Modeling the two-locus architecture of divergent pollinator adaptation: how variation in SAD paralogs affects fitness and evolutionary divergence in sexually deceptive orchids

Abstract

Divergent selection by pollinators can bring about strong reproductive isolation via changes at few genes of large effect. This has recently been demonstrated in sexually deceptive orchids, where studies (1) quantified the strength of reproductive isolation in the field; (2) identified genes that appear to be causal for reproductive isolation; and (3) demonstrated selection by analysis of natural variation in gene sequence and expression. In a group of closely related Ophrys orchids, specific floral scent components, namely n-alkenes, are the key floral traits that control specific pollinator attraction by chemical mimicry of insect sex pheromones. The genetic basis of species-specific differences in alkene production mainly lies in two biosynthetic genes encoding stearoyl–acyl carrier protein desaturases (SAD) that are associated with floral scent variation and reproductive isolation between closely related species, and evolve under pollinator-mediated selection. However, the implications of this genetic architecture of key floral traits on the evolutionary processes of pollinator adaptation and speciation in this plant group remain unclear. Here, we expand on these recent findings to model scenarios of adaptive evolutionary change at SAD2 and SAD5, their effects on plant fitness (i.e., offspring number), and the dynamics of speciation. Our model suggests that the two-locus architecture of reproductive isolation allows for rapid sympatric speciation by pollinator shift; however, the likelihood of such pollinator-mediated speciation is asymmetric between the two orchid species O. sphegodes and O. exaltata due to different fitness effects of their predominant SAD2 and SAD5 alleles. Our study not only provides insight into pollinator adaptation and speciation mechanisms of sexually deceptive orchids but also demonstrates the power of applying a modeling approach to the study of pollinator-driven ecological speciation.

References Ayasse, M., J. Stökl, and W. Francke. 2011. Chemical ecology and pollinator-driven speciation in sexually deceptive orchids. Phytochem. 72:1667–1677. Haslam, T. M., and L. Kunst. 2013. Extending the story of very-long-chain fatty acid elongation. Plant Sci. 210:93–107. Hopkins, R., and M. D. Rausher. 2014. The cost of reinforcement: selection on flower color in allopatric populations of Phlox drummondii. Am. Nat. 183:693–710. Lexer, C., and A. Widmer. 2008. The genic view of plant speciation: recent progress and emerging questions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 363:3023–3036. Mallet, J., A. Meyer, P. Nosil, and J. L. Feder. 2009. Space, sympatry and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 22:2332–2341. Mant, J., R. Peakall, and F. P. Schiestl. 2005a. Does selection on floral odor promote differentiation among populations and species of the sexually deceptive orchid genus Ophrys? Evolution 59:1449–1463. Mant, J. G., C. Brändli, N. J. Vereecken, C. M. Schulz, W. Francke, and F. P. Schiestl. 2005b. Cuticular hydrocarbons as sex pheromone of the bee Colletes cunicularius and the key to its mimicry by the sexually deceptive orchid, Ophrys exaltata. J. Chem. Ecol. 31:1765–1787. Nosil, P., and D. Schluter. 2011. The genes underlying the process of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:160–167. Ossowski, S., K. Schneeberger, J. I. Lucas-Lledo, N. Warthmann, R. M. Clark, R. G. Shaw, et al. 2010. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 327:92–94. Ostevik, K. L., B. T. Moyers, G. L. Owens, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2012. Parallel ecological speciation in plants? Int. J. Ecol. 2012: Article ID 939862. Perera, M. A. D. N., W. Qin, M. Yandeau-Nelson, L. Fan, P. Dixon, and B. J. Nikolau. 2010. Biological origins of normal-chain hydrocarbons: a pathway model based on cuticular wax analyses of maize silks. Plant J. 64:618–632. Presgraves, D. C. 2010. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:175–180. R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Schiestl, F. P., M. Ayasse, H. F. Paulus, C. Löfstedt, B. S. Hansson, F. Ibarra, et al. 2000. Sex pheromone mimicry in the early spider orchid (Ophrys sphegodes): patterns of hydrocarbons as the key mechanism for pollination by sexual deception. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 186:567–574. Schlüter, P. M., and F. P. Schiestl. 2008. Molecular mechanisms of floral mimicry in orchids. Trends Plant Sci. 13:228–235. Schlüter, P. M., P. M. Ruas, G. Kohl, C. F. Ruas, T. F. Stuessy, and H. F. Paulus. 2009. Genetic patterns and pollination in Ophrys iricolor and O. mesaritica (Orchidaceae): sympatric evolution by pollinator shift. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 159:583–598. Schlüter, P. M., P. M. Ruas, G. Kohl, C. F. Ruas, T. F. Stuessy, and H. F. Paulus. 2011a. Evidence for progenitor-derivative speciation in sexually deceptive orchids. Ann. Bot.108:895–906. Schlüter, P. M., S. Xu, V. Gagliardini, E. J. Whittle, J. Shanklin, U. Grossniklaus, et al. 2011b. Stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturases are associated with floral isolation in sexually deceptive orchids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108:5696–5701. Sedeek, K. E. M., W. Qi, M. A. Schauer, A. K. Gupta, L. Poveda, S. Xu, et al. 2013. Transcriptome and proteome data reveal candidate genes for pollinator attraction in sexually deceptive orchids. PLoS ONE 8:e64621. Sedeek, K. E. M., G. Scopece, Y. M. Staedler, J. Schönenberger, S. Cozzolino, F. P. Schiestl, et al. in press. Genic rather than genome-wide differences between sexually deceptive Ophrys orchids with different pollinators. Mol. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/mec.12992. Shanklin, J., and E. B. Cahoon. 1998. Desaturation and related modifications of fatty acids. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49:611–641. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York. Vereecken, N. J., and F. P. Schiestl. 2008. The evolution of imperfect floral mimicry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105:7484–7488. Xu, S., P. M. Schlüter, G. Scopece, H. Breitkopf, K. Gross, S. Cozzolino, et al. 2011. Floral isolation is the main reproductive barrier among closely related sexually deceptive orchids. Evolution 65:2606–2620. Xu, S., P. M. Schlüter, U. Grossniklaus, and F. P. Schiestl. 2012a. The genetic basis of pollinator adaptation in a sexually deceptive orchid. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002889. Xu, S., P. M. Schlüter, and F. P. Schiestl. 2012b. Pollinator-driven speciation in sexually deceptive orchids. Int. J. Ecol. 2012: Article ID 285081.