Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils from the Aerial Parts of Pinus eldarica Grown in Northwestern Iran

Abstract

[...]it seems that this tree is an EO-poor plant. According to previous studies, even EOs from plants of the same species can differ in their composition according to the geographical location and age of the plant [20,21]. According to the results of the analysis of the bark EO, there was a high proportion of the monoterpene hydrocarbon limonene (16.99%); moreover, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, such as caryophyllene oxide (13.22%) and drimenol (13.2%), were the next most abundant components. According to our study, the EOs of P. eldarica contain monoterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, and oxygenated hydrocarbons.

1. Introduction

Pinus eldarica, also known as the Tehran pine, is a coniferous tree of the family Pinaceae. The trees grow to a height of 12–15 m and have a brownish-gray or light gray bark. The needles are paired, medium green, and reach a length of 6–9 cm. The cones may be either solitary or in pairs. P. eldarica is native to west Asia and is adapted to warm and dry climates. The trees grow on a wide variety of soil types and have been extensively planted in Iran [1,2]. Pines have been used in medicine and industry throughout human life. Pine needle essential oils (EOs) are used to add odors to products in the soap and perfume manufacturing industry. Previously, the analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antiseptic effects of pine EOs have been reported [3].

P. eldarica has been used for the treatment of asthma [4]; moreover, it is useful in treating eczema and other skin wounds and irritations [5]. In previous studies, it has been shown that the EO from the bark of P. eldarica contains polyphenolic compounds, such as taxifolin and catechin, which have a wide range of pharmacological activities [6]. Owing to the important therapeutic applications of P. eldarica in traditional medicine, the composition of the EOs from the needles, fruits, and bark of P. eldarica grown in Isfahan and Iran has been investigated [2,7]. It was found that D-germacrene, β–caryophyllene, α-pinene, and longifolene were the main components of the EOs of the needles, fruits, and bark of P. eldarica, respectively. The composition of resins and needle EOs from P. sylvestris, which is native to Europe and Asia, has also been assessed in previous studies [3,8]. The main constituents were δ-3-carene, α-pinene, δ-cadinene, β-pinene, and camphene. The biological activities of the essential EOs of pines have been reported in different parts of the world [9]. The main components of pine extracts, such as α-pinene and β-pinene, have displayed a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activities [10,11]. Previous studies have shown that pine extracts also have potential antifungal properties [12,13].

The composition and content of the EOs of P. eldarica may differ depending on the area where these pines are grown. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the EOs from the needles, bark, and pollen of the P. eldarica grown in northwestern Iran. The present study was designed to elucidate the chemical profile and antimicrobial activity of these EOs. With growing interest surrounding the use of EOs in the pharmaceutical industry, the results of this study may reveal a new horizon for the development of new pharmaceutical products.

2. Results & Discussion 2.1. Chemical Composition

EOs were extracted from the aerial parts of P. eldarica via hydrodistillation. The yields of the EOs obtained were 1.2 cm³/100 g of dried needles, 0.7 cm³/100 g of dried pollen, and 0.9 cm³/100 g of dried bark (Table 1). These very low yields were consistent with those obtained in previous studies conducted on other species within the genus Pinus [14]. Therefore, it seems that this tree is an EO-poor plant.

The chemical compositions of the EOs from the needles, bark, and pollen of P. eldarica were analyzed using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and are shown in Table 2 (The Gas chromatogram, condition and method are showed in the Supplementary Materials). The experimental retention indices (RI) of the chemicals in non-polar column and their percentage peak areas are also shown. The differences between the EOs of the needles, bark, and pollen were studied, and the main components of the EOs were identified. Fifty-eight constituents representing 99.98% of the needle EO, 11 components representing 99.94% of the pollen EO, and 33 components representing 99.79% of the bark EO were identified (Table 2). The main fraction of the EO derived from the dried needles was found to consist of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (49.25% of the EO), which is in agreement with the results of previous studies [2,15]. Monoterpene hydrocarbons (32.91% of the EO) made up the main fraction of the EO derived from dried bark; this was also found in a previously reported study [7]. In the pollen EO, monoterpene hydrocarbons (61.44% of the EO) made up the main fraction, which has not been reported previously. The EOs of the three different aerial parts of P. eldarica were mostly composed of hydrocarbon compounds (Figure 1); caryophyllene, limonene, caryophyllene oxide, α-pinene, and β-pinene were identified in all parts.

The main constituents of the needle EO were the sesquiterpene hydrocarbons D-germacrene (18.17%) and caryophyllene (15.42%) and the monoterpene hydrocarbons β-pinene (10.62%) and γ-terpinene (12.96%). The most abundant compound, d-germacrene, has been known to exert cytotoxic activity against cancer cell lines, fungicidal activity, and antibacterial properties against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [16,17]. In a previous study, the main constituents of the P. eldarica needle EO were determined to be d-germacrene and β-caryophyllene [15]. This is consistent with the results of our study.

Among the monoterpene hydrocarbons that were found in needle EO, γ-terpinene (12.96%) and β-pinene (10.62%) were the most abundant. It has been reported that γ-terpinene possesses potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. Treatment with γ-terpinene has been shown to reduce inflammatory parameters, such as edema and cytokine production [18]. In a previous study, α-pinene and β-pinene were determined to be the main compounds in P. eldarica [2]. Moreover, α-pinene (0.1–30.8%) and δ-3-carene (1.0–25.5%) were found to be the major components of the Lithuanian P. sylvestris needle EO [19]. It can hence be concluded that γ-terpinene has not been found in high amounts in other pines in previous studies. According to previous studies, even EOs from plants of the same species can differ in their composition according to the geographical location and age of the plant [20,21].

In the present study, in the pollen EO, α-pinene (25.64%) and limonene (19.94%) were the most abundant compounds (Table 2). Pharmacological studies have suggested that low exposure to α-pinene leads to anti-inflammatory activity via the suppression of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [22]. It has also been shown that α-pinene has potential anti-osteoarthritic [23], antimicrobial [24], antiulcerogenic, and gastroprotective properties [25]. According to the results of the analysis of the bark EO, there was a high proportion of the monoterpene hydrocarbon limonene (16.99%); moreover, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, such as caryophyllene oxide (13.22%) and drimenol (13.2%), were the next most abundant components. Limonene has been reported to possess potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [26] and inhibit the growth of cancer cells by interfering with the action of G proteins involved in cell signaling pathways [27]. Caryophyllene oxide, an oxygenated terpenoid has been shown to exert significant antifungal [28] and anticancer activities via the suppression of cellular growth and induction of apoptosis [29]. In a previous study of the bark of P. eldarica from Isfahan and Iran, α-pinene and caryophyllene oxide were the main constituents of the EO [7]. This result differed from that of the current study, possibly due to difference in the area the studied pines were grown. A classification of the samples based on structure type of EOs obtained from different aerial parts of P. eldarica is summarized in Figure 2. A large number of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (49.25%), monoterpene hydrocarbons (37.57%), and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (5.05%) were detected in the needle EO in this study, whereas the content of diterpenoids was significantly lower (0.23%). The pollen and bark EO had a large abundance of monoterpene hydrocarbons (61.44% and 32.91%, respectively). Considering all these data together has shown that there is quantitative variation between species and between different aerial parts of Pinus. This information could be valuable for the chemotaxonomic study of Pinus species.

