It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Malformation of mango inflorescences (MMI) disease causes severe economic losses worldwide. Present research investigates the underlying causes of MMI. Results revealed significantly higher levels of cyanide, a by-product of ethylene biosynthesis, in malformed inflorescences (MI) of mango cultivars. There was a significant rise in ACS transcripts, ACS enzyme activity and cyanide and ethylene levels in MI as compared to healthy inflorescences (HI). Significant differences in levels of methionine, phosphate, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine, ascorbate and glutathione, and activities of dehydroascorbate reductase and glutathione reductase were seen in MI over HI. Further, a lower expression of β-cyanoalanine synthase (β-CAS) transcript was associated with decreased cellular β-CAS activity in MI, indicating accumulation of unmetabolized cyanide. TEM studies showed increased gum-resinosis and necrotic cell organelles, which might be attributed to unmetabolized cyanide. In field trials, increased malformed-necrotic-inflorescence (MNI) by spraying ethrel and decreased MNI by treating with ethylene inhibitors (silver and cobalt ions) further confirmed the involvement of cyanide in MMI. Implying a role for cyanide in MMI at the physiological and molecular level, this study will contribute to better understanding of the etiology of mango inflorescence malformation, and also help manipulate mango varieties genetically for resistance to malformation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India; Department of Plant Physiology, CBSH, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India; Department of Botany, Zakir Husain Delhi College (University of Delhi), New Delhi, India
2 Department of Plant Physiology, CBSH, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India
3 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India; Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Molecular Plant Nutrition, Gatersleben, Germany
4 Department of Botany, Zakir Husain Delhi College (University of Delhi), New Delhi, India
5 Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
6 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India