Radiation capture and conversion efficiencies of Miscanthus sacchariflorus, M. sinensis and their naturally occurring hybrid M. × giganteus

Abstract

Miscanthus is a rhizomatous C4 grass of great interest as a biofuel crop because it has the potential to produce high yields over a wide geographical area with low agricultural inputs on marginal land less suitable for food production. At the moment, a clonal interspecific hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus is the most widely cultivated and studied in Europe and the United States, but breeding programmes are developing newer more productive varieties. Here, we quantified the physiological processes relating to whole season yield in a replicated plot trial in Wales, UK. Light capture and conversion efficiency were parameterized for four carefully selected genotypes (M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus and Miscanthus × giganteus). Differences in the canopy architecture in mature stands as measured by the extinction coefficient (k) were small (0.55–0.65). Sensitivity analysis on a mathematical model of Miscanthus was performed to quantify the accumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (iPAR) in the growing season using (i) k, (ii) variation in the thermal responses of leaf expansion rate, (iii) base temperature for degree days and (iv) date start of canopy expansion. A 10% increase in k or leaf area per degree day both had a minimal effect on iPAR (3%). Decreasing base temperature from 10 to 9 °C gave an 8% increase in iPAR. If the starting date for canopy expansion was the same as shoot emergence date, then the iPAR increases by 12.5%. In M. × giganteus, the whole season above ground and total (including below ground) radiation-use efficiency (RUE) ranged from 45% to 37% higher than the noninterspecific hybrid genotypes. The greater yields in the interspecific hybrid M. × giganteus are explained by the higher RUE and not by differences in iPAR or partitioning effects. Studying the mechanisms underlying this complex trait could have wide benefits for both fuel and food production.

References Beale CV, Long SP (1995) Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy conversion in cool climates? Plant, Cell and Environment, 18, 641–650. Beale CV, Long SP (1997) Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4 grasses Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides. Biomass and Bioenergy, 12, 419–428. Clifton-Brown JC, Neilson BM, Lewandowski I, Jones MB (2000) The modelled productivity of Miscanthus × giganteus (GREEF et DEU) in Ireland. Industrial Crops and Products, 12, 97–109. Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Andersson B, Basch G, Christian DG, Bonderup-Kjeldsen J, Teixeira F (2001) Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1013–1019. Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Bangerth F, Jones MB (2002) Comparative responses to water stress in stay-green, rapid- and slow senescing genotypes of the biomass crop, Miscanthus. New Phytologist, 154, 335–345. Cosentino SL, Patane C, Sanzone E, Copani V, Salvatore F (2007) Effects of soil water content and nitrogen supply on the productivity of Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu. in a Mediterranean environment. Industrial Crops and Products, 25, 75–88. Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester. Dohleman FG, Long SP (2009) More productive than Maize in the Midwest: how does miscanthus do it? Plant Physiology, 150, 2104–2115. Dohleman FG, Heaton EA, Leakey AD, Long SP (2009) Does greater leaf-level photosynthesis explain the larger solar energy conversion efficiency of Miscanthus relative to switchgrass? Plant, Cell and Environment, 32, 1525–1537. Falconer D (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Essex, UK. Farrell AD, Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Jones MB (2006) Genotypic variation in cold tolerance influences yield of Miscanthus. Annals of Applied Biology, 149, 337–345. Greef JM, Deuter M (1993) Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus × giganteus GREEF et DEU. Angewandte Botanik, 67, 87–90. Haefner JW (1996) Modeling Biological Systems. Chapman and Hall, London. Hartl DL, Clark AG (2007) Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. Hastings A, Clifton-Brown J, Wattenbach M, Mitchell CP, Stampfl P, Smith P (2009a) Future energy potential of Miscanthus in Europe. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 1, 180–196. Hastings A, Clifton-Brown JC, Wattenbach M, Mitchell CP, Smith P (2009b) The development of MISCANFOR, a new Miscanthus crop growth model: towards more robust yield predictions under different climatic and soil conditions. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 1, 154–170. Hodkinson TR, Renvoize S (2001) Nomenclature of Miscanthus × giganteus (Poaceae). Kew Bulletin, 56, 759–760. Jensen E, Robson P, Norris J, Cookson A, Farrar K, Donnison I, Clifton-Brown J (2013) Flowering induction in the bioenergy grass Miscanthus sacchariflorus is a quantitative short-day response, whilst delayed flowering under long days increases biomass accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 541–552. Kiniry JR, Tischler CR, Esbroeck GA (1999) Radiation use efficiency and leaf CO2 exchange for diverse C4 grasses. Biomass and Bioenergy, 17, 95–112. Kiniry JR, Johnson MVV, Bruckerhoff SB, Kaiser JU, Cordsiemon RL, Harmel RD (2012) Clash of the titans: comparing productivity via radiation use efficiency for two grass giants of the biofuel field. BioEnergy Research, 5, 41–48. Lemon J (2006) Plotrix: a package in the red light district of R. In: R News. Mendiburu F (2013) Agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural research in R. Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B281, 277–294. Muetzelfeldt R (2004) Declarative Modelling in Ecological and Environmental Research. European Commission, Luxembourg. Muggeo VMR (2008) Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. In: R News. Naidu SL, Moose SP, Al-Shoaibi AK, Raines CA, Long SP (2003) Cold tolerance of C₄ photosynthesis in Miscanthus × giganteus: adaptation in amounts and sequence of C₄ photosynthetic enzymes. Plant Physiology, 132, 1688–1697. Price L, Bullard M, Lyons H, Anthony S, Nixon P (2003) Identifying the yield potential of Miscanthus × giganteus: an assessment of the spatial and temporal variability of M. × giganteus biomass productivity across England and Wales. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26, 3–13. R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Richter GM, Riche AB, Dailey AG, Gezan SA, Powlson DS (2008) Is UK biofuel supply from Miscanthus water-limited? Soil Use and Management, 24, 235–245. Ritz C, Streibig JC (2008) Nonlinear Regression with R. Springer, New York. Robson P, Farrar K, Gay A, Jensen E, Clifton-Brown J, Donnison I (2013) Variation in canopy duration in the perennial biofuel crop Miscanthus reveals complex associations with yield. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 2373–2383. Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP (2010) Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science, 329, 790–792. Vargas LA, Andersen MN, Jensen CR, Jorgensen U (2002) Estimation of leaf area index, light interception and biomass accumulation of Miscanthus sinensis ‘Goliath’ from radiation measurements. Biomass and Bioenergy, 22, 1–14. Visser P, Pignatelli V (2001) Utilisation of Miscanthus. In: Miscanthus - for Energy and Fibre (eds Jones MB, Walsh M), pp. 109–154. James and James (Science Publishers), London. Wang DF, Portis AR, Moose SP, Long SP (2008) Cool C-4 photosynthesis: Pyruvate P-i dikinase expression and activity corresponds to the exceptional cold tolerance of carbon assimilation in Miscanthus × giganteus. Plant Physiology, 148, 557–567. Zub HW, Brancourt-Hulmel M (2010) Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 201–214. Zub HW, Arnoult S, Younous J, Lejeune-Henaut I, Brancourt-Hulmel M (2012) The frost tolerance of Miscanthus at the juvenile stage: differences between clones are influenced by leaf-stage and acclimation. European Journal of Agronomy, 36, 32–40.