Oral submucous fibrosis: a contemporary narrative review with a proposed inter-professional approach for an early diagnosis and clinical management

Abstract

Oral Submucous fibrosis (OSMF) has traditionally been described as “a chronic, insidious, scarring disease of the oral cavity, often with involvement of the pharynx and the upper esophagus”. Millions of individuals are affected, especially in South and South East Asian countries. The main risk factor is areca nut chewing. Due to its high morbidity and high malignant transformation rate, constant efforts have been made to develop effective management. Despite this, there have been no significant improvements in prognosis for decades. This expert opinion paper updates the literature and provides a critique of diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls common in developing countries and of deficiencies in management. An inter-professional model is proposed to avoid these pitfalls and to reduce these deficiencies.

Introduction

Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF) is a potentially malignant disorder which was described by Schwartz in 1952 as “Atropica idiopathica mucosae oris” and later by Jens J. Pindborg in 1966 as “an insidious, chronic disease that affects any part of the oral cavity and sometimes the pharynx [1]. Although occasionally preceded by, or associated with, the formation of vesicles, it is always associated with a juxtaepithelial inflammatory reaction followed by fibroelastic change of the lamina propria and epithelial atrophy that leads to stiffness of the oral mucosa and causes trismus and an inability to eat” [1]. OSMF is also characterized by reduced movement and depapillation of the tongue, blanching and leathery texture of the oral mucosa, progressive reduction of mouth opening, and shrunken uvula [2,3,4]. Other terms used to describe OSMF include idiopathic scleroderma of the mouth, juxtaepithelial fibrosis, idiopathic palatal fibrosis, diffuse oral submucous fibrosis, and sclerosing stomatitis [5,6,7,8].

Epidemiology (Table 1) (Fig. 1)

Worldwide, the number of cases of OSMF was estimated to be 2.5 million in 1996 [33]. Although many case finding studies have been conducted, particularly in South and South East Asia, OSMF is not a notifiable disease and no population-based data are available [33]. The prevalence of OSMF in India has been estimated to range from 0.2–2.3% in males and 1.2–4.6% in females, with a broad age range from 11 to 60 years [34,35,36]. A marked increase in incidence has been observed after the widespread marketing of commercial tobacco and areca nut products, generally known as Gutkha, which is sold in single-use packets [33]. Currently, it is estimated that areca nut is consumed by 10–20% of the World’s population in a wide variety of formulations [37, 38]. The global South Asian diaspora also has a significant problem with cases reported from the United Kingdom, USA, South Africa, and many European countries.

Table 1 Worldwide prevalence studies on Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Full size table

Fig. 1

figure1

Global and Indian prevalence studies of Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Full size image

Table 1 and Fig. 1 present published estimates of the prevalence of OSMF, which range from 0.1 to 30%, varying by geographical location, sample size, and sampling methodology. There is an urgent need for large well-designed epidemiological surveys to understand the true global and regional burden of OSMF.

Major etiology, contributing factors and etiopathogenesis (Tables 2 and 3) (Fig. 2)

Although the etiopathogenesis of this disease is multifactorial, areca nut-chewing in any formulation is considered the main causative agent. (Fig. 2) Contributory risk factors suggested includes chewing of smokeless tobacco, high intake of chilies, toxic levels of copper in foodstuffs and masticatories, vitamin deficiencies, and malnutrition resulting in low levels of serum proteins, anemia and genetic predisposition.

Table 2 Major aetiology of Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Full size table

Table 3 Contributing risk factors for Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Full size table

Fig. 2

figure2

Etiopathogenesis [44]

Full size image

Diagnostic approach

Diagnosis of OSMF is based on clinical signs and symptoms that include burning sensation, pain, and ulceration (Table 4) [4, 46, 47]. Progressive restriction in mouth opening, blanching of the mucosa, depapillation of the tongue, and loss of pigmentation are other classic features (Fig. 3) [46]. Dysphonia and hearing impairment is also observed in advanced cases [48, 49]. Quality of life (QoL) is severely affected, worsening with increasing stage of the disease [50].

