Gene Modules Co-regulated with Biosynthetic Gene Clusters for Allelopathy between Rice and Barnyardgrass

Abstract

The allelopathic potential of rice (Oryza sativa) against weeds has been previously investigated [13] and several secondary metabolites, including fatty acids, indoles, momilactones, phenolics, and terpenes, have been demonstrated to be major allelochemicals in rice capable of suppressing the growth of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) [2]. In the rice genome, genes encoding diterpene synthases and chemical-alteration enzymes, including P450s, formed the momilactone gene cluster [19]. Identification of Candidate Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Rice and Barnyardgrass A hybrid pipeline integrating plantiSMASH, metabolic pathway annotation, and co-expression validation was adopted to identify BGCs in the barnyardgrass and rice genomes. Additionally, prior studies established that quercetin and its derivatives are allelochemicals with inhibitory effects on plant growth [27]. [...]in addition to the DIMBOA cluster, we found a potential new BGC responsible for quercetin biosynthesis, which could be employed by barnyardgrass against rice during their allelopathic interaction. 2.3.

1. Introduction

Allelopathy is a common biological phenomenon by which one plant influences the growth of neighboring plants through the release of allelochemicals into the rhizosphere [1]. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to crop–weed allelopathy due to its promising application in weed management and crop protection [2,3]. Critical genetic mechanisms or pathways involved in crop- weed allelopathic interactions have been revealed [3,4]. One of these is the discovery of ‘operon- like’ biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) that are responsible for the coordinate formation of various allelochemicals [5] mediating allelopathic interactions [4,6]. It has been suggested that clustering of genes of the same biosynthetic pathway could help coordinate the expression of the component genes and minimize self-toxicity caused by accumulation of intermediate compounds. In addition, co-inheritance of whole pathway facilitates co-regulation of the genes involved, enables faster response to local environmental changes and finally enhances plant survival [5,7].

The unique features of known plant BGCs provide clues for identification of new gene clusters. For example, BGCs usually consist of two or more non-homologous genes that locate in an adjacent genomic region and encode different enzymes of the same pathway [5]. The functionally characterized gene clusters to date generally include 3–10 genes [8]. Another important characteristic of all the clusters identified so far is the presence of the P-450 monooxygenases (P450s) [5]. In addition, genes in the core cluster are coordinately regulated at the transcriptional level, and a co- expression pattern of the genes involved has been proved to be one of the critical criteria for successful gene cluster discovery [9]. Taking advantages of the above characteristics, state-of-the-art approaches, such as PlantiSMASH [10] and PlantClusterFinder [11], have been developed and successfully used in the identification of candidate gene clusters in plants.

As a staple food in the world, rice production is threatened by agricultural weeds, among which the Echinochloa complex is reported to be among the most persistent weeds associated with rice cultivation globally [12]. The allelopathic potential of rice (Oryza sativa) against weeds has been previously investigated [13] and several secondary metabolites, including fatty acids, indoles, momilactones, phenolics, and terpenes, have been demonstrated to be major allelochemicals in rice capable of suppressing the growth of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) [2]. Notably, among diterpenoid phytoalexins in rice, momilactone B has a much higher growth-inhibiting activity against surrounding plants than momilactone A, while phytocassanes showed no allelopathic effects, and are regarded as phytoalexins against pathogens in soils [14,15,16]. On the other hand, barnyardgrass also releases growth inhibitors that are harmful for rice growth [17,18]. Interestingly, both rice and barnyardgrass have evolved gene clusters that can biosynthesize allelochemicals against each other [4,6]. In the rice genome, genes encoding diterpene synthases and chemical-alteration enzymes, including P450s, formed the momilactone gene cluster [19]. The momilactone chemicals are significantly induced and inhibit the growth of barnyardgrass [20]. Meanwhile, 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) released from barnyardgrass has been confirmed to be a critical allelochemical against rice. Three copies of the DIMBOA clusters have been found in the barnyardgrass genome, and the genes within the cluster are significantly over-expressed in barnyardgrass co-cultured with rice. As many more new candidate gene clusters in plants have been predicted by the new approaches [10,11], it is of interest to know whether there are more BGCs involved in allelopathy between rice and barnyardgrass.

Following the discovery of BGCs an open question remained as to whether which other genes and regulatory factors are important in coregulating gene expression in these clusters and thus play roles in the modulating allelopathic interactions. For example, Yamamura et al. [21] found a bHLH transcription factor (LOC_Os01g09990) named as DPF in rice that acts as a master regulator of the biosynthesis of diterpenoid phytoalexin. Over-expression and knockdown of this transcription factor increased and decreased, respectively, the expression level of genes in both BGCs (momilactone, phytocassane), and consequently affected the accumulation of diterpenoid phytoalexins. Analysis of co-expression gene network has been widely used to study the relationships between functional modules and plant biological processes, and to uncover gene regulatory mechanisms in both model and non-model plants [22]. As genes involved in specialized metabolic pathways are often coordinately regulated, co-expression has been adopted to discover genes in plant-specialized metabolism [9]. Notably, WGCNA (weighted gene co-expression network analysis) is an efficient co- expression analysis tool for identification of biologically relevant associations between phenotypes and gene modules [23]. This approach has been effectively applied in Arabidopsis and rice to detect candidate biomarkers [24]. Uncovering the potential co-regulating gene modules with BGCs would be helpful in exploring the genetic mechanism of how plants detecting allelochemicals, uncover the upstream transcription factors regulating gene clusters and genes or pathways responsible for secreting allelochemicals.

In this study, we conducted a detailed co-expression investigation using time-course transcriptome data generated from mono- and co-cultured rice and barnyardgrass. We identified a candidate BGC in the barnyardgrass genome that is responsible for quercetin glucoside biosynthesis and whose expression is responsive to the presence of rice. We also investigated gene modules and candidate hub genes co-expressed with the functionally well-characterized BGCs in rice (momilactone, phytocassane) and barnyardgrass (DIMBOA, momilactone-like) using co-expression network analysis. Our results provide new insights into the regulatory mechanisms of BGCs responsible for allelopathic interactions between rice and barnyardgrass.

2. Results 2.1. Transcriptomic Profiling for Allelopathic Interaction between Rice and Barnyardgrass

RNA-Seq was used to investigate the transcriptomic profiles during allelopathic interactions between a rice accession (PI312777) with a high allelopathic potential and barnyardgrass (STB08). For rice, we generated a total of 37.18 GB data, and mapped the clean reads to the rice genome (MSU v7) with an average mapping rate of 87.4% (Table S1). For barnyardgrass, a total of 40.99 GB data were generated, and the average mapping rate was 80.7% (Table S1).

2.2. Identification of Candidate Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Rice and Barnyardgrass

A hybrid pipeline integrating plantiSMASH, metabolic pathway annotation, and co-expression validation was adopted to identify BGCs in the barnyardgrass and rice genomes. A total of 98 BGCs were identified in E. crus-galli, while for rice, 46 candidate BGCs were obtained from the PlantiSMASH database. By applying the co-pathway method [11], we reduced the number of BGCs to 11 and 4 in barnyardgrass and rice, respectively (Table S2). We further utilized transcriptomic data to eliminate the BGCs without a gene co-expression pattern, which allowed us to identify seven and two confident candidate BGCs in barnyardgrass and rice, respectively (Table S2).

The two rice BGCs are actually known ones, one is the phytocassane gene cluster in chromosome 2, and another is the momilactone A gene cluster in chromosome 4 [19,25]. Of the seven barnyardgrass BGCs, four were identified in our previous study with a role in biosynthesis of DIBOA-glucoside (PWY-6949) and momilactone A (PWY-7477) [4]. The other three were new with one each involved in biosynthesis of β-caryophyllene (PWY-6275), flavonol (PWY-3101), and quercetin glucoside (PWY-7129) (Table S2).

Notably, the candidate quercetin glucoside cluster includes two CYP450s, two UDP-glucosyl transferases, and one 2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase, and most of the genes encoding these proteins showed a highly co-expressed pattern (Figure 1A and Table S2). All five genes were significantly up-regulated in barnyardgrass when it was co-cultured (3h) with rice (Figure 1B) based on data previously generated in an experiment with three biological replicates [4]. Quercetin, is a plant flavonol from the flavonoid group of polyphenols, has previously been detected in E. crus-galli [26]. Additionally, prior studies established that quercetin and its derivatives are allelochemicals with inhibitory effects on plant growth [27]. Therefore, in addition to the DIMBOA cluster, we found a potential new BGC responsible for quercetin biosynthesis, which could be employed by barnyardgrass against rice during their allelopathic interaction.

2.3. Gene Modules Co-regulated with the DIMBOA and Potential Momilactone Gene Clusters in Barnyardgrass

Gene co-expression network was constructed for barnyardgrass based on the transcriptomic profiles. Genes were categorized into 46 co-expression modules, with the module size ranging from 108 to 9413.

We then studied the correlations between these 46 modules and the previously identified DIMBOA and candidate momilactone gene clusters in barnyardgrass [4] (Figure 2A). For the presumable momilactone cluster, the ‘MEred’ module was the most significantly and positively (p < 0.05, R² > 0.5) co-expressed with three genes (CYP99A2, KSL4, and CYP76M5) in the cluster. With the same threshold, we found that five modules, namely ‘MEviolet’, ‘MEturquoise’, ‘MEgreen’, ‘MEpaleturquoise’, ‘MEpink’, were positively co-expressed with all three copies of the DIMBOA cluster, but all of them were negatively correlated with the presumable momilactone gene cluster. Among them, the ‘MEpink’ module was the most significantly correlated module (Figure 2A). All five modules had a similar expression pattern and all were significantly and positively correlated with 14 of the 17 genes in the three copies of the DIMBOA cluster, but not with the three copies of BX8 in the DIMBOA cluster. This observation is consistent with the gene co-expression pattern observed in the maize DIMBOA cluster [28], suggesting that the terminal gene BX8 in the barnyardgrass DIMBOA cluster might have a unique gene expression signature different from the core genes of the cluster.

Enrichment analyses by AgriGO and MapMan were performed to better understand the possible functional roles of these modules. According to gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, the 2446 genes of the ‘MEpink’ module were enriched for 12 GO terms, including ‘GTPase activity’, ‘RNA binding’, ‘translation factor activity’, and ‘nucleic acid binding’ (Figure 2B and Table S3). The ‘MEturquoise’ and ‘MEgreen’ modules were enriched for 28 (7374 genes) and 21 (5107 genes) GO terms, respectively; many were related to mitochondrial, ATP and kinase activity (Table S4). Based on MapMan, 37, 62 and 10 significant categories were significantly associated with the ‘MEpink’, ‘MEturquoise’ and ‘MEgreen’ module, respectively (Table S4). Pathways associated with ‘glucosinolates synthesis’, ‘cytochrome P450′, and ‘phenylpropanoid metabolism’ were also found to be enriched.

In the gene co-expression network analysis, identification of hub genes is vital due to their higher connectivity and consequently more functional activities than the marginal genes. Based on the intramodular connectivity, the top 30 hub genes were selected for each of the three modules. Most hub genes of the ‘MEpink’ module were annotated as cytochrome P450, O-methyltransferase, glycine-rich protein family, root cap and terpene synthase (Table S5). Plant O-methyltransferases methylate the oxygen atom of various secondary metabolites, and play a key role in lignin biosynthesis, stress tolerance, and disease resistance in plants [29]. Glycine-rich proteins (GRPs) function in plant defense, hormonal signaling, stress responses, and plant cell development [30]. Terpene synthases (TPS) is a big enzyme family in plants, catalyzing the synthesis of diverse terpene molecules [31]. A wide range of plant biological and physiological processes, including environmental adaption, cell growth and development, and defense against biotic and abiotic stressors are controlled by terpenoids [32]. The results of our co-expression analyses suggest that gene clusters for multiple other secondary metabolic pathways together with the DIMBOA gene clusters could be involved in the allelopathic interaction between barnyardgrass and rice.

2.4. New Hub Genes Co-regulating with the Two Known Diterpenoid Gene Clusters in Rice

Based on our expression data of rice, a total of 27 co-expression modules were constructed with the module size ranging from 121 to 4513 members. We then studied the correlations between the two known rice BGCs with the 27 co-expression modules. Interestingly, the ‘MEroyalblue’ module (with 487 genes) was found to be significantly and positively (p < 0.05, R² > 0.5) correlated with the expression of four (OsCPS4, CYP99A3, OsKSL4, CYP99A2) of the five genes in the momilactone gene cluster. This module was also co-expressed with six (CYP76M5, CYP76M8, CYP76M7, CYP71Z7, OsCPS2, CYP76M6) of ten genes in the phytocassane cluster (Figure 3A).

We further investigated the possible biological roles of the genes in this module. GO enrichment analysis identified eight significantly enriched terms. The most significant ones were in the molecular function category, including ‘transcription regulator activity, ‘transcription factor activity’, ‘DNA binding’, and ‘receptor binding’. In the biological process, GO terms like ‘response to stimulus’, ‘response to stress’, and ‘signaling’ were overrepresented (Figure 3B and Table S6). According to MapMan enrichment analysis, genes involved in regulation of transcription were enriched, particularly transcription factors of the C2H2 and B3 families (Table S6). These observations suggested a possible role of the transcription factors in regulation of the momilactone A and phytocassane gene clusters.

The ‘MEroyalblue’ module had 50 hub genes with seven belonging to five different transcription factor families (B3, bHLH, C2H2, LBD and WOX) (Figure 3C; Table S7). Notably, one of the transcription factors were previous functionally characterized bHLH diterpenoid phytoalexin factor (DPF, LOC_Os01g00990), which has been confirmed to regulate the expression of genes in both the momilactone and phytocassane clusters [21]. In addition, we also identified a cluster of five genes encoding ‘SCP-like extracellular protein’ with the PFAM ‘Cysteine-rich secretory protein family’ encoding gene in the hub gene list, suggesting a possible role of the module in secreting allelochemicals. Based on qRT-PCR, both the C2H2 family transcription factor, LOC_Os03g32220, and the gene (LOC_Os07g03580) encoding cysteine-rich secretory protein were significantly upregulated in barnyardgrass co-cultured with rice (Figure 3D), supporting a role of the genes in allelopathic interaction between rice and barnyardgrass.

2.5. Putative Upstream Genes of the DIMBOA and Presumable Momilactone Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Barnyardgrass

It has been previously demonstrated that DPF (LOC_Os01g09900) acts as a master transcriptional regulatory factor for diterpenoid phytoalexin biosynthesis in rice [33]. Given that the momilactone cluster is currently only found in rice and barnyardgrass, it was of interest to know the potential roles of the barnyardgrass genes orthologous to the rice DPF. Based on the phylogenetic analysis, we found four DPF orthologs in barnyardgrass (Figure 4A). When examining the co- expression pattern of these barnyardgrass DPF orthologs with the genes in the momilactone gene cluster in rice and barnyardgrass, we observed a different pattern. In rice, three genes (1 DPF and 2 DPF-like) were highly co-expressed with the genes of the momilactone cluster, particularly with CYP99A2, OsKSL4, and OsCPS4 (Figure 4B). In barnyardgrass, however, we did not observe a highly co-regulated relationship between the DPF orthologs and genes in the presumable momilactone gene clusters (Figure 4C), suggesting that the regulatory mechanism for momilactone biosynthesis might be different in the two species.

The first step in benzoxazinoid biosynthesis is catalyzed by indole-3-glycerolphosphatelyase (BX1), which converts indole-3-glycerolphosphate into indole. The maize genome contains three genes encoding indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase (IGPS) (with Pfam ‘PF00218′). A previous study found that only one (GRMZM2G106950) of the three IGPS genes was highly co-expressed with the core BX genes (BX1-BX5) in the benzoxazinoid pathway, and this gene was suggested to catalyze the reaction directly upstream of BX1 [28]. The E. crus-galli genome contains 12 putative indole- 3- glycerol phosphate synthases (with Pfam ‘PF00218). Phylogenetic analysis suggested that six of the 12 genes are orthologs of the maize IGPS (Figure 5A), and three of the six were highly co- expressed with the core BX genes (BX1-BX5) in all three copies of the DIMBOA cluster (Figure 5B). qRT-PCR analysis showed that the three IGPS genes are significantly over-expressed in barnyardgrass co-cultured with rice than when grown alone (Figure 5C). These results suggest that, just like in maize, these three barnyardgrass IGPS genes are likely regulators of the genes of the DIMBOA clusters, and that they could function in the allelopathic interaction between barnyardgrass and rice.

3. Discussion

The discovery of new plant BGCs has been facilitated by the increasing availability of assembled plant genomes and the development of novel bioinformatics tools for gene cluster discovery. Using the PlantiSMASH software, we identified a total of 46 and 98 candidate gene clusters in the rice and barnyardgrass genome, respectively. However, the candidate gene clusters were narrowed down to two (rice) and seven (barnyardgrass) when we applied additional methods like co-pathway and co- expression analyses. A previous study found that many bioinformatically predicted BGCs in plants are typically not co-expressed, and thus many of them may not be true BGCs that correspond with actual secondary metabolic pathways [28]. Our results presented here together with results from prior studies suggest that it is essential to use multiple approaches in predicting BGCs with a potential biological role. The final candidate gene clusters identified in this study meet the criteria of physical proximity, co-expression, and within the same pathway, and thus should be relatively reliable. However, further experimental validation is needed to verify their BGC identity.

Interestingly, one of the identified BGCs is annotated to be involved in quercetin biosynthesis. In addition to the potential allelopathic effect on plants [27], quercetin is claimed to be a versatile antioxidant with protective abilities against tissue injury induced by various drug toxicities [34]. Quercetin and its derivatives have been detected in E. crus-galli, and reported to have significant activities against the human carcinoma [26], consistent with traditional use of E. crus-galli as medication. Therefore, this predicted quercetin cluster could also have the potential to be used in development of medicines via metabolic engineering approaches.

Co-expression network analysis can be used for investigation of thousands of genes with identical expression patterns, clustering, and instantaneous recognition over various situations [35]. It is an important and magnificent method for gene interaction analysis and interpretation of molecular mechanism in numerous species [35]. When performing the co-expression network analysis, we observed that the genes in the rice momilactone and phytocassane BGCs were positively co-expressed and had a common co-regulated module ‘MERoyalblue’ (Figure 3). This is likely due to the fact that both clusters produce the same secondary compounds, diterpenoid phytoalexins, derived from a common precursor, geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGDP) [21]. In addition, it has also been reported that the DPF transcription factor can activate not only OsCPS2 expression for phytocassane biosynthesis, but CYP99A2 for momilactone biosynthesis. However, a different expression pattern was observed in barnyardgrass. Here, the expression of genes in the DIMBOA cluster and presumable momilactone clusters were negatively co-expressed (Figure 2). Based on our previous findings [4], when barnyardgrass is co-cultured with rice, the genes within all three copies of the DIMBOA clusters were significantly upregulated. Therefore, we propose that, unlike the momilactone cluster in rice, the function of the likely momilactone cluster in barnyardgrass has changed from allelopathic interaction to another. This is supported by the different co-expression pattern of the orthologous bHLHs in the two species.

The discovery of the involvement of biosynthetic gene clusters for allelopathic interactions between rice and barnyardgrass has brought about more implications for the molecular mechanisms of crop–weed interaction. Herein we explored and discovered genetic modules and candidate hub regulatory genes via co-expression and pathway analysis. In future, a couple of interesting issues remain to be resolved. For example, chromatin analyses by Hi-C or ChIP-seq could be performed to better understand the regulatory mechanism involved in the biosynthetic pathways. How did the barnyardgrass evolve to acquire the DIMBOA and candidate momilactone gene clusters which are present in the genomes of two most staple crops (rice and maize) of the world? In addition, for rice breeding, bulked segregant analysis and genome wide association methods could be applied for investigating the adaptive alleles or genes which confer resistance to DIMBOA.

4. Materials and Methods 4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Barnyardgrass (STB08) seeds picked up from rice paddy fields in the lower Yangtze River area of China (30°17′ N, 119°57′ E) and rice (PI312777) seeds were collected from Chui-Hua Kong’s laboratory at China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. The rice–barnyardgrass allelopathic interaction experiment was performed as previously described [4]. The RSA (relay seeding in agar) method with minor modifications [36] was used to investigate the allelopathic interactions between barnyardgrass (STB08) and rice (PI312777). Ten germinated rice seeds (PI312777) were first transferred to a bottle (10 cm in base diameter) with 50 mL of 0.5% agar medium, and germinated barnyardgrass seeds (STB08) were transferred to a Petri dish with sterile water. The PI312777 seeds were ordered in three rows with a 3-4-3 pattern. Ten germinated STB08 seeds were then transferred between two rows in the same bottle containing the rice seeds. The PI312777 and STB08 seedlings were co-cultured for 3 h, 3 d, 7 d, and 14 d in a SAFE incubator (Ningbo, China) with a day/night regime of 14 h (30 °C) and 10 h (20 °C), and 75% relative humidity. Mono-cultured PI312777 and STB08 grown in the same conditions were used as controls. For the RNA-Seq experiment, ten mono- and co-cultured PI312777 and STB08 plants were collected from each time point, instantly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at –80 °C until use. A total of 32 RNA-seq datasets were generated, 16 each for rice and barnyardgrass (Table S1).

4.2. Analysis of RNA-seq Data

Illumina RNA-Seq libraries from PI312777 and STB08 were prepared and sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 system following the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were filtered before the downstream analysis to decrease data noise. NGSQC Toolkit version v2.3.3 was applied in quality control and filtering with the default settings [37]. TopHat2 [38] was used to map the reads to the rice reference genome (MSU7.0, http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/) and E. crus-galli reference genome (http://ibi.zju.edu.cn/RiceWeedomes/Echinochloa/) [4]. After alignment, the Cufflinks package was used to measure the FPKM (fragments per kilobase per million reads) value of each gene.

4.3. Metabolic Pathway Annotation

To build the E. crus-galli metabolic enzyme database, The Ensemble Enzyme Prediction Pipeline (E2P2 v3.0, https://dpb.carnegiescience.edu/labs/rhee-lab/software) was used for enzymatic annotations of the E. crus-galli coding genes [11]. Using the enzymatic annotations, PathoLogic [39] version 21.0 implemented in Pathway Tools was then applied to construct the metabolic pathway database [40]. The metabolic pathway annotation file of O. sativa was downloaded from Plant Metabolic Network v13.0 (https://www.plantcyc.org/).

4.4. Prediction of Candidate Biosynthetic Gene Clusters by PlantiSMASH

The online computational tool kit PlantiSMASH [10] was utilized to predict candidate biosynthetic gene clusters in the barnyardgrass genome. The rice gene clusters predicted by this software were fetched from http://plantismash.secondarymetabolites.org/precalc/results/Oryza_sativa_Japonica/.

4.5. Gene Cluster Validation by Co-pathway and Co-expression Analyses

The candidate gene clusters predicted by plantiSMASH were first annotated with the species- specific metabolic pathway database and further filtered with the following approaches. (1) Co-pathway: we used two criteria to define co-pathway metabolic gene clusters, (a) at least two genes annotated with the same pathway ID (MetaCyc pathway identifier), (b) genes of the same cluster classified into at least two different reactions (MetaCyc reaction identifier); (2) co-expression: first, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was calculated for all the gene pairs within a characterized metabolic gene cluster, and the number of pairs showing significant co-expression (p-value < 0.05) was calculated; second, PCC was calculated for all the metabolic gene pairs, and its distribution was estimated [11], we then took the 95th percentile as the PCC threshold to select co-expressed genes. Co-expression coefficient matrix was visualized using the R package ‘corrplot’ [41].

4.6. Co-expression Network Investigation

WGCNA was used to build the gene co-expression networks [23]. All genes, except those not expressed in all time points, were used in clustering, and the gene dendrogram was employed in module identification by the dynamic tree cut method (mergeCutHeight = 0.25, maxBlockSize = 8000) for both rice and barnyardgrass. The β, a crucial parameter for network building, was chosen as suggested in the user’s guide to adjust both the scale-free topology and appropriate node connection. Then, the modules were examined for their connections with the trait by correlating module eigengenes (MEs) with trait measurements. BGCs of rice (momilactone, phytocassane) and barnyardgrass (DIMBOA, momilactone) were considered traits. Module eigengenes were regarded as the critical components in the principal component analysis for the individual gene module, and the expression arrangement of all genes could be outlined into a single typical expression profile within an assumed module. Furthermore, significant modules were selected based on p-value < 0.05.

4.7. Module Hub Gene Analysis and Visualization

Hub genes, the utmost central and linked genes, engage in many interactions and play a more significant function than other genes of the network [42]. The MM (module membership) was specified as the correlation of gene expression profile with ME, and the GS (gene significance) measure was defined as (the absolute value of) the correlation between gene and traits. We took the absolute value in both MM and GS measurement. In WGCNA, the connectivity level was defined as the sum of all weight through all edges of a node. We used MM > 0.8, GS > 0.2 and the highest intramodular connectivity in identification of the hub genes for both barnyardgrass and rice. The co- expression interactions and patterns of the top hub genes of each barnyardgrass module and all significant rice hub genes were visualized using Cytoscape v 3.6.1 [43].

4.8. Enrichment Analyses of Gene Modules

AgriGO with ‘Oryza sativa MSU7.0’ set as the species background (http://bioinfo.cau.edu.cn/agriGO/) was used for the GO enrichment analysis. GO enrichment terms were selected based on p-value (0.0001) and the false discovery rate (0.05). Furthermore, we used MapMan in investigating the complex metabolic pathways and biological process, and the PlantTFDB 4.0 database (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn/prediction.php) in analyzing rice TFs [44].

4.9. Orthologous Gene Identification

To identify the E. crus-galli genes orthologous to genes encoding rice bHLH (LOC_Os01g09990) and maize indole-3-glycerolphosphate synthase (GRMZM2G106950), we created a protein database by combining protein sequences of six grass species (including O. sativa, Z. mays, B. distachyon, S. bicolor, S. italica, and E. crus-galli) and A. thaliana (downloaded from Phytozome v9.0 except E. crus- galli). BLASTP was then used to scan homologous genes encoding the two genes in the protein database (E-value thresholds: 10⁻¹⁰). RAxML v8 was applied with the parameters ‘- m PROTGAMMAAUTO -auto-prot = bic’ to automatically select the best protein model for tree construction [45]. Each tree was constructed with 100 bootstraps. MEGA v5.1 [46] was applied to draw the constructed tree.

4.10. Gene Expression Validation Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

RNA was extracted utilizing the Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) method following the manufacturer’s protocol. The PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser and SYBR Premix ExTaq™ (Takara, Japan) was used in cDNA generation and qRT-PCR based on the manufacturer’s instruction. qRT- PCR was carried out using the LightCycler^® 96 System (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The qRT-PCR was setup following the protocol described previously [47]. Three biological replicates were used, and the values shown are the mean ± SD, where the statistical significance evaluated using the Student’s t-test. The rice and barnyardgrass actin genes were used as internal controls for normalizing the variance in rice and barnyardgrass, respectively. The primers used in qRT-PCR are shown in Table S8.

5. Conclusions

To achieve sustainable agriculture with less chemical usage, it is desirable to better understand the genetic mechanism underlying crop–weed interactions and develop competitive crop cultivars. Allelopathy through secondary metabolites is one of the central processes underlying crop–weed interactions, and biosynthetic gene clusters have been proved to convey genomic mechanism governing these allelopathic interactions. In this study, we not only identified candidate new biosynthetic gene clusters but also applied gene correlation network to identify gene modules and hub genes associated with BGCs involved in the allelopathic interactions. This study provides fresh insights into the secondary metabolic pathways and related regulatory mechanism involved in the rice–barnyardgrass allelopathic interaction.

Figure 1. Characterization of the identified candidate quercetin biosynthetic gene cluster. (A) Gene co-expression pattern for the genes in the candidate gene cluster. (B) Expression changes of the five genes in the quercetin gene cluster in barnyardgrass before and after co-cultured with rice. The expression data are based on our previous RNA-Seq experiment with three biological replicates [4].

Figure 2. Co-regulated modules and hub genes with biosynthetic gene clusters in barnyardgrass. (A) The relationship between the 46 gene modules with genes in the three copies of the 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) gene cluster and the presumable momilactone gene clusters in barnyardgrass. Each row corresponds to a module eigengene (correlation between a column and a trait). Each cell contains the corresponding correlation efficient and p-value. The arrows indicate three highly co-expressed modules 'MEpink', 'MEturquiise' and 'MEgreen'. (B) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment result for the genes in the 'MEpink' module.

Figure 3. One gene module co-regulated with the two biosynthetic gene clusters in rice. (A) The relationship between the 27 gene modules with genes in the momilactone and phytocassane gene cluster in barnyardgrass. Each row corresponds to a module eigengene (correlation between a column and a trait). Each cell contains the corresponding correlation efficient and p-value. The arrow indicates the most highly co-expressed 'MEroyalblue' module. (B) GO enrichment result for the genes in the 'MEroyalblue' module. (C) The gene co-expression network among the hub genes from the 'MEroyalblue' module with genes in the momilactone and phytocassane gene clusters. Transcription factors are colored in red. (D) Gene expression changes of the two rice hub genes after co-cultured with barnyardgrass. Expression value of genes without co-cultured with barnyardgrass was normalized to be one. Three biological replicates were used in the experiment.

Figure 4. Co-expression pattern between genes in the momilactone cluster and transcription factor DPFs. (A) Phylogenetic tree for rice diterpenoid phytoalexin factor (DPF) and its homologous genes. The rice DPF (LOC_Os01g09900) gene is highlighted with red dot, while its paralogs is highlighted with red dashed frame. The orthologous DPFs in E. crus-galli are highlighted in the blue dot box. (B) The co-expression coefficient matrix for genes in the momilactone cluster and DPFs in rice. The rice DPF genes regulating the rice BGCs are highlighted with red dot box. (C) The co-expression coefficient matrix for genes in the predicted momilactone cluster and DPF homologs in barnyardgrass.

Figure 5. Co-expression pattern between genes in three copies of the DIMBOA cluster and IGPS orthologs in barnyardgrass. (A) Phylogenetic tree for genes homologous to IGPS across 6 grass species and Arabidopsis thaliana. The gene encoding indole-3-glycerolphosphate synthase (IGPS) in maize is highlighted in the red dotand the two homologous genes in maize are indicated by grey dots. Barnyardgrass orthologs are boxed in red dot box. (B) The co-expression coefficient matrix for genes in the three copies of the DIMBOA cluster and IGPSs in barnyardgrass. (C) Gene expression changes of the 5 barnyardgrass IGPSs after co-culturing with rice. Expression value of genes without co- culturing with rice was normalized to be one. Three biological replicates were used in the experiment.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/16/3846/s1. Table S1: Summary of the RNA-seq data for rice and baryardgrass in this study. Table S2: Predicted candidate biosynthetic gene clusters in the rice and barnyardgrass genomes. Table S3: GO enrichment for genes in the gene modules associated with the expression of the DIMBOA and momilactone gene clusters in barnyardgrass. Table S4: MapMan functional enrichment for genes in the gene modules associated with the expression of the DIMBOA and momilactone gene clusters in barnyardgrass. Table S5: Top 30 hub genes for each module associated with the DIMBOA and momilactone cluster in barnyardgrass. Table S6: Functional enrichment for the rice MEroyalblue module. Table S7: Hub TFs in the modules associated with the momilactone and phytocassane cluster in rice. Table S8: Primers used in qRT-PCR in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Q. and L.F.; Formal Analysis, M.H.S., F.L., M.A., L.M., L.J., D.W., S.W., W.W., and J.Q.; Validation, M.H.S., M.A., H.C., Y.W., F.F., and C.Y.; Writing-original draft, M.H.S., J.Q.; Writing-review and editing, Q.-H.Z., L.F.; Funding acquisition, J.Q. and L.F.

Funding

The work was financially supported by grants from the Zhejiang and National Natural Science Foundation (LZ17C130001/91435111), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018T110597), and the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, the 111 Project (B17039).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the IBM high performance computing cluster of Analysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University. We thank Michael P. Timko (University of Virginia) and Golam Jalal Ahammed (Henan University of Science and Technology) for their help with editing. We also appreciate the reviewers and editors for the patience to the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no Conflict of interest to declare.

Abbreviations

BGCs Biosynthetic gene clusters

DPF Diterpenoid phytoalexin factor

WGCNA Weighted gene co-expression network analysis

BX1 Indole-3-glycerolphosphatelyase

IGPS Indole-3-glycerolphosphate synthase

PCC Pearson correlation coefficient

MM Module membership

GS Gene significance

qRT-PCR quantitative real-time PCR

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

1. Rice, E. Allelopathy, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USA, 1984; p. 422.

2. Khanh, T.D.; Chung, M.I.; Xuan, T.D.; Tawata, S. The exploitation of crop allelopathy in sustainable agricultural production. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2005, 191, 172-184.

3. Cheng, F.; Cheng, Z.H. Research Progress on the use of Plant Allelopathy in Agriculture and the Physiological and Ecological Mechanisms of Allelopathy. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1020.

4. Guo, L.B.; Qiu, J.; Ye, C.Y.; Jin, G.L.; Mao, L.F.; Zhang, H.Q.; Yang, X.F.; Peng, Q.; Wang, Y.Y.; Jia, L.; et al. Echinochloa crus-galli genome analysis provides insight into its adaptation and invasiveness as a weed. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1031.

5. Boycheva, S.; Daviet, L.; Wolfender, J.-L.; Fitzpatrick, T.B. The rise of operon-like gene clusters in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 447-459.

6. Xu, M.M.; Galhano, R.; Wiemann, P.; Bueno, E.; Tiernan, M.; Wu, W.; Chung, I.M.; Gershenzon, J.; Tudzynski, B.; Sesma, A.; et al. Genetic evidence for natural product-mediated plant-plant allelopathy in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2012, 193, 570-575.

7. Olsen, K.M.; Small, L.L. Micro- and macroevolutionary adaptation through repeated loss of a complete metabolic pathway. New Phytol. 2018, 219, 757-766.

8. Nutzmann, H.W.; Osbourn, A. Regulation of metabolic gene clusters in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 503-510.

9. Higashi, Y.; Saito, K. Network analysis for gene discovery in plant-specialized metabolism. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1597-1606.

10. Kautsar, S.A.; Duran, H.G.S.; Blin, K.; Osbourn, A.; Medema, M.H. plantiSMASH: Automated identification, annotation and expression analysis of plant biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W55-W63.

11. Schlapfer, P.; Zhang, P.; Wang, C.; Kim, T.; Banf, M.; Chae, L.; Dreher, K.; Chavali, A.K.; Nilo-Poyanco, R.; Bernard, T.; et al. Genome-Wide Prediction of Metabolic Enzymes, Pathways, and Gene Clusters in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 2041-2059.

12. Kraehmer, H.; Jabran, K.; Mennan, H.; Chauhan, B. Global distribution of rice weeds-A review. Crop Prot. 2016, 80, 73-86.

13. Xuan, T.D.; Chung, M.I.; Khanh, T.D.; Tawata, S. Identification of phytotoxic substances from early growth of barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli) root exudates. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32, 895-906.

14. Toyomasu, T.; Niida, R.; Kenmoku, H.; Kanno, Y.; Miura, S.; Nakano, C.; Shiono, Y.; Mitsuhashi, W.; Toshima, H.; Oikawa, H.; et al. Identification of diterpene biosynthetic gene clusters and functional analysis of labdane-related diterpene cyclases in Phomopsis amygdali. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 1038-1047.

15. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ino, T.; Ota, K. Secretion of momilactone A from rice roots to the rhizosphere. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 691-696.

16. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Peters, R.J. The role of momilactones in rice allelopathy. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 175-185.

17. Kato-Noguchi, H. Barnyard grass-induced rice allelopathy and momilactone B. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1016-1020.

18. Zhao, H.; Li, H.B.; Kong, C.H.; Xu, X.H.; Liang, W.J. Chemical response of allelopathic rice seedlings under varying environmental conditions. Allelopathy J. 2005, 15, 105-110.

19. Shimura, K.; Okada, A.; Okada, K.; Jikumaru, Y.; Ko, K.W.; Toyomasu, T.; Sassa, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Kodama, O.; Shibuya, N.; et al. Identification of a biosynthetic gene cluster in rice for momilactones. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 34013-34018.

20. Khanh, T.D.; Xuan, T.D.; Chung, I.M. Rice allelopathy and the possibility for weed management. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 151, 325-339.

21. Yamamura, C.; Mizutani, E.; Okada, K.; Nakagawa, H.; Fukushima, S.; Tanaka, A.; Maeda, S.; Kamakura, T.; Yamane, H.; Takatsuji, H.; et al. Diterpenoid phytoalexin factor, a bHLH transcription factor, plays a central role in the biosynthesis of diterpenoid phytoalexins in rice. Plant J. 2015, 84, 1100-1113.

22. Aoki, K.; Ogata, Y.; Shibata, D. Approaches for extracting practical information from gene co-expression networks in plant biology. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 381-390.

23. Langfelder, P.; Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 559.

24. Shaik, R.; Ramakrishna, W. Genes and Co-Expression Modules Common to Drought and Bacterial Stress Responses in Arabidopsis and Rice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77261.

25. Swaminathan, S.; Morrone, D.; Wang, Q.; Fulton, D.B.; Peters, R.J. CYP76M7 is an ent-cassadiene C11alpha-hydroxylase defining a second multifunctional diterpenoid biosynthetic gene cluster in rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3315-3325.

26. El Molla, S.G.; Motaal, A.A.; El Hefnawy, H.; El Fishawy, A. Cytotoxic activity of phenolic constituents from Echinochloa crus-galli against four human cancer cell lines. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2016, 26, 62-67.

27. Parvez, M.M.; Tomita-Yokotani, K.; Fujii, Y.; Konishi, T.; Iwashina, T. Effects of quercetin and its seven derivatives on the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana and Neurospora crassa. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2004, 32, 631-635.

28. Wisecaver, J.H.; Borowsky, A.T.; Tzin, V.; Jander, G.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Rokas, A. A Global Coexpression Network Approach for Connecting Genes to Specialized Metabolic Pathways in Plants. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 944-959.

29. Lam, K.C.; Ibrahim, R.K.; Behdad, B.; Dayanandan, S. Structure, function, and evolution of plant O-methyltransferases. Genome 2007, 50, 1001-1013.

30. Czolpinska, M.; Rurek, M. Plant Glycine-Rich Proteins in Stress Response: An Emerging, Still Prospective Story. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 302.

31. Chen, F.; Tholl, D.; Bohlmann, J.; Pichersky, E. The family of terpene synthases in plants: A mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J. 2011, 66, 212-229.

32. Zhou, F.; Wang, C.Y.; Gutensohn, M.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, D.; Dudareva, N.; Lu, S. A recruiting protein of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase controls metabolic flux toward chlorophyll biosynthesis in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6866-6871.

33. Miyamoto, K.; Fujita, M.; Shenton, M.R.; Akashi, S.; Sugawara, C.; Sakai, A.; Horie, K.; Hasegawa, M.; Kawaide, H.; Mitsuhashi, W.; et al. Evolutionary trajectory of phytoalexin biosynthetic gene clusters in rice. Plant J. 2016, 87, 293-304.

34. David, A.V.A.; Arulmoli, R.; Parasuraman, S. Overviews of biological importance of quercetin: A bioactive flavonoid. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016, 10, 84.

35. Serin, E.A.; Nijveen, H.; Hilhorst, H.W.; Ligterink, W. Learning from Co-expression Networks: Possibilities and Challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 444.

36. Navarez, D.; Olofsdotter, M. Relay seeding technique for screening allelopathic rice (Oryza sativa). In Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 25-28 June 1996; pp. 25-28.

37. Patel, R.K.; Jain, M. NGS QC Toolkit: A toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30619.

38. Kim, D.; Pertea, G.; Trapnell, C.; Pimentel, H.; Kelley, R.; Salzberg, S.L. TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R36.

39. Karp, P.D.; Latendresse, M.; Caspi, R. The pathway tools pathway prediction algorithm. Stand. Genomic Sci. 2011, 5, 424-429.

40. Caspi, R.; Altman, T.; Billington, R.; Dreher, K.; Foerster, H.; Fulcher, C.A.; Holland, T.A.; Keseler, I.M.; Kothari, A.; Kubo, A.; et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D459-D471.

41. Wei, T.; Simko, V.; Levy, M.; Xie, Y.; Jin, Y.; Zemla, J. Package 'corrplot'. Statistician 2017, 56, 316-324.

42. Albert, R. Scale-free networks in cell biology. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 4947-4957.

43. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498-2504.

44. Jin, J.; Tian, F.; Yang, D.C.; Meng, Y.Q.; Kong, L.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. PlantTFDB 4.0: Toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D1040-D1045.

45. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312-1313.

46. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731-2739.

47. Alamin, M.; Zeng, D.-D.; Qin, R.; Sultana, M.H.; Jin, X.-L.; Shi, C.-H. Characterization and Fine Mapping of SFL1, a Gene Controlling Screw Flag Leaf in Rice. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017, 35, 491-503.