It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In most yeast-driven biotechnological applications, biomass is separated from the aqueous phase after fermentation or production has finished. During winemaking, yeasts are removed after fermentation by racking, filtration, or centrifugation, which add costs to the overall process and may reduce product yield. Theoretically, clarification and filtration can be aided through use of yeast strains that form flocs due to cell-cell binding, a process known as flocculation. However, because early flocculation can cause stuck/sluggish fermentations, this phenotype is not common amongst commercially available wine yeasts. In this study we sought to identify wine strains that exhibit late-fermentation flocculant behaviour using two complementary approaches; a high-throughput sedimentation rate assay of individual strains and a competitive sedimentation assay using a barcoded yeast collection. Amongst 103 wine strains, several exhibited strong sedimentation at the end of the wine fermentation process under various environmental conditions. Two of these strains, AWRI1688 and AWRI1759, were further characterised during red winemaking trials. Shiraz wines produced with both strains displayed improved filtration-related properties. AWRI1759 produced wines with greater filterability, whereas AWRI1688 enabled the recovery of larger wine volumes after racking. Thus, this study demonstrates the effective use of sedimentation screening assays to identify wine yeasts with practical winemaking applications.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The Australian Wine Research Institute, PO Box 197, Glen Osmond, Adelaide, Australia (GRID:grid.452839.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0405 222X); Department of Wine & Food Science, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Adelaide, Australia (GRID:grid.1010.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7304)
2 The Australian Wine Research Institute, PO Box 197, Glen Osmond, Adelaide, Australia (GRID:grid.452839.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0405 222X)
3 The Australian Wine Research Institute, PO Box 197, Glen Osmond, Adelaide, Australia (GRID:grid.452839.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0405 222X); College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Wiegand Hall, 3051 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.4391.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 1969)