You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2015. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Bioenergy deployment offers significant potential for climate change mitigation, but also carries considerable risks. In this review, we bring together perspectives of various communities involved in the research and regulation of bioenergy deployment in the context of climate change mitigation: Land-use and energy experts, land-use and integrated assessment modelers, human geographers, ecosystem researchers, climate scientists and two different strands of life-cycle assessment experts. We summarize technological options, outline the state-of-the-art knowledge on various climate effects, provide an update on estimates of technical resource potential and comprehensively identify sustainability effects. Cellulosic feedstocks, increased end-use efficiency, improved land carbon-stock management and residue use, and, when fully developed,
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2 Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
3 Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
4 Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
5 Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
6 National Renewable Energy Laboratory of the US Department of Energy, Golden, CO, USA
7 Institute of Environmental Science and Technology and Department of Economics & Economic History, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
8 Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
9 Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Netherlands
10 The Nature Conservancy, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
11 Institute of Social Ecology Vienna, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Vienna and Graz, Austria; Integrative Research Institute on Transformation in Human-Environment Systems, Austria and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
12 Sao Paulo State Environment Secretariat, Sao Paolo, Brazil
13 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany
14 Human-Environment Systems Group, Institute for Environmental Decisions, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich and HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation, Zurich, Switzerland
15 Energy and Environmental Analysis Research Group, Electric Power Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
16 Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland
17 Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
18 Center for Ecosystems Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico (CIECO UNAM), Morelia, Mexico