It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Avian influenza (AI) affects wild aquatic birds and poses hazards to human health, food security, and wildlife conservation globally. Accordingly, there is a recognized need for new methods and tools to help quantify the dynamic interaction between wild bird hosts and commercial poultry. Using satellite-marked waterfowl, we applied Bayesian joint hierarchical modeling to concurrently model species distributions, residency times, migration timing, and disease occurrence probability under an integrated animal movement and disease distribution modeling framework. Our results indicate that migratory waterfowl are positively related to AI occurrence over North America such that as waterfowl occurrence probability or residence time increase at a given location, so too does the chance of a commercial poultry AI outbreak. Analyses also suggest that AI occurrence probability is greatest during our observed waterfowl northward migration, and less during the southward migration. Methodologically, we found that when modeling disparate facets of disease systems at the wildlife-agriculture interface, it is essential that multiscale spatial patterns be addressed to avoid mistakenly inferring a disease process or disease-environment relationship from a pattern evaluated at the improper spatial scale. The study offers important insights into migratory waterfowl ecology and AI disease dynamics that aid in better preparing for future outbreaks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA (GRID:grid.17088.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2150 1785); U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, USA (GRID:grid.2865.9) (ISNI:0000000121546924)
2 U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, USA (GRID:grid.2865.9) (ISNI:0000000121546924)
3 University of Maryland, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.164295.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 7177)
4 Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Saskatchewan, Canada (GRID:grid.410334.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2184 7612)
5 Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, USA (GRID:grid.448525.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0744 4729)
6 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Texas Chenier Plain Refuge Complex, Anahuac, USA (GRID:grid.448525.a)
7 U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, USA (GRID:grid.2865.9) (ISNI:0000000121546924)