It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Typically, estimating genetic parameters, such as disease heritability and between-disease genetic correlations, demands large datasets containing all relevant phenotypic measures and detailed knowledge of family relationships or, alternatively, genotypic and phenotypic data for numerous unrelated individuals. Here, we suggest an alternative, efficient estimation approach through the construction of two disease metrics from large health datasets: temporal disease prevalence curves and low-dimensional disease embeddings. We present eleven thousand heritability estimates corresponding to five study types: twins, traditional family studies, health records-based family studies, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and polygenic risk scores. We also compute over six hundred thousand estimates of genetic, environmental and phenotypic correlations. Furthermore, we find that: (1) disease curve shapes cluster into five general patterns; (2) early-onset diseases tend to have lower prevalence than late-onset diseases (Spearman’s ρ = 0.32, p < 10–16); and (3) the disease onset age and heritability are negatively correlated (ρ = −0.46, p < 10–16).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Department of Medicine, Institute of Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
2 Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Medicine, Institute of Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Committee on Genomics, Genetics, and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
4 Institute for Next Generation Healthcare, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
5 Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
6 Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
7 Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
8 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
9 Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
10 Centre for Individualized Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden
11 Department of Medicine, Institute of Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Committee on Genomics, Genetics, and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA