It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a frequently overlooked public health concern that is difficult to diagnose and treat. Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is a common mTBI neuropathology in which axonal shearing and stretching induces breakdown of the cytoskeleton, impaired axonal trafficking, axonal degeneration, and cognitive dysfunction. DAI is becoming recognized as a principal neuropathology of mTBI with supporting evidence from animal model, human pathology, and neuroimaging studies. As mitochondrial dysfunction and calcium overload are critical steps in secondary brain and axonal injury, we investigated changes in protein expression of potential targets following mTBI using an in vivo controlled cortical impact model. We show upregulated expression of sodium calcium exchanger1 (NCX1) in the hippocampus and cortex at distinct time points post-mTBI. Expression of dynamin-related protein1 (Drp1), a GTPase responsible for regulation of mitochondrial fission, also changes differently post-injury in the hippocampus and cortex. Using an in vitro model of DAI previously reported by our group, we tested whether pharmacological inhibition of NCX1 by SN-6 and of dynamin1, dynamin2, and Drp1 by dynasore mitigates secondary damage. Dynasore and SN-6 attenuate stretch injury-induced swelling of axonal varicosities and mitochondrial fragmentation. In addition, we show that dynasore, but not SN-6, protects against H2O2-induced damage in an organotypic oxidative stress model. As there is currently no standard treatment to mitigate cell damage induced by mTBI and DAI, this work highlights two potential therapeutic targets for treatment of DAI in multiple models of mTBI and DAI.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
3 Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
4 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA