Geographic selection bias of occurrence data influences transferability of invasive Hydrilla verticillata distribution models

Abstract

Due to socioeconomic differences, the accuracy and extent of reporting on the occurrence of native species differs among countries, which can impact the performance of species distribution models. We assessed the importance of geographical biases in occurrence data on model performance using Hydrilla verticillata as a case study. We used Maxent to predict potential North American distribution of the aquatic invasive macrophyte based upon training data from its native range. We produced a model using all available native range occurrence data, then explored the change in model performance produced by omitting subsets of training data based on political boundaries. We also compared those results with models trained on data from which a random sample of occurrence data was omitted from across the native range. Although most models accurately predicted the occurrence of H. verticillata in North America (AUC > 0.7600), data omissions influenced model predictions. Omitting data based on political boundaries resulted in larger shifts in model accuracy than omitting randomly selected occurrence data. For well-documented species like H. verticillata, missing records from single countries or ecoregions may minimally influence model predictions, but for species with fewer documented occurrences or poorly understood ranges, geographic biases could misguide predictions. Regardless of focal species, we recommend that future species distribution modeling efforts begin with a reflection on potential spatial biases of available occurrence data. Improved biodiversity surveillance and reporting will provide benefit not only in invaded ranges but also within under-reported and unexplored native ranges.