2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

Recently, the antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens are increasing and resulting in a reduction in the efficiency of clinical treatments. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli have a high ability to become resistant to antibiotics. Latest reports of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus have shown that effective antibiotics against the organism may not be readily available for a long time [30]. It was demonstrated that 71.6% of E. coli strains isolated from children’s stool and water samples in South Africa were multi-antibiotic resistant [31]. Several studies have focused on natural plant products with potent anticancer, antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant effects, and the efficacy of EOs have been emphasized [32,33,34]. According to our study, the EOs of P. eldarica contain monoterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, and oxygenated hydrocarbons. In this study, the antibacterial and antifungal properties of the EOs of P. eldarica were examined. The results of the antimicrobial assay are presented in Table 3. Both needle and bark EOs displayed antibacterial activity against S. aureus (ATCC 29213) and pollen EO exhibited a bactericidal effect against E. coli (ATCC 25922). Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) was most sensitive to the bark EO, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 125 µg/mL. These EOs of P. eldarica contain major compounds, such as α-pinene, germacrene, caryophyllene, and limonene, which have been reported to display antimicrobial activity against important pathogens. Rivas da Silva et al. [35] tested the biological activities of α-pinene and β-pinene enantiomers against C. albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans T₁-444 Serotype A, Rhizopus oryzae UCP1506, and S. aureus using the MIC and the minimal microbicidal concentration (MMC). They reported that the (+)-enantiomers showed high antifungal activity and that the synergistic effects of these compounds combined with microbicides reduced the MIC of the combined materials [35]. In the similar study performed by Scalas et al. [36], the EO of P. sylvestris and α-pinene displayed good inhibitory activities against C. neoformans. In addition, combination of itraconazole with the EO of P. sylvestris showed a good synergistic action against C. neoformans. The EO of Liquidambar styraciflua leaf, which includes α-pinene as its major compound, also showed a good synergistic effect with tetracycline and ciprofloxacin against Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633) [37]. In the present study, EO of pollen was rich in α-pinene (25.64%) and exhibited moderate antibacterial activity against E. coli with MIC level of 225 μg/mL. Recently, one study reported the moderate antifungal activity of Thimus algeriensis EO against C. glabrata (ATCC22553) and C. albicans and a total of 29 compounds were identified in the EO of T. algeriensis, with α-terpinyl acetate (47.4%), neryl acetate (9.6%), and α-pinene (6.8%) as the major compounds [38]. Moreover, the antimicrobial activity of Juniperus oxycedrus EO was found against S. aureus subs. aureus (CCM 4223) and predominant constituent of J. oxycedrus EO was also identified as α-pinene [39]. In a study of the antifungal activity of P. pinaster bark, its ethanolic extract displayed high antifungal activity against Trametes versicolor and moderate antifungal activity against Coniophera puteana [40]. It was shown that limonene has antibacterial activities against S. aureus (gram-positive), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (gram-negative), and the yeast, C. neoformans [41]. The antibacterial activities of P. elliottii resin-oil against multidrug-resistant strains were evaluated using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method. The MIC varied between 25 and 100 µg/mL, and the drug-resistant mutant of Staphylococcus epidermidis was more sensitive to the oils [42].

3. Materials and Methods 3.1. Plant Material

Pine needles, bark, and pollen were collected from the Tabriz district in Iran. The samples were collected in June 2018 and identified (No. 4036) by the Herbarium of the School of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The specimens were air dried at room temperature, powdered, and stored in airtight bottles at 4 °C.

3.2. Essential Oil Preparation

P. eldarica bark, needles, and pollen powders (100 g) were hydro-distilled (with 1.2 L of water) in a Clevenger-type apparatus by recirculating the condensed water. The distillation was terminated after 240 min. The resulting EOs were dissolved in diethyl ether, collected, and treated with anhydrous sodium sulfate to remove excess water. The diethyl ether was removed carefully at room temperature, and the remaining EOs were stored in sealed vials at 4 °C until analysis.

3.3. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Analysis of the Essential Oils

Analysis of the EOs was carried out using a Shimadzu QP5050A GC/MS instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at the following conditions: the volume of sample injected was 1 μL; the helium carrier gas flow rate was 1.3 mL/min, with a split ratio 1:8; the injection site temperature was 270 °C; a DB-1 capillary column (60 m × 0.25 mm) was used, with a film thickness of 0.25 μm; the column temperature was 50 °C increasing at 4 °C/min to 300 °C; an ionization potential of 70 eV was used; the source temperature was 300°C; and the mass range was 30–600 m/z.

3.4. Identification of Components

The identification of the components was conducted using computer matching against library spectra (Library Database Wiley 229, NIST 21, NIST 107), obtaining their retention indices with reference to an n-alkane series (C8-C20) in a temperature-programmed run, interpreting their fragmentation pattern, and comparing the mass spectra with relevant reference samples and the literature [43,44].

3.5. Microbial Strains and Culture Media

All microbial strains were obtained from the Microbiology Laboratory, Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University (Tabriz, Iran) of Medical Sciences. Stock cultures of gram-positive S. aureus (ATCC 29213), gram-negative E. coli (ATCC 25922), and C. albicans (ATCC 10231) were sub-cultured and maintained on nutrient agar at 37 °C for 24 h; subsequently, they were diluted in sterile saline solution (0.85% w/v) to reach a final concentration of 0.5 McFarland (~1.5 × 10⁸ colony-forming units [CFUs]/mL).

3.6. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

Briefly, the EOs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and 180 µL was serially diluted from 2000 µg/mL to 10 µg/mL (up to eight dilutions) in Mueller-Hinton broth (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). These dilutions were added to 96-well microplates, and 20 µL of the microbial cultures were added at a concentration of 1.5 × 10⁸ CFU/mL to reach a final volume of 200 µL/well. Gentamicin was used as the positive control as it is a broad-spectrum antibiotic, and normal saline/dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the negative control. To complete the test, each organism was suspended separately in 200 µL of Mueller–Hinton broth. C. albicans (ATCC 10231) was cultured in Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with 1% glucose. All the tests were performed in triplicate to ensure reliability of the results. The sealed microplates were mixed on a plate shaker at 300 rpm for 30 s. They were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and observed for growth or turbidity; subsequently, the MIC was determined. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the EO that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation [45]. For each well showing no growth, a loopful of broth was then sub-cultured on a nutrient agar plate (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to verify if the growth of the microorganism had been inhibited. The growth of the microorganism on the solid media indicated that the specific concentration of the EO was unable to inhibit the growth of the microorganism.

4. Conclusions

This is the first study, to our knowledge, that investigated the chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of EOs from the aerial parts of P. eldarica grown in northwestern Iran. The main components of the EOs were sesquiterpene hydrocarbons in the needles and monoterpene hydrocarbons in the pollen and bark. In particular, β-pinene, β-myrcene, limonene, and caryophyllene were the most abundant chemicals identified in the EOs of all three plant parts. The EOs demonstrated antimicrobial activity against some highly susceptible strains, E. coli, C. albicans, and S. aureus. The results of the study provide experimental evidence that EOs from aerial parts of P. eldarica can be useful in the EO industry and in the development of antibiotics. In addition, P. eldarica, which is widely grown in Iran, can be used to provide low-cost therapies in land surrounding the Caspian Sea.

Figure 1. Some chemical components of essential oils obtained from the aerial parts of Pinus eldarica using hydrodistillation.

Figure 2. Chemical groups identified in the essential oils obtained from different aerial parts of Pinus eldarica.

Plant Materials	Yield of EO *
Needles	1.2
Pollen	0.7
Bark	0.9

* (cm3/100 g of dry plant material).

		Needles	Bark	Pollen
No.	Component a	Content, %			RI b
1	n-Hentriacontane	0.59	-	-	472
2	α-Pinene	t	-	25.64	928
3	Camphene	2.95	1.87	-	940
4	Verbenene	-	1	-	949
5	β-Pinene	10.62	2.82	3.12	967
6	β-Myrcene	2.85	1.35	4.34	981
7	α-Phellandrene	t	-	-	994
8	Carene	0.12	-	2.98	1017
9	β-Phellandrene	0.2	-	-	1019
10	Limonene	4.79	16.99	19.94	1020
11	Cis-Ocimene	0.11	-	-	1025
12	β-Ocimene	2.07	-	-	1036
13	γ-Terpinene	12.96	-	-	1047
14	α-Terpinolene	0.23	-	-	1063
15	α-Pinene oxide	-	0.62	-	1065
16	Linalool	t	0.85	-	1082
17	α-Campholenal	t	-	-	1097
18	α-Campholene aldehyde	-	1.72	-	1119
19	Verbenol	-	2.46	5.42	1132
20	Pinocarvone	-	1.15	-	1145
21	Myrtenal	-	1.65	-	1166
22	α-Phellandren-8-ol	-	2.22	-	1167
23	Myrtenol	-	1.71	-	1182
24	T-Carveol	-	1.28	-	1204
25	Carvone	-	1.17	-	1220
26	2-Cyclopropylidene-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptane	0.15	-	-	1254
27	Bornyl acetate	3.09	-	-	1264
28	Thymol	t	-	-	1270
29	α-Terpinyl acetate	1.68	-	-	1338
30	Neryl acetate	0.16	-	-	1343
31	α-Cubebene	0.25	-	-	1360
32	α-Copaene	0.49	-	-	1387
33	Longifolene	-	3.44	11.66	1393
34	β-Elemene	0.38	-	-	1398
35	β-Cubebene	0.82	-	-	1420
36	Caryophyllene	15.42	9.43	3.52	1426
37	Aromadendrene	0.23	-	-	1440
38	α-Caryophyllene	3.36	-	-	1454
39	α-Humulene	-	2.26	-	1463
40	α–Amorphene	0.81	-	-	1466
41	D-Germacrene	18.17	0.93	-	1473
42	Valencene	0.51	-	-	1486
43	Tridecanal	0.23	-	-	1489
44	γ –Muurolene	2.07	-	-	1501
45	α–Cadinene	0.13	-	-	1522
46	δ–Cadinene	2.42	-	-	1522
47	γ–Cadinene	0.93	-	-	1525
48	α–Muurolene	0.73	-	-	1537
49	Epiglobulol	0.16	-	-	1548
50	Lauric acid	0.34	-	-	1552
51	Isopatchoulane	0.15	-	-	1552
52	Spathulenol	0.91	-	-	1570
53	4(14)-Salvialen-1-one	0.34	-	-	1580
54	Cedrol	0.33	-	-	1585
55	Caryophyllene oxide	1.03	13.22	12.21	1595
56	Humulane-1,6-dien-3-ol	-	0.88	-	1619
57	γ–Eudesmol	-	0.62	-	1624
58	α–Cadinol	0.51	-	-	1630
59	Viridiflorol	0.25	-	-	1636
60	Cadalene	0.36	-	-	1641
61	Widdrene	0.15	-	-	1644
62	Aromadendrene oxide	0.63	-	-	1650
63	Pinocarveol	-	2.82	-	1654
64	Isospathulenol	0.12	-	-	1667
65	Tumerone	1.76	-	-	1680
66	6-Isopropenyl-4,8a-dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-naphthalen-2-ol	0.61	-	-	1690
67	1,5-Epoxysalvial-4(14)-ene	0.27	-	-	1945
68	18-Norabieta-8,11,13-triene	-	0.73	-	1969
69	Phenethyl isovalerate	-	0.71	-	1986
70	Palmitinic acid	0.97	-	-	2001
71	Humulene oxide	-	1.61	-	2038
72	13(16),14-Labdien-8-ol	-	1.51	-	2120
73	Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone	0.45	1.6	-	2131
74	Linalyl anthranilate	0.4	-	-	2157
75	Manoyl oxide	-	1.37	7.32	2376
76	Drimenol	-	13.2	-	2494
77	α-Campholenic aldehyde	t		-	-
78	Pinocarveylacetate	0.18		-	-
79	3-Ethyl-3-hydroxyandrostan-17-one	0.23		-	-
80	tricyclo[4.3.0.07,9]nonane,2,2,5,5,8,8-hexamethyl	-	1.02	-	-
81	Acetic acid, bornyl ester	-	4.96	-	-
82	Isopimaric acid	-	0.62	-	-
83	Acetic acid, 1,7,7-trimethyl-bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl ester	-	-	3.79	-
	Total	99.98	99.79	99.94
	Monoterpene hydrocarbons	37.572	32.91	61.44
	Oxygenated monoterpenes	0.22	7.92
	Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons	49.25	17.08	15.18
	Oxygenated sesquiterpenes	5.05	28.65	12.21
	Diterpenoids	0.23	4.23	7.32

a Compounds listed in order of elution from a DB-1 column; b RI-retention index on non-polar column; t = trace (<0.1%).

Microorganisms	MIC * (µg/mL)
	Needles	Pollen	Bark	Gentamicin
C. albicans	na	1000	125	16
E. coli	na	225	na	16
S. aureus	125	na	125	16

na—no activity.

Supplementary Materials

Gas chromatograms from the GC/MS analysis are available free of charge on the Internet.

Author Contributions

T.G., H.H., and K.H.K. designed the experiments. T.G. performed the experiments. H.S.K analyzed the antimicrobial data. S.A., S.F., and A.D. analyzed the phytochemical data. T.G., S.C.B., H.H., and K.H.K. wrote the main manuscript text, including all figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed by the Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran (Grant No. 58972) and the Iran National Science Foundation (Grant No. 97008952). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2018R1A2B2006879).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

1. Parsa, A. Flora of Iran; Offset Press Inc.: Tehran, Iran, 1978; Volume 1, p. 488.

2. Afsharypuor, S.; Sanaty, F. Essential oil constituents of leaves and fruits of Pinus eldarica Medw. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 327-328.

3. Ludwiczuk, A.; Skalicka-Wo'zniak, K.; Georgiev, M.I. Pharmacognosy: Fundamentals, Applications and Strategies; Badal, S., Delgoda, R., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2017; pp. 233-266.

4. Mamedov, N.; Craker, L.E. Medicinal plants used for the treatment of bronchial asthma in Russia and Central Asia. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2011, 8, 91-117.

5. Mamedov, N.; Gardner, Z.; Craker, L.E. Medicinal plants used in Russia and Central Asia for the treatment of selected skin conditions. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2005, 11, 191-222.

6. Chudnyi, A.V.; Rudenko, B.A. Composition of turpentine oil from Pinus eldarica Medw. Rastit. Resur. 1982, 18, 252-255.

7. Irvani, S.; Zolfaghari, B. Phytochemical analysis of Pinus eldarica bark. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 9, 243-250.

8. Judzentiene, A.; Kupcinskiene, E. Chemical composition on essential oils from needles of Pinus sylvestris L. Grown in Northern Lithuania. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2008, 20, 26-29.

9. Lee, J.H.; Yang, H.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Hong, S.K. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil from cones of Pinus koraiensis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 497-502.

10. Leite, A.M.; Lima, E.O.; Souza, E.L.; Diniz, M.F.F.M.; Trajano, V.N.; Medeiros, I.A. Inhibitory effect of β-pinene, α-pinene and eugenol on the growth of potential infectious endocarditis causing Gram-positive bacteria. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 43, 121-126.

11. De Sousa Eduardo, L.; Farias, T.C.; Ferreira, S.B.; Ferreira, P.B.; Lima, Z.N.; Ferreira, S.B. Antibacterial activity and time-kill kinetics of positive enantiomer of α-pinene against strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 917-924.

12. Yang, V.W.; Clausen, C.A. Antifungal effect of essential oils on southern yellow pine. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2007, 59, 302-306.

13. Kokalisburelle, N.; Rodriguezkabana, R. Effects of pine bark extracts and pine bark powder on fungal pathogens, soil enzyme activity, and microbial populations. Biol. Control 1994, 4, 269-276.

14. Kurose, K.; Okamura, D.; Yatagai, M. Composition of the essential oils from the leaves of nine Pinus species and the cones of three of Pinus species. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 10-20.

15. Sarvmeili, N.; Jafarian-Dehkordi, A.; Zolfaghari, B. Cytotoxic effects of Pinus eldarica essential oil and extracts on HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 11, 476-483.

16. Essien, E.E.; Newby, J.M.; Walker, T.M.; Ogunwande, I.A.; Setzer, W.N.; Ekundayo, O. Essential oil constituents, anticancer and antimicrobial activity of Ficus mucoso and Casuarina equisetifolia leaves. Am. J. Essent. Oils Nat. Prod. 2016, 4, 1-6.

17. Shafagha, A.; Shafaghatlonbar, M. Antimicrobial activity and chemical constituents of the essential oils from flower, leaf and stem of Gypsophila bicolor from Iran. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 275-276.

18. Ramalho, T.R.; Oliveira, M.T.; Lima, A.L.; Bezerra-Santos, C.R.; Piuvezam, M.R. Gamma-terpinene modulates acute inflammatory response in mice. Planta Med. 2015, 81, 1248-1254.

19. Venskutonis, P.R.; Vyskupaityte, K.; Plausinaitis, R. Composition of essential oils of Pinus sylvestris L. from different localities of Lithuania. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 559-565.

20. Benabdelkader, T.; Zitouni, A.; Guitton, Y.; Jullien, F.; Maitre, D.; Casabianca, H.; Legendre, L.; Kameli, A. Essential oils from wild populations of Algerian Lavandula stoechas L.: Composition, chemical variability, and in vitro biological properties. Chem. Biodivers. 2011, 8, 937-953.

21. Kiran, C.R.; Chakka, A.K.; Amma, K.P.; Menon, A.N.; Kumar, M.M.; Venugopalan, V.V. Influence of cultivar and maturity at harvest on the essential oil composition, oleoresin and [6]-gingerol contents in fresh ginger from northeast India. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 4145-4154.

22. Kim, D.S.; Lee, H.J.; Jeon, Y.D.; Han, Y.H.; Kee, J.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Shin, H.J.; Kang, J.; Lee, B.S.; Kim, S.H.; et al. Alpha-pinene exhibits anti-inflammatory activity through the suppression of MAPKs and the NF-κB pathway in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2015, 43, 731-742.

23. Rufino, A.T.; Ribeiro, M.; Judas, F.; Salgueiro, L.; Lopes, M.C.; Cavaleiro, C.; Mendes, A.F. Anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective activity of (+)-α-pinene: Structural and enantiomeric selectivity. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 264-269.

24. Kovač, J.; Šimunović, K.; Wu, Z.; Klančnik, A.; Bucar, F.; Zhang, Q.; Možina, S.S. Antibiotic resistance modulation and modes of action of (-)-α-pinene in Campylobacter jejuni. Plos ONE 2015, 10.

25. De Almeida Pinheiro, M.; Magalhães, R.M.; Torres, D.M.; Cavalcante, R.C.; Mota, F.S.; Oliveira Coelho, E.M.; Moreira, H.P.; Lima, G.C.; Ara&#xFAjo, P.C.; Cardoso, J.H.; et al. Gastroprotective effect of alpha-pinene and its correlation with antiulcerogenic activity of essential oils obtained from Hyptis species. Pharm. Mag. 2015, 11, 123-130.

26. Yu, L.; Yan, J.; Sun, Z. D-limonene exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in an ulcerative colitis rat model via regulation of iNOS, COX-2, PGE2 and ERK signaling pathways. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 2339-2346.

27. Crowell, P.L.; Gould, M.N. Chemoprevention and therapy of cancer by d-limonene. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 1994, 5, 1-22.

28. Yang, D.; Michel, L.; Chaumont, J.P.; Millet-Clerc, J. Use of caryophyllene oxide as an antifungal agent in an in vitro experimental model of onychomycosis. Mycopathologia 1999, 148, 79-82.

29. Fidyt, K.; Fiedorowicz, A.; Strządała, L.; Szumny, A. β-caryophyllene and β-caryophyllene oxide-natural compounds of anticancer and analgesic properties. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 3007-3017.

30. McGuinness, W.A.; Malachowa, N.; DeLeo, F.R. Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2017, 90, 269-281.

31. Chukwu, M.O.; Abia, A.L.K.; Ubomba-Jaswa, E.; Obi, L.C.; Dewar, J.B. Antibiotic resistance profile and clonality of E. coli isolated from water and paediatric stool samples in the north-west, province South Africa. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 13, 517-530.

32. Guleria, S.; Tiku, A.K.; Koul, A.; Gupta, S.; Singh, G.; Razdan, V.K. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of the essential oil and extracts of Zanthoxylum alatum grown in north-western Himalaya. Sci. World J. 2013.

33. Kalemba, D.; Kunicka, A. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oils. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 813-829.

34. Hoai, N.T.; Duc, H.V.; Thao, D.T.; Orav, A.; Raal, A. Selectivity of Pinus sylvestris extract and essential oil to estrogen-insensitive breast cancer cells Pinus sylvestris against cancer cells. Pharm. Mag. 2015, 11, 290-295.

35. Rivas da Silva, A.C.; Lopes, P.M.; de Azevedo, M.M.; Costa, D.C.; Alviano, C.S.; Alviano, D.S. Biological activities of α-pinene and β-pinene enantiomers. Molecules 2012, 17, 6305-6316.

36. Scalas, D.; Mandras, N.; Roana, J.; Tardugno, R.; Cuffini, A.M.; Ghisetti, V.; Benvenuti, S.; Tullio, V. Use of Pinus sylvestris L. (Pinaceae), Origanum vulgare L. (Lamiaceae), and Thymus vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae) essential oils and their main components to enhance itraconazole activity against azole susceptible/not-susceptible Cryptococcus neoformans strains. Bmc Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 143.

37. Mancarz, G.F.F.; Laba, L.C.; Morais Silva, T.A.; Pazzim, M.D.S.; de Souza, D.; Prado, M.R.M.; de Souza, L.M.; Nakashima, T.; Mello, R.G. Chemical composition and biological activity of Liquidambar styraciflua L. leaf essential oil. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 138, 111446.

38. Rezzoug, M.; Bakchiche, B.; Gherib, A.; Roberta, A.; Guido, F.; Kilinçarslan, Ö.; Mammadov, R.; Bardaweel, S.K. Chemical composition and bioactivity of essential oils and ethanolic extracts of Ocimum basilicum L. and Thymus algeriensis Boiss. & Reut. from the Algerian Saharan Atlas. Bmc Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19.

39. Semerdjieva, I.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Radoukova, T.; Radanović, D.; Marković, T.; Dincheva, I.; Stoyanova, A.; Astatkie, T.; Kačániová, M. Essential oil yield, composition, bioactivity and leaf morphology of Juniperus oxycedrus L. from Bulgaria and Serbia. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2019, 84, 55-63.

40. Özgenç, Ö.; Durmaz, S.; Yıldız, Ü.; Erişir, E. A comparison between some wood bark extracts: Antifungal activity. Kast. Univ. Orman Fak. Derg. 2017, 17, 502-508.

41. Van Vuuren, S.F.; Viljoen, A.M. Antimicrobial activity of limonene enantiomers and 1,8-cineole alone and in combination. Flavour. Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 540-544.

42. Leandro, L.F.; Cardoso, M.J.; Silva, S.D.; Souza, M.G.; Veneziani, R.C.; Ambrosio, S.R.; Martins, C.H. Antibacterial activity of Pinus elliottii and its major compound, dehydroabietic acid, against multidrug-resistant strains. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 1649-1653.

43. Adams, R.P. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography / mass spectroscopy. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 8, 671-672.

44. Sandra, P.; Bicchi, C. Capillary Gas Chromatography in Essential Oil Analysis; Huethig-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 259-274.

45. Andrew, J.M. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001, 48, 5-16.