You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.
You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.
Habitat–performance relationships of a large mammal on a predator-free island dominated by humans
Allen, Andrew M; Dorey, Augusta; Malmsten, Jonas; Edenius, Lars; Ericsson, Göran
; et al.Allen, Andrew M; Dorey, Augusta; Malmsten, Jonas; Edenius, Lars; Ericsson, Göran; Singh, Navinder J.
Ecology and Evolution; Bognor Regis Vol. 7, Iss. 1, (Jan 2017): 305-319.
DOI:10.1002/ece3.2594
ReferencesAldridge, C. L., & Boyce, M. S. (2008). Accounting for fitness: Combining survival and selection when assessing wildlife-habitat relationships. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 54, 389–419.Allen, A. M., Månsson, J., Sand, H., Malmsten, J., Ericsson, G., & Singh, N. J. (2016). Scaling up movements : from individual space use to population patterns. Ecosphere7: e01524.Andersen, R., Gaillard, J. M., Linnell, J. D. C., & Duncan, P. (2000). Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69, 672–682.Andren, H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat – A review. Oikos, 71, 355–366.Arnemo, J. M., Ahlqvist, P., Andersen, R., Berntsen, F., Ericsson, G., Odden, J., ··· Swenson, J. E. (2006). Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia. Wildlife Biology, 12, 109–113.Bakker, J. P., Rosén, E., Ozinga, W. A., Bretfeld, M., Feldt, T., & Stahl, J. (2012). Long-term effects of scrub clearance and litter removal on the re-establishment of dry alvar grassland species. Annales Botanici Fennici, 49, 21–30.Ballard, W. B., Whitman, J. S., & Reed, D. J. (1991). Population dynamics of moose in southern central Alaska. Wildlife Monographs, 114, 1–49.Bårdsen, B.-J., Fauchald, P., Tveraa, T., Langeland, K., Yoccoz, N., & Ims, R. A. (2008). Experimental evidence of a risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-lived mammal. Ecology, 89, 829–837.Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4vanBeest, F. M., VanMoorter, B., & Milner, J. M. (2012). Temperature-mediated habitat use and selection by a heat-sensitive northern ungulate. Animal Behaviour, 84, 723–735.Benhamou, S. (2011). Dynamic approach to space and habitat use based on biased random bridges. PLoS One, 6, e14592.Bergström, R., & Hjeljord, O. (1987). Moose and vegetation interactions in northwestern Europe and Poland. Swedish Wildlife Research, 1, 213–228.Bjørneraas, K., Herfindal, I., Solberg, E. J., Sæther, B.-E., vanMoorter, B., & Rolandsen, C. M. (2012). Habitat quality influences population distribution, individual space use and functional responses in habitat selection by a large herbivore. Oecologia, 168, 231–243.Bjørneraas, K., Solberg, E. J., Herfindal, I., VanMoorter, B., Rolandsen, C. M., Tremblay, J.-P., ··· Astrup, R. (2011). Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape. Wildlife Biology, 17, 44–54.Börger, L., & Fryxell, J. M. (2012). Quantifying individual difference in dispersal using net squared displacement. In J.Colbert, M.Baguette, T.Benton & J.Bullock (Eds.), Dispersal Ecology and Evolution (pp. 221–230). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Bowyer, R. T., Van Ballenberghe, V., & Kie, J. G. (1998). Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan moose: Long-term versus proximal effects of climate. Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 1332–1344.Bowyer, R. T., VanBallenberghe, V., Kie, J. G., & Maier, J. A. K. (1999). Birth-site selection by Alaskan moose: Maternal strategies for coping with a risky environment. Journal of Mammalogy, 80, 1070–1083.Boyce, M. S., Mao, J. S., Merrill, E. H., Fortin, D., Monica, G., Fryxell, J., ··· Turner, M. G. (2003). Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park. Ecoscience, 10, 421–431.Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998). Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York, USA: Springer.Calenge, C. (2006). The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling, 197, 516–519.Cook, J. G., Johnson, B. K., Cook, R. C., Riggs, R. A., Delcurto, T., Bryant, L. D., & Irwin, L. L. (2004). Effects of Summer-Autumn Nutrition and Parturition Date on Reproduction and Survival of Elk. Wildlife Monographs, 155, 1–61.Dettki, H., Brode, M., Clegg, I., Giles, T., & Hallgren, J. (2014). Wireless Remote Animal Monitoring (WRAM) – A new international database e-infrastructure for management and sharing of telemetry sensor data from fish and wildlife. 7th Int. Congress on Env. Modelling and Software: 122–128.Ericsson, G., Wallin, K., Ball, J. P., & Broberg, M. (2001). Age-related reproductive effort and senescence in free-ranging moose, Alces alces. Ecology, 82, 1613–1620.Felton, A. M., Felton, A., Raubenheimer, D., Simpson, S. J., Krizsan, S. J., Hedwall, P.-O., & Stolter, C.(2016). The nutritional balancing act of a large herbivore: An experiment with captive moose (Alces alces L). J. K. Bump, editor. PLoS One11:e0150870.Festa-Bianchet, M., Gaillard, J., & Jorgenson, J. T. (1998). Mass- and Density-Dependent Reproductive Success and Reproductive Costs in a Capital Breeder. The American Naturalist, 152, 367–379.Fieberg, J., & Kochanny, C. O. (2005). Quantifying home-range overlap: The importance of the utilization distribution. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 1346.Fischer, J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2007). Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: A synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 265–280.Forchhammer, M. C., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Lindström, J., & Albon, S. D. (2001). Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70, 721–729.Franzmann, A. W., & Schwartz, C. C. (1985). Moose twinning rates : A possible population condition assessment. Journal of Wildlife Management, 49, 394–396.Fretwell, S. D., & Lucas, H. L. (1969). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica, 19, 16–36.Fryxell, J. M., Mercer, W. E., & Gellately, R. B. (1988). Population dynamics of Newfoundland moose using cohort analysis. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 52, 14.Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Delorme, D., & Jorgenson, J. (2000). Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: Bigger is not always better. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 267, 471–477.Gaillard, J. M., Festa-Bianchet, M., & Yoccoz, N. G. (1998). Population dynamics of large herbivores: Variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 58–63.Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Yoccoz, N. G., Loison, A., & Toïgo, C. (2000). Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 367–393.Gaillard, J.-M., Hebblewhite, M., Loison, A., Fuller, M., Powell, R., Basille, M., & VanMoorter, B. (2010). Habitat-performance relationships: Finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2255–2265.Gaillard, J., Loison, A., Toïgo, C., Delorme, D., & Laere, G. V. A. N. (2003). Cohort effects and deer population dynamics. Ecoscience, 10, 412–420.Gillies, C. S., Hebblewhite, M., Nielsen, S. E., Krawchuk, M. A., Aldridge, C. L., Frair, J. L., ··· Jerde, C. L. (2006). Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 887–898.Gillingham, M. P., & Parker, K. L. (2008). The importance of individual variation in defining habitat selection by moose in northern British Columbia. Alces, 44, 7–20.Gingras, J., Couturier, S., Côté, S. D., & Tremblay, J. P. (2014). Opposite responses of body condition and fertility in adjacent moose populations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 78, 830–839.Grøtan, V., Sæther, B. E., Lillegård, M., Solberg, E. J., & Engen, S. (2009). Geographical variation in the influence of density dependence and climate on the recruitment of Norwegian moose. Oecologia, 161, 685–695.Haanes, H., Markussen, S. S., Herfindal, I., RØed, K. H., Solberg, E. J., Heim, M., ··· Sæther, B. E. (2013). Effects of inbreeding on fitness-related traits in a small isolated moose population. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 4230–4242.Hagner, O., Nilsson, M., Reese, H., Egberth, M., & Olsson, H. (2005). Procedure for classification of forests for CORINE land cover in Sweden. In M.Oluic (Ed.), New Strategies for European Remote Sensing (523–529). Rotterdam, NL: Millpress.Hebblewhite, M., & Merrill, E. (2008). Modelling wildlife-human relationships for social species with mixed-effects resource selection models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 834–844.Hebblewhite, M., Merrill, E., & McDermid, G. (2008). A multi-scale test of the forage maturation hypothesis in a partially migratory ungulate population. Ecological Monographs, 78, 141–166.Hedrick, P., & Kalinowski, S. (2000). Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 31, 139–162.Herfindal, I., Haanes, H., Røed, K. H., Solberg, E. J., Markussen, S. S., Heim, M., & Sæther, B.-E. (2014). Population properties affect inbreeding avoidance in moose. Biology Letters, 10, 20140786–20140786.Johnson, D. H. (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61, 65.Johnson, C. J., Parker, K. L., Heard, D. C., & Gillingham, M. P. (2002). A multiscale behavioural approach to understanding the movements of woodland caribou. Ecological Applications, 12, 1840–1860.Jönsson, K. I. (1997). Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos, 78, 57.Jonsson, F. (2007). Den Öländska älgstammens förvaltning: en gransking av förvaltningsplanerna och jaktens upplägg. MSc Thesis, SLU, Umeå, Sweden.Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457–481.Karlsen, S. R., Solheim, I., Beck, P. S. A., Høgda, K. A., Wielgolaski, F. E., & Tømmervik, H. (2007). Variability of the start of the growing season in Fennoscandia, 1982–2002. International Journal of Biometeorology, 51, 513–524.Keech, M. A., Bowyer, R. T., Ver Hoef, J. M., Boertje, R. D., Dale, B. W., & Stephenson, T. R. (2000). Life-history consequences of maternal condition in Alaskan moose. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 450–462.Keech, M. A., Lindberg, M. S., Boertje, R. D., Valkenburg, P., Taras, B. D., Boudreau, T. A., & Beckmen, K. B. (2011). Effects of predator treatments, individual traits, and environment on moose survival in Alaska. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 75, 1361–1380.Kerby, J., & Post, E. (2013). Capital and income breeding traits differentiate trophic match-mismatch dynamics in large herbivores. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20120484.Lenarz, M. S., Fieberg, J., Schrage, M. W., & Edwards, A. J. (2010). Living on the edge: Viability of moose in northeastern Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 1013–1023.Lenarz, M. S., Nelson, M. E., Schrage, M. W., & Edwards, A. J. (2009). Temperature mediated moose survival in Northeastern Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 503–510.Lindström, J. (1999). Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 343–348.Lowe, S. J., Patterson, B. R., & Schaefer, J. A. (2010). Lack of behavioral responses of moose (Alces alces) to high ambient temperatures near the southern periphery of their range. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 88, 1032–1041.MacNally, R. (1996). Hierarchical partitioning as an interpretative tool in multivariate inference. Australian Journal of Ecology, 21, 224–228.Malmsten, J. (2014). Reproduction and Health of Moose in Southern Sweden, PhD Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Malmsten, J., Widén, D. G., Rydevik, G., Yon, L., Hutchings, M. R., Thulin, C.-G., ··· Dalin, A.-M. (2014). Temporal and spatial variation in Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in Swedish moose (Alces alces). Epidemiology and Infection, 142, 1205–1213.Manly, B. F., McDonald, L., Thomas, D., McDonald, T. L., & Erickson, W. P. (2007). Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. New York, USA: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Mann, H. B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13, 245.Månsson, J. (2007). Moose management and browsing dynamics in boreal forest, PhD Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Månsson, J., Kalén, C., Kjellander, P., Andrén, H., & Smith, H. (2007). Quantitative estimates of tree species selectivity by moose (Alces alces) in a forest landscape. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22, 407–414.Månsson, J., Roberge, J.-M., Edenius, L., Bergström, R., Nilsson, L., Lidberg, M., Komstedt, K., & Ericsson, G. (2015). Food plots as a habitat management tool: Forage production and ungulate browsing in adjacent forest. Wildlife Biology, 21, 246–253.Mathisen, K. M., Buhtz, F., Danell, K., Bergström, R., Skarpe, C., Suominen, O., & Persson, I.-L. (2010). Moose density and habitat productivity affects reproduction, growth and species composition in field layer vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21, 705–716.Matthiopoulos, J., Fieberg, J., Aarts, G., Beyer, H. L., & Morales, J. (2015). Establishing the link between habitat selection and animal population dynamics. Ecological Monographs, 85, 413–436.McCormack, J. E., Hird, S. M., Zellmer, A. J., Carstens, B. C., & Brumfield, R. T. (2013). Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66, 526–538.McLoughlin, P. D., Gaillard, J.-M., Boyce, M. S., Bonenfant, C., Messier, F., Duncan, P., ··· Klein, F. (2007). Lifetime reproductive success and composition of the home range in a large herbivore. Ecology, 88, 3192–3201.Melin, M., Matala, J., Mehtätalo, L., Tiilikainen, R., Tikkanen, O.-P., Maltamo, M., ··· Packalen, P. (2014). Moose (Alces alces) reacts to high summer temperatures by utilizing thermal shelters in boreal forests – An analysis based on airborne laser scanning of the canopy structure at moose locations. Global Change Biology, 20, 1115–1125.Milner, J. M., VanBeest, F. M., Schmidt, K. T., Brook, R. K., & Storaas, T. (2014). To feed or not to feed? Evidence of the intended and unintended effects of feeding wild ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Management, 78, 1322–1334.Milner, J. M., vanBeest, F. M., Solberg, E. J., & Storaas, T. (2013). Reproductive success and failure: The role of winter body mass in reproductive allocation in Norwegian moose. Oecologia, 172, 995–1005.Monteith, K. L., Klaver, R. W., Hersey, K. R., Holland, A. A., Thomas, T. P., & Kauffman, M. J. (2015). Effects of climate and plant phenology on recruitment of moose at the southern extent of their range. Oecologia, 178, 1137–1148.Monteith, K. L., Stephenson, T. R., Bleich, V. C., Conner, M. M., Pierce, B. M., & Bowyer, R. T. (2013). Risk-sensitive allocation in seasonal dynamics of fat and protein reserves in a long-lived mammal. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82, 377–388.Mosser, A., Fryxell, J. M., Eberly, L., & Packer, C. (2009). Serengeti real estate: Density vs. fitness-based indicators of lion habitat quality. Ecology Letters, 12, 1050–1060.Murray, K., & Conner, M. M. (2009). Methods to quantify variable importance: Implications for the analysis of noisy ecological data. Ecology, 90, 348–355.Murray, D. L., Cox, E. W., Ballard, W. B., Whitlaw, H. A., Lenarz, M. S., Custer, T. W., ··· Fuller, T. K. (2006). Pathogens, nutritional deficiency, and climate influences on a declining moose population. Wildlife Monographs, 166, 1–30.Mysterud, A. (2000). Diet overlap among ruminants in Fennoscandia. Oecologia, 124, 130–137.Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691–692.Norman, A. J., & Spong, G. (2015). Single nucleotide polymorphism-based dispersal estimates using noninvasive sampling. Ecology and Evolution, 5, 3056–3065.Northrup, J. M., Hooten, M. B., Anderson, C. R., & Wittemyer, G. (2013). Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. Ecology, 94, 1456–1463.Ohlson, M., Staaland, H., Ohison, M., & Staaland, H. (2001). Mineral diversity in wild plants: Benefits and bane for Moose. Oikos, 94, 442–454.Olsson, M., Cox, J. J., Larkin, J. L., Widén, P., & Olovsson, A. (2011). Space and habitat use of moose in southwestern Sweden. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57, 241–249.Parker, K. L., Barboza, P. S., & Gillingham, M. P. (2009). Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Functional Ecology, 23, 57–69.Peterson, R. O. (1999). Wolf-moose interactions on Isle Royal: The end of natural regulation?Ecological Applications, 9, 10–16.Pettorelli, N., Pelletier, F., vonHardenberg, A., Festa-Bianchet, M., & Côté, S. D. (2007). Early onset of vegetation growth vs. rapid green-up: Impacts on juvenile mountain ungulates. Ecology, 88, 381–390.Post, E., Pedersen, C., Wilmers, C. C., & Forchhammer, M. C. (2008). Warming, plant phenology and the spatial dimension of trophic mismatch for large herbivores. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2005–2013.Post, E., Stenseth, N. C., Langvatn, R., & Fromentin, J. M. (1997). Global climate change and phenotypic variation among red deer cohorts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 264, 1317–1324.Pulliam, H. R., & Danielson, B. J. (1991). Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: A landscape perspective on population dynamics. The American Naturalist, 137, S50–S66.R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing.Rolandsen, C. M., Solberg, E. J., Heim, M., Holmstrøm, F., Solem, M. I., & Sæther, B.-E. (2008). Accuracy and repeatability of moose (Alces alces) age as estimated from dental cement layers. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54, 6–14.Rosén, E. (2006). Alvar vegetation of Öland—Changes, monitoring and restoration. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 106B, 387–399.Rosén, E., & Bakker, J. P. (2005). Effects of agri-environment schemes on scrub clearance, livestock grazing and plant diversity in a low-intensity farming system on Öland, Sweden. Basic and Applied Ecology, 6, 195–204.Sand, H. (1996). Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): The relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia, 106, 212–220.Sand, H. (1998). Costs of reproduction in female moose (Alces alces) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76, 187–193.Senft, R. L., Coughenour, M. B., Bailey, D. W., Rittenhouse, L. R., Sala, O. E., & Swift, D. M. (1987). Large Foraging and Herbivore Hierarchies Ecological Landscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory. BioScience, 37, 789–795.Shipley, L. A., Blomquist, S., & Danell, K. (1998). Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76, 1722–1733.Sims, M., Elston, D., Larkahm, A., Nussy, D., & Albon, S. (2007). Identifying when weather influences life-history traits of grazing herbivores. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 761–770.Singh, N. J., Allen, A. M., & Ericsson, G. (2016). Quantifying migration behaviour using net squared displacement approach: Clarifications and caveats. PLoS One, 11, e0149594.Stephens, P. A., Boyd, I. L., Mcnamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (2009). Capital breeding and income breeding: Their meaning, measurement, and worth. Ecology, 90, 2057–2067.Stubsjøen, T., Sæther, B.-E., Solberg, E. J., Heim, M., & Rolandsen, C. M. (2000). Moose (Alces alces) survival in three populations in northern Norway. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 1822–1830.Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management (SAHWM) (2015). Wildlife Data. Retrieved from http://www.viltdata.se/. Accessed: 20 August 2015.Swedish Meteorological and Hydrology Institute (SMHI) (2015). Meteorological observations data downloads. Retrieved from http://opendata-download-metobs.smhi.se/ Accessed: 7 July 2015.Swenson, J. E., Dahle, B., Busk, H., Opseth, O., Johansen, T., Söderberg, A., ··· Cederlund, G. (2007). Predation on Moose Calves by European brown bears. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 1993–1997.Testa, J. W. (2004). Population dynamics and life history trade-offs of Moose (Alces alces) in South-Central Alaska. Ecology, 85, 1439–1452.Testa, J. W., & Adams, G. P. (1998). Body condition and adjustments to reproductive effort in female moose (Alces alces). Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 1345–1354.Testa, J., Becker, E., & Lee, G. (2000a). Movement of female moose in relation to birth and death of calves. Alces, 36, 155–162.Testa, J. W., Becker, E. F., & Lee, G. R. (2000b). Temporal patterns in the survival of twin and single moose (Alces alces) calves in southcentral Alaska. Journal of Mammalogy, 81, 162–168.Thomas, D. L., & Taylor, E. J. (1990). Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. Journal of Wildlife Management, 54, 322–330.VanMoorter, B., Gaillard, J. M., McLoughlin, P. D., Delorme, D., Klein, F., & Boyce, M. S. (2009). Maternal and individual effects in selection of bed sites and their consequences for fawn survival at different spatial scales. Oecologia, 159, 669–678.Walsh, C., & MacNally, R. (2013). Hier.part: Hierarchical partitioning. R package version 1.0-4. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hier.partWam, H. K., Histøl, T., Nybakken, L., Solberg, E. J., & Hjeljord, O. (2016). Transient nutritional peak in browse foliage after forest clearing advocates cohort management of ungulates. Basic and Applied Ecology, 17, 252–261.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
The demographic consequences of changes in habitat use driven by human modification of landscape, and/or changes in climate, are important for any species. We investigated habitat–performance relationships in a declining island population of a large mammal, the moose (Alces alces), in an environment that is predator-free but dominated by humans. We used a combination of demographic data, knowledge of habitat selection, and multiannual movement data of female moose (n = 17) to understand how space use patterns affect fecundity and calf survival. The calving rate was 0.64 and was similar to calving rates reported in other populations. Calf survival was 0.22 (annually) and 0.32 (postsummer), which are particularly low compared to other populations where postsummer survival is typically above 0.7. Home ranges were mainly composed of arable land (>40%), and selection for arable land was higher in winter than in summer, which contrasts with previous studies. Females that spent more time in broadleaf forest in the summer prior to the rut had higher fecundity rates, while more time spent in arable land resulted in lower fecundity rates. Females that spent more time in thicket/scrubland habitats during winter had lower calf survival, while females that had higher use of mixed forests tended to have higher calf survival. The dominance, and subsequent use, of suboptimal foraging habitats may lead to poor body condition of females at parturition, which may lower calf body weights and affect the mother's ability to lactate. In addition, our results indicated that the growing season has advanced significantly in recent decades, which may be causing a mismatch between parturition and optimal resource availability. These effects may exacerbate the female's ability to meet the energetic demands of lactation. Therefore, the observed low calf survival appears to be caused by a combination of factors related to current land use and may also be due to changing vegetation phenology. These results have important implications for the management of species in human-dominated landscapes in the face of climate change, and for an increased understanding of how species may adapt to future land use and climate change.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
Details
Title
Habitat–performance relationships of a large mammal on a predator-free island dominated by humans
Author
Allen, Andrew M 1
; Dorey, Augusta 2 ; Malmsten, Jonas 3 ; Edenius, Lars 1 ; Ericsson, Göran 1 ; Singh, Navinder J 1
1 Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
2 Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden; Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Ascot, Berkshire, UK
3 Department of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden