It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Antarctic shallow coastal marine communities were long thought to be isolated from their nearest neighbours by hundreds of kilometres of deep ocean and the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. The discovery of non–native kelp washed up on Antarctic beaches led us to question the permeability of these barriers to species dispersal. According to the literature, over 70 million kelp rafts are afloat in the Southern Ocean at any one time. These living, floating islands can play host to a range of passenger species from both their original coastal location and those picked in the open ocean. Driven by winds, currents and storms towards the coast of the continent, these rafts are often cited as theoretical vectors for the introduction of new species into Antarctica and the sub-Antarctic islands. We found non-native kelps, with a wide range of “hitchhiking” passenger organisms, on an Antarctic beach inside the flooded caldera of an active volcanic island. This is the first evidence of non-native species reaching the Antarctic continent alive on kelp rafts. One passenger species, the bryozoan Membranipora membranacea, is found to be an invasive and ecologically harmful species in some cold-water regions, and this is its first record from Antarctica. The caldera of Deception Island provides considerably milder conditions than the frigid surrounding waters and it could be an ideal location for newly introduced species to become established. These findings may help to explain many of the biogeographic patterns and connections we currently see in the Southern Ocean. However, with the impacts of climate change in the region we may see an increase in the range and number of organisms capable of surviving both the long journey and becoming successfully established.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Angulo-Preckler, Carlos 1
; Martín-Martín, Rafael P 2 ; Figuerola Blanca 3
; Griffiths, Huw James 4
; Waller, Catherine Louise 5 1 University of Barcelona & Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology, and Environmental Sciences, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5841.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0247)
2 University of Barcelona & Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Department of Biology, Healthcare and the Environment, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5841.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0247)
3 Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5841.8)
4 British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Cambridge, England (GRID:grid.478592.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0598 3800)
5 University of Hull, Department of Biological and Marine Sciences, Hull, UK (GRID:grid.9481.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0412 8669)




