It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Accurate in vivo quantification of subtalar joint kinematics can provide important information for the clinical evaluation of subtalar joint function; the analysis of outcome of surgical procedures of the hindfoot; and the design of a replacement subtalar joint prosthesis. The objective of the current study was to explore the potential of full weight-bearing clinical computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the helical axis and centre of rotation of the subtalar joint during inversion and eversion motion. A subject specific methodology was proposed for the definition of the subtalar joint motion combining three-dimensional (3D) weight-bearing imaging at different joint positions with digital volume correlation (DVC). The computed subtalar joint helical axis parameters showed consistency across all healthy subjects and in line with previous data under simulated loads. A sphere fitting approach was introduced for the computation of subtalar joint centre of rotation, which allows to demonstrate that this centre of rotation is located in the middle facet of the subtalar joint. Some translation along the helical axis was also observed, reflecting the elasticity of the soft-tissue restraints. This study showed a novel technique for non-invasive quantitative analysis of bone-to-bone motion under full weight-bearing of the hindfoot. Identifying different joint kinematics in patients with ligamentous laxity and instability, or in the presence of stiffness and arthritis, could help clinicians to define optimal patient-specific treatments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Portsmouth, Zeiss Global Centre, School of Mechanical and Design Engineering, Portsmouth, UK (GRID:grid.4701.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 6636)
2 Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, UCL Institute of Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Science, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Stanmore, UK (GRID:grid.416177.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0417 7890)
3 University of Portsmouth, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Portsmouth, UK (GRID:grid.4701.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 6636)
4 Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, UCL Institute of Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Science, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Stanmore, UK (GRID:grid.416177.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0417 7890); South Kensington Campus, MSK Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Level 2, Faculty Building, London, UK (GRID:grid.416177.2); The London Ankle & Arthritis Centre, The Wellington Hospital, Wellington Place, London, UK (GRID:grid.439678.7)