It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Creation of protected areas is a cornerstone of nature conservation. However, with increasing population, the pressure on land for agriculture increases, especially in peri-urban areas. We investigated land-use changes in a peri-urban forest reserve subject to anthropogenic influence and assessed the extant plant community structure through various indices. The results show that there is active forest conversion into farmland, and this conversion affects surrounding waterbodies as well. A new guild of species dominates under anthropogenic activity and comprises cocoa farms and mosaic forest. Cocoa Farms were more diverse (H = 3.08) than Dense Forest (H = 2.75) yet both were strikingly dissimilar with high carbon stocks in Cocoa Farm (128 Mg/Ha) compared to Dense Forest (51.6 Mg/ha) indicating that the forest is highly degraded. Land cover change predictions indicate further increase in forest conversion to farmland and accommodation. Our results show that legislating protected areas needs to be accompanied by consistent monitoring, and poverty alleviation alternatives that relieve pressure from forests, if conservation is to be successful.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
2 Department of Agriculture, Higher Technical Teachers’ Training College Kumba, University of Buea, Kumba, Cameroon
3 South West Regional Delegation of Forest and Fauna, Ministry of Forest and Fauna, Buea, Republic of Cameroon