Abstract

Because solar power is constrained by local resources, the LSMU scenario (Scenario 4) cannot save energy or reduce GHG emissions significantly compared with the Coal + Grid Electricity scenario (Scenario 2). Sensitivity Analysis To illustrate the robustness of results, we alter the coefficients. Since we focus on the NG pathway compared with the conventional coal and public grid combined pathway, CCoal−Heat , CElec−Cool , and CCoal−Elec are changed by 10% and 30%. [...]the source of natural gas is not an important factor determining the GHG emission reduction performance of DG projects. 5.5. [...]the paper used the China case study to indicate the comprehensive benefits of NG DG projects, which can be an effective solution to striking the balance between stable supply and clean production.

Details

Title
Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis of Natural Gas-Based Distributed Generation Projects in China
Author
Liu, Hansi; Zhou, Sheng; Peng, Tianduo; Ou, Xunmin
Publication year
2017
Publication date
Oct 2017
Publisher
MDPI AG
e-ISSN
19961073
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2316092638
Copyright
© 2017. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.