It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
It has been generally acknowledged that glacial climates at the time of the Pleistocene altered the patterns of species distributions, prompting latitudinal and altitudinal distribution shifts in several species, including poikilothermic species commonly known for their thermal sensitivity. However, the historical phylogeographic patterns of such species have remained largely unknown. Here, we present the historical biogeographic, phylogenetic, and phylogeographic relationships of the Caucasian pit viper, G. h. caucasicus, based on two mtDNA (cyt b and ND4) and one nDNA (c-mos) genes. This pit viper represents the westernmost member of the Crotalinae subfamily in the Palearctic and occurs in a variety of habitats, from 30 m to 3,000 m above sea level. In Iran, it is distributed on the northern and southern slopes of the Alborz Mountains, rendering it a target for phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies of a terrestrial poikilothermic animal. Our study identified four Iranian lineages of G. h. caucasicus along the northeastern to northwestern slopes of the Alborz Mountains and southern Azerbaijan (Talysh Mountains). Diversification of the Iranian lineages highlights population expansion and subsequent isolation into four plausible refugial areas during the Quaternary paleo-climatic oscillations, confirmed by our molecular dating and historical biogeographic analyses. The results of coalescence-based simulations support the incursion of the species from northeastern Iran to the western end of the Alborz, and then toward Transcaucasia via two directions: northern and southern slopes of the Alborz Mountains. Furthermore, our results clearly implied that G. h. caucasicus should be elevated to species rank and further referred to as G. caucasicus (Nikolsky, 1916).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 CEFE, PSL-EPHE (Biogéographie et Ecologie des Vertébrés), CNRS, University Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, IRD, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.433534.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2169 1275)
2 CEFE, PSL-EPHE (Biogéographie et Ecologie des Vertébrés), CNRS, University Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, IRD, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.433534.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2169 1275); University of Johannesburg, Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, Department of Zoology, Johannesburg, South Africa (GRID:grid.412988.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0109 131X)
3 Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Department of Environmental Science, Karaj, Iran (GRID:grid.46072.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 0612 7950)
4 Laboratory of Forest Genomics Siberian Federal University, rasnoyarsk, Russia (GRID:grid.412592.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0940 9855)
5 Faculty of Sciences, Golestan University, Department of Biology, Gorgan, Iran (GRID:grid.440784.b)