It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Neuroprotection has proven clinically unsuccessful in subarachnoid hemorrhage. We believe that this is because the major component in the early damage pathway, the vascular wall, has not been given the necessary focus. U0126 is a potent inhibitor of vascular phenotypical changes, exemplified by functional endothelin B (ETB) receptor upregulation. The current study aimed to determine the optimal dose of U0126 ex vivo and test the toxicology of this dose in vivo. To find the optimal dose and test a suitable in vivo delivery system, we applied an ex vivo model of blood flow cessation and investigated functional ETB receptor upregulation (using a specific agonist) as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was depolarization-induced contractility assessed by 60 mM K+ stimuli. Furthermore, an in vivo toxicology study was performed on the optimal selected doses. U0126 (10 µM) had a strong effect on the prevention of functional ETB receptor contractility, combined with minimal effect on the depolarization-induced contractility. When cremophor EL was chosen for drug delivery, it had an inhibitory and additive effect (combined with U0126) on the ETB receptor contractility. Hence, 10 µM U0126 in 0.5% cremophor EL seems to be a dose that will be close to the maximal inhibition observed ex vivo on basilar arteries, without exhibiting side effects in the toxicology studies. U0126 and cremophor EL are well tolerated at doses that have effect on ETB receptor upregulation. Cremophor EL has an additional positive effect, preventing functional ETB receptor upregulation, making it suitable as a drug delivery system.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark;
2 GenuiNova AB, Hjärup, Sweden;
3 Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark;; Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Experimental Vascular Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden