It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Because solar power is constrained by local resources, the LSMU scenario (Scenario 4) cannot save energy or reduce GHG emissions significantly compared with the Coal + Grid Electricity scenario (Scenario 2). Sensitivity Analysis To illustrate the robustness of results, we alter the coefficients. Since we focus on the NG pathway compared with the conventional coal and public grid combined pathway, CCoal−Heat , CElec−Cool , and CCoal−Elec are changed by 10% and 30%. [...]the source of natural gas is not an important factor determining the GHG emission reduction performance of DG projects. 5.5. [...]the paper used the China case study to indicate the comprehensive benefits of NG DG projects, which can be an effective solution to striking the balance between stable supply and clean production.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer