1. Introduction
Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension, characterized by increased intrahepatic resistance and splanchnic hyperemia, is considered the end stage of liver diseases. Increased portal inflow to a stiff liver can result in the development of portosystemic collaterals, aiming to divert stagnant blood flow. Gastroesophageal varices are the most serious collaterals clinically, because bleeding from these fragile vessels can be lethal and the treatment efficacy of pharmacological agents is still suboptimal [1]. Recent studies have indicated that angiogenesis participates in the development and aggravation of collaterals and increased portal blood inflow. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent proangiogenic factor, is overexpressed in splanchnic organs of portal hypertensive animals [2,3]. In addition, splanchnic VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and endothelial cell marker CD31 are up-regulated in portal hypertensive rats [2]. These findings suggest that anti-angiogenesis may be a new treatment strategy in controlling portal hypertension.
Cruciferous vegetables such as cabbage and cauliflower have been noticed due to their potential in treating cancer and chronic diseases [4,5]. These vegetables contain large amounts of glucobrassicin, an indolylmethyl glucosinolate. When these plants are cut or chewed, a thioglucosidase-mediated autolytic process takes place, generating indole-3-carbinol (I3C). In addition, when being exposed to acid, I3C forms various condensation products [6,7], with 3,3′-diindolymethane (DIM) being the most common. There is approximately 12 mg of DIM in 200 g of broccoli [8,9]. I3C has been shown to prevent the proliferation of various tumor cells, including breast cancer and colon cancer [10]. Furthermore, both I3C and DIM significantly reduced the incidence of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors in female rats and benzo(a)pyrene-induced forestomach neoplasia in female mice [11,12].
Of their anti-cancer mechanisms, the anti-angiogenesis effect is remarkable and might be applied to control pathological angiogenesis in cirrhosis. For example, I3C has been shown to decrease the density of CD31-stained prostate tumor microvessels [13], and DIM suppressed the proliferation of cultured human vascular endothelial cells and vascularization of Matrigel plugs in athymic mice [14]. Regarding the mechanism of angiogenesis, p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK or Erk1/2), which are activated when VEGF binds VEGFR2, have been linked to VEGF-mediated endothelial cell proliferation [15,16,17,18]. Nitric oxide (NO) also participates in portal hypertension-related angiogenesis [19,20], and its synthesis is stimulated by VEGF [21]. On the other hand, the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α regulates VEGF expression and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) also act as pro-angiogenic factors [22,23]. However, whether I3C and/or DIM may mitigate this pathological condition and what the underlying mechanism is have yet to be investigated.
Emerging data show that I3C and DIM exert anti-fibrosis, anti-oxidant, and anti-inflammation effects on the liver through pleiotropic mechanisms [24]. The therapeutic effect of I3C on hepatic fibrosis of rats has been demonstrated [25]. Through de-ubiquitinating the receptor-interacting protein 1, I3C induced apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells then reversed liver fibrosis [26]. In addition, DIM suppressed hepatic stellate cells activation by down-regulating the expression of microRNA-21, and administration of DIM in vivo attenuated liver fibrosis [27].
Considering the anti-angiogenesis and anti-fibrotic effects of I3C and DIM, and the easy access to cruciferous vegetables in daily life, this study investigated the influences of I3C and DIM on the development of portal hypertension, liver fibrosis, and the severity of mesenteric angiogenesis and portosystemic collaterals in rats with common bile duct ligation (CBDL)-induced liver cirrhosis.
2. Results 2.1. Body Weight, Hemodynamics, Liver, and Kidney Biochemical Parameters
Table 1 shows the hemodynamic parameters and plasma levels of the liver, renal biochemical parameters of the sham, and CBDL-cirrhotic rats treated with I3C, DIM, or vehicle. As compared with the sham-vehicle group analyzed with t-test, CBDL-vehicle group had significantly lower body weight. Besides, the lower mean arterial pressure (p = 0.017), superior mesenteric arterial resistance (p = 0.001), systemic vascular resistance (p = 0.001), and higher portal pressure (p < 0.001), superior mesenteric artery flow (p = 0.032), cardiac index (p = 0.008), and stroke volume (p < 0.001) in CBDL group indicated that CBDL successfully induced the hemodynamic features of portal hypertension. In CBDL groups analyzed with ANOVA, compared with the vehicle, I3C reduced portal pressure by 15.2% (p = 0.033). There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, cardiac index, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, superior mesenteric artery flow, superior mesenteric artery resistance, and other biochemical markers (all p > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in body weight among the three groups. In sham groups analyzed with ANOVA, compared with vehicle, DIM increased cardiac output of 22.8% (p = 0.010), cardiac index of 26.4% (p = 0.003), stroke volume of 29.8% (p = 0.044), and decreased systemic vascular resistance of 20.4% (p = 0.003). I3C increased stroke volume of 38.6% (p = 0.011). There were no significant differences in plasma levels of liver and kidney biochemical parameters.
2.2. Degree of Portosystemic Shunting and Plasma VEGF Concentration
The degree of portosystemic shunting in CBDL-cirrhotic rats analyzed with ANOVA is depicted in Figure 1A. Compared with vehicle, I3C markedly decreased the degree of shunting by 49.8%. Although DIM tended to reduce the shunting degree, the statistical significance was not reached (CBDL-vehicle (n = 4) vs. CBDL-DIM (n = 6) vs. CBDL-I3C (n = 6): 86.73 ± 3.76% vs. 63.26 ± 33.95% vs. 43.51 ± 34.48%, I3C vs. vehicle, p = 0.044; DIM vs. vehicle: p = 0.248).
Figure 1B shows the plasma VEGF concentration of CBDL-cirrhotic rats analyzed with ANOVA. Compared with vehicle, I3C significantly decreased the VEGF concentration by 20.4% (CBDL-vehicle (n = 5) vs. CBDL-DIM (n = 7) vs. CBDL-I3C (n = 7): 19.70 ± 2.03 vs. 19.37 ± 2.37 vs. 15.68 ± 1.93, DIM vs. vehicle: p > 0.05, I3C vs. vehicle: p = 0.005).
2.3. Mesenteric Angiogenesis
Figure 2 shows that compared with vehicle, DIM significantly reduced both vascular length per unit window area (μm−1) and vascular area per unit window area (%) as analyzed with ANOVA (CBDL-vehicle (n = 4) vs. CBDL-DIM (n = 7) in vascular length per unit window area (μm−1): 0.0622 ± 0.0202 vs. 0.0403 ± 0.0096, p = 0.046; in vascular area per unit window area (%): 10.00 ± 3.40 vs. 6.32 ± 1.91, p = 0.018) in CBDL-cirrhotic rats. I3C did not significantly influence either parameter (both p > 0.05 vs. vehicle).
2.4. Angiogenesis-Related Protein Expressions in Mesentery
The mesenteric proangiogenic factor protein expressions of CBDL-cirrhotic rats analyzed with ANOVA are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Compared with vehicle, DIM and I3C significantly down-regulated the expressions of VEGF and pAkt (CBDL-vehicle vs. CBDL-DIM vs. CBDL-I3C (/β-actin): VEGF, 1.69 ± 0.68 vs. 0.70 ± 0.33 vs. 0.53 ± 0.36, p = 0.003 and p = 0.001 for DIM vs. vehicle and I3C vs. vehicle, respectively; pAkt, 1.92 ± 0.86 vs. 1.14 ± 0.65 vs. 0.69 ± 0.23, p = 0.047 and 0.003, respectively). Compared with vehicle, DIM significantly down-regulated pErk (CBDL-vehicle vs. CBDL-DIM: 1.25 ± 0.23 vs. 0.62 ± 0.31, p = 0.016). In addition, I3C significantly down-regulated the expressions of NFκB sububit p65 and pIκBα (CBDL-vehicle vs. CBDL-I3C: NFκB p65, 1.28 ± 0.55 vs. 0.57 ± 0.34, p = 0.016; pIκBα, 1.19 ± 0.37 vs. 0.49 ± 0.05, p = 0.014). Neither DIM nor I3C significantly influenced the protein expressions of pVEGFR2, peNOS, piNOS, pRaf-1, HIF-1α, or MMP-9, as compared with the vehicle (all p > 0.05).
2.5. Liver Fibrosis
Figure 5 shows that, compared with vehicle, DIM and I3C reduced the percentage of Sirius red-stained area by 49.5% and 78.1%, respectively (CBDL-vehicle (n = 6) vs. CBDL-DIM (n = 7) vs. CBDL-I3C (n = 8): 13.09 ± 2.11 vs. 6.61 ± 1.64 vs. 2.87 ± 0.80, DIM vs. vehicle and I3C vs. vehicle: both p < 0.05 analyzed with ANOVA).
3. Discussion
Both I3C and its dimeric product, DIM, are prevalent in cruciferous vegetables, and they have aroused much attention with regards to their anti-cancer and anti-angiogenesis effects [28,29,30]. In the current study, we found that I3C and/or DIM ameliorated portal hypertension, portosystemic shunting, liver fibrosis, mesenteric vascular density, and down-regulated proangiogenic factors expressions in rats with CBDL-induced liver cirrhosis, although they did not exert exactly the same effects.
