- Ig
- immunoglobulin
- LT
- liver transplant
- PBC
- primary biliary cholangitis
- rPBC
- recurrent PBC
- UDCA
- ursodeoxycholic acid
Abbreviations
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic disease characterized by granulomatous destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. The precise pathogenic mechanisms of developing PBC are still poorly understood, and the development of disease is believed to result from a combination of multiple genetic factors interacting with environmental triggers.
Although relatively rare, up to 10% of patients listed for liver transplant (LT) in North America and Europe have a diagnosis of PBC. The outcome after LT for patients with PBC is generally good, with 1‐year and 5‐year patient survival rates reported between 93%‐94% and 82%‐90%, respectively. However, recurrent PBC (rPBC) is common, and the risk of recurrence increases with time following LT (Table ). In the majority of studies, rPBC has been linked to the more potent immunosuppression regimens, especially with the initial use of tacrolimus following LT. This observation may appear counterintuitive as increased risk with immunosuppression is usually associated with infectious rather than autoimmune disease processes. However, it is notable that specific immunosuppressive treatments are not routinely used for patients with PBC due to lack of efficacy and undue side effects. Following LT, initial tacrolimus therapy is associated with both earlier and more severe recurrence, whereas cyclosporine has been shown to be protective against rPBC in Europe and North America (Table ). The reasons for this observation are not clear and could include issues concerning alloreactivity, hastening any infectious process linked with PBC, immune reconstitution with immunosuppression withdrawal, and even off‐target effects of different regimens. In this regard, it is notable that cyclosporine is known to have broad antiviral effects and has been shown to block the replication of a betaretrovirus that has been linked with PBC.
RECENT STUDIES REPORTING TRANSPLANTATION, RECURRENCE RATE, AND RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE OF PBCAuthor, Year, Country | n | Cadaveric LT/LDLT | Rate of rPBC | Risk Factors for rPBC |
Sanchez et al., 2003 United States |
169 | All cadaveric LT | 11% at 6 years | ‐ Use of tacrolimus |
Levitsky, 2003 United States |
46 | All cadaveric LT | 15% at 6.5 years | ‐ None |
Neuberger, 2004 United Kingdom |
485 | All cadaveric LT | 23% at 6.6 years | ‐ Use of tacrolimus |
Jacob et al., 2006 Germany |
100 | All cadaveric | 14% at 10 years |
‐ Younger age at LT ‐ Use of tacrolimus |
Charatcharoenwitthaya et al., 2007 United States |
154 | All cadaveric LT | 34% at 11 years |
‐ Shorter duration of maintenance corticosteroids ‐ Male recipients ‐ Older recipient age at transplant ‐ Use of tacrolimus |
Morioka et al., 2007 Japan |
50 | All LDLT | 18% at 3 years |
‐ Lower number of HLA‐A, B, DR mismatches ‐ Lower trough level of tacrolimus within 1 year |
Montano‐Loza et al., 2010 Canada |
108 | 97% cadaveric LT | 29% at 10 years | ‐ Use of tacrolimus |
Manousou et al., 2010 United Kingdom |
103 | All cadaveric LT | 35% at 9 years |
‐ Azathioprine had protective effects rPBC ‐ Graft failure in 6% of rPBC |
Egawa et al., 2016 Japan |
444 | All LDLT | 21% at 10 years |
‐ Younger age at LT ‐ IgM >554 mg/dL ‐ Sex mismatch ‐ Use of cyclosporine ‐ HLA‐DR locus mismatching |
Kogiso et al., 2017 Japan |
388 | All LDLT | 15% at 5 years |
‐ Younger recipient age ‐ HLA B60 positivity ‐ Lower MELD score at LT ‐ Initial treatment with cyclosporine ‐ Donor sex mismatch ‐ Shorter operative time |
Abbreviations: DR, antigen D‐related; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; MELD, Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease.
In this issue of Hepatology Communications, Kogiso et al. present a large, retrospective, multicenter study of patients with PBC who survived for more than 1‐year after receiving a living donor liver transplantation. Approximately 15% of patients developed rPBC (median, approximately 5 years), and this was associated with a younger age at time of LT, preserved liver function status manifested with lower Child‐Pugh and Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease scores, high serum immunoglobulin (Ig)M level, sex mismatch, human leukocyte antigen B60 and D‐related 8, and initial treatment with cyclosporine. These findings are consistent with other Japanese studies reporting an association of rPBC with high IgM, sex mismatch, and initial immunosuppression with cyclosporine.
As discussed, the increased risk of rPBC with initial use of cyclosporine in Japan is contrary to observations from the majority of the LT series from North America and Europe reporting a protective effect of this calcineurin inhibitor (Table ). Of note, the authors had previously reported that the switch from tacrolimus to cyclosporine decreased the risk of rPBC in a different study, suggesting that timing of cyclosporine use is an important factor. While the opposing findings concerning cyclosporine use and rPBC in Japan are likely related to differences in management and immunosuppression practices worldwide, there remains a possibility that ethnicity, genetic predisposition, and environmental factors also play a role in the development of rPBC. For example, a recent study from the United Kingdom showed an association of rPBC with the recipient's interleukin‐12A polymorphisms that have been linked with a predisposition to PBC in genome‐wide association studies of subjects of European descent. Specifically, the use of tacrolimus in patients with the genotype AG or GG of the rs62270414 single‐nucleotide polymorphism had an increased risk of rPBC, and the use of cyclosporine in patients with the AA genotype had a lower risk for rPBC. In contrast, genome‐wide association studies from Japan have suggested that the interleukin‐12 axis plays far less of a role in the genetic predisposition to PBC in this ethnic group. These data suggest the possibility that the influence of distinct immunosuppressive agents on rPBC might vary as a result of the immunogenetic differences that impact the initial development of PBC in Japan.
The association of increased risk of rPBC with a younger age at the time of LT and less advanced liver disease appears counterintuitive as well. However, it is conceivable that the sicker patients may not have had a chance of developing rPBC if they succumbed in the first year following LT, particularly as rPBC was associated with a shorter duration of surgery, perhaps implying that longer surgeries are associated with increased mortality within the first year. Indeed, the 1‐year survival rate of 80% reported in this article is approximately 10% lower than that reported in other studies. Notably, a younger age has been associated with rPBC in other reports and an increased risk of progressing to LT due to a lack of response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (Table ). It is not clear why younger patients would have genetic or environmental risk factors that lead to an accelerated disease process either before or after LT.
In this study, the authors found that higher IgM levels prior to LT were associated with a higher risk of rPBC, indicating ongoing immune dysregulation at the time of LT. These data suggest that disease recurrence may well be a continuum of a systemic disease before LT, leading to recurrence after transplantation. Similar observations have been reported in patients with autoimmune hepatitis; those with elevated IgG levels and aminotransferases at the time of transplantation have been shown to be predisposed to recurrent disease after LT. It is not clear why this should be the case, but parallels exist with infectious disease processes in LT recipients. For example, patients with biochemical features of hepatitis and increased viral loads prior to LT are at risk of earlier and more severe disease recurrence. It is interesting to speculate that there might be a role of infectious agents in triggering recurrent (or de novo) autoimmune liver disease in addition to the contribution of genetic predisposition in the donor and recipient.
Possibly the most relevant issue for patients is to establish the clinical significance of rPBC. In most studies, overall long‐term graft and patient survival have not been adversely affected even though the frequency of graft failure due to rPBC has been established in some studies (Table ). However, most studies have only reported a follow‐up between 5 and 10 years. In addition, studies with protocol biopsies are uncommon, and therefore the real frequency of rPBC remains unknown. Larger population studies with longer follow‐up and protocol biopsies may be required to demonstrate the trend of reduced long‐term graft and patient survival. Another issue that needs to be addressed is the question of progression of fibrosis with minimal changes in liver biochemistry tests in patients who do not undergo protocol biopsies.
Finally, strategies to reduce the risk of rPBC following LT have recently been reported. An uncontrolled multicenter study including French and Swiss centers was able to show that administration of UDCA soon after LT for PBC was associated with a lower risk of rPBC. While the efficacy of UDCA in preventing rPBC should be evaluated in clinical control trials, this postoperative treatment seems a sensible addition in the management of PBC following LT because it is well tolerated and of proven benefit in patients prior to LT. However, the institution of cyclosporine as a preventative measure against rPBC appears less straight forward. The accumulated data suggest that tacrolimus provides better graft and overall survival than cyclosporine, and further studies will be necessary to determine whether cyclosporine therapy results in improved patient and graft survival in patients with PBC following LT.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Abbreviations Ig immunoglobulin LT liver transplant PBC primary biliary cholangitis rPBC recurrent PBC UDCA ursodeoxycholic acid Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic disease characterized by granulomatous destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. RECENT STUDIES REPORTING TRANSPLANTATION, RECURRENCE RATE, AND RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE OF PBC Author, Year, Country n Cadaveric LT/LDLT Rate of rPBC Risk Factors for rPBC Sanchez et al., 2003 United States 169 All cadaveric LT 11% at 6 years ‐ Use of tacrolimus Levitsky, 2003 United States 46 All cadaveric LT 15% at 6.5 years ‐ None Neuberger, 2004 United Kingdom 485 All cadaveric LT 23% at 6.6 years ‐ Use of tacrolimus Jacob et al., 2006 Germany 100 All cadaveric 14% at 10 years ‐ Younger age at LT ‐ Use of tacrolimus Charatcharoenwitthaya et al., 2007 United States 154 All cadaveric LT 34% at 11 years ‐ Shorter duration of maintenance corticosteroids ‐ Male recipients ‐ Older recipient age at transplant ‐ Use of tacrolimus Morioka et al., 2007 Japan 50 All LDLT 18% at 3 years ‐ Lower number of HLA‐A, B, DR mismatches ‐ Lower trough level of tacrolimus within 1 year Montano‐Loza et al., 2010 Canada 108 97% cadaveric LT 29% at 10 years ‐ Use of tacrolimus Manousou et al., 2010 United Kingdom 103 All cadaveric LT 35% at 9 years ‐ Azathioprine had protective effects rPBC ‐ Graft failure in 6% of rPBC Egawa et al., 2016 Japan 444 All LDLT 21% at 10 years ‐ Younger age at LT ‐ IgM >554 mg/dL ‐ Sex mismatch ‐ Use of cyclosporine ‐ HLA‐DR locus mismatching Kogiso et al., 2017 Japan 388 All LDLT 15% at 5 years ‐ Younger recipient age ‐ HLA B60 positivity ‐ Lower MELD score at LT ‐ Initial treatment with cyclosporine ‐ Donor sex mismatch ‐ Shorter operative time Abbreviations: DR, antigen D‐related; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; MELD, Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease. Approximately 15% of patients developed rPBC (median, approximately 5 years), and this was associated with a younger age at time of LT, preserved liver function status manifested with lower Child‐Pugh and Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease scores, high serum immunoglobulin (Ig)M level, sex mismatch, human leukocyte antigen B60 and D‐related 8, and initial treatment with cyclosporine. [...]strategies to reduce the risk of rPBC following LT have recently been reported.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada