It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Superfluidity, first discovered in liquid 4He, is closely related to Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) phenomenon. However, even at zero temperature, a fraction of the quantum liquid is excited out of the condensate into higher momentum states via interaction-induced fluctuations—the phenomenon of quantum depletion. Quantum depletion of atomic BECs in thermal equilibrium is well understood theoretically but is difficult to measure. This measurement is even more challenging in driven-dissipative exciton–polariton condensates, since their non-equilibrium nature is predicted to suppress quantum depletion. Here, we observe quantum depletion of a high-density exciton–polariton condensate by detecting the spectral branch of elementary excitations populated by this process. Analysis of this excitation branch shows that quantum depletion of exciton–polariton condensates can closely follow or strongly deviate from the equilibrium Bogoliubov theory, depending on the exciton fraction in an exciton polariton. Our results reveal beyond mean-field effects of exciton–polariton interactions and call for a deeper understanding of the relationship between equilibrium and non-equilibrium BECs.
Many aspects of polariton condensate behaviour can be captured by mean-field theories but interactions introduce additional quantum effects. Here the authors observe quantum depletion in a driven-dissipative condensate and find that deviations from equilibrium predictions depend on the excitonic fraction.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 The Australian National University, ARC Centre of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies and Nonlinear Physics Centre, Research School of Physics, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.1001.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 7477)
2 Monash University, ARC Centre of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies and School of Physics and Astronomy, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)
3 University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.21925.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9000); National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, USA (GRID:grid.419357.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2199 3636)
4 Princeton University, Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials (PRISM), Princeton, USA (GRID:grid.16750.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 5006)
5 University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.21925.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9000)
6 The Australian National University, Laser Physics Centre, Research School of Physics, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.1001.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 7477)