Table 4 Intra- and extra- oral manifestations of OSMF at different stages

Full size table

Fig. 3

figure3

Clinical expressions of Oral Submucous Fibrosis. Oral Submucous Fibrosis in a 27-year-old male with a history of gutkha chewing. Panel A shows sunken cheeks and prominent malar bone. Panel B shows significant blanching or marble-like appearance of the soft palate and faucial pillars. Note the altered, inverted shape of the uvula. Panels C & D show blanched bands of upper and lower labial mucosae and vestibule, which are stiff and palpable. Panels E, F & G: A 24-year-old female with a history of chewing baked areca nut. Panel E: significant blanching of soft palate and faucial pillars, and shrunken uvula. Panels F & G: thick fibrous bands and brown/black pigmentation on left & right buccal mucosae

Full size image

OSMF progresses over time and management depends on the stage at clinical presentation. In 2012, More et al. proposed a disease progression-based classification (Table 5) which represents the clinical and functional staging of OSMF. This classification has been widely accepted/recommended as the closest fit for Indian population, especially to understand the disease progression/ clinical pattern [3, 35, 51]. In 2017, Passi D. et al. proposed a pathologically updated and treatment management-based classification. This classification chiefly focuses and recommends the treatment management based on the clinical stage of OSMF [52]. Later in 2018, Arakeri G. et al. proposed a three-component classification scheme (TFM) which can essentially be useful for effective communication amongst the care team, categorization of OSMF, recording data and disease prognosis, and treatment management. Additionally, this classification also describes OSMF malignant transformation in detail [53].

Table 5 More et al. 2012 classification of OSMF

Full size table

Approaches to non-surgical management.

Although there is general agreement regarding clinical staging, approaches to management of patients vary widely [54]. Numerous interventions have been reported and are summarized in Table 6 [60, 68,69,70]. Supportive regimens, such as vitamin and iron supplements, a mineral-rich diet, red fruits, green leafy vegetables, and green tea consumption, are often recommended but there are no good quality studies confirming their efficacy.

Table 6 Treatments for OSMF

Full size table

Malignant transformation of OSMF

OSMF is classified as an oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) [3]. Patients with OSMF have been reported with higher risk of developing oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), compared to other OPMD’s [71, 72]. Although 7.6% of OSMF cases transformed to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in a 17-year follow up study reported in 1970 [73], other studies with smaller follow up periods report malignant transformation rates ranging from 1.9–9%, [74,75,76] depending on diagnostic criteria and duration of follow up [77].

Studies suggest that malignant transformation in patients with OSMF differs from those without OSMF. This difference is believed to arise from the mechanism of areca nut carcinogenesis. A retrospective study conducted in China reported that oral cancer originating from OSMF is clinically more invasive and exhibits higher metastasis and recurrence rates compared to “conventional” OSCC [78]. In contrast, Chaturvedi et al. found that OC arising in a background of OSMF represented a clinico-pathologically distinct entity, less aggressive than the “conventional” tobacco-related OC’s seen in India [46]. Better prognostic features associated with OC occurring in a background of OSMF included early tumor stage, thinner lesions, fewer neck metastases with less extra-capsular spread, and more highly differentiated neoplasms. It was suggested that fibrosis in the oral mucosa and tumor stroma, with reduced vascularity, inhibits lymphatic and vascular spread [46].

Studies have shown higher risk of malignant transformation of OSMF when observed with simultaneous oral leukoplakia [77]. A wide array of studies was implemented recently to determine the possible mechanisms involved in malignant transformation, and many have focused their attention on molecular markers which could be helpful for early diagnosis and have possible, helpful therapeutic implications [79,80,81].

Proposed diagnostic and management approach

As with other lifestyle related diseases, primary prevention at population and individual levels needs to be improved. Space does not permit an exhaustive discussion of the approaches here but, in the case of OSMF, this involves education of the public regarding the dangers of areca nut and tobacco, and legislation to restrict the sale of gutkha and similar products [82,83,84]. Several Indian states have had success in this regard. Since May 2013, gutkha is banned in 24 states and 5 union territories of India, under the provision of centrally enacted Food Safety and Regulation (Prohibition) Act 2011 [85]. The ban is enforced by the State public health ministry, Food and Drug Administration and the local police. Although there is a significant reduction in the legal purchase of gutkha, the Supreme Court and higher enforcement bodies are still chasing to cease the illegal sale [85, 86].

What of the many millions already afflicted? Despite efforts to improve the management of OSMF, many come so late to diagnosis that cure is impossible, and interventions are of limited efficacy. So early diagnosis is of great importance. Further, most OSMF patients chew tobacco as well as an areca nut product, may imbibe unhealthy amounts of alcohol, and abuse other drugs. They often have dietary deficiencies. Therefore, they are at high risk of co-morbidities, including metabolic syndromes, respiratory, gastrointestinal/liver and cardiovascular diseases. (Fig. 4) [87, 88].

Fig. 4

figure4

Oral and Systemic outcomes of OSMF possible in the absence of holistic management

Full size image

Dependent on their dominant symptoms, patients may seek consultation from either primary care physicians (PCP) or dentists. When examined by a dentist, the diagnostic and treatment approach is likely to be focused on the oral signs and symptoms. Conversely, when patients present to a PCP, the focus of management is likely to be general, with the oral condition under-investigated and under-managed. In most of the world, these patients are not managed by a multidisciplinary team.

We propose an inter-professional approach that may increase rates of early diagnosis of OSMF and potentially malignant disorders/OSCC, with integrated management of both oral and systemic symptoms, improving long-term prognosis, reducing suffering and improving quality of life.

When a patient presents to a dentist, and a clinical diagnosis of OSMF is made, he/she should be referred to their primary care physician with a note of planned dental management. If any underlying systemic disease is diagnosed, the medical treatment plan should be communicated back to the dentist. If no systemic disease is diagnosed, a written medical clearance letter, including an assessment of risks of developing any systemic condition, and recommendations for review visits, should be included.

When a patient presents to a physician, if he/she is a user of areca nut, and especially if restricted mouth opening is present, he/she should be immediately referred to a dentist detailing any planned management of other disease. The dentist should report back to the physician with a treatment plan for OSMF, if present, or dental clearance letter with a suggested risk of developing OSMF or any other oral disease.

This, after all, should be routine in any integrated health care system.

Conclusion

Although studied intensively over many decades, one might say centuries, especially in South Asia, OSMF is hardly recognized and is poorly understood across the globe. The incidence is rising; there has been no significant improvement in management, nor reduction in its high malignant transformation rate.

Better integration of medical and dental services, especially in developing countries, may reduce patients’ suffering and improve their life quality. All health care professions must work together in public education and primary prevention.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

1. 1.

Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM. Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966;22(6):764–79.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

2. 2.

Ahmad MS, Ali SA, Ali AS, Chaubey KK. Epidemiological and etiological study of oral submucous fibrosis among gutkha chewers of Patna, Bihar, India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(2):84–9.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

3. 3.

More CB, Das S, Patel H, Adalja C, Kamatchi V, Venkatesh R. Proposed clinical classification for oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Oncol. 2012;48(3):200–2.

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

4. 4.

More CB, Rao NR. Proposed clinical definition for oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(4):311–4.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* Google Scholar

5. 5.

Aziz SR. Coming to America: betel nut and oral submucous fibrosis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(4):423–8.

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

6. 6.

Kerr AR, Warnakulasuriya S, Mighell AJ, Dietrich T, Nasser M, Rimal J, et al. A systematic review of medical interventions for oral submucous fibrosis and future research opportunities. Oral Dis. 2011;17(1 Suppl 1):42–57.