The development and progression of portal hypertension is determined by three interactive vascular systems: Hepatic, splanchnic, and portosystemic collateral systems [31]. Each system is composed of structural and functional aspects. Increased intrahepatic resistance derived from fibrosis and exaggerated vasoconstriction is the primary factor determining portal pressure. In addition, splanchnic vasodilation and mesenteric angiogenesis elevate portal inflow and pressure. In collateral vasculature, portosystemic collaterals also develop to divert stagnant portal inflow, with the severity shown by shunting degree [32]. Moreover, the increased collaterals related to angiogenesis enhance splanchnic blood flow and further aggravate portal hypertension. In this study, portal pressure, the dominant pathophysiological marker of liver cirrhosis, was significantly reduced by DIM and I3C. Furthermore, the significant reduction of shunting degree and plasma VEGF level, the main factor involved in angiogenesis in the I3C-treated group suggested that I3C increased collateral vascular resistance by reducing shunting and ameliorating pathological angiogenesis [33]. Furthermore, DIM and I3C did not influence splanchnic hemodynamic derangement, as shown by superior mesenteric artery flow and resistance. Based on these findings, the decrease in intrahepatic resistance may be the main factor driving the portal hypotensive effect. Consistent with this hypothesis, Sirius red staining indicated that both DIM and I3C markedly ameliorated the extent of liver fibrosis, which contributed to reduction of intrahepatic resistance [34]. In addition, we checked the hemodynamic and liver/kidney biochemistry data on corresponding sham groups, showing that DIM or I3C increased cardiac output, cardiac index, stroke volume and decreased systemic vascular resistance, suggesting a beneficial cardiovascular impact of these compounds in normal subjects. Interestingly, this has not been identified in the past. The lack of elevated liver and kidney biochemistry levels also indicate their lack of major organ toxicity.
Previous investigations have reported that DIM not only inhibits the VEGF-mediated Ras-Raf-Erk1/2 cascade activation but also suppresses NFκB and Akt activation in cancer cells [35,36]. I3C has also been reported to suppress the lipopolysaccharide-induced capillary-like structure formation of endothelial cells and VEGF and NO secretion [37]. In addition, it has been shown to inhibit NFκB and IκBα kinase activation in myeloid and leukemia cells [38]. Consistently, we also found that I3C down-regulated mesenteric VEGF, pAkt, IκBα, and NFκB subunit, p65. Furthermore, DIM significantly suppressed VEGF, pAkt and pErk expressions, suggesting the downregulation of VEGF-mediated ERK signaling pathway (Figure 6). It is worth noting that in CBDL-induced cirrhosis, DIM alleviated the mesenteric angiogenesis more effectively than I3C did.
Although DIM but not I3C significantly ameliorated mesenteric vascular density, I3C, but not DIM, reduced the degree of shunting and plasma VEGF level. This indicates that I3C decreased the whole portosystemic shunting amount while DIM exerted more regional specific effect on mesentery. Nevertheless, these interesting findings suggest that via taking cruciferous vegetables, the source of both I3C and DIM, cirrhotic patients may benefit from both beneficial effects. Indeed, further clinical surveys are warranted.
The previous studies have reported that I3C and DIM own anti-fibrosis, anti-angiogenesis, and anti-inflammation capacities in different tissues [39]. The current study identified that I3C and DIM treatments exerted anti-angiogenesis and anti-fibrosis effects in CBDL rats. However, the anti-inflammation effect was not prominent as evidenced by the similar plasma levels of ALT among control and treated rats. Indeed, previous reports have demonstrated that I3C and DIM attenuated liver inflammation in animals with ethanol- or staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced acute liver injury [40,41]. Regarding chronic liver injury, Liu et al. showed that an 8-week DIM treatment alleviated hepatic steatosis and inflammation in mice with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [42]. Compared to the aforementioned animal models with obvious hepatic inflammation, 4 weeks post CBDL, rats are characterized by jaundice, portal hypertension, liver fibrosis, and mild to moderate inflammation [43,44,45]. Therefore, the anti-inflammatory effects of I3C/DIM in 4 week-CBDL rats may not be comparable. However, experiments performed with a different time frame post CBDL to address the impacts of anti-inflammation on liver cirrhosis by I3C and DIM treatments are warranted in the future.
In summary, I3C and DIM ameliorated the development of portal hypertension and cirrhosis in CBDL rats and improved the cardiovascular function in non-cirrhotic control rats. The mitigation of severity of portosystemic collaterals and mesenteric angiogenesis is also noteworthy. However, cautions should be paid in translating the results of animal experiments. Although glucosinolates are present in relatively high concentrations in cruciferous vegetables, glucobrassicin, the glucosinolate precursor of I3C, makes up only about 8–12% of the total glucosinolates [46]. Furthermore, the amounts of I3C and DIM are variable and depend, in part, on the processing and preparation of foods. In fact, a nutritional company declared that it takes around 18 kg of broccoli to provide roughly 200 mg of I3C and 20 mg of DIM [47]. Based upon the current findings, the compounds might serve as pharmacological targets for the development of treatment agents despite supplying these doses via the diet.
4. Materials and Methods 4.1. Animal Model: Common Bile Duct Ligation (CBDL) Rats
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 240–270 g at the time of surgery were used. Secondary biliary cirrhosis was induced via CBDL operation under ketamine anesthesia (100 mg/kg body weight, intramuscularly) [43]. Surgical control group received sham operation. Two ligatures, one of which near the junction of hepatic ducts and the other above the entrance of pancreatic duct, were tied then the CBD between two ligatures were cut apart. A high yield of secondary biliary cirrhosis was noted 4 weeks after the surgery. To avoid coagulation defects, CBDL rats received weekly vitamin K injections (50 μg/kg body weight, intramuscularly) [44,45].
4.2. Systemic and Splanchnic Hemodynamics and Biochemical Markers Measurement
The right femoral artery and superior mesenteric vein were cannulated using a PE-50 catheter connected to a Spectramed DTX transducer (Spectramed Inc., Oxnard, CA, USA). Continuous recordings of mean arterial pressure, heart rate and portal pressure were performed on a multi-channel recorder (model RS 3400, Gould Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) [48,49]. The superior mesenteric artery flow was detected with a pulsed-Doppler flow transducer (T206 small animal blood flow meter, Transonic System Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA). Cardiac output was measured using a thermodilution method as previously described using a Columbus Instruments Cardiotherm 500-AC-R (Columbus Instruments International Co., Columbus, OH, USA) [50]. Cardiac index (mL/min/100 g body weight) was calculated as cardiac output per 100 g body weight. Stroke volume was calculated as cardiac output/heart rate (mL/beats). Systemic vascular resistance (mmHg/mL/min/100 g body weight) was calculated as mean arterial pressure/cardiac index. Superior mesenteric artery resistance (mmHg/mL/min/100 g body weight) was calculated as (mean arterial pressure–portal pressure)/superior mesenteric artery flow per 100 g body weight. Liver and kidney biochemical levels were measured: Alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and creatinine.
4.3. Color Microsphere Method for Portosystemic Shunting Degree Analysis
The degree of portosystemic shunting was determined using the technique described by Chojkier and Groszmann whereas substituting color for radioactive microspheres according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Dye Track; Triton Technology, San Diego, CA, USA) [51]. Spillover between wavelengths was corrected using the matrix inversion technique. Portosystemic shunting was calculated as number of lung microspheres/(liver plus lung) microspheres. It has been shown that color microspheres provide results similar to those using radioactive microspheres [52].
4.4. Immunofluorescent Study for Mesenteric Vascular Density
Angiogenesis was quantified using CD31-labelled microvascular networks in rat mesenteric connective tissue windows according to a previous study with minor modifications [53]. From each rat, at least four mesenteric windows (wedge-shaped regions of connective tissue bordered by the intestinal wall and ileal blood vessel pairs) were dissected free and fixed in 100% MeOH (−20 °C for 30 min). Primary antibody mouse anti-rat CD31-biotin (1:200; AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) and secondary antibody (CY2-conjugated streptavidin, 1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) were applied. At least four sets of data were obtained for each mesenteric window. Magnified immunofluorescent images (100×) were assessed using an upright fluorescent microscope (AX80, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a charge-couple device (QICAM, High-performance IEEE 1394 FireWireTM Digital CCD Camera, Q IMAGING, BD, Canada) and thresholded by Image J software (available for download from the National Institutes of Health [54] as previously described [55].
4.5. Western Blotting for Protein Analysis
The concentrations of mesentery protein extracts were determined by the Bradford method [56]. Blots were incubated with the primary antibodies (anti-eNOS, anti-iNOS (1:1000; Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA); anti-phosphorylated eNOS (peNOS, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-phosphorylated iNOS (piNOS, 1:1000; Abcam plc, Cambridge, UK); anti-NFκB p65 (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); anti-IκBα (1:1000; Abcam plc); anti-phosphorylated IκBα (pIκBα, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology); anti-Akt, -phosphorylated Akt Ser473 (pAkt) (1:1000 and 1:2000, respectively, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-Erk, -phosphorylated Erk (pErk) (1:3000, Millipore Corporation); anti-HIF-1α (1:200; Abcam plc); anti-Raf-1, -phosphoylated-Ser-338 Raf-1 (-pRaf-1), -VEGFR2, -phosphorylated-VEGFR2 (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology); anti-VEGF, MMP-9 (1:1000, 90 min at room temperature, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-beta-actin (1:5000; Cell Signaling Technology). The specific proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate, Merk Millipore Co., Billerica, MA, USA) and scanned with a computer-assisted video densitometer and digitalized system (BioSpectrum® 600 Imaging System, Ultra-Violet Products Ltd., Upland, CA, USA). Then the signal intensity (integral volume) of the appropriate band was analyzed.
4.6. Determination of Plasma VEGF Concentration
Plasma levels of VEGF were measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
4.7. Determination of Hepatic Fibrosis
The percentage of stained areas of paraffin-embedded liver sections were assessed using a Sirius red staining kit (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA) and Image J software [55].
4.8. Drugs
I3C was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA), and DIM was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. All solutions were freshly prepared on the day of the experiment.
4.9. Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test for the comparisons of hemodynamic parameters between CBDL-vehicle and Sham-vehicle groups. ANOVA with the least significant difference test was applied for the comparisons among CBDL-vehicle, -DIM, -I3C groups, and among Sham-vehicle, -DIM, -I3C groups, respectively. Results were considered statistically significant at a two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05. The SPSS 21 statistical package for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used.
4.10. Study Protocol
Rats were randomly allocated to receive I3C (20 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection, which allowed for maximal systemic exposure according to the previous publication [57]), DIM (5 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection), or vehicle from the first day after CBDL and sham operations. Sham groups were used to monitor the potential influences of I3C and DIM on hemodynamics of normal subjects. On the 29th day after the surgery, the following were evaluated: Body weight, systemic and portal hemodynamics, plasma levels of liver and kidney biochemical parameters, portosystemic collateral shunting, mesenteric angiogenesis, plasma VEGF concentration, liver fibrosis, and mesenteric Western blot analysis for proangiogenic factor protein expressions. This study has been authorized by Taipei Veterans General Hospital Animal Committee with experimental approval (IACUC 2015-084, approved on 8th Jun., 2015). All animals received humane care according to the criteria outlined in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” published by the National Institutes of Health, the United States (NIH publication 86–23, revised 1985).
CBDL-Vehicle
n = 5 | CBDL-DIM
n = 7 | CBDL–I3C
n = 7 | Sham-Vehicle
n = 6 | Sham-DIM
n = 6 | Sham-I3C
n = 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BW (g) | 388.0 ± 20.2 # | 409.1 ± 4.2 | 408.0 ± 20.9 | 447.8 ± 11.6 | 432.7 ± 7.2 | 451.0 ± 10.8 |
MAP (mmHg) | 120.7 ± 4.7 # | 108.9 ± 5.6 | 106.6 ± 8.9 | 145.96 ± 4.66 | 145.5 ± 5.0 | 150.0 ± 6.0 |
HR (beats/min) | 363 ± 10 | 326 ± 11 * | 361 ± 12 | 376 ± 19 | 353 ± 18 | 317 ± 27 |
PP (mmHg) | 17.8 ± 1.2 ### | 16.2 ± 0.6 * | 16.1 ± 1.1 * | 10.7 ± 0.3 | 9.5 ± 0.5 | 9.5 ± 0.5 |
CO (mL/min) | 141.5 ± 5.5 | 120.7 ± 8.8 | 123.8 ± 6.0 | 131.3 ± 2.0 | 161.2 ± 11.6 * | 140.1 ± 4.2 |
CI (mL/min/100 g) | 36.4 ± 2.0 # | 29.4 ± 2.1 | 30.17 ± 3.1 | 29.4 ± 0.9 | 37.2 ± 2.3 ** | 31.1 ± 0.8 |
SV (mL/beats) | 0.39 ± 0.02 ### | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.07 ± 0.01 * | 0.08 ± 0.00 * |
SVR (mmHg/mL/min/100 g) | 3.24 ± 0.56 ## | 3.87 ± 0.27 | 3.70 ± 0.61 | 4.99 ± 0.24 | 3.97 ± 0.23 ** | 4.82 ± 0.13 |
SMA flow (mL/min/100 g) | 5.9 ± 0.4 # | 6.2 ± 0.4 | 5.8 ± 0.8 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 5.6 ± 0.5 |
SMAR (mmHg/mL/min/100 g) | 18.04 ± 2.15 ## | 15.62 ± 1.64 | 17.54 ± 2.33 | 28.83 ± 1.20 | 24.31 ± 2.84 | 25.81 ± 1.58 |
ALT (U/L) | 237.8 ± 40.0 | 206.1 ± 32.0 | 189.9 ± 29.3 | 45.8 ± 2.2 | 53.8 ± 2.6 | 48.3 ± 2.5 |
Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 9.35 ± 0.64 | 8.64 ± 0.41 | 8.13 ± 0.82 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 0.55 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.01 |
BW: body weight; MAP: mean arterial pressure; HR: heart rate; PP: portal pressure; CO: cardiac output; CI: cardiac index; SV: stroke volume; SVR: systemic vascular resistance; SMA: superior mesenteric artery; SMAR: superior mesenteric artery resistance; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001, DIM-or I3C-treated group vs. corresponding vehicle group analyzed with ANOVA; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.005, ### p < 0.001, CBDL-vehicle vs. sham-vehicle group analyzed with t-test.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization-C.-C.C. and H.-C.H.; Data curation-T.C. and H.-L.H.; Formal analysis-T.-I.H.; Funding acquisition-C.-C.C. and H.-C.H.; Methodology-S.-J.H. and M.-H.T.; Project administration-C.-C.C.; Resources-T.-I.H.; Supervision-F.-Y.L., M.-C.H. and S.-D.L.; Writing-original draft, T.C. and H.-L.H.; Writing-review & editing, C.-C.C. and H.-C.H.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (V105C-032) and Szu-Zuan Research Foundation of Internal Medicine (No. 108009).
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Chia-chi Lu for her excellent technical assistance. We also thank the Clinical Research Core Laboratory of Taipei Veterans General Hospital for providing experimental space and facilities.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Miñano, C.; Garcia-Tsao, G. Clinical pharmacology of portal hypertension. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 2010, 39, 681-695.
2. Fernandez, M.; Vizzutti, F.; Garcia-Pagan, J.C.; Rodes, J.; Bosch, J. Anti-VEGF receptor-2 monoclonal antibody prevents portal-systemic collateral vessel formation in portal hypertensive mice. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 886-894.
3. Mejias, M.; Garcia-Pras, E.; Tiani, C.; Miquel, R.; Bosch, J.; Fernandez, M. Beneficial effects of sorafenib on splanchnic, intrahepatic, and portocollateral circulations in portal hypertensive and cirrhotic rats. Hepatology 2009, 49, 1245-1256.
4. Cohen, J.H.; Kristal, A.R.; Stanford, J.L. Fruit and vegetable intakes and prostate cancer risk. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000, 92, 61-68.
5. Anderton, M.J.; Jukes, R.; Lamb, J.H.; Manson, M.M.; Gescher, A.; Steward, W.P.; Williams, M.L. Liquid chromatographic assay for the simultaneous determination of indole-3-carbinol and its acid condensation products in plasma. J. Chromatogr. B. 2003, 787, 281-291.
6. Verhoeven, D.H.T.; Verhagen, H.; Goldbohm, R.A.; van den Brandt, P.A.; van Poppel, G.A. A review of mechanisms underlying anticarcinogenicity by brassica vegetables. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1997, 103, 79-129.
7. Chang, Y.C.; Riby, J.; Chang, G.H.F.; Peng, B.C.; Firestone, G.; Bjeldanes, L.F. Cytostatic and antiestrogenic effect of 2-(indole-3-ylmethyl)-3,3'-diindolylmethane, a major in vivo product of dietary indole-3-carbinol. Biochem. Pharm. 1999, 58, 825-834.
8. Reed, G.A.; Arneson, D.W.; Putnam, W.C.; Smith, H.J.; Gray, J.C.; Sullivan, D.K.; Mayo, M.S.; Crowell, J.A.; Hurwitz, A. Single-dose and multiple-dose administration of indole-3-carbinol to women: Pharmacokinetics based on 3,39-diindolylmethane. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2006, 15, 2477-2481.
9. Anderton, M.J.; Manson, M.M.; Verschoyle, R.D.; Gescher, A.; Lamb, J.H.; Farmer, P.B.; Steward, W.P.; Williams, M.L. Pharmacokinetics and tissue disposition of indole-3-carbinol and its acid condensation products after oral administration to mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 5233-5241.
10. Aggarwal, B.B.; Ichikawa, H. Molecular targets and anticancer potential of indole-3-carbinol and its derivatives. Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 1201-1215.
11. Grubbs, C.J.; Steele, V.E.; Casebolt, T.; Juliana, M.M.; Eto, I.; Whitaker, L.M.; Dragnev, K.H.; Kelloff, G.J.; Lubet, R.L. Chemoprevention of chemically induced mammary carcinogenesis by indole-3-carbinol. Anticancer Res. 1995, 15, 709-716.
12. Chen, I.; McDougal, A.; Wang, F.; Safe, S. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated antiestrogenic and antitumorigenic activity of diindolylmethane. Carcinogenesis 1998, 19, 1631-1639.
13. Souli, E.; Machluf, M.; Morgenstern, A.; Sabo, E.; Yannai, S. Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) exhibits inhibitory and preventive effects on prostate tumors in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 863-870.
14. Chang, X.; Tou, J.C.; Hong, C.; Kim, H.A.; Riby, J.E.; Firestone, G.L.; Bjeldanes, L.F. 3,30-diindolylmethane inhibits angiogenesis and the growth of transplantable human breast carcinoma in athymic mice. Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 771-778.
15. Kroll, J.; Waltenberger, J. The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor KDR activates multiple signal transduction pathways in porcine aortic endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32521-32527.
16. Kanno, S.; Oda, N.; Abe, M.; Terai, Y.; Ito, M.; Shitara, K.; Tabayashi, K.; Shibuya, M.; Sato, Y. Roles of two VEGF receptors, Flt-1 and KDR, in the signal transduction of VEGF effects in human vascular endothelial cells. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2138-2146.
17. Shibuya, M. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-Receptor2: Its biological functions, major signaling pathway, and specific ligand VEGF-E. Endothelium 2006, 13, 63-69.
18. Olsson, A.K.; Dimberg, A.; Kreuger, J.; Claesson-Welsh, L. VEGF receptor signalling-in control of vascular function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 359-371.
19. Sumanovski, L.T.; Battegay, E.; Stumm, M.; van der Kooij, M.; Sieber, C.C. Increased angiogenesis in portal hypertensive rats: Role of nitric oxide. Hepatology 1999, 29, 1044-1049.
20. Sieber, C.C.; Sumanovski, L.T.; Stumm, M.; van der Kooij, M.; Battegay, E. In vivo angiogenesis in normal and portal hypertensive rats: Role of basic fibroblast growth factor and nitric oxide. J. Hepatol. 2001, 34, 644-650.
21. Kroll, J.; Waltenberger, J. A novel function of the vascularendothelial growth factor receptor-2(KDR): Rapid release of nitric oxidein response to VEGF-A stimulation in endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 265, 636-639.
22. Zeng, Z.; Huang, W.D.; Gao, Q.; Su, M.L.; Yang, Y.F.; Liu, Z.C.; Zhu, B.H. Arnebin-1 promotes angiogenesis by inducing eNOS, VEGF and HIF-1α expression through the PI3K-dependent pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 36, 685-697.
23. Vilen, S.T.; Salo, T.; Sorsa, T.; Nyberg, P. Fluctuating Roles of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 920595.
24. Wang, S.Q.; Cheng, L.S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.Y.; Jiang, W. Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C) and its Major Derivatives: Their Pharmacokinetics and Important Roles in Hepatic Protection. Curr. Drug Metab. 2016, 17, 401-409.
25. Ping, J.; Gao, A.M.; Xu, D.; Li, R.W.; Wang, H. Therapeutic effect of indole-3-carbinol on pig serum-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats. Yao Xue Xue Bao 2011, 46, 915-921.
26. Li, B.; Cong, M.; Zhu, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Jin, W.; Wan, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Ao, Y.; Wang, H. Indole-3-Carbinol Induces Apoptosis of Hepatic Stellate Cells through K63 De-Ubiquitination of RIP1 in Rats. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 1481-1490.
27. Zhang, Z.; Gao, Z.; Hu, W.; Yin, S.; Wang, C.; Zang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Dong, L. 3,3'-Diindolylmethane ameliorates experimental hepatic fibrosis via inhibiting miR-21 expression. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 170, 649-660.
28. Marques, M.; Laflamme, L.; Benassou, I.; Cissokho, C.; Guillemette, B.; Gaudreau, L. Low levels of 3,3'-diindolylmethane activate estrogen receptor α and induce proliferation of breast cancer cells in the absence of estradiol. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 524.
29. El-sayed, M.T.; Hamdy, N.A.; Osman, D.A.; Ahmed, K.M. Indoles as anti-cancer agents. Adv. Mod. Oncol. Res. 2015, 1, 20-35.
30. Kunimasa, K.; Kobayashi, T.; Sugiyama, S.; Kaji, K.; Ohta, T. Indole-3-carbinol Suppresses Tumor-Induced Angiogenesis by Inhibiting Tube Formation and Inducing Apoptosis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 2243-2246.
31. Hsu, J.; Huang, H.C. Management of ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis: Recent evidence and controversies. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2013, 76, 123-130.
32. Hsu, J.; Lee, F.Y.; Wang, S.S.; Hsin, I.F.; Lin, T.Y.; Huang, H.C.; Chang, C.C.; Chuang, C.L.; Ho, H.L.; Lin, H.C.; et al. Caffeine ameliorates hemodynamic derangements and portosystemic collaterals in cirrhotic rats. Hepatology 2015, 61, 1672-1684.
33. Park, S.H.; Lee, S.S. The Relationship between Serum VEGF Concentration and Prognosis of Lung Cancer. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2003, 18, 207-211.
34. Huang, Y.; de Boer, W.B.; Adams, L.A.; MacQuillan, G.; Rossi, E.; Rigby, P.; Raftopoulos, S.C.; Bulsara, M.; Jeffrey, G.P. Image analysis of liver collagen using sirius red is more accurate and correlates better with serum fibrosis markers than trichrome. Liver Int. 2013, 33, 1249-1256.
35. Chang, X.; Firestone, G.L.; Bjeldanes, L.F. Inhibition of growth factor-induced Ras signaling in vascular endothelial cells and angiogenesis by 3,3'-diindolylmethane. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 541-550.
36. Li, Y.; Chinni, S.R.; Sarkar, F.H. Selective growth regulatory and pro-apoptotic effects of DIM is mediated by AKT and NF-κB pathways in prostate cancer cells. Front. Biosci. 2005, 10, 236-243.
37. Wang, M.L.; Shih, C.K.; Chang, H.P.; Chen, Y.H. Antiangiogenic activity of indole-3-carbinol in endothelial cells stimulated with activated macrophages. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 811-820.
38. Takada, Y.; Andreeff, M.; Aggarwal, B.B. Indole-3-carbinol suppresses NF-kappaB and IkappaBalpha kinase activation, causing inhibition of expression of NF-kappaB-regulated antiapoptotic and metastatic gene products and enhancement of apoptosis in myeloid and leukemia cells. Blood 2005, 106, 641-649.
39. Ampofo, E.; Schmitt, B.M.; Menger, M.D.; Laschke, M.W. Targeting the Microcirculation by Indole-3-carbinol and Its Main Derivate 3,3,'-diindolylmethane: Effects on Angiogenesis, Thrombosis and Inflammation. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 962-968.
40. Choi, Y.; Abdelmegeed, M.A.; Song, B.J. Preventive effects of indole-3-carbinol against alcohol-induced liver injury in mice via antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic mechanisms: Role of gut-liver-adipose tissue axis. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 55, 12-25.
41. Busbee, P.B.; Nagarkatti, M.; Nagarkatti, P.S. Natural indoles, indole-3-carbinol (I3C) and 3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM), attenuate staphylococcal enterotoxin B-mediated liver injury by downregulating miR-31 expression and promoting caspase-2-mediated apoptosis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118506.
42. Liu, Y.; She, W.; Wang, F.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W. 3, 3'-Diindolylmethane alleviates steatosis and the progression of NASH partly through shifting the imbalance of Treg/Th17 cells to Treg dominance. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 23, 489-498.
43. Franco, D.; Gigou, M.; Szekely, A.M.; Bismuth, H. Portal hypertension after bile duct obstruction. Effect of the bile diversion on portal pressure in the rat. Arch Surg. 1979, 114, 1064-1067.
44. Cameron, G.R.; Hasan, S.M. Disturbances of structure and function in the liver as the result of biliary obstruction. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1958, 75, 33-49.
45. Kountouras, J.; Billing, B.H.; Scheuer, P.J. Prolonged bile duct ligation obstruction: A new experimental model of cirrhosis in the rat. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1984, 65, 305-311.
46. Kushad, M.M.; Brown, A.F.; Kurilich, A.C.; Juvik, J.A.; Klein, B.P.; Wallig, M.A.; Jeffery, E.H. Variation of glucosinolates in vegetable crops of Brassica oleracea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1541-1548.
47. Designed Nutritional Products. 2003. Available online: http://www.designednutritional.com/Header%20Side%20Door/AnswersBrocoli.html (accessed on 6 August 2019).
48. Lee, F.Y.; Wang, S.S.; Tsai, Y.T.; Lin, H.J.; Lin, H.C.; Chu, C.J.; Wu, S.L.; Tai, C.C.; Lee, S.D. Aminoguanidine corrects hyperdynamic circulation without ameliorating portal hypertension and portal hypertensive gastropathy in anesthetized portal hypertensive rats. J. Hepatol. 1997, 26, 687-693.
49. Lee, F.Y.; Colombato, L.A.; Albillos, A.; Groszmann, R.J. Administration of Nω-nitro-L- arginine ameliorates portal-systemic shunting in portal-hypertensive rats. Gastroenterology 1993, 105, 1464-1470.
50. Albillos, A.; Colombato, L.A.; Groszmann, R.J. Vasodilatation and sodium retention in prehepatic portal hypertension. Gastroenterology 1992, 102, 931-935.
51. Chojkier, M.; Groszmann, R.J. Measurement of portal-systemic shunting in the rat by using γ-labeled microspheres. Am. J. Physiol. 1981, 240, G371-G375.
52. Hodeige, D.; de Pauw, M.; Eechaute, W.; Weyne, J.; Heyndrickx, G.R. On the validity of blood flow measurement using colored microspheres. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, H1150-H1158.
53. Anderson, C.R.; Ponce, A.M.; Price, R.J. Immunohistochemical identification of an extracellular matrix scaffold that microguides capillary sprouting in vivo. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2004, 52, 1063-1072.
54. ImageJ Website. Available online: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ (accessed on 12 January 2016).
55. Huang, H.C.; Wang, S.S.; Hsin, I.F.; Chang, C.C.; Lee, F.Y.; Lin, H.C.; Chuang, C.L.; Lee, J.Y.; Hsieh, H.G.; Lee, S.D. Cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist ameliorates mesenteric angiogenesis and portosystemic collaterals in cirrhotic rats. Hepatology 2012, 56, 248-258.
56. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248-254.
57. Garikapasy, V.P.S.; Ashok, B.T.; Chen, Y.G.; Mittelman, A.; Latropoulos, M.; Tiwari, R.K. Anti-carcinogenic and anti-metastatic properties of indole-3-carbinol in prostate cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2004, 13, 89-93.
1 Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
2 Institute of Pharmacology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
3 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Lotong Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan 26546, Taiwan
4 Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
5 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
6 Chang Gung University College of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
7 Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
8 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
* Correspondence: [email protected]
† These authors contributed equally to this work.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Considering the anti-angiogenesis and anti-fibrotic effects of I3C and DIM, and the easy access to cruciferous vegetables in daily life, this study investigated the influences of I3C and DIM on the development of portal hypertension, liver fibrosis, and the severity of mesenteric angiogenesis and portosystemic collaterals in rats with common bile duct ligation (CBDL)-induced liver cirrhosis. 2. Body Weight, Hemodynamics, Liver, and Kidney Biochemical Parameters Table 1 shows the hemodynamic parameters and plasma levels of the liver, renal biochemical parameters of the sham, and CBDL-cirrhotic rats treated with I3C, DIM, or vehicle. [...]the lower mean arterial pressure (p = 0.017), superior mesenteric arterial resistance (p = 0.001), systemic vascular resistance (p = 0.001), and higher portal pressure (p < 0.001), superior mesenteric artery flow (p = 0.032), cardiac index (p = 0.008), and stroke volume (p < 0.001) in CBDL group indicated that CBDL successfully induced the hemodynamic features of portal hypertension. In collateral vasculature, portosystemic collaterals also develop to divert stagnant portal inflow, with the severity shown by shunting degree [32]. [...]the increased collaterals related to angiogenesis enhance splanchnic blood flow and further aggravate portal hypertension.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer