Abstract
Models that account for sex‐specific behavior and population dynamics are becoming more common in the stock assessment of sexually dimorphic fishes. However, such models can be data intensive and require some knowledge or assumptions about the sex ratio of fishery landings. A recent stock assessment review of Summer Flounder Paralichthys dentatus identified the need to account for sex‐specific fishing mortality in the assessment model; however, no data on the sex composition of the catch were available. Fishery‐independent, sex‐specific information for this species is collected annually by the National Marine Fisheries Service's Northeast Fisheries Science Center during their bottom trawl survey. Sex at age from the survey could be applied to the fishery landings if the probability of landing a given sex at a given age is equivalent for fish collected by the survey and those in the landings. To generate the first regionally comprehensive database on the sex ratio of Summer Flounder landings and to determine the efficacy of using survey sex‐at‐age keys to estimate the sex of landed fish, we recorded the sex composition of the commercial and recreational catches of Summer Flounder (n = 31,912) in 2010 and 2011. When (1) trawl survey length data were left‐truncated to simulate the minimum retention sizes in the fisheries and (2) age–length keys generated from fishery‐dependent data were applied to length frequency distributions from the survey to simulate the growth rates of landed fish, the sex‐at‐age pattern in the survey‐derived data closely resembled the patterns in the catch. However, statistically significant differences in sex at age remained between the catch and the survey‐derived data. We hypothesize that these differences are attributable to differences in the spatiotemporal distributions of the sexes and of the survey and fishing effort.
Received March 9, 2015; accepted June 23, 2015
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Haskin Shellfish Research Laboratory–Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Port Norris, New Jersey, USA
2 Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, Mississippi, USA
3 Cornell University Cooperative Extension, Marine Program, Riverhead, New York, USA
4 Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia, USA





