It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are promising antimicrobials, however, the potential of bacterial resistance is a major concern. Here we systematically study the evolution of resistance to 14 chemically diverse AMPs and 12 antibiotics in Escherichia coli. Our work indicates that evolution of resistance against certain AMPs, such as tachyplesin II and cecropin P1, is limited. Resistance level provided by point mutations and gene amplification is very low and antibiotic-resistant bacteria display no cross-resistance to these AMPs. Moreover, genomic fragments derived from a wide range of soil bacteria confer no detectable resistance against these AMPs when introduced into native host bacteria on plasmids. We have found that simple physicochemical features dictate bacterial propensity to evolve resistance against AMPs. Our work could serve as a promising source for the development of new AMP-based therapeutics less prone to resistance, a feature necessary to avoid any possible interference with our innate immune system.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary
2 Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary; Doctoral School of Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
3 Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary; Faculty of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
4 Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary; HCEMM-BRC Metabolic Systems Biology Lab, Szeged, Hungary
5 Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
6 Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, San Francisco, CA, USA
7 Doctoral School of Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
8 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
9 Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
10 Institute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
11 Department of Biotechnology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary