It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Memories are encoded by memory traces or engrams, represented within subsets of neurons that are synchronously activated during learning. However, the molecular mechanisms that drive engram stabilization during consolidation and consequently ensure its reactivation by memory recall are not fully understood. In this study we manipulate, during memory consolidation, the levels of the de novo DNA methyltransferase 3a2 (Dnmt3a2) selectively within dentate gyrus neurons activated by fear conditioning. We found that Dnmt3a2 upregulation enhances memory performance in mice and improves the fidelity of reconstitution of the original neuronal ensemble upon memory retrieval. Moreover, similar manipulation in a sparse, non-engram subset of neurons does not bias engram allocation or modulate memory strength. We further show that neuronal Dnmt3a2 overexpression changes the DNA methylation profile of synaptic plasticity-related genes. Our data implicates DNA methylation selectively within neuronal ensembles as a mechanism of stabilizing engrams during consolidation that supports successful memory retrieval.
Memories are encoded within neuronal ensembles activated during learning. Here the authors show that DNA methylation within neuronal ensembles contributes to the stability of the memory trace, and increases the likelihood of neuronal ensemble reactivation during retrieval.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Heidelberg University, Department of Neurobiology, Interdisciplinary Centre for Neurosciences (IZN), Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373); Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 29, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10417.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 0444 9382)
2 Heidelberg University, Department of Neurobiology, Interdisciplinary Centre for Neurosciences (IZN), Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373)
3 Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Heidelberg University, Department of Neurophysiology, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373)
4 German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epigenomics, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7497.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 0584)