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

7. 7.

Van der Waal I. Historical perspective and nomenclature of potentially malignant or potentially premalignant oral epithelial lesions with emphasis on leukoplakia-some suggestions for modifications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125(6):577–81.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

8. 8.

Kiran Kumar K, Saraswathi TR, Ranganathan K, Uma Devi M, Elizabeth J. Oral submucous fibrosis: a clinico-histopathological study in Chennai. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18(3):106–11.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

9. 9.

Pindborg JJ, Kalapesi ILK, Kale SA, Singh B, Taleyarkhan BN. Frequency of oral leukoplakia and related conditions among 10,000 Bombayites. Preliminary Rep, J Ind Dent Assoc. 1965;37:228–9.

* CAS

* Google Scholar

10. 10.

Pindborg JJ, Chawla TN, Misra RK, Nagpaul RK, Gupta VK. Frequency of oral carcinoma, leukoplakia, leukokeratosis, leukoedema, sub mucous fibrosis and lichen planus in 10,000 Indians in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. India Preliminary J Dent Res. 1965;44(3):61.

* CAS

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

11. 11.

Pindborg JJ, Bhat M, Devnath KR, Narayan HR, Ramchandra S. Frequency of oral white lesions in 10,000 individuals in Bangalore, South India, preliminary report. Ind J Med Sci. 1966;2:349–52.

* Google Scholar

12. 12.

Zachariah J, Mathew B, Varma NA, Iqbal AM, Pindborg JJ. Frequency of oral mucosal lesions among 5000 individuals in Trivandrum, South India. Preliminary Rep J Indian Dent Assoc. 1966;38(11):290–4.

* CAS

* Google Scholar

13. 13.

Pindborg JJ, Mehta FS, Gupta PC, Daftary DK. Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis among 50,915 Indian villagers. Brit J Cancer. 1968;22:646–54.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

14. 14.

Wahi PN, Mittal VP, Lahiri B, Luthera UK, Seth RK, Arma GD. Epidemiological study of precancerous lesions of the oral cavity: A preliminary report. Ind J Med Res. 1970;50:1361–91.

* Google Scholar

15. 15.

Mehta FS, Gupta PC, Daftary DK, Pindborg JJ, Choksi SK. An epidemiologic study of oral cancer and precancerous conditions among 101,761 villagers in Maharashtra. India Int J Cancer. 1972;10(1):134–41.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

16. 16.

Lay KM, Sein K, Myint A, Ko SK, Pindborg JJ. Epidemiologic study of 600 villagers of oral precancerous lesions in Bilugyun: preliminary report. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1982;10(3):152–5.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

17. 17.

Seedat HA, Vanwyk CW. Betelnut chewing and sub mucous fibrosis in Durban. South Africa Med J. 1988;74(3):568–71.

* CAS

* Google Scholar

18. 18.

Tang JG, Jian XF, Gao ML, Ling TY, Zhang KH. Epidemiological survey of oral submucous fibrosis in Xiangtan City, Hunan Province. China Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25(2):177–80.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

19. 19.

Patil PB, Bathi R, Chaudhari S. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in dental patients with tobacco smoking, chewing, and mixed habits: a cross-sectional study in South India. J Fam Community Med. 2013;20(2):130–5.

* Article

* Google Scholar

20. 20.

Hazarey VK, Erlewad DM, Mundhe KA, Ughade SN. Oral submucous fibrosis: study of 1000 cases from Central India. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36(1):12–7.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

21. 21.

Mathew AL, Pai KM, Sholapurkar AA, Vengal M. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in patients visiting a dental school in southern India. Indian J Dent Res. 2008;19(2):99–103.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

22. 22.

Mehrotra R, Pandya S, Chaudhary AK, Kumar M, Singh M. Prevalence of oral pre-malignant and malignant lesions at a tertiary level hospital in Allahabad. India Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9(2):263–5.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

23. 23.

Sharma R, Raj SS, Miahra G, Reddy YG, Shenava S, Narang P. Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis in patients visiting dental college in rural area of Jaipur, Rajasthan. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2012;24(1):1–4.

* Google Scholar

24. 24.

Agarwal A, Chandel S, Singh N, Singhal A. Use of tobacco and oral sub mucous fibrosis in teenagers. J Dent Sci Res. 3(3):1–4.

25. 25.

Bhatnagar P, Rai S, Bhatnagar G, Kaur M, Goel S, Prabhat M. Prevalence study of oral mucosal lesions, mucosal variants, and treatment required for patients reporting to a dental school in North India: in accordance with WHO guidelines. J Fam Community Med. 2013;20(1):41–8.

* Article

* Google Scholar

26. 26.

Burungale SU, Durge PM, Burungale DS, Zambare MB. Epidemiological study of premalignant and malignant lesions of the Oral cavity. J Acad Ind Res (JAIR). 2014;2(9):519–23.

* Google Scholar

27. 27.

Kumar NN, Aravinda K, Dhillon M, Gupta S, Reddy S, Srinivas RM. Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis among habitual gutkha and areca nut chewers in Moradabad district. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014;4:8–13.

* Article

* Google Scholar

28. 28.

Patil S, Doni B, Maheshwari S. Prevalence and distribution of oral mucosal lesions in a geriatric Indian population. Can Geriatr J. 2015;18(1):11–4.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* Google Scholar

29. 29.

Singh P, Mittal R, Chandak S, Bhondey A, Rathi A, Chandwani M. Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis in children of rural area of Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res. 2016;3(4):243–5.

* Article

* Google Scholar

30. 30.

Tyagi VN, More MD. Prevalence of Oral submucous fibrosis at OPD of ENT department of SMBT Institute of Medical Sciences, Nasik. J Appl Med Sci. 2018;6(1F):395–8.

* Google Scholar

31. 31.

Yang S, Wang Y, Su N, Yu H, Wei C, Yu C, Chang Y. Changes in prevalence of precancerous oral submucous fibrosis from 1996 to 2013 in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based retrospective study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(2):147–52.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

32. 32.

More C, Rao NR, More S, Johnson NW. Reasons for initiation of areca nut and related products in patients with oral submucous fibrosis within an endemic area in Gujarat. India Subst Use Misuse. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1660678.

33. 33.

Cox SC, Walker DM. Oral submucous fibrosis. Rev Aust Dent J. 1996;41(5):294–9.

* CAS

* Article

* Google Scholar

34. 34.

More C, Peter R, Nishma G, Chen Y, Rao N. Association of Candida species with Oral submucous fibrosis and Oral leukoplakia: a case control study. Ann Clin Lab Res. 2018;06(3):248.

* Article

* Google Scholar

35. 35.

More C, Gupta S, Joshi J, Varma S. Classification system of Oral submucous fibrosis. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2012;24(1):24–9.

* Article

* Google Scholar

36. 36.

More C, Shilu K, Gavli N, Rao NR. Etiopathogenesis and clinical manifestations of oral submucous fibrosis, a potentially malignant disorder: an update. Int J Curr Res. 2018;10(07):71816–20.

* Google Scholar

37. 37.

Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of areca nut usage. Addict Biol. 2002;7(1):77–83.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

38. 38.

Srinivasan M, Jewell SD. Evaluation of TGF-alpha and EGFR expression in oral leukoplakia and oral submucous fibrosis by quantitative immunohistochemistry. Oncol. 2001;61(4):284–92.

* CAS

* Article

* Google Scholar

39. 39.

Anila Namboodiripad PC, Cystatin C. Cystatin C: its role in pathogenesis of OSMF. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014;4(1):42–6.

* CAS

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* Google Scholar

40. 40.

Hernandez BY, Zhu X, Goodman MT, Gatewood R, Mendiola P, Quinata K, et al. Betel nut chewing, oral premalignant lesions, and the oral microbiome. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172196.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* CAS

* Google Scholar

41. 41.

More CB, Gavli N, Chen Y, Rao NR. A novel clinical protocol for therapeutic intervention in oral submucous fibrosis: an evidence based approach. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018;22(3):382–91.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

42. 42.

More C, Shah P, Rao N, Pawar R. Oral submucous fibrosis: an overview with evidence-based management. Int J Oral Health Sci Adv. 2015;3(3):40–9.

* Google Scholar

43. 43.

Pillai R, Balaram P, Reddiar KS. Pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis. Relationship to risk factors associated with oral cancer. Cancer. 1992;69(8):2011–20.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

44. 44.

Seedat HA, van Wyk CW. Submucous fibrosis in non-betel nut chewing subjects. J Biol Buccale. 1988;16(1):3–6.

* CAS

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

45. 45.

Rajalalitha P, Vali S. Molecular pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis—a collagen metabolic disorder. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34(6):321–8.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

46. 46.

Chaturvedi P, Vaishampayan SS, Nair S, Nair D, Agarwal JP, Kane SV, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma arising in background of oral submucous fibrosis: a clinicopathologically distinct disease. Head Neck. 2013;35(10):1404–9.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

47. 47.

More C, Pawar R, Rao N, Shah P, Gavli N. Oral ulcer: an overview with an emphasis on differential diagnosis. Int J Oral Health Sci Adv. 2015;3(4):1–13.

* Google Scholar

48. 48.

Dyavanagoudar SN. Oral submucous fibrosis: review on etiopathogenesis. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2009;1(2):72–7.

* CAS

* Article

* Google Scholar

49. 49.

Lee CK, Tsai MT, Lee HC, Chen HM, Chiang CP, Wang YM, et al. Diagnosis of oral submucous fibrosis with optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(5):054008.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

50. 50.

Tadakamadla J, Kumar S, Lalloo R, Gandhi Babu DB, Johnson NW. Impact of oral potentially malignant disorders on quality of life. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(1):60–5.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

51. 51.

Hebbar PB, Sheshaprasad R, Gurudath S, Pai A, Sujatha D. Oral submucous fibrosis in India: are we progressing?? Indian J Cancer. 2014;51(3):222–6.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

52. 52.

Passi D, Bhanot P, Kacker D, Chahal D, Atri M, Panwar Y. Oral submucous fibrosis: newer proposed classification with critical updates in pathogenesis and management strategies. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2017;8(2):89.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* Google Scholar

53. 53.

Arakeri G, Brennan PA. TFM classification and staging of oral submucous fibrosis: A new proposal. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(5):539.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

54. 54.

Gnanam A. Kannadasan Kamal, Venkatachalapathy S, David Jasline. Multimodal treatment options for oral submucous fibrosis, SRM University. J Dent Sci. 2010;1(1):26–9.

* Google Scholar

55. 55.

Karemore TV, Motwani M. Evaluation of the effect of newer antioxidant lycopene in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(4):524–8.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

56. 56.

Hazarey VK, Sakrikar AR, Ganvir SM. Efficacy of curcumin in the treatment for oral submucous fibrosis - a randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015;19(2):145–52.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* Google Scholar

57. 57.

Maher R, Aga P, Johnson NW, Sankaranarayanan R, Warnakulasuriya S. Evaluation of multiple micronutrient supplementation in the management of oral submucous fibrosis in Karachi. Pakistan Nutr Cancer. 1997;27(1):41–7.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

58. 58.

Patil S, Al-Zarea BK, Maheshwari S, Sahu R. Comparative evaluation of natural antioxidants spirulina and aloe vera for the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2015;5(1):11–5.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* Google Scholar

59. 59.

Alam S, Ali I, Giri KY, Gokkulakrishnan S, Natu SS, Faisal M, et al. Efficacy of aloe vera gel as an adjuvant treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(6):717–24.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

60. 60.

Goel S, Ahmed J. A comparative study on efficacy of different treatment modalities of oral submucous fibrosis evaluated by clinical staging in population of southern Rajasthan. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015;11(1):113–8.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

61. 61.

James L, Shetty A, Rishi D, Abraham M. Management of oral submucous fibrosis with injection of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone in grade III oral submucous fibrosis. J Int Oral Health. 2015 Aug;7(8):82–5.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

62. 62.

Krishnamoorthy B, Khan M. Management of oral submucous fibrosis by two different drug regimens: a comparative study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013;10(4):527–32.

* Google Scholar

63. 63.

Singh P, Pandey A, Shingh A, Ahuja T, Sharma S, Bhagalia S, Trehan M. Efficacy of intralesional placental extract, dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in treatment of oral submucous fibrosis: a comparative study. JK Pract. 2016;21(1–2):29–34.

* Google Scholar

64. 64.

Bhadage CJ, Umarji HR, Shah K, Välimaa H. Vasodilator isoxsuprine alleviates symptoms of oral submucous fibrosis. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(5):1375–82.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

65. 65.

Rajendran R, Rani V, Shaikh S. Pentoxifylline therapy: a new adjunct in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. Indian J Dent Res. 2006;17(4):190–8.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

66. 66.

Vijayakumar M, Priya D. Physiotherapy for improving mouth opening & tongue protrusion in patients with Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) – case series. Int J Pharm Sci Health Care. 2013;3(2):50–8.

* Google Scholar

67. 67.

Kamath VV. Surgical interventions in Oral submucous fibrosis: a systematic analysis of the literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14(3):521–31.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

68. 68.

Koneru A, Hunasgi S, Hallikeri K, Surekha R, Nellithady GS. Vanishree M. Treat Modalities OSMF J Adv Clin Res Insights. 2014;1(2):64–72.

* Article

* Google Scholar

69. 69.

Arakeri G, Rai KK, Boraks G, Patil SG, Aljabab AS, Merkx MA, et al. Current protocols in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: an update. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46(6):418–23.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

70. 70.

Warnakulasuriya S, Kerr AR. Oral submucous fibrosis: a review of the current management and possible directions for novel therapies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122(2):232–41.

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

71. 71.

Heck JE, Marcotte EL, Argos M, Parvez F, Ahmed A, Islam T, et al. Betel quid chewing in rural Bangladesh: prevalence, predictors and relationship to blood pressure. Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;41(2):462–71.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

72. 72.

Aziz SR. Oral submucous fibrosis: case report and review of diagnosis and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(11):2386–9.

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

73. 73.

Murti P, Bhonsle R, Pindborg JJ, Daftary D, Gupta P, Mehta FS. Malignant transformation rate in oral submucous fibrosis over a 17-year period. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985;13(6):340–1.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

74. 74.

Paymaster JC. Cancer of the buccal mucosa; a clinical study of 650 cases in Indian patients. Cancer. 1956 May;9(3):431–5.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

75. 75.

Hsue SS, Wang WC, Chen CH, Lin CC, Chen YK, Lin LM. Malignant transformation in 1458 patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders: a follow-up study based in a Taiwanese hospital. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36(1):25–9.

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

76. 76.

Arakeri G, Patil SG, Aljabab AS, Lin KC, Merkx MA, Gao S, et al. Oral submucous fibrosis: an update on pathophysiology of malignant transformation. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46(6):413–7.

* PubMed

* Article

* Google Scholar

77. 77.

Ray JG, Ranganathan K, Chattopadhyay A. Malignant transformation of oral submucous fibrosis: overview of histopathological aspects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122(2):200–9.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

78. 78.

Guo F, Jian XC, Zhou SH, Li N, Hu YJ, Tang ZG. A retrospective study of oral squamous cell carcinomas originated from oral submucous fibrosis. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011;46(8):494–7.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

79. 79.

Shah JP, Batsakis JG, Johnson NW. Oral cancer. London: Dunitz; 2003.

