plays key roles in regulating cytoskeletal integrity and signal transduction. Considering the deleterious consequences of a dysfunctional PP2A, it is unlikely that the changes observed in these postmortem brain analyses represent a protective effect in surviving neurons. In relation to α‐synucleinopathies in particular, PP2A catalyzes the dephosphorylation of phospho‐Ser129 α‐synuclein, and the methylation state of the PP2A C subunit regulates this activity. Accordingly, the finding of decreased PP2A methylation in this study provides a molecular mechanism for the reduced PP2A activity reported in α‐synucleinopathies and is likely a significant contributor to the hyperphosphorylation of aggregated α‐synuclein in these disorders.
The striking association between decreased levels of PP2A methylation and decreased levels of LCMT‐1 suggests that a primary regulatory locus for PP2A methylation is LCMT‐1. In assessing the regulatory parameters that might control PP2A carboxyl methylation in the CNS, there has been a focus on factors that underlie methylation metabolism such as levels of the methyl donor, S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM), the competitive inhibitor, S‐adenosyl homocysteine (SAH), or the methylation cycle intermediate homocysteine. Accordingly, there is considerable evidence that SAM and SAH levels play a substantial role in regulating PP2A. Conditions of methylation and one carbon stress have been shown to cause DNA hypomethylation at loci that appear to contribute to the pathogenesis of PD. Similar epigenetic mechanisms may function directly or indirectly to reduce the expression of LCMT‐1 and increase the expression of PME‐1. This might provide a transcriptional mechanism to enforce the regulatory consequences of one‐carbon/methylation stress on PP2A activity, and at the same time, conserve methyl groups under conditions of methyl deficiency. In this regard, it is worth noting that L‐dopa therapy appears to exacerbate methylation deficiencies and results in hyperhomocysteinemia due to the action of catechol‐O‐methyl transferase (COMT).
Considerable evidence suggests that oxidative stress plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of PD and DLB. Evidence has also been reported that PP2A phosphatase activity is sensitive to oxidative stress, and this sensitivity is proposed to be mediated by oxidation of a pair of vicinal cysteines located near the phosphatase active site of the C subunit. Additionally, PP2A oxidation by exposure to micromolar levels of hydrogen peroxide has been shown to completely block its methylation by LCMT‐1. Furthermore, the X‐ray crystal structure of a complex between LCMT‐1 and PP2A supports the notion that the formation of a disulfide crosslink between these cysteine residues might preclude formation of a productive LCMT‐1‐PP2A complex and, thereby, block the methyltransferase activity of LCMT‐1. Thus, the oxidative stress environment in α‐synucleinopathies may contribute to the decreased methylation of PP2A and its activity.
Besides the mechanisms that can reduce PP2A methylation, several additional factors would be expected to contribute to the state of PP2A dysregulation in α‐synucleinopathies. Pathologic α‐synuclein accumulation itself may be an inhibitor of PP2A activity resulting in a vicious cycle exacerbating the hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of pathogenic proteins including α‐synuclein and tau in Lewy body disease. Overexpression of α‐synuclein, particularly its A53T mutant which causes dominantly inherited PD and dementia, increases intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species in SH‐SY5Y neuroblastoma cells , contributing to oxidative stress‐mediated dysregulation of PP2A. Accordingly, A53T‐mutant α‐synuclein reportedly reduces PP2A activity more than the wild‐type isoform does. And in the rat striatum, α‐synuclein overexpression using viral vector‐mediated gene transfer results in decreased expression of PP2A B and C subunits as well as decreased PP2A activity. This effect is associated with increased α‐synuclein phosphorylation and aggregation as well as neuronal cell death and inflammation. Interestingly, parkin, which is linked to recessively inherited PD due to loss of function mutations, reportedly prevents α‐synuclein‐mediated reduction in PP2A expression and activity and mitigates the pathology induced by α‐synculein. The negative impact of impaired PP2A activity is also exerted on parkin functioning as well contributing to neuronal dyshomeostasis. Inhibition of PP2A with okadaic acid in cultured primary neurons reduces parkin expression level and K48‐linked polyubiquitination, which is implicated in parkin‐mediated mitophagy, suggesting that reduced PP2A activity impairs the machinery necessary for mitophagy leading to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria.
Another mechanism through which α‐synuclein accumulation leads to impaired PP2A activity is through the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase), which has strong genetic link to PD and is decreased in sporadic PD brains. In this regard, accumulation of oligomeric and phosphorylated α‐synuclein with age in the brains of cynomolgus monkeys is associated with decreased expression and activity of GCase, as well as reduced activity of PP2A particularly in brain regions that are susceptible to α‐synucleinopathy‐related neurodegeneration. This inverse association between GCase activity, α‐synuclein phosphorylation, and PP2A activity is also demonstrated in cultured neuronal cells, whereby inhibition of GCase activity leads to increased α‐synuclein phosphorylation and reduced methylated PP2A levels and activity. Inhibition of autophagy due to loss of GCase function is also associated with inactivation of PP2A, while activation of autophagy with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin or metformin stimulates PP2A and reduces α‐synuclein phosphorylation in neuronal cells. GCase dysfunction may reduce PP2A activity through impaired lysosomal function and consequent α‐synuclein accumulation. In addition, GCase can also modulate PP2A directly through the product of its enzymatic activity, ceramide, which is an activator of PP2A and of autophagy. Thus, a reduction in GCase activity decreases the production of ceramide leading to reduced PP2A activity. This may explain why accumulation of α‐synuclein in GCase mutants can be reversed by ceramide.
The present findings point to parallels in the dysregulation of PP2A, and in particular its methylation state, between α‐synucleinopathies and Alzheimer's disease. Decreased phosphatase activity toward abnormally phosphorylated tau had been recognized in AD brains. Evidence for the mechanism of this decrease in phosphatase activity comes from the finding that LCMT‐1 is decreased in AD brains, associated with decreased levels of methylated PP2A, and closely matching tau pathology. In addition, levels of Bα containing PP2A critical for regulating tau are decreased in tangle‐bearing neurons correlating with increased tau pathology. And the sensitivity to exogenously administered Aβ oligomers is reduced in the brains of transgenic animals overexpressing LCMT‐1 and exacerbated in mice overexpressing PME‐1. In this study, although DLB cases have more advanced concomitant AD‐like pathology than PD cases (Table ), the observation that indices of PP2A dysregulation in the cortex are not worse in DLB compared to PD suggests that α‐synucleinopathy is the primary driver of PP2A dysregulation in these two conditions. The finding that down‐regulation of LCMT‐1 and changes in PP2A methylation are more prominent in the SN compared to the cortex in PD and DLB supports this notion and may be due to greater oxidative stress environment in the SN. Nevertheless, the contribution of concomitant AD pathology to these changes cannot be entirely excluded. Among the neurobiological consequences of altered LCMT‐1 expression and PP2A methylation that relate to neurodegenerative diseases is neuritogenesis. Experimentally, in cultured neuroblastoma cells, enhanced expression of LCMT‐1 increases methylated C and Bα levels and promotes neuritogenesis. These findings collectively suggest a global role of methylated PP2A in regulating brain protein homeostasis and neuronal survival in neurodegenerative diseases.
The above findings from postmortem brain analysis of PD and DLB patients suggest that efforts to enhance PP2A activity are a plausible therapeutic strategy in order to mitigate the neuropathology of α‐synucleinopathies. The ability of EHT, which prevents the demethylation of PP2A, in reducing α‐synuclein phosphorylation and aggregation associated with improved neuropathological abnormalities and behavioral deficits in α‐synuclein transgenic mice supports this conclusion. Enhancing PP2A activity has also been shown to mitigate the pathology in an AD model as well: EHT treatment resulted in substantial amelioration of AD‐like pathologies such as tau hyperphosphorylation, elevated amyloid‐β levels, and cognitive impairment in a rat model of AD generated by viral vector‐mediated expression of the PP2A endogenous inhibitor I2PP2A, or SET protein, in the brain. And in aged mice and in transgenic tauopathy models of AD, the use of another enhancer of PP2A activity, sodium selenite, has also been demonstrated to reduce tau hyperphosphorylation. Thus, PP2A modulation may provide a common approach for treating neurodegenerative proteinopathies associated with hyperphosphorylated pathogenic proteins.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to the Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program of Sun City, Arizona, and the Arizona Parkinson Disease consortium for the clinical data and provision of human brain tissue samples.
This study was supported by a grant from the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research to S.P.B. and M.M.M. T.G.B. is supported by grants from the NIA, NINDS, Michael J. Fox Foundation and the State of Arizona. J.B.S. is supported by NIH grant AT006868. M.M.M. is the William Dow Lovett Professor of Neurology and is supported by the American Parkinson Disease Association and by NIH grants AT006868 and NS073994. The Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program is supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U24 NS072026 National Brain and Tissue Resource for Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders), the National Institute on Aging (P30 AG19610 Arizona Alzheimer's Disease Core Center), the Arizona Department of Health Services (contract 211002, Arizona Alzheimer's Research Center), the Arizona Biomedical Research Commission (contracts 4001, 0011, 05‐901 and 1001 to the Arizona Parkinson's Disease Consortium), and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research.
Author contribution
Experiments were conceived by M.V., S.P.B., J.B.S., and M.M.M. Experiments were designed by H.‐J., P., K.W.L. and M.M.M. Brain sections, clinical and neuropathological information were contributed by T.G.B. and C.H.A. Experiments were performed by H.‐J. P., K.W.L., and E.S.P. Data were analyzed by H.‐J. P., S.O., R.Y., J.Z., and M.M.M. Results were interpreted by M.V., S.P.B., J.B.S., and M.M.M. The manuscript was drafted by H.‐J.P. T.G.B., C.H.A., M.V., S.P.B., J.B.S. and M.M.M. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.
Conflict of Interest
J.B.S has a significant financial interest in Signum Biosciences, which is developing PP2A phosphatase‐enhancing agents. M.V. is employed by Signum Biosciences. S.P.B. was employed by Signum Biosciences. T.G.B. has received personal fees from GE Healthcare and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals for work unrelated to this study. Other co‐authors have no relevant potential conflict of interest to report.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Objective
Protein phosphatase 2A (
Methods
We compared the state of
Results
Interpretation
These findings support the hypothesis that
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Center for Neurodegenerative and Neuroimmunologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Rutgers – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey
2 Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, Arizona
3 Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
4 Signum Biosciences, Princeton, New Jersey
5 Signum Biosciences, Princeton, New Jersey; Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey