A Positive Quadriceps Active Test, without the Quadriceps Being Active

Abstract

Case. A 55-year-old male with a chronic isolated grade 3 PCL injury who demonstrates a positive quadriceps active test without activating his quadriceps musculature. Conclusion. Gravity and hamstring contraction posteriorly translate the tibia into a subluxed position. Subsequent gastrocnemius contraction with the knee flexed causes an anterior tibial translation by virtue of the mass enlargement of the gastrocnemius muscular bulk, the string of a bow effect, and the anterior origin of the gastrocnemius in relation to the posterior border of the subluxed tibia aided by the normal posterior tibial slope.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries have been classically described as having a posterior station, posterior draw test, and a positive dial test at 90 degrees of knee flexion [1–4]. In addition, the quadriceps’ active test has been used to further define this injury [4, 5]. This test was first described by Daniel and colleagues in 1988 and is performed by having the knee at 90 degrees flexion and getting the patient to extend the knee against resistance [6]. During this action, the activation of the quadriceps musculature is believed to anteriorly translate the tibia from a posteriorly subluxed position to a reduced neutral position. The translation is clinically observed and used to further confirm the diagnosis, with a reported sensitivity of 54-98% and a specificity of 97-100% [2, 6].

However, when assessing the patients during this type of examination, one can often observe that some patients do not activate the quadriceps musculature, yet they successfully reduce their knee joint. In these patients, gravity or hamstrings activation posteriorly subluxes the tibia. Then, almost paradoxically, it appears that these patients contract their gastrocnemius to anteriorly translate their tibias. This anterior translation is then described as a positive quadriceps active test, despite the quadriceps not being active.

This finding may be important in the patient with quadriceps dysfunction where the clinical diagnosis of a PCL injury is difficult. In addition, typical rehabilitation for PCL injuries include quadriceps strengthening, but not all patients benefit equally. In these patients, gastrocnemius muscle function may offer additional advantage.

We present a case of a patient with a positive quadriceps activation test achieved without activating the quadriceps.

2. Case Report

Both verbal and written informed consents were obtained from the patient for this case report.

Mr. AD is a 55-year-old male truck driver who was involved in a motorbike accident at the age of 17 years, where he sustained a right proximal tibia and grade 3 PCL injury. He was managed conservatively for his PCL injury and denied any residual significant symptoms despite his continued clinical PCL laxity. He presented to the orthopaedic service for another reason, when incidentally, we reviewed his knee as a teaching case. During his examination, he was found to have anterior proximal tibial scarring, an S-shaped coronal tibial deformity but normal overall mechanical axis and normal tibial alignment in the sagittal plane. He had a positive posterior sag with a grade 3 posterior station, a positive posterior draw, reverse Lachmans, and dial test at 90 degrees of flexion but normal at 30 degrees. He was stable in the varus/valgus plane. His X-rays confirmed a healed proximal tibia and fibula fracture as well as posterior subluxation of his tibia on his femur (Figure 1). Hence, his clinical and radiographic signs confirmed an isolated grade 3 PCL injury in the presence of a previous proximal tibia and fibula fracture.

[figures omitted; refer to PDF]

On performing a quadriceps active test at 90 degrees of knee flexion, it was noted that he did not activate his quadriceps but rather contracted his calf musculature to reduce his knee joint (Figure 2).

[figures omitted; refer to PDF]

3. Discussion

The lateral gastrocnemius muscle originates on the lateral surface of the lateral femoral condyle, while the medial head arises from the posterior surface of the medial femoral condyle and the popliteal surface of the distal femur [7]. The two heads are surrounded by the deep fascia and converge side-by-side before inserting into the dense aponeurosis of the tendo-achilles [7].

The majority of the muscle mass lies at the level of the proximal tibia. Therefore, when the gastrocnemius contracts, the muscle shortens and enlarges in the axial plane, pressing on the posterior soft tissues and the posteriorly subluxed tibia, causing an anterior force which reduces the knee joint (Figure 3).

[figures omitted; refer to PDF]

In addition, with contraction of the gastrocnemius on a fixed ankle and knee, the musculotendinous structure acts as the string of a bow forcing the posteriorly subluxed tibia anteriorly, aided by the natural posterior slope of the proximal tibia and the origin of the gastrocnemius being anterior to the posterior border of the subluxed tibia (Figure 4).

[figures omitted; refer to PDF]

4. Conclusion

We propose that in some patients, a positive quadriceps active test can occur without quadriceps activation. We propose that gravity or hamstring contraction posteriorly translates the tibia into a subluxed position. Subsequent gastrocnemius contraction with the knee flexed causes an anterior tibial translation by virtue of the mass enlargement of the gastrocnemius muscular bulk, the string of a bow effect, and the anterior origin of the gastrocnemius in relation to the posterior border of the subluxed tibia aided by the normal posterior tibial slope. This finding aids the clinical diagnosis even in patients with quadriceps dysfunction and suggests that gastrocnemius strengthening may enhance rehabilitation after PCL injuries.

Ethical Approval

Informed patient consent was obtained from the patient of this case.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Glynny Kieser for her editorial input.

References

[1] W. C. Loos, J. M. Fox, M. E. Blazina, W. Del Pizzo, M. J. Friedman, "Acute posterior cruciate ligament injuries," American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 9 no. 2, pp. 86-92, DOI: 10.1177/036354658100900203, 1981.

[2] R. A. Rubinstein, K. D. Shelbourne, J. R. McCarroll, C. D. VanMeter, A. C. Rettig, "The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries," American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 22 no. 4, pp. 550-557, DOI: 10.1177/036354659402200419, 1994.

[3] G. A. Malanga, S. Andrus, S. F. Nadler, J. McLean, "Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 84 no. 4, pp. 592-603, DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50026, 2003.

[4] R. B. The, "Orthopaedic physical examination," 2005.

[5] Y. B. Jung, E. W. Lee, B. H. Koo, "Reliability of the manual maximal displacement test and quadriceps active test with KT-1000 TM arthrometer in the assessment of posterior instability of the knee," Journal of Korean Knee Society, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 56-59, 1998.

[6] D. M. Daniel, M. L. Stone, P. Barnett, R. Sachs, "Use of the quadriceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciate ligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee," The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 70 no. 3, pp. 386-391, DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198870030-00010, 1988.

[7] R. M. H. McMinn, Last’s Anatomy, 2005.