* Google Scholar

80. 80.

Shah JP, Johnson NW. Oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018.

* Google Scholar

81. 81.

Bazarsad S, Zhang X, Kim K-Y, Illeperuma R, Jayasinghe RD, Tilakaratne WM, et al. Identification of a combined biomarker for malignant transformation in oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2016;46(6):431–8.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* CAS

* Google Scholar

82. 82.

Mckay AJ, Patel RKK, Majeed A. Strategies for Tobacco Control in India: A Systematic Review. Plos One. 2015;10(4).

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* CAS

* Google Scholar

83. 83.

Arora M, Tewari A, Tripathy V, Nazar GP, Juneja NS, Ramakrishnan L, et al. Community-based model for preventing tobacco use among disadvantaged adolescents in urban slums of India. Health Promot Int. 2010;25:143–52.

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

84. 84.

Kumar MS, Sarma PS, Thankappan KR. Community-based group intervention for tobacco cessation in rural Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster randomized trial. J Subst Abus Treat. 2012;43:53–60.

* CAS

* Article

* Google Scholar

85. 85.

Prabhu RV. A need to spread awareness regarding the ill effects of Arecanut and its commercial products on Oral health. Tropical Medicine & Surgery. 2014;02(03). Garg a, Chaturvedi P, Gupta PC. A review of the systemic adverse effects of areca nut or betel nut. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014;35(1):3–9.

* Article

* Google Scholar

86. 86.

Arora M, Madhu R. Banning smokeless tobacco in India: policy analysis. Indian J Cancer. 2012;49(4):336.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

87. 87.

Garg A, Chaturvedi P, Gupta PC. A review of the systemic adverse effects of areca nut or betel nut. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014;35(1):3–9.

* PubMed

* PubMed Central

* Article

* Google Scholar

88. 88.

Chakrabarti S, Mishra A, Agarwal JP, Garg A, Nair D, Chaturvedi P. Acute toxicities of adjuvant treatment in patients of oral squamous cell carcinoma with and without submucous fibrosis: a retrospective audit. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12(2):932–7.

* CAS

* PubMed

* Article

* PubMed Central

* Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

1. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

* Naman R. Rao

2. Division of Oral Medicine and Dentistry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

* Alessandro Villa

3. Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

* Alessandro Villa

4. Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

* Chandramani B. More

5. Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

* Ruwan D. Jayasinghe

6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, NYU College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA

* Alexander Ross Kerr

7. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia

* Newell W. Johnson

Authors

1. Search for Naman R. Rao in:

* PubMed •

* Google Scholar

2. Search for Alessandro Villa in:

* PubMed •

* Google Scholar

3. Search for Chandramani B. More in:

* PubMed •

* Google Scholar

4. Search for Ruwan D. Jayasinghe in:

* PubMed •

* Google Scholar

5. Search for Alexander Ross Kerr in:

* PubMed •

* Google Scholar

6. Search for Newell W. Johnson in:

* PubMed •

* Google Scholar

Contributions

This manuscript arises out of discussions between the authors, both at international scientific meetings and in private. All have considerable experience of treating and researching Oral Submucous Fibrosis and similar disorders. The first draft was written by Naman Rao and revised with input from all other authors. All authors have approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naman R. Rao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The clinical photographs shown are from Department of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Radiology, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Vadodara, Gujarat state, India. The consent for publishing the photograph was taken from the patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rao, N.R., Villa, A., More, C.B. et al. Oral submucous fibrosis: a contemporary narrative review with a proposed inter-professional approach for an early diagnosis and clinical management. J of Otolaryngol - Head & Neck Surg 49, 3 (2020) doi:10.1186/s40463-020-0399-7

Download citation

*

Received: 07 August 2019

*

Accepted: 01 January 2020

*

Published: 08 January 2020

*

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-0399-7

Keywords

* Oral submucous fibrosis

* Global epidemiology

* Areca nut

* Management