It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Cancer proteogenomics promises new insights into cancer biology and treatment efficacy by integrating genomics, transcriptomics and protein profiling including modifications by mass spectrometry (MS). A critical limitation is sample input requirements that exceed many sources of clinically important material. Here we report a proteogenomics approach for core biopsies using tissue-sparing specimen processing and microscaled proteomics. As a demonstration, we analyze core needle biopsies from ERBB2 positive breast cancers before and 48–72 h after initiating neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. We show greater suppression of ERBB2 protein and both ERBB2 and mTOR target phosphosite levels in cases associated with pathological complete response, and identify potential causes of treatment resistance including the absence of ERBB2 amplification, insufficient ERBB2 activity for therapeutic sensitivity despite ERBB2 amplification, and candidate resistance mechanisms including androgen receptor signaling, mucin overexpression and an inactive immune microenvironment. The clinical utility and discovery potential of proteogenomics at biopsy-scale warrants further investigation.
Connecting genomics and proteomics allows the development of more efficient and specific treatments for cancer. Here, the authors develop proteogenomic methods to defining cancer signaling in-vivo starting from core needle biopsies and with application to a HER2 breast cancer focused clinical trial.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details











1 Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.66859.34)
2 Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.39382.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 926X)
3 Baylor College of Medicine, Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.39382.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 926X)
4 Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
5 NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.472704.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0433 7962)
6 Duke University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.189509.c) (ISNI:0000000100241216)
7 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
8 Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.66859.34); Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.32224.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 0386 9924)