It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Treatment of community urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended-spectrum β lactamase (ESBL)- producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) is more expensive than treating ESBL-negative opposites. Evaluation of the prevalence of ESBL-production among urinary E. coli isolates is crucial due to its great impact on the choice of proper antimicrobials. Accordingly, the aim of this work was to detect and characterize ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from outpatients with signs of UTIs in Upper Egypt. Urinary E. coli isolates were identified by 16S rRNA and their ESBL-production was confirmed by Modified Double Disc Synergy Test (MDDST) and ESBL- CHROMagar media. Isolates were then subjected to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for new Clermont phylogrouping, ESBL genes detection and CTX-M typing. The study enrolled 583 patients with clinically diagnosed UTIs. Uropathogens were found in 400 urine samples (68.6%) out of which 134 E. coli isolates were identified. Among the examined uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), 80 (59.7%) were recognized as ESBL-producers. Greater than half of the ESBL-producers were multi-drug resistant (MDR) (62%). All of them were susceptible to meropenem. Most of the E. coli isolates were distributed in 4 phylogenetic groups: B2 = 42 (52.5%), F = 17 (21.25%) and Clade I or II = 10 (12.5%). The predominant gene types were TEM 60 (75%) and CTX-M gene 45 (56.25%). The CTX-M-1 group was the most prevalent (62.2%), including the CTX-M-15 enzyme, followed by the CTX-M-2 group, CTX-M-8 group and CTX-M-9 group. In conclusion, the results present alarming evidence of a serious spread of ESBL genes in Egypt, especially the epidemiological CTX-M 15, with the potential for the dissemination of MDR UPEC strains in the community.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Minia University, Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department. Faculty of Medicine, Minia, Egypt (GRID:grid.411806.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 8999 4945)
2 Beni-Suef University, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef, Egypt (GRID:grid.411662.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0412 4932); Red Deer College, Department of Science and Engineering, Red Deer, Canada (GRID:grid.421394.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0013 674X)
3 Beni-Suef University, Microbiology and Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef, Egypt (GRID:grid.411662.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0412 4932)
4 Minia University, Microbiology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Minia, Egypt (GRID:grid.411806.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 8999 4945)