It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Disease modules in molecular interaction maps have been useful for characterizing diseases. Yet biological networks, that commonly define such modules are incomplete and biased toward some well-studied disease genes. Here we ask whether disease-relevant modules of genes can be discovered without prior knowledge of a biological network, instead training a deep autoencoder from large transcriptional data. We hypothesize that modules could be discovered within the autoencoder representations. We find a statistically significant enrichment of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) relevant genes in the last layer, and to a successively lesser degree in the middle and first layers respectively. In contrast, we find an opposite gradient where a modular protein–protein interaction signal is strongest in the first layer, but then vanishing smoothly deeper in the network. We conclude that a data-driven discovery approach is sufficient to discover groups of disease-related genes.
The study of disease modules facilitates insight into complex diseases, but their identification relies on knowledge of molecular networks. Here, the authors show that disease modules and genes can also be discovered in deep autoencoder representations of large human gene expression datasets.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Linköping University, Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping, Sweden (GRID:grid.5640.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 9922)
2 Linköping University, Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping, Sweden (GRID:grid.5640.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 9922); New York University, Department of Biology, Center For Genomics and Systems Biology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.137628.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8753); New York University, Center for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.137628.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8753)
3 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.45672.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 1926 5090); Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Computational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Solna, Center for Molecular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.4714.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0626); Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden (GRID:grid.452834.c)