It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Glucose electrolysis offers a prospect of value-added glucaric acid synthesis and energy-saving hydrogen production from the biomass-based platform molecules. Here we report that nanostructured NiFe oxide (NiFeOx) and nitride (NiFeNx) catalysts, synthesized from NiFe layered double hydroxide nanosheet arrays on three-dimensional Ni foams, demonstrate a high activity and selectivity towards anodic glucose oxidation. The electrolytic cell assembled with these two catalysts can deliver 100 mA cm−2 at 1.39 V. A faradaic efficiency of 87% and glucaric acid yield of 83% are obtained from the glucose electrolysis, which takes place via a guluronic acid pathway evidenced by in-situ infrared spectroscopy. A rigorous process model combined with a techno-economic analysis shows that the electrochemical reduction of glucose produces glucaric acid at a 54% lower cost than the current chemical approach. This work suggests that glucose electrolysis is an energy-saving and cost-effective approach for H2 production and biomass valorization.
Renewable biomass conversion may afford high-value products from common materials, but catalysts usually require expensive metals and exhibit poor selectivities. Here, authors employ nickel-iron oxide and nitride electrocatalysts to produce H2 and to convert glucose to glucaric acid selectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 University of Science & Technology of China, CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, Department of Applied Chemistry, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.59053.3a) (ISNI:0000000121679639) ; University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675)
2 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675)
3 University of Science & Technology of China, CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, Department of Applied Chemistry, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.59053.3a) (ISNI:0000000121679639)
4 Tongji University, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.24516.34) (ISNI:0000000123704535)
5 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Chemistry, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675)