It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ferns are notorious for possessing large genomes and numerous chromosomes. Despite decades of speculation, the processes underlying the expansive genomes of ferns are unclear, largely due to the absence of a sequenced homosporous fern genome. The lack of this crucial resource has not only hindered investigations of evolutionary processes responsible for the unusual genome characteristics of homosporous ferns, but also impeded synthesis of genome evolution across land plants. Here, we used the model fern species Ceratopteris richardii to address the processes (e.g., polyploidy, spread of repeat elements) by which the large genomes and high chromosome numbers typical of homosporous ferns may have evolved and have been maintained. We directly compared repeat compositions in species spanning the green plant tree of life and a diversity of genome sizes, as well as both short- and long-read-based assemblies of Ceratopteris. We found evidence consistent with a single ancient polyploidy event in the evolutionary history of Ceratopteris based on both genomic and cytogenetic data, and on repeat proportions similar to those found in large flowering plant genomes. This study provides a major stepping-stone in the understanding of land plant evolutionary genomics by providing the first homosporous fern reference genome, as well as insights into the processes underlying the formation of these massive genomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
2 Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; The Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
3 Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA
4 Department of Applied Plant Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
5 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; The Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; The Biodiversity Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
6 Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; The Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; The Biodiversity Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA