INTRODUCTION
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that mainly affects the axial spine and sacroiliac joints. Osteophyte formation and ankyloses often develop later in this disease, which may lead to a typical spine imaging manifestation known as “bamboo spine” (Fattahi et al., ). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐B27 presents in over 90% of patients with AS (Reveille et al.,). Recent studies have shown that the gut microbiota may be a vital factor relevant to AS (Ranganathan, Gracey, Brown, Inman, & Haroon, ). Investigations into the fecal microbiota of AS patients support the association between AS and the gut microbiota (Ranganathan et al., ). Notably, subclinical gut inflammation was observed in more than 60% of patients with AS (VanPraet, Jacques, Van denBosch, & Elewaut, ), indicating that intestinal disorders are related to AS pathogenesis.
Ankylosing spondylitis treatment mainly targets the remission of disease progression. Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) blockers have been shown to improve inflammatory conditions in the spine and sacroiliac joints (Taurog, Chhabra, & Colbert, ). The mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of TNF‐α blockers on AS remains uncertain. Further studies have proposed the gut microbiota as an important factor that may influence anti‐TNF‐α treatment outcomes. A study involving 18 patients with AS found that the host's gut microbial community can predict the clinical response related to anti‐TNF‐α therapy and that the order Burkholderiales is considered a biomarker determining the response to anti‐TNF‐α treatment (Bazin et al., ). In addition, imbalanced gut microbial communities in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) showed normal microorganism colonization after anti‐TNF‐α therapy (Busquets et al., ; Magnusson et al., ). Moreover, age‐related alterations in the gut microbiota were reversed in TNF−/− mice. These mice exhibited decreased intestinal permeability and reduced systemic inflammation compared with those in mice of the same age (Thevaranjan et al., ).
The gastrointestinal tract of mammalian hosts is colonized by many commensal microbes, herein referred to as the gut microbiota (Clavel, Gomes‐Neto, Lagkouvardos, & Ramer‐Tait, ), and disorder of the gut microbiota is regarded as important to the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, including IBD, allergies, diabetes, and axial spondyloarthritis (Jiménez et al., ; Leone, Cham, & Chang, ; Tilg & Moschen, ; Wen et al., ). Although gut microbiota alterations in anti‐TNF‐α‐treated AS have been reported (Bazin et al., ), the interactions between anti‐TNF‐α therapy and the gut microbiota remain unknown. In this study, we hypothesized that the treatment effect of TNF‐α blockers on AS benefitted mucosal barrier protection and regulated an imbalanced intestinal microbiota and that IL‐17A mediated by Th17 cells in the host's intestines was implicated in the treatment responses. Hence, in this study, we constructed an animal model of ankylosing spondylitis by injecting proteoglycan and dimethyldioctadecylammonium (DDA) into BALB/c mice (Glant, Mikecz, Arzoumanian, & Poole, ; Tseng et al., ). The composition and function of the fecal microbiota were analyzed via 16S rDNA high‐throughput sequencing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice and construction of the proteoglycan (PG)‐induced AS model
Thirty female BALB/c retired breeder mice (8 months old) weighing 26 ± 2.4 g were purchased from Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd. Mice were housed in the Central Animal Laboratory of Southern Medical University under standard conditions with uninterrupted access to food and water. All mice were adapted for 2 weeks before the experiments commenced.
As previously described (Boldizsar, Tarjanyi, Nemeth, Mikecz, & Glant, ; Ishikawa, Colavite, Rosa, et al., ), 100 µg of cartilage proteoglycan emulsifier (Sigma) plus 2 mg of DDA adjuvant (Sigma) were mixed in 200 µl of normal saline and injected into the abdominal cavities of the mice on days 0, 21, and 42.
Treatment protocols and arthritis assessment
The thirty mice were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 10 per group): the control, PG, and rhTNFR:Fc groups. The control group contained 10 healthy mice. The mice in the PG group were intraperitoneally injected with normal saline, and the PG‐induced mice in the rhTNFR:Fc group were treated with an rhTNFR:Fc solution of etanercept (5 µg/g) diluted in normal saline via intraperitoneal injection three times per week. This dosage was based on previous publications showing that rhTNFR:Fc efficiently inhibited murine TNF‐α (Fei et al., ; Fries et al., ). rhTNFR:Fc treatment was initiated 4 weeks after the third PG induction to modify the clinical effect of the TNF‐α inhibitor on AS.
The arthritis score and body weight were evaluated weekly from the third immunization until euthanasia (week 14) and blindly assessed by two investigators. Arthritis severity was assessed using a standard visual scoring system (Ishikawa, Colavite, da Rosa, et al., ).
The mice were euthanized with avertin at 14 weeks; the ankle joints were then removed, and hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was performed as previously described ( Glant, ).
ELISA
The serum TNF‐α and IL‐17A concentrations were determined using commercial ELISA kits (ABclonal Technology) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Each cytokine was measured three times independently, and the final concentration was calculated using a standard curve.
Pathological and immunohistochemical assessment of ileal tissue
Ileal tissues were obtained immediately after the mice were sacrificed. After irrigation with normal saline, ileal tissues were fixed in 4% phosphate‐buffered paraformaldehyde. The operation was conducted later as previously described (Xue et al., ). In addition, immunohistochemistry was conducted in accordance with standard procedures (Ruan et al., ). The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti‐ZO‐1 (diluted 1:150; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and anti‐occludin (diluted 1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C, warmed at 37°C for 45 min, and then incubated with secondary antibody. The final products were imaged and analyzed using a Zeiss microscope (Carl Zeiss).
Gut permeability in vivo
Mice were fasted with water supplementation for 6 hr and were then administered fluorescein isothiocyanate‐conjugated dextran (4 kDa; DX‐4000‐FITC, Sigma‐Aldrich) by gavage. The reagent dose was calculated as 60 mg per 100 g of body weight (Cani et al., ). Venous blood (300 µl) was obtained from behind the eye sockets after 1 hr and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 3 min. The supernatant was diluted with an equal volume of phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). Fluorescence measurements were subsequently conducted with excitation at 485 nm and emission at 535 nm.
Western blot analysis
Ileal tissues were obtained and stored in liquid nitrogen. Samples were incubated in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Beyotime) for the extraction of total protein. Protein sample concentrations were measured by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Beyotime). The prepared proteins were separated by 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were subsequently transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore). Membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti‐occludin (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and anti‐β‐actin (1:5,000; Bioss) at 4°C overnight and were then incubated with secondary antibody (goat anti‐rabbit) for 1 hr. An electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting kit (Beyotime) was used to detect the target bands on the membranes. The target bands were visualized, and the protein intensity was analyzed using the Gene Gnome Bio Imaging System (Syngene Bio‐imaging).
16S rDNA high‐throughput sequencing analysis
The cecal contents were collected from the mice in sterile, tightly closed containers, and immediately preserved at −80°C. DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen Ltd.) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. The fecal microbiota in 15 fecal samples was determined via 16S rDNA gene sequencing at the Realbio Genomics Institute (Shanghai, China). The F341F forward primer (5'‐ACTCCTACGGGRSGCAGCAG‐3') and the R806R reverse primer (5'‐GGACTACVVGGGTATCTAATC‐3') were used to amplify the V3‐V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rDNA. Files were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a 97% similarity threshold for the reads. The data from all samples were then normalized for analysis of alpha and beta diversity. Briefly, the number of sequences in the sample with the fewest sequences (21,246 reads/sample) was selected to set the threshold value, and the same number of sequences from each of the samples was randomly extracted for subsequent analysis (Huang et al., ). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was conducted on UniFrac distance matrices using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) software based on community differences, and the distance distribution was determined by heatmap analysis. The relative species abundances were calculated using the annotation results in R software. Metagenome function was predicted by PICRUSt (Qi et al., ).
Statistical analysis
SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analyses. All statistical analyses were conducted at least three times. Statistical differences among the three groups were analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni's test. The Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test was used to analyze the relative species proportions. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05.
RESULTS
RhTNFR:Fc attenuated body weight loss and severity in PG‐induced mice
Figure a shows the experimental program schedules. Figure b,c shows the increased arthritis incidence and scores in PG‐induced mice. Arthritis incidence was delayed after rhTNFR:Fc inoculation, and the arthritis scores in the rhTNFR:Fc group were significantly decreased between 12 and 14 weeks. Figure d shows the dynamic variations in body weight. Histological features of the hind limbs of PG‐induced mice showed inflammatory cell infiltration, synovial hyperplasia, cartilage destruction, and bone erosion, which were not present in control mice. rhTNFR:Fc‐treated mice exhibited mild inflammatory cell infiltration and joint space narrowing. However, synovial hyperplasia, cartilage destruction, and bone erosion were not observed in rhTNFR:Fc mice (Figure e).
RhTNFR:Fc treatment attenuated arthritis progression and body weight loss in PG‐induced mice. (a) Experimental schedule. (b) Arthritis incidence. (c) Arthritis score (*p < .05, **p < .01, rhTNFR:Fc vs. PG along). (d) The body weight changes in the three groups (n = 10/group) were monitored after the third immunization. (e) Representative HE images (400x) from mice in the three groups are shown. Bars = 500 mm. Black arrows indicate synovial hyperplasia, blue arrows indicate cartilage erosion, green arrows indicate narrowing joint space, and yellow arrows indicate pannus formation. Data values are presented as the mean ± SD
RhTNFR:Fc improved the mucosal morphology of the ileal tissue and decreased gut permeability in PG‐induced mice
In control group mice, the intestinal villi were smooth and showed normal glands, while the intestinal villi of the PG‐induced mice were disorganized, structurally disrupted, and often separated from the basement membrane. After rhTNFR:Fc treatment, the intestinal damage showed mild villus shortening (Figure a). Gut permeability was significantly increased in the PG group compared with that in the control group. After rhTNFR:Fc supplementation, gut permeability in the mice markedly declined (Figure b).
RhTNF:Fc treatment improved intestinal barrier function and decreased the serum levels of the inflammatory cytokines TNF‐α and IL‐17A in PG‐induced mice. (a) Control mice showing smooth villi and normal glands; PG‐induced mice showing disorganized villi and disrupted villous structure; and rhTNFR:Fc mice showing mild shortening of villi (Scale bar is 100um). (b) Serum levels of DX‐4000‐FITC in the three groups. (c) The quantitative expression levels of TJ proteins in the ileal tissue of mice were determined by western blotting. (d) The relative expression percentages of the TJ proteins ZO‐1 and occludin by analysis of greyscale intensity. (e) Serum TNF‐α and (f) IL‐17A levels were determined by ELISA. (g) ZO‐1‐ and occludin‐positive staining appears brown (Scale bar is 50 µm). A high color intensity indicates a high level of the target protein. Values are expressed as the means ± SD. *p < .05, **p < .01
RhTNFR:Fc increased the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins in PG‐induced mice
Figure c and shows the ZO‐1 and occludin protein expression levels, which were lower in PG mice than in control group mice. However, the ZO‐1 and occludin expression levels were significantly increased after rhTNFR:Fc treatment. These results were consistent with the immunohistochemistry results, in which PG‐induced mice showed lighter brown staining than did control mice, and the intensity of brown staining in rhTNFR:Fc mice was stronger than that in PG‐induced mice (Figure g).
RhTNFR:Fc decreased the serum TNF‐α and IL‐17A levels
The TNF‐α and IL‐17A levels in PG‐induced mice were significantly increased compared with those in control mice, and rhTNFR:Fc treatment distinctly decreased the PG‐induced upregulation of serum TNF‐α. In addition, the decline in IL‐17A expression was more subtle than that in TNF‐α expression (Figure e,f).
RhTNFR:Fc modulated the composition of the microbiota in PG‐induced mice
Four hundred forty‐seven OTUs were obtained. Venn diagrams indicated 17, 9, and 14 unique OTUs in the control, PG, and treatment groups, respectively (Figure a). The α‐diversity of the gut microbial communities in the three groups was evaluated, and the richness estimators, including the Chao1 index (Figure b, p = .33) and observed species (Figure c, p = .05), were not significantly different among the groups. However, the PD diversity estimator was significantly lower in the PG group than in the control and rhTNFR:Fc groups (Figure d, p = .018).
Effect of rhTNFR:Fc on the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota in PG‐induced mice. (a) Total OTU analysis (≧97% identity level); the number shows the total number of OTUs in each block. (b) Chao1 index (p = .33). (c) Observed species (p = .05). (d) PD index (p = .02). ANOSIM analysis of the three groups; (e) the weighted and (f) unweighted UniFrac distances accounted for the abundance of species. R > 0 indicates that the differences between the groups were larger than the differences within the groups. (g) The weighted and (h) unweighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots for all samples; each point represents one mouse in this study. The top taxonomic profiles in the three groups at the (i) phylum level and (j) genus level. Differences were considered significant for p < .05
Analysis of similarities (ANOSIM; Figure e,f) indicated that the gut microbial communities differed among the three groups (p < .05). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was conducted based on compositional similarities of the gut microbial communities. Figure g,H shows that the PG samples were separated from the control samples, whereas the rhTNFR:Fc group was a short distance from the control group (the control and rhTNFR:Fc groups did not statistically differ) and was distant from the PG group (p < .05).
The gut microbiota profiles were dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes at the phylum level (Figure i). PG‐induced mice showed an altered gut flora with a decreased abundance of Bacteroidetes (38.4%) and an increased abundance of Firmicutes (54.8%) and Proteobacteria (5%) compared with the abundances of Bacteroidetes (61.5%), Firmicutes (34.2%), and Proteobacteria (2.6%) in control mice. However, the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes (62%), Firmicutes (34.6%), and Proteobacteria (2.3%) in the gut flora of mice in the rhTNFR:Fc treatment group did not significantly differ, and the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes was similar to that of the control group.
Figure j shows the changes in relative abundance at the genus level. PG‐induced mice exhibited notably increased relative abundances of Alistipes, Odoribacter, and Clostridium XIVa and markedly decreased relative abundances of Alloprevotella, Barnesiella, and Bacteroides. Helicobacter, Flavonifractor, and Akkermansia showed little variation after PG induction. At the genus level, the relative abundances of Alloprevotella, Barnesiella, Odoribacter, and Clostridium XIVa were significantly restored by rhTNFR:Fc treatment, and the relative abundance of Lactobacillus was prominently increased compared with that in the PG and control groups.
Figure a shows the hierarchical clustering heatmap analysis of Bacteroidetes at the phylum and order levels. The abundance of the class Bacteroidia was significantly decreased in PG mice compared with that in control and rhTNFR:Fc mice. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways predicted for the intestinal flora differed significantly among the three groups (Figure b). The enrichment of the KEGG pathways involving “cell motility,” “membrane transport,” and “signal transduction” was significantly increased in the PG group. After rhTNFR:Fc treatment, the genes were highly enriched in “nucleotide metabolism,” “signaling molecules and interaction,” and “digestive system.”
Heatmap, functional prediction, and co‐abundance network analysis in the three groups. (a) The heatmap exhibits species differences at all levels. The color intensity represents the relative abundance of bacteria, as shown at the top of the figure. Horizontal clustering reflects the degree of abundance similarity of the species in each sample: the closer the distance and the shorter the branch, the more similar the composition was among the samples. Vertical clustering reflects the degree of expression similarity of all species in each sample: the closer the distance and the shorter the branch, the more similar the composition and richness were among the samples. (b) The representative KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways classified into level two functional categories using PICRUSt. (c) Co‐abundance network analysis of genera in the three groups. The size of each circle indicates the relative abundance of one genus. The solid line indicates a positive correlation, while the dashed line indicates a negative correlation. A thicker line indicates a stronger interaction between the two species
Gut bacteria interact with each other rather than act in isolation. Next, we performed a co‐abundance network analysis using Cytoscape software to study how different intestinal microbes interact with each other. As shown in Figure c, the rhTNFR:Fc group contained high abundances of Alloprevotella, Barnesiella, and Lactobacillus and showed a higher number of positive connections than the PG and control groups. Furthermore, positive connections generally occurred within groups, while negative connections occurred among different groups.
DISCUSSION
Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is thought to be relevant to the gut microbiota (Ranganathan et al., ). Recent research has revealed that anti‐TNF‐α therapy improves the gut microbial community, which is relevant to its therapeutic effect (Bárdos et al., ; Thevaranjan et al., ). However, the underlying mechanism is unclear. In our study, we established a model of PG‐induced AS (Glant et al., ). rhTNFR:Fc treatment effectively suppressed arthritis onset, increased the clinical scores, and decreased body weight loss. 16S DNA sequencing revealed that rhTNFR:Fc treatment reversed the gut microbial changes due to PG induction, indicating that the therapeutic effect of anti‐TNF‐α on AS may be associated with regulating the gut microbiota and improving gut barrier function.
IL‐17 is produced by the Th17 subset of helper T cells and is considered to play key genetic and therapeutic roles and to exhibit elevated serum concentrations in AS (Gracey et al., ; Smith & Colbert, ). In our study, the concentration of IL‐17A was significantly decreased after rhTNFR:Fc treatment, indicating that the effect of anti‐TNF‐α therapy may be related to the inhibition of serum IL‐17A.
The gut microbiota may be responsible for gut barrier function, and high gut permeability reduces the gap between the external environment and the circulatory system. Some microbial antigens are structurally similar to self‐antigens, and immune cells activated by microbial antigens also react with self‐antigens, consequently leading to autoimmune attacks. This effect is called “molecular mimicry” and is proposed as the pathogenic mechanism of AS (Cusick, Libbey, & Fujinami, ). An investigation of patients with AS determined the general existence of high gut permeability in AS (Martínez‐González et al., ). In addition, the gut permeability of older mice with TNF knockdown was similar to that of either young or old germ‐free mice, indicating that TNF can regulate gut barrier function (Thevaranjan et al., ). Noth R et al. found that the increased intestinal permeability in patients with Crohn's disease was significantly decreased after 7 days of infliximab treatment (Noth et al., ). Consistent with these results, PG‐induced mice had high gut permeabilities compared with those of healthy control mice; however, this trend was reversed by rhTNFR:Fc treatment. Moreover, the levels of the TJ proteins ZO‐1 and occludin were decreased in PG‐induced mice, but rhTNFR:Fc restored the barrier function by upregulating ZO‐1 and occludin protein expression. Although inhibiting TNF‐α contributed to the improved gut permeability, whether this effect was caused by rhTNFR:Fc directly or by indirect regulation of the gut microbiota is unclear.
Decreased gut microbiota diversity occurs in many diseases, including IBD and AS (Costello et al., ; Leone et al., ). A decreased Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes abundance ratio indicates an imbalanced gut microbiota (Murphy et al., ). rhTNFR:Fc treatment significantly increased the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio to 1.79, which was approximately equal to that in healthy mice. These results are consistent with those from SpA patients (Breban et al., ). In addition, an increase in the relative proteobacterial abundance in healthy individuals is relevant to the emergence of diseases, including metabolic disorders and inflammatory diseases (Shin, Whon, & Bae, ). In this study, the relative proteobacterial abundances decreased after rhTNFR:Fc treatment, suggesting that rhTNFR:Fc exerted a protective effect on the recovery of the gut microbiota composition.
Next, we predicted the KEGG pathways with PICRUSt. A previous gut microbial study on AS revealed that the genes belonging to “membrane transport” and “cell motility” were notably enriched (Wen et al., ). The present study yielded similar results, indicating that dysbiosis in PG‐induced mice leads to functional changes in the gut microbiota that are possibly related to upregulation of membrane transport and cell motility genes. However, rhTNFR:Fc treatment altered this state by enriching genes related to nucleotide metabolism, signaling molecules, and interactions. Curtis et al. () reported that nucleotide metabolism, especially adenosine signaling, shows an important metabolic signature of promoting inflammation resolution (Wen et al., ). In addition, Tang et al. revealed that inflamed tissues from patients with ulcerative colitis exhibited mucosal communities that lacked the genes related to nucleotide and carbohydrate metabolism (Tang et al., ). The anti‐inflammatory effect of rhTNFR:Fc on mice might be related to nucleotide metabolism, which is regulated by the gut microbiota. However, the effects of rhTNFR:Fc on the composition and function of the gut microbiota remain to be clarified.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, rhTNFR:Fc treatment modulated the gut microbiota, decreased the levels of inflammatory cytokines, and recovered intestinal barrier function in PG‐induced mice. This study provides new insights for anti‐TNF‐α therapeutic strategies via regulating the gut microbiota in mice with ankylosing spondylitis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81572628 and 81372869) and the Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou (Grant No. 201704020033).
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Hai L and Bin L: conceptualized the study. Lianjun Y and Zhifei C: involved in data curation. Bin L and Zhifei C: performed formal analysis. Hai L and Bin L: involved funding acquisition. Bin L, Lianjun Y, Zhihai S, Min W, Weicong Zh, Jinshi L, and Tingxuan W: investigated the manuscript. Jincheng H and Qinghao Zh: involved the methodology. Hai L and Qingchu L: involved in project administration. Junchi Zh and Jincheng H: Software. Hai L: supervised the study. Zhifei C and Junchi Zh: validated the manuscript. Bin L: wrote the manuscript and prepared the original draft. Lianjun Y: wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript.
ETHICS STATEMENT
All animal experiments were approved by the ethics committee of Southern Medical University and were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The raw data were uploaded to the National Center for Biotechnology Information SRA database under the accession number
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic, progressive disease, and its treatment is relevant to the gut microbiota. Anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (anti‐TNF‐α) therapy alters the gut microbiota in many diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. However, little is known about the effect of TNF‐α blocker treatment on the gut microbiota in ankylosing spondylitis. Herein, the effect of a TNF‐α blocker on the gut microbiota in proteoglycan‐induced arthritis was investigated. Proteoglycan‐induced mice were treated with an rhTNFR:Fc solution of etanercept (5 µg/g) for 4 weeks. rhTNFR:Fc treatment attenuated the arthritis incidence and severity of arthritis in the proteoglycan‐induced mice and decreased inflammation in the ankle joints and ameliorated ileal tissue destruction. Moreover, high gut permeability occurred, and zonula occludens‐1 and occludin protein levels were reduced in proteoglycan‐induced mice. These levels were significantly restored by the administration of rhTNFR:Fc. The serum TNF‐α and IL‐17 levels were also decreased. In addition, flora analysis via 16S rDNA high‐throughput sequencing revealed that rhTNFR:Fc treatment restored the gut microbiota composition to a composition similar to that in control mice. In conclusion, anti‐TNF‐α therapy attenuated proteoglycan‐induced arthritis progression and modulated the gut microbiota and intestinal barrier function. These results provide new insights for anti‐TNF‐α therapy strategies via regulating the gut microbiota in ankylosing spondylitis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Spine surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academy of Orthopedics of Guangdong Province, Orthopaedic Hospital of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
3 Department of Orthopedics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China