It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A discontinuity in the seismic velocity associated with the lithosphere-asthenosphere interface, known as the Gutenberg discontinuity, is enigmatic in its origin. While partial mantle melts are frequently suggested to explain this discontinuity, it is not well known which factors critically regulate the melt production. Here, we report geochemical evidence showing that the melt fractions in the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary were enhanced not only by accumulation of compacted carbonated melts related to recycled ancient marine sediments, but also by partial melting of a pyroxene-rich mantle domain related to the recycled oceanic eclogite/pyroxenites. This conclusion is derived from the first set of Mg isotope data for a suite of young petit-spot basalts erupted on the northwest Pacific plate, where a clearly defined Gutenberg discontinuity exists. Our results reveal a specific linkage between the Gutenberg discontinuity beneath the normal oceanic regions and the recycling of ancient subducted crust and carbonate through the deep Earth.
The seismic Gutenberg discontinuity has long been associated with the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, yet the physical explanation of what is causing the discontinuity remains debated. Here, the authors report geochemical evidence, including Mg isotopes, and suggest that melting of recycled crust is responsible for the Gutenberg discontinuity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.473484.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 0811)
2 Tohoku University, Center for Northeast Asian Studies, Sendai, Japan (GRID:grid.69566.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 6943)
3 Chiba Institute of Technology, Ocean Resources Research Center for Next Generation, Chiba, Japan (GRID:grid.254124.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 246X)
4 Zhejiang University, School of Earth Sciences, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X)
5 Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.473484.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 0811) ; Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Oceanography, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.16821.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 8293)
6 Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.473484.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 0811) ; Hohai University, School of Oceanography, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.257065.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 3465)