Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large-scale disturbance specialist

Abstract

To conserve habitat for disturbance specialist species, ecologists must identify where individuals will likely settle in newly disturbed areas. Habitat suitability models can predict which sites at new disturbances will most likely attract specialists. Without validation data from newly disturbed areas, however, the best approach for maximizing predictive accuracy can be unclear (Northwestern U.S.A.). We predicted habitat suitability for nesting Black-backed Woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus; a burned-forest specialist) at 20 recently (≤6 years postwildfire) burned locations in Montana using models calibrated with data from three locations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. We developed 8 models using three techniques (weighted logistic regression, Maxent, and Mahalanobis D² models) and various combinations of four environmental variables describing burn severity, the north–south orientation of topographic slope, and prefire canopy cover. After translating model predictions into binary classifications (0 = low suitability to unsuitable, 1 = high to moderate suitability), we compiled “ensemble predictions,” consisting of the number of models (0–8) predicting any given site as highly suitable. The suitability status for 40% of the area burned by eastside Montana wildfires was consistent across models and therefore robust to uncertainty in the relative accuracy of particular models and in alternative ecological hypotheses they described. Ensemble predictions exhibited two desirable properties: (1) a positive relationship with apparent rates of nest occurrence at calibration locations and (2) declining model agreement outside surveyed environments consistent with our reduced confidence in novel (i.e., “no-analogue”) environments. Areas of disagreement among models suggested where future surveys could help validate and refine models for an improved understanding of Black-backed Woodpecker nesting habitat relationships. Ensemble predictions presented here can help guide managers attempting to balance salvage logging with habitat conservation in burned-forest landscapes where black-backed woodpecker nest location data are not immediately available. Ensemble modeling represents a promising tool for guiding conservation of large-scale disturbance specialists.

References Aarts, G., J. Fieberg, S. Brasseur, and J. Matthiopoulos. 2013. Quantifying the effect of habitat availability on species distributions. J. Anim. Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12061. Aragón, P., A. Baselga, and J. M. Lobo. 2010. Global estimation of invasion risk zones for the western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera: integrating distribution models and physiological thresholds to assess climatic favourability. J. Appl. Ecol. 47:1026–1035. Araújo, M. B., and M. New. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:42–47. Austin, M. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol. Model. 200:1–19. Barrows, C. W., K. L. Preston, J. T. Rotenberry, and M. F. Allen. 2008. Using occurrence records to model historic distributions and estimate habitat losses for two psammophilic lizards. Biol. Conserv. 141:1885–1893. Beal, F. E. L. 1911. Food for the woodpeckers of the United States. USDA Biol. Surv. Bullet. 37:25–27. Berglund, D., R. Bush, and R. Lundberg. 2008. Region one vegetation council existing forested vegetation classification system and adaptation to inventory and mapping. Region 1 Vegetation Classification, Inventory, and Analysis Report #08-02. Available at http://fsweb.r1.fs.fed.us/forest/inv/classify/r1_ex_veg_classification.pdf. Bonnot, T. W., J. J. Millspaugh, and M. A. Rumble. 2009. Multi-scale nest-site selection by black-backed woodpeckers in outbreaks of mountain pine beetles. For. Ecol. Manage. 259:220–228. Browning, D. M., S. J. Beaupre, and L. Duncan. 2005. Using partitioned Mahalanobis D²(K) to formulate a GIS-based model of timber rattlesnake hibernacula. J. Wildlife Manag. 69:33–44. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York. Dixon, R. D., and V. A. Saab. 2000. Black-backed woodpecker (Picoides arcticus). A. Poole, ed. The birds of North America online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. Available at http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/509. Dudley, J.G., and V. A. Saab. 2003. A field protocol to monitor cavity-nesting birds. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-44, Fort Collins, CO. Dudley, J. G., V. A. Saab, and J. P. Hollenbeck. 2012. Foraging habitat selection of Black-backed Woodpeckers in forest burns of southwestern Idaho. Condor 114:348–357. Elith, J., and J. R. Leathwick. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:677–697. Elith, J., S. J. Phillips, T. Hastie, M. Dudík, Y. E. Chee, and C. J. Yates. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17:43–57. ESRI. 2010. ArcGIS 10. ESRI, Redlands, CA. Fielding, A. H., and J. F. Bell. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24:38–49. Hanser, S.E. 2011. Dose-response calculator for ArcGIS: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 631. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/631/. Heikkinen, R. K., M. Marmion, and M. Luoto. 2012. Does the interpolation accuracy of species distribution models come at the expense of transferability? Ecography 35:276–288. Hirzel, A. H., G. Le Lay, V. Helfer, C. Randin, and A. Guisan. 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol. Model. 199:142–152. Hollenbeck, J. P., V. A. Saab, and R. W. Frenzel. 2011. Habitat suitability and nest survival of White-headed Woodpeckers in unburned forests of Oregon. J Wildlife Manag. 75:1061–1071. Hoyt, J. S., and S. J. Hannon. 2002. Habitat associations of the black-back and three-toed woodpeckers in the boreal forest of Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 32:1881–1888. Jiménez-Valverde, A., P. Acevedo, A. M. Barbosa, J. M. Lobo, and R. Real. 2013. Discrimination capacity in species distribution models depends on the representativeness of the environmental domain. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22:508–516. Johnson, V., V. Saab, D. Vanderzanden, H. Lachowski, R. Brannon, and C. Crist. 2000. Using landsat satellite imagery to assess fire-created habitat for cavity-nesting birds [CD-ROM]. Pp. 10–14 in J. D. Greer, ed. Remote sensing and geospatial technologies for the new millennium; proceedings of the Eighth Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 2000. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD. Keenan, T., J. Maria Serra, F. Lloret, M. Ninyerola, and S. Sabate. 2011. Predicting the future of forests in the Mediterranean under climate change, with niche- and process-based models: CO₂ matters!. Glob. Change Biol. 17:565–579. Key, C. H. 2006. Ecological and sampling constraints on defining landscape fire severity. Fire Ecol. 2:34–59. Knick, S. T., and J. T. Rotenberry. 1998. Limitations to mapping habitat use areas in changing landscapes using the Mahalanobis distance statistic. J Agricult. Biol. Environ. Stat. 3:311–322. Knick, S. T., S. E. Hanser, and K. L. Preston. 2013. Modeling ecological minimum requirements for distribution of greater sage-grouse leks: implications for population connectivity across their western range, U.S.A. Ecol. Evol. 3:1539–1551. Lefsky, M. A., W. B. Cohen, G. G. Parker, and D. J. Harding. 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 52:19–30. Lele, S. R., and J. L. Keim. 2006. Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. Ecology 87:3021–3028. LEMMA. 2012. Landscape ecology, modeling, mapping, and analysis. http://www.fsl.orst.edu/lemma/main.php?project=imap&id=home. Accessed December 2011 – March 2012. Lentile, L. B., F. W. Smith, and W. D. Shepperd. 2006. Influence of topography and forest structure on patterns of mixed severity fire in ponderosa pine forests of the South Dakota Black Hills, USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 15:557–566. Lobo, J. M., A. Jimenez-Valverde, and J. Hortal. 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography 33:103–114. Marmion, M., M. Parviainen, M. Luoto, R. K. Heikkinen, and W. Thuiller. 2009. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Divers. Distrib. 15:59–69. Merow, C., M. J. Smith, and J. A. Silander. 2013. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species' distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36:1058–1069. Mieszkowska, N., G. Milligan, M. T. Burrows, R. Freckleton, and M. Spencer. 2013. Dynamic species distribution models from categorical survey data. J. Anim. Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12100. Morrison, M. L. 2012. The habitat sampling and analysis paradigm has limited value in animal conservation: a prequel. J. Wildl. Manag. 76:438–450. MTBS. 2012. Monitoring trends in burn severity. http://mtbs.gov/dataquery/individualfiredata.html. (accessed December 2011–March 2012). Nappi, A., P. Drapeau, J.-F. Giroux, J.-P. L. Savard, and F. Moore. 2003. Snag use by foraging black-backed woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus) in a recently burned eastern boreal forest. Auk 120:505–511. Pearman, P. B., A. Guisan, O. Broennimann, and C. F. Randin. 2008. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:149–158. Pearson, R. G., and T. P. Dawson. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12:361–371. Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, and R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190:231–259. Pierson, J. C., F. W. Allendorf, V. Saab, P. Drapeau, and M. K. Schwartz. 2010. Do male and female black-backed woodpeckers respond differently to gaps in habitat? Evol. Appl. 3:263–278. Preston, K. L., J. T. Rotenberry, R. A. Redak, and M. F. Allen. 2008. Habitat shifts of endangered species under altered climate conditions: importance of biotic interactions. Glob. Change Biol. 14:2501–2515. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org/. Recio, M. R., R. Mathieu, G. B. Hall, A. B. Moore, and P. J. Seddon. 2013. Landscape resource mapping for wildlife research using very high resolution satellite imagery. Methods Ecol. Evol. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12094. Roberts, D. R., and A. Hamann. 2012. Method selection for species distribution modelling: are temporally or spatially independent evaluations necessary? Ecography 35:792–802. Rotenberry, J. T., K. L. Preston, and S. T. Knick. 2006. GIS-based niche modeling for mapping species' habitat. Ecology 87:1458–1464. Royle, J. A., R. B. Chandler, C. Yackulic, and J. D. Nichols. 2012. Likelihood analysis of species occurrence probability from presence-only data for modelling species distributions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:545–554. Russell, R. E., V. A. Saab, J. G. Dudley, and J. J. Rotella. 2006. Snag longevity in relation to wildfire and postfire salvage logging. For. Ecol. Manage. 232:179–187. Russell, R. E., V. A. Saab, and J. G. Dudley. 2007. Habitat-suitability models for cavity-nesting birds in a postfire landscape. J. Wildlife Manag. 71:2600–2611. Russell, R. E., J. F. Lehmkuhl, S. T. Buckland, and V. A. Saab. 2010. Short-term responses of red squirrels to prescribed burning in the Interior Pacific Northwest, USA. J. Wildlife Manag. 74:12–17. Saab, V. A., R. E. Russell, and J. G. Dudley. 2007. Nest densities of cavity-nesting birds in relation to postfire salvage logging and time since wildfire. Condor 109:97–108. Saab, V. A., R. E. Russell, and J. G. Dudley. 2009. Nest-site selection by cavity-nesting birds in relation to postfire salvage logging. For. Ecol. Manage. 257:151–159. Saab, V. A., R. E. Russell, J. J. Rotella, and J. G. Dudley. 2011. Modeling nest survival of cavity-nesting birds in relation to postfire salvage logging. J. Wildlife Manag. 75:794–804. Schoennagel, T., T. T. Veblen, and W. H. Romme. 2004. The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests. Bioscience 54:661–676. Thuiller, W., L. Brotons, M. B. Araújo, and S. Lavorel. 2004. Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. Ecography 27:165–172. Thuiller, W., B. Lafourcade, R. Engler, and M. B. Araújo. 2009. BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32:369–373. Turner, M. G., W. H. Romme, and R. H. Gardner. 1999. Prefire heterogeneity, fire severity, and early postfire plant reestablishment in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Int. J. Wildland Fire 9:21–36. USGS (United States Geological Survey). The National Map Viewer. http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/. (accessed December 2011–March 2012). Veloz, S. D., J. W. Williams, J. L. Blois, F. He, B. Otto-Bliesner, and Z. Liu. 2012. No-analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late quaternary: implications for 21st-century predictions by species distribution models. Glob. Change Biol. 18:1698–1713. Wenger, S. J., and J. D. Olden. 2012. Assessing transferability of ecological models: an underappreciated aspect of statistical validation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:260–267. Whitlock, C., S. L. Shafer, and J. Marlon. 2003. The role of climate and vegetation change in shaping past and future fire regimes in the northwestern US and the implications for ecosystem management. For. Ecol. Manage. 178:5–21. Williams, J. W., and S. T. Jackson. 2007. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5:475–482. Wilson, K. A., M. I. Westphal, H. P. Possingham, and J. Elith. 2005. Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data. Biol. Conserv. 122:99–112. Zurell, D., F. Jeltsch, C. F. Dormann, and B. Schröder. 2009. Static species distribution models in dynamically changing systems: how good can predictions really be? Ecography 32:733–744. Zurell, D., J. Elith, and B. Schröder. 2012. Predicting to new environments: tools for visualizing model behaviour and impacts on mapped distributions. Divers. Distrib. 18:628–634.