Genotype × environment interaction analysis of North American shrub willow yield trials confirms superior performance of triploid hybrids

Abstract

Development of dedicated bioenergy crop production systems will require accurate yield estimates, which will be important for determining many of the associated environmental and economic impacts of their production. Shrub willow (Salix spp) is being promoted in areas of the USA and Canada due to its adaption to cool climates and wide genetic diversity available for breeding improvement. Willow breeding in North America is in an early stage, and selection of elite genotypes for commercialization will require testing across broad geographic regions to gain an understanding of how shrub willow interacts with the environment. We analyzed a dataset of first-rotation shrub willow yields of 16 genotypes across 10 trial environments in the USA and Canada for genotype-by-environment interactions using the additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) model. Mean genotype yields ranged from 5.22 to 8.58 oven-dry Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹. Analysis of the main effect of genotype showed that one round of breeding improved yields by as much as 20% over check cultivars and that triploid hybrids, most notably Salix viminalis × S. miyabeana, exhibited superior yields. We also found important variability in genotypic response to environments, which suggests specific adaptability could be exploited among 16 genotypes for yield gains. Strong positive correlations were found between environment main effects and AMMI parameters and growing environment temperatures. These findings demonstrate yield improvements are possible in one generation and will be important for developing cultivar recommendations and for future breeding efforts.

References Åhman I (1998) Rust scorings in a plantation of Salix viminalis clones during ten consecutive years. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 28, 251–258. Amichev BY, Hangs RD, Belanger N, Volk TA, Vujanovic V, Schoenau JJ, Van Rees KCJ (2015) First-rotation yields of 30 short-rotation willow cultivars in central Saskatchewan, Canada. Bioenergy Research, 8, 292–306. Annicchiarico P (2002) Genotype x Environment Interactions: Challenges and Opportunities for Plant Breeding and Cultivar Recommendations. Food & Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. Aylott MJ, Casella E, Tubby I, Street NR, Smith P, Taylor G (2008) Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK. New Phytologist, 178, 358–370. Bonosi L, Ghelardini L, Weih M (2013) Towards making willows potential bio-resources in the South: Northern Salix hybrids can cope with warm and dry climate when irrigated. Biomass and Bioenergy, 51, 136–144. Buchholz T, Volk TA (2011) Improving the profitability of willow crops-identifying opportunities with a crop budget model. Bioenergy Research, 4, 85–95. Cameron KD, Phillips IS, Kopp RF, Volk TA, Maynard CA, Abrahamson LP, Smart LB (2008) Quantitative genetics of traits indicative of biomass production and heterosis in 34 full-sib F₁ Salix eriocephala families. Bioenergy Research, 1, 80–90. Caputo J, Balogh SB, Volk TA, Johnson L, Puettmann M, Lippke B, O'Neil E (2014) Incorporating uncertainty into a life cycle assessment (LCA) model of short-rotation willow biomass (Salix spp.) crops. Bioenergy Research, 7, 48–59. Cooper M, Hammer GL (1996) Synthesis of strategies for crop improvement. In: Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement (eds Cooper M, Hammer GL), pp. 591–623. CABI, Wallingford, UK. Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6, 36–40. Environment Canada 2015. National Climate Data, Available at: http://climate.weather.gc.ca/ (accessed 6 October 2015). Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Crop and Pasture Science, 14, 742–754. Gauch HG (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics, 44, 705–715. Gauch HG (1992) Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials: AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Gauch HG (2006a) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46, 1488–1500. Gauch HG (2006b) Winning the accuracy game. American Scientist, 94, 133–141. Gauch HG (2007) MATMODEL Version 3.0: Open Source Software for AMMI and Related Analyses. Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Gauch HG (2012) Scientific Method in Brief. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Gauch HG (2013) A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science, 53, 1860–1869. Gauch HG, Furnas RE (1991) Statistical analysis of yield trials with MATMODEL. Agronomy Journal, 83, 916–920. Gauch HG Jr, Zobel RW (1990) Imputing missing yield trial data. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 79, 753–761. Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1997) Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science, 37, 311–326. Gauch HG, Piepho H-P, Annicchiarico P (2008) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Science, 48, 866–889. Gollob HF (1968) A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika, 33, 73–115. Gouker FE, Smart LB 2015. Willow cultivar diversity groups fact sheet. Available at: http://willow.cals.cornell.edu/ (accessed 21 October 2015). Hanley SJ, Karp A (2014) Genetic strategies for dissecting complex traits in biomass willows (Salix spp.). Tree Physiology, 34, 1167–1180. Hauk S, Knoke T, Wittkopf S (2014) Economic evaluation of short rotation coppice systems for energy from biomass—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 435–448. Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2003) Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25, 147–165. Karp A, Shield I (2008) Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytologist, 179, 15–32. Karp A, Hanley SJ, Trybush SO, Macalpine W, Pei M, Shield I (2011) Genetic improvement of willow for bioenergy and biofuels. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 53, 151–165. Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2005) Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24, 385–406. Kiernan BD, Volk TA, Tharakan PJ, Nowak CA, Phillipon SP, Abrahamson LP, White EH (2003) Clone-site testing and selections for scale-up plantings. Final Report prepared for the United States Department of Energy, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY, 67 pp. Kopp RF, Smart LB, Maynard CA, Isebrands JG, Tuskan GA, Abrahamson LP (2001) The development of improved willow clones for eastern North America. Forestry Chronicle, 77, 287–292. Kuzovkina YA, Quigley MF (2005) Willows beyond wetlands: uses of Salix L. species for environmental projects. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 162, 183–204. Kuzovkina YA, Weih M, Romero MA et al. (2008) Salix: botany and global horticulture. In: Horticultural Reviews (ed. Janick J), pp. 447–489. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. Labrecque M, Teodorescu TI (2003) High biomass yield achieved by Salix clones in SRIC following two 3-year coppice rotations on abandoned farmland in southern Quebec, Canada. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25, 135–146. Larsen SU, Jørgensen U, Lærke PE (2014) Willow yield is highly dependent on clone and site. Bioenergy Research, 7, 1280–1292. Larsson S (1998) Genetic improvement of willow for short-rotation coppice. Biomass and Bioenergy, 15, 23–26. Lindegaard KN, Barker JHA (1997) Breeding willows for biomass. Aspects of Applied Biology, 49, 155–162. Lindegaard KN, Carter MM, McCracken A et al. (2011) Comparative trials of elite Swedish and UK biomass willow varieties 2001-2010. Aspects of Applied Biology, 112, 57–66. McCracken AR, Dawson WM (2003) Rust disease (Melampsora epitea) of willow (Salix spp.) grown as short rotation coppice (SRC) in inter- and intra-species mixtures. Annals of Applied Biology, 143, 381–393. Mosseler A (1990) Hybrid performance and species crossability relationships in willows (Salix). Canadian Journal of Botany, 68, 2329–2338. Mosseler A, Major JE, Labrecque M (2014a) Genetic by environment interactions of two North American Salix species assessed for coppice yield and components of growth on three sites of varying quality. Trees, 28, 1401–1411. Mosseler A, Major JE, Labrecque M (2014b) Growth and survival of seven native willow species on highly disturbed coal mine sites in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44, 340–349. NASA POWER 2015. Prediction of worldwide energy resource climatology resource for agroclimatology. Available at: from http://power.larc.nasa.gov/ (accessed 6 October 2015). NOAA NCEI 2015. Global historical climatology network. Available at: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access (accessed 6 October 2015). Paderewski J, Rodrigues PC (2014) The usefulness of EM-AMMI to study the influence of missing data pattern and application to Polish post-registration winter wheat data. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 8, 640–645. Piepho HP (1995) Robustness of statistical tests for multiplicative terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 90, 438–443. Piepho HP, Möhring J (2005) Best linear unbiased prediction of cultivar effects for subdivided target regions. Crop Science, 45, 1151–1159. Richards BK, Stoof CR, Cary IJ, Woodbury PB (2014) Reporting on marginal lands for bioenergy feedstock production: a modest proposal. Bioenergy Research, 7, 1060–1062. Rodrigues PC, Pereira DGS, Mexia JT (2011) A comparison between joint regression analysis and the additive main and multiplicative interaction model: the robustness with increasing amounts of missing data. Scientia Agricola, 68, 679–686. Rönnberg-Wästljung A, Thorsén J (1988) Inter- and intraspecific variation and genotype × site interaction in Salix alba L., S. Dasyclados Wimm. and S. viminalis L. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 3, 449–463. SAS Institute Inc. (2013) (Version 9.4). SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Serapiglia MJ, Cameron KD, Stipanovic AJ, Abrahamson LP, Volk TA, Smart LB (2013) Yield and woody biomass traits of novel shrub willow hybrids at two contrasting sites. Bioenergy Research, 6, 533–546. Serapiglia MJ, Gouker FE, Smart LB (2014) Early selection of novel triploid hybrids of shrub willow with improved biomass yield relative to diploids. BMC Plant Biology, 14, 74. Serapiglia MJ, Gouker FE, Hart JF, Unda F, Mansfield SD, Stipanovic AJ, Smart LB (2015) Ploidy level affects important biomass traits of novel shrub willow (Salix) hybrids. Bioenergy Research, 8, 259–269. Simmonds NW (1991) Selection for local adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 82, 363–367. Sixto H, Salvia J, Barrio M, Ciria MP, Cañellas I (2011) Genetic variation and genotype-environment interactions in short rotation Populus plantations in southern Europe. New Forests, 42, 163–177. Sixto H, Gil P, Ciria P, Camps F, Sánchez M, Cañellas I, Voltas J (2014) Performance of hybrid poplar clones in short rotation coppice in Mediterranean environments: analysis of genotypic stability. GCB Bioenergy, 6, 661–671. Smart LB, Cameron KD (2008) Genetic improvement of willow (Salix spp.) as a dedicated bioenergy crop. In: Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops (ed. Vermerris W), pp. 377–396. Springer New York, New York, NY, USA. Smart LB, Cameron KD (2012) Shrub willow. In: Handbook of Bioenergy Crop Plants (eds Kole C, Joshi CP, Shonnard DR), pp. 687–708. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. Smart LB, Volk TA, Lin J et al. (2005) Genetic improvement of shrub willow (Salix spp.) crops for bioenergy and environmental applications in the United States. Unasylva, 56, 51–55. Smart LB, Cameron KD, Volk TA, Abrahamson LP (2008) Breeding, selection, and testing of shrub willow as a dedicated energy crop. NABC Report 19 Agricultural Biofuels: Technology, Sustainability, and Profitability, National Agricultural Biotechnology Council, Ithaca, NY, 85–92. Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2005) The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. Journal of Agricultural Science, 143, 449–462. Stoof CR, Richards BK, Woodbury PB et al. (2015) Untapped potential: opportunities and challenges for sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the Northeast USA. Bioenergy Research, 8, 482–501. Stott KG (1991) Nomenclature of the promising biomass coppice willows, Salix × sericans Tausch ex Kern., Salix dasyclados Wimm. and Salix ‘Aquatica Gigantea’. Botanical Journal of Scotland, 46, 137–143. U. S. Department of Energy (2011) U.S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. (Leads Perlack RD, Stokes BJ), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 227 p. Van Eeuwijk F (1995) Linear and bilinear models for the analysis of multi-environment trials: I. An inventory of models. Euphytica, 84, 1–7. Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, Cameron KD et al. (2011) Yields of willow biomass crops across a range of sites in North America. Aspects of Applied Biology, 112, 67–74. Walsh M, De La Torre UgarteD, Shapouri H, Slinsky S (2003) Bioenergy crop production in the United States: potential quantities, land use changes, and economic impacts on the agricultural sector. Environmental and Resource Economics, 24, 313–333. Wang Z, Macfarlane DW (2012) Evaluating the biomass production of coppiced willow and poplar clones in Michigan, USA, over multiple rotations and different growing conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy, 46, 380–388. Wang DA, Jaiswal D, Lebauer DS, Wertin TM, Bollero GA, Leakey ADB, Long SP (2015) A physiological and biophysical model of coppice willow (Salix spp.) production yields for the contiguous USA in current and future climate scenarios. Plant, Cell & Environment, 38, 1850–1865. Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40, 597–605. Zalesny RS Jr, Hall RB, Zalesny JA, Mcmahon BG, Berguson WE, Stanosz GR (2009) Biomass and genotype × environment interactions of Populus energy crops in the Midwestern United States. Bioenergy Research, 2, 106–122. Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal, 80, 388–393. Zsuffa L (1990) Genetic improvement of willows for energy plantations. Biomass, 22, 35–47.