References Alexander, J. M., and P. J. Edwards. 2010. Limits to the niche and range margins of alien species. Oikos 119:1377–1386. Anderson, R. P., and A. Raza. 2010. The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. J. Biogeogr. 37:1378–1393. Anderson, L. W. J., R. A. Pitelli, R. Carruthers, R. L. C. M. Pitelli, and W. L. B. Ferreira. (2005) First hydrilla found in Brazil: implications of further dispersal and likely impacts. 45th Aquatic Plant Management Society Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA. Barve, N., V. Barve, A. Jiménez-Valverde, A. Lira-Noriega, S. P. Maher, A. T. Peterson, et al. 2011. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 222:1810–1819. Benoit, L. K. (2011) Cryptic Speciation, Genetic Diversity and Herbicide Resistance in the Invasive Aquatic Plant Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle (Hydrocharitaceae). Dissertations Collection for University of Connecticut, Paper AAI3492149. Bookbinder, M. P., E. Dinerstein, A. Rijal, H. Cauley, and A. Rajouria. 1998. Ecotourism's support of biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 12:1399–1404. Broennimann, O., and A. Guisan. 2008. Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invasive ranges matter. Biol. Lett. 4:585–589. Broennimann, O., U. A. Treier, H. Müller-Schärer, W. Thuiller, A. T. Peterson, and A. Guisan. 2007. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol. Lett. 10:701–709. Brotons, L., W. Thuiller, M. B. Araújo, and A. H. Hirzel. 2004. Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography 27:437–448. Buckingham, G. R., and C. A. Bennett. 1996. Laboratory biology of an immigrant Asian moth, Parapoynx diminutalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), on Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrocharitaceae). Fla. Entomol. 79:353–363. Cook, C. D. K., and R. Lüönd. 1982. A revision of the genus Hydrilla (Hydrocharitaceae). Aquat. Bot. 13:485–504. DeLong, E. R., D. M. DeLong, and D. L. Clarke-Pearson. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845. Edwards, J. L., M. A. Lane, and E. S. Nielsen. 2000. Interoperability of biodiversity databases: biodiversity information on every desktop. Science 289:2312–2314. Ehrlich, P. R., and A. H. Ehrlich. 1992. The value of biodiversity. Ambio 21:219–226. Elith, J., and C. H. Graham. 2009. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32:66–77. Elith, J., C. H. Graham, R. P. Anderson, M. Dudík, S. Ferrier, A. Guisan, et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151. Elith, J., M. Kearney, and S. Phillips. 2010. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1:330–342. Elith, J., S. J. Phillips, T. Hastie, M. Dudík, Y. E. Chee, and C. J. Yates. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17:43–57. Engler, R., and A. Guisan. 2009. MigClim: predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. Divers. Distrib. 15:590–601. Evangelista, P. H., S. Kumar, T. J. Stohlgren, C. S. Jarnevich, A. W. Crall, J. B. III Norman, et al. 2008. Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Divers. Distrib. 14:808–817. Feeley, K. J., and M. R. Silman. 2011. Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought. Divers. Distrib. 17:1132–1140. Franklin, J. (2009) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K. Franklin, J., K. E. Wejnert, S. A. Hathaway, C. J. Rochester, and R. N. Fisher. 2009. Effect of species rarity on the accuracy of species distribution models for reptiles and amphibians in southern California. Divers. Distrib. 15:167–177. Heikkinen, R. K., M. Marmion, and M. Luoto. 2012. Does the interpolation accuracy of species distribution models come at the expense of transferability? Ecography 35:276–288. Hijmans, R. J. 2012. Cross-validation of species distribution models: removing spatial sorting bias and calibration with a null model. Ecology 93:679–688. Hill, M. P., A. A. Hoffmann, S. Macfadyen, P. A. Umina, and J. Elith. 2012. Understanding niche shifts: using current and historical data to model the invasive redlegged earth mite, Halotydeus destructor. Divers. Distrib. 18:191–203. Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow, (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley Inter-Science, Hoboken, NJ. Hulme, P. E. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:10–18. Jiménez-Valverde, A. 2012. Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21:498–507. Keller, R. P., and J. M. Drake. (2009) Trait-based risk assessment for invasive species. Pp. 44–62 in R. P. Keller, D. M. Lodge, M. A. Lewis, J. F. Shogren, eds. Bioeconomics of invasive species: integrating ecology, economics, policy, and management. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Kramer-Schadt, S., J. Niedballa, J. D. Pilgrim, B. Schröder, J. Lindenborn, V. Reinfelder, et al. 2013. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 19:1366–1379. Langeland, K. A. 1996. Hydrilla verticillata (L.F.) Royle (Hydrocharitaceae), “The Perfect Aquatic Weed”. Castanea 61:293–304. Loo, S. E., R. MacNally, and P. S. Lake. 2007. Forecasting New Zealand mudsnail invasion range: model comparisons using native and invaded ranges. Ecol. Appl. 17:181–189. Luoto, M., J. Pöyry, R. K. Heikkinen, and K. Saarinen. 2005. Uncertainty of bioclimate envelope models based on the geographical distribution of species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14:575–584. Macilwain, C. 1998. When rhetoric hits reality in debate on bioprospecting. Nature 392:535–540. Madeira, P., T. Van, and T. Center. 1999. Integration of five Southeast Asian accessions into the world-wide phenetic relationships of Hydrilla verticillata as elucidated by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Aquat. Bot. 63:161–167. Mau-Crimmins, T. M., H. R. Schussman, and E. L. Geiger. 2006. Can the invaded range of a species be predicted sufficiently using only native-range data? Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana) in the southwestern United States. Ecol. Model. 193:736–746. McDowell, W. G., A. J. Benson, and J. E. Byers. 2014. Climate controls the distribution of a widespread invasive species: implications for future range expansion. Freshw. Biol. 59:847–857. McPherson, J. M., and W. Jetz. 2007. Effects of species' ecology on the accuracy of distribution models. Ecography 30:135–151. Meyerson, L. A., and J. K. Reaser. 2002. Biosecurity: moving toward a comprehensive approach. Bioscience 52:593–600. New, M., M. Hulme, and P. Jones. 1999. Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: development of a 1961-90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. J. Clim. 12:829–856. Owens, H. L., L. P. Campbell, L. L. Dornak, E. E. Saupe, N. Barve, J. Soberón, et al. 2013. Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas. Ecol. Model. 263:10–18. Pearman, P. B., A. Guisan, O. Broennimann, and C. F. Randin. 2008. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:149–158. Perrings, C., M. Williamson, E. B. Barbier, D. Delfino, S. Dalmazzone, J. Shogren, et al. 2002. Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conserv. Ecol. 6:1. Peters, J. A., and D. M. Lodge. 2009. Invasive species policy at the regional level: a multiple weak links problem. Fisheries 34:373–380. Peterson, A. T., M. Papes, and D. A. Kluza. 2003. Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Sci. 51:863–868. Peterson, A. T., M. Papeş, and M. Eaton. 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30:550–560. Phillips, S. J.. 2008. Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. (2007). Ecography, 31:272–278. Phillips, S. J., and M. Dudík. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175. Phillips, S., R. Anderson, and R. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190:231–259. Phillips, S. J., M. Dudík, J. Elith, C. H. Graham, A. Lehmann, J. Leathwick, et al. 2009. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 19:181–197. Radosavljevic, A., and R. P. Anderson. 2014. Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. J. Biogeogr. 41:629–643. Randin, C. F., T. Dirnböck, S. Dullinger, N. E. Zimmermann, M. Zappa, and A. Guisan. 2006. Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space? J. Biogeogr. 33:1689–1703. Robinson, T. P., R. D. van Klinken, and G. Metternicht. 2010. Comparison of alternative strategies for invasive species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 221:2261–2269. Rybicki, N. B., and V. Carter. 2002. Light and temperature effects on the growth of wild celery and hydrilla. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 40:92–99. Spencer, D. F., G. G. Ksander, J. D. Madsen, and C. S. Owens. 2000. Emergence of vegetative propagules of Potamogeton nodosus, Potamogeton pectinatus, Vallisneria americana, and Hydrilla verticillata based on accumulated degree-days. Aquat. Bot. 67:237–249. Steward, K., and T. Van. 1987. Comparative studies of monoecious and dioecious Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) biotypes. Weed Sci. 35:204–210. Steward, K. K., T. K. Van, V. Carter, and A. H. Pieterse. 1984. Hydrilla invades Washington, DC and the Potomac. Am. J. Bot. 71:162–163. Stockwell, D. R. B., and D. P. Peters. 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13:143–158. Thuiller, W., D. M. Richardson, P. Pyšek, G. F. Midgley, G. O. Hughes, and M. Rouget. 2005. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob. Change Biol. 11:2234–2250. Tsoar, A., O. Allouche, O. Steinitz, D. Rotem, and R. Kadmon. 2007. A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution. Divers. Distrib. 13:397–405. Václavíc, T., and R. K. Meentemeyer. 2009. Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions? Ecol. Model. 220:3248–3258. Václavíc, T., and R. K. Meentemeyer. 2012. Equilibrium or not? Modelling potential distribution of invasive species in different stages of invasion. Divers. Distrib. 18:73–83. Van, T. K., W. T. Haller, and L. A. Garrard. 1978. The effect of daylength and temperature on hydrilla growth and tuber production. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 16:57–59. Warren, D. L. 2012. In defense of “niche modeling”. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27:497–500. Warren, D. L., and S. N. Seifert. 2011. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol. Appl. 21:335–342. Western, D. (1989) Overview. Pp. xi–xv in D. Western, M. C. Pearl, eds. Conservation for the Twenty-first Century. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY. Wieczorek, J., Q. Guo, and R. Hijmans. 2004. The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 18:745–767. Wiens, J. A., D. Stralberg, D. Jongsomjit, C. A. Howell, and M. A. Snyder. 2009. Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106:19729–19736. Wisz, M. S., R. J. Hijmans, J. Li, A. T. Peterson, C. H. Graham, and A. Guisan. 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 14:763–773.