It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Tumor expression of immune co-inhibitory ligands, such as PD-L1 and Galectin-9, have potential prognostic value in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Circulating levels of these molecules, however, have hardly been studied. This study aims to assess the prognostic significance of circulating PD-L1 and circulating Galectin-9 in patients with resected HCC, and to compare their prognostic significance to the intra-tumoral expression of these same molecules. Archived tissues and stored peripheral blood samples from 81 patients who underwent HCC resection or liver transplantation, with curative intent, were used. Immunohistochemistry was performed to determine intra-tumoral expression of PD-L1 and Galectin-9, while ELISA was used to quantify their respective circulating levels. High circulating PD-L1 (HR 0.12, 95%CI 0.16–0.86, p = 0.011) and high circulating Galectin-9 (HR 0.11, 95%CI 0.15–0.85, p = 0.010) levels were both associated with improved HCC-specific survival. Surprisingly, there was no correlation between circulating levels of PD-L1 and Galectin-9 and their intra-tumoral expression levels. In fact, circulating levels of PD-L1 and Galectin-9 were predictive of HCC-specific survival independently of intra-tumoral levels and baseline clinicopathologic characteristics. Combined analysis of circulating levels and intra-tumoral expression of PD-L1 (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.16–0.68, p = 0.002) and Galectin-9 (HR 0.27, 95%CI 0.13–0.57, p = 0.001) resulted in more confident prediction of survival. In conclusion, circulating PD-L1 and Galectin-9 levels prognostically differentiate resected HCC patients, independently of their intra-tumoral expression. Combining circulating and intra-tumoral expression levels of PD-L1 or Galectin-9 further improves the prognostic values of these immune biomarkers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Rochester, MN, USA
3 Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
4 Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Immunology Research, Medicine, Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, FES-Iztacala, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico
5 Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
6 Academic Medical Center, Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
7 Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands