It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We aimed to investigate whether daily fluctuations in mental health-relevant Twitter posts are associated with daily fluctuations in mental health crisis episodes. We conducted a primary and replicated time-series analysis of retrospectively collected data from Twitter and two London mental healthcare providers. Daily numbers of ‘crisis episodes’ were defined as incident inpatient, home treatment team and crisis house referrals between 2010 and 2014. Higher volumes of depression and schizophrenia tweets were associated with higher numbers of same-day crisis episodes for both sites. After adjusting for temporal trends, seven-day lagged analyses showed significant positive associations on day 1, changing to negative associations by day 4 and reverting to positive associations by day 7. There was a 15% increase in crisis episodes on days with above-median schizophrenia-related Twitter posts. A temporal association was thus found between Twitter-wide mental health-related social media content and crisis episodes in mental healthcare replicated across two services. Seven-day associations are consistent with both precipitating and longer-term risk associations. Sizes of effects were large enough to have potential local and national relevance and further research is needed to evaluate how services might better anticipate times of higher risk and identify the most vulnerable groups.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764)
2 King’s College London, Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); King’s College London, Centre for Implementation Science, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764)
3 IT University of Copenhagen, Department of Computer Science, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.32190.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0620 5453)
4 University College London, Division of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.450564.6)
5 University of Sheffield, Department of Computer Science, Sheffield, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262)
6 King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.37640.36) (ISNI:0000 0000 9439 0839)