Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2015. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Bioenergy deployment offers significant potential for climate change mitigation, but also carries considerable risks. In this review, we bring together perspectives of various communities involved in the research and regulation of bioenergy deployment in the context of climate change mitigation: Land-use and energy experts, land-use and integrated assessment modelers, human geographers, ecosystem researchers, climate scientists and two different strands of life-cycle assessment experts. We summarize technological options, outline the state-of-the-art knowledge on various climate effects, provide an update on estimates of technical resource potential and comprehensively identify sustainability effects. Cellulosic feedstocks, increased end-use efficiency, improved land carbon-stock management and residue use, and, when fully developed, BECCS appear as the most promising options, depending on development costs, implementation, learning, and risk management. Combined heat and power, efficient biomass cookstoves and small-scale power generation for rural areas can help to promote energy access and sustainable development, along with reduced emissions. We estimate the sustainable technical potential as up to 100 EJ: high agreement; 100–300 EJ: medium agreement; above 300 EJ: low agreement. Stabilization scenarios indicate that bioenergy may supply from 10 to 245 EJ yr−1 to global primary energy supply by 2050. Models indicate that, if technological and governance preconditions are met, large-scale deployment (>200 EJ), together with BECCS, could help to keep global warming below 2° degrees of preindustrial levels; but such high deployment of land-intensive bioenergy feedstocks could also lead to detrimental climate effects, negatively impact ecosystems, biodiversity and livelihoods. The integration of bioenergy systems into agriculture and forest landscapes can improve land and water use efficiency and help address concerns about environmental impacts. We conclude that the high variability in pathways, uncertainties in technological development and ambiguity in political decision render forecasts on deployment levels and climate effects very difficult. However, uncertainty about projections should not preclude pursuing beneficial bioenergy options.

Details

Title
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment
Author
Creutzig, Felix 1 ; Ravindranath, N H 2 ; Berndes, Göran 3 ; Bolwig, Simon 4 ; Bright, Ryan 5 ; Cherubini, Francesco 5 ; Chum, Helena 6 ; Corbera, Esteve 7 ; Delucchi, Mark 8 ; Faaij, Andre 9 ; Fargione, Joseph 10 ; Haberl, Helmut 11 ; Garvin Heath 6 ; Lucon, Oswaldo 12 ; Plevin, Richard 8 ; Popp, Alexander 13 ; Robledo-Abad, Carmenza 14 ; Rose, Steven 15 ; Smith, Pete 16 ; Stromman, Anders 5 ; Suh, Sangwon 17 ; Masera, Omar 18 

 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany 
 Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India 
 Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden 
 Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark 
 Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway 
 National Renewable Energy Laboratory of the US Department of Energy, Golden, CO, USA 
 Institute of Environmental Science and Technology and Department of Economics & Economic History, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 
 Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, CA, USA 
 Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Netherlands 
10  The Nature Conservancy, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA 
11  Institute of Social Ecology Vienna, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Vienna and Graz, Austria; Integrative Research Institute on Transformation in Human-Environment Systems, Austria and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 
12  Sao Paulo State Environment Secretariat, Sao Paolo, Brazil 
13  Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany 
14  Human-Environment Systems Group, Institute for Environmental Decisions, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich and HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation, Zurich, Switzerland 
15  Energy and Environmental Analysis Research Group, Electric Power Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA 
16  Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland 
17  Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 
18  Center for Ecosystems Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico (CIECO UNAM), Morelia, Mexico 
Pages
916-944
Section
Invited Research Review
Publication year
2015
Publication date
Sep 2015
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ISSN
17571693
e-ISSN
17571707
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2289923887
Copyright
© 2015. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.