Is my study system good enough? A case study for identifying maternal effects

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate how simulation studies can be used to answer questions about identifiability and consequences of omitting effects from a model. The methodology is presented through a case study where identifiability of genetic and/or individual (environmental) maternal effects is explored. Our study system is a wild house sparrow (Passer domesticus) population with known pedigree. We fit pedigree-based (generalized) linear mixed models (animal models), with and without additive genetic and individual maternal effects, and use deviance information criterion (DIC) for choosing between these models. Pedigree and R-code for simulations are available. For this study system, the simulation studies show that only large maternal effects can be identified. The genetic maternal effect (and similar for individual maternal effect) has to be at least half of the total genetic variance to be identified. The consequences of omitting a maternal effect when it is present are explored. Our results indicate that the total (genetic and individual) variance are accounted for. When an individual (environmental) maternal effect is omitted from the model, this only influences the estimated (direct) individual (environmental) variance. When a genetic maternal effect is omitted from the model, both (direct) genetic and (direct) individual variance estimates are overestimated.

References Baalsrud, H., B.-E. Sæther, I. Hagen, A. Myhre, T. Ringsby, H. Pärn, and H. Jensen. 2014. Effects of population characteristics and structure on estimates of effective population size in a house sparrow metapopulation. Mol. Ecol. 23:2653–2668. Bijma, P., W. M. Muir, and J. A. M. V. Arendonk. 2007. Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175:277–288. Bradford, G. E. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. vii. Maternal effects in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 35:1324–1334. Charmantier, A., and D. Réale. 2005. How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Mol. Ecol. 14:2839–2850. Claeskens, N. L., and G. Hjort. 2008. Model selection and model averaging. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Fong, Y., H. Rue, and J. Wakefield. 2010. Bayesian inference for generalized linear mixed models. Biostatistics 11:397–412. Gelman, A., J. Hwang, and A. Vehtari. 2014. Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Stat. Comput. 24:997–1016. Hadfield, J. D. 2008. Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating. Proc. R. Soc. B 275:723–734. Hadfield, J. D., J. W. Alastair, and L. E. B. Kruuk. 2011. Cryptic evolution: does environmental deterioration have a genetic basis? Genetics 187:1099–1113. Hagen, I. J., A. M. Billing, B. Rønning, S. A. Pedersen, H. Pärn, and J. S. Henrik Jensen. 2013. The easy road to genome-wide medium density SNP screening in a non-model species: development and application of a 10 KSNP-chip for the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13:429–439. Holand, A. M., and S. Martino. 2016. AnimalINLA: Bayesian Animal Models. R package version 1.4. Holand, A. M., I. Steinsland, S. Martino, and H. Jensen. 2013. Animal models and integrated nested Laplace approximations. G3 (Bethesda) 3:1241–1251. Holand, H., H. Jensen, J. Tufto, H. Pärn, B.-E. Sæther, and T. Ringsby. 2015. Endoparasite infection has both short- and long-term negative effects on reproductive success of female house sparrows, as revealed by faecal parasitic egg counts. PLoS One 10:e0125773. Jensen, H., I. Steinsland, T. H. Ringsby, and B.-E. Sæther. 2008. Evolutionary dynamics of a sexual ornament in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): the role of indirect selection within and between sexes. Evolution 62:1275–1293. Kirkpatrick, R., and M. Lande. 1989. The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43:485–503. Koch, R. M. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. vi. Maternal effects in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 35:1316–1323. Kruuk, L., J. Slate, J. Pemberton, S. Brotherstone, T. Guinness, and F. Clutton-Brock. 2002. Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56:1683–1695. Kruuk, L. E. B., and J. D. Hadfield. 2007. How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1890–1903. Larsen, C. T., A. M. Holand, H. Jensen, I. Steinsland, and A. Roulin. 2014. On estimation and identifiability issues of sex-linked inheritance with a case study of pigmentation in Swiss barn owl (Tyto alba). Ecol. Evol. 4:1555–1566. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quatitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. Meyer, K. 1992. Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 31:179–204. Meyer, K. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameters for weaning weight of beef cattle accounting for direct-maternal environmental covariances. Livest. Prod. Sci. 52:187–199. Morrissey, M., A. Wilson, J. Pemberton, and M. Ferguson. 2007. A framework for power and sensitivity analyses for quantitative genetic studies of natural populations, and case studies in soay sheep (Ovis aries). Evol. Biol. 20:2309–2321. Mousseau, C., and T. A. Fox. 1998. Maternal effects as adaptations. Pp. 375. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Nossen, I., T. Ciesielski, M. Dimmen, H. Jensen, T. Ringsby, A. Polder, B. Rønning, B. Jenssen, and B. Styrishave. 2016. Steroids in house sparrows (Passer domesticus): effects of POPs and male quality signalling. Sci. Total Environ. 547:295–304. Pärn, H., H. Jensen, T. H. Ringsby, and B.-E. Sæther. 2009. Sex-specific fitness correlates of dispersal in a house sparrow metapopulation. J. Anim. Ecol. 78:1216–1225. Reale, D., J. Festa-Bianchet, and M. Jorgenson. 1999. Heritability of body mass varies with age and season in wild bighorn sheep. Heredity 83:526–532. Ringsby, T. H., B.-E. Sæther, J. Tufto, H. Jensen, and E. Solberg. 2002. Asynchronous spatiotemporal demography of a house sparrow metapopulation in a correlated environment. Ecology 83:561–569. Ripley, B. D. 1987. Stochastic simulation. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Rönnegård, J., and L. Woolliams. 2003. Predicted rates of inbreeding with additive maternal effects. Genet. Res. 82:67–77. Robison, O. 1981. The influence of maternal effects on the efficiency of selection; a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 8:121–137. Rue, H., S. Martino, and N. Chopin. 2009. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 71:319–392. Sorensen, D., and D. Gianola. 2002. Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York. Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. van der Linde. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 64:583–639. Steinsland, I., and H. Jensen. 2010. Utilizing Gaussian Markov random field properties of Bayesian animal models. Biometrics 66:763–771. Steinsland, I., C. T. Larsen, A. Roulin, and H. Jensen. 2014. Quantitative genetic modeling and inference in the presence of nonignorable missing data. Evolution 68:1735–1747. Thompson, R. 1976. The estimation of maternal genetic variances. Biometrics 32:903–917. Willham, R. 1980. Problems in estimating maternal effects. Livest. Prod. Sci. 7:405–418. Willham, R. L. 1963. The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19:8–27. Wilson, A. J., D. W. Coltman, J. M. Pemberton, A. D. Overall, K. A. Byrne, and L. E. Kruuk. 2005. Maternal genetic effects set the potential for evolution in a free-living vertebrate population. J. Evol. Biol. 18:405–414. Wolf, J. 2003. Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100:4655–4660. Wolf, J., E. Brodie, J. Cheverud, M. Moore, and A. J. Wade. 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:64–69.