Summary. Antifungal properties were assessed of water and ethanol extracts from the pan-tropical plants Oxalis barrelieri L., Stachytarpheta cayennensis L., and Euphorbia hirta L. against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, Alternaría solani Sorauer, and Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. The plant extracts inhibited fungal growth in vitro at 1.25-20 mg mL-1, and the degrees of inhibition increased in a dose-dependent manner. Ethanol extracts from the plants inhibited fungal growth by 80-100%, while water extracts showed less antifungal activity, with maximum growth inhibition of 62%. Growth inhibition from ethanol extracts was two- to three-fold greater than for water extracts at equivalent concentrations. Antifungal activity of the extracts varied with their content and composition of phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, and alkaloids. In greenhouse experiments, spraying tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) with ethanol extract from E. hirta at 2.5 mg mL-1 did not cause phytotoxicity, and increased plant size, when compared to untreated plants. Spraying E. hirta ethanol extract on tomato plants infected by R. solani reduced disease severity up to 80%, when compared to non-sprayed plants. These results demonstrate potential of leaf extracts from E. hirta, O. barrelieri, and S. cayennensis as biofungicides for the control of R. solani, A. solani, and F. oxysporum, which are among the most important causal agents of tomato diseases.
Keywords. Euphorbia hirta, Oxalis barrelieri, Stachytarpheta cayennensis, antifungal activity, plant growth promotion.
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)
INTRODUCTION
In Cameroon, tomato is the most important vegetable crop, with production of over 1.18 million tons harvested from 92,626 hectares in 2016 (FAO, 2017). However, phytopathogenic fungi are responsible for the most prevalent diseases, including: late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary; early blight, caused by Alternaría spp.; damping-off and seedling blights, caused by Pythium spp.; Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold; and Fusarium wilt and root rot, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. spp. (Jones et al., 2014). Furthermore, bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al., and bacterial canker caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. are also reported to cause severe crop losses in epidemic years (Fontem et al., 1999).
Most strategies for pest management rely on frequent application of synthetic chemical pesticides and copper compounds, to avoid yield and quality losses. These may have consequences for human health, the environment, and from development of resistant pathogen strains, due to continuous use of the same available chemicals (Ishii and Hollomon, 2015; Lucas et al., 2015). For these reasons, it is important to identify new effective strategies for disease management that pose reduced risks to human health and the environment.
Biofungicides have emerged as the main alternative to conventional fungicides, and the application of plant-derived products is a potential choice in disease management (Ribera and Zuñiga, 2012; Pusztahelyi et al., 2015). Tropical plants are rich sources of bioactive chemicals for the development of biopesticides as safe disease control agents, as reviewed by Suprapta (2016). Examples include papaya anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) that can be efficiently managed using extracts from tickberry (Lantana camara, Verbenaceae) (Ademe et al., 2013); and grey mold (Botrytis cinerea) of blackcurrant controlled by extracts from hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis, Lamiaceae) and summer savory (Satureja hortensis, Lamiaceae) (Sesan et al., 2015). Several plants are reported to produce diverse arrays of low molecular mass antimicrobial compounds, often called 'natural products'. These may also play important roles in plant physiology. Some of these compounds may provide antimicrobial potential and beneficial effects on plants, such as early seed germination, plant growth promotion, improved crop yield, and increased tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses (Wink, 2010). The compounds can also enhance postharvest shelf-life of perishable products (Ji et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2011; Kharchoufi et al., 2018; Scavo et al., 2019).
Many local plants commonly present in several Cameroon provinces, including Oxalis barrelieri L., Stachytarpheta cayennensis L., and Euphorbia hirta L., have been gaining attention, based on their ethnobotanical uses, phytochemical and pharmacological properties, and their easiness to be cropped in tropical areas. Euphorbia hirta has been chemically studied and found to possess antifungal activity against Fusarium moniliforme Sheldon and Phoma sorghina Saccardo (Karanga et al., 2017). Oxalis barrelieri plant extracts showed inhibitory effects on mycelium growth and conidia germination of F. oxysporum and P. infestans (Dakole et al., 2016). Plant extract of S. cayennensis inhibited the growth of different bacteria (Okoye et al., 2010).
Effects of plant extracts on fungal pathogens of tomato have not been studied. The present study aimed to: i) examine the antifungal activity of water and hydro-ethanolic extracts of E. hirta, O. barrelieri and S. cayennensis against three major phytopathogenic fungi affecting tomato (i.e. R. solani, A. solani, and F. oxysporum); ii) determine the phytochemical composition of these extracts; and iii) assess the growth promoting and protective effects of the E. hirta ethanol extract on tomato. Once antimicrobial activity is confirmed, such extracts or their components may have potential to be developed as innovative agrochemicals, for implementing sustainable pest management in organic and integrated tomato production.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant material
Three pan-tropical plant species, Oxalis barrelieri L. (Oxalidaceae), Stachytarpheta cayennensis L. (Verbenaceae) and Euphorbia hirta L. (Euphorbiaceae) were collected from a local area (Central Region, YaoundéMbankomo, Cameroon) (Figure 1). These species were chosen based on their previously studied phytochemical properties (Senthikumar, 2018). They were grown until the flowering stage and harvested. After harvesting, the plant material was shade-dried for 2 weeks, and the dried leaves were milled into powder.
Tomato seeds 'Leader F1', obtained from ISI Sementi, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy, were sown and transplanted in a greenhouse into trays containing a commercial soil mix (Dueemme Marketing srl.). The greenhouse was maintained at a constant temperature of 27°C, with a 16 h photoperiod each day. Tomato plants were used for experiments 3 weeks after sowing, at the five to six true leaf stage.
Fungus strains
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, strain FUSITS04 and Alternaria solani Sorauer, both originat- ing from Cameroon, and Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn (courtesy of P. Nipoti, University of Bologna, Italy) were used during the experiments. These fungi were isolated from diseased tomato plants, and were maintained on 3.9% potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 4°C until used for experiments. R. solani was also used for greenhouse in planta experiments.
Preparation of crude plant extracts
Before extraction, leaf powders were defatted (1:6, w/v) by mixing in 600 mL of anhydrous n-hexane under continuous stirring at room temperature (21 ± 1°C) for 24 h. After filtration through fine cloth, each defatted plant residue was hexane-evaporated in a laminar flow cabinet. Extraction of the plant residues was achieved using either distilled water or 70% hydro-ethanol solution. Plant material was soaked (1:6, w/v) in 600 mL of distilled water or in 600 mL of ethanol solution under continuous stirring for 24 h, followed by filtration through Whatman No. 1 filter paper (11 pm pore size) and centrifugation at 5,200 x g for 10 min. The supernatants were then collected and the solvents evaporated overnight (12 h) in a ventilated oven at 50°C. The dried pellets obtained were designated as: WEox (water extract of O. barrelieri), EEox (ethanol extract of O. barrelieri), WEst (water extract of S. cayennensis, EEst (ethanol extract of S. cayennensis), WEeu (water extract of E. hirta), or EEeu (ethanol extract of E. hirta). The extracts were stored at 4°C until used.
Effects of plant extracts on fungus growth in vitro
Effects of different water and ethanol extracts on growth of fungi were assayed in vitro on PDA agar plates, amended with different concentrations of the plant extracts, using the supplemented agar method described by Rios et al. (1988).
Five increasing amounts of each plant extract, from 0.125 to 2 g, were added to flasks containing 100 mL of PDA medium before autoclaving (at 121°C for 15 min). This gave final concentrations of each extract in poured PDA plates of 1.25, 2.50, 5, 10, or 20 mg mL-1. PDA plates without extract additions were used as experimental controls. Each agar plate was then inoculated with a 5 mm diam. mycelium plug taken from the margin of a 7-d-old culture, and kept in an incubator at 27°C. Growth was assessed after 7 d, by measuring two opposing diameters of the fungus colony. Growth inhibition relative to the controls was calculated according to the following equation:
...
where, D = colony diameter in the control PDA plate, and d = colony diameter in the amended PDA plate.
Each fungus-extract combination was replicated in five plates, and all experiments were independently repeated three times.
Greenhouse in planta experiments
Application of plant extract and fungus inoculation
To perform in planta experiments, the most active ethanol extract of E. hirta (EEeu) was chosen for assessment against A. solani. Prior to these experiments, a preliminary assay was carried out on a set of tomato plants to assess for possible phytotoxic effects of EEeu. Since no visible phytotoxic effects were observed in this assay after 1 week, an aqueous solution of EEeu was used as a spray onto the shoots canopy of tomato plants, at a concentration of 2.50 mg mL-1.
Inoculum of R. solani was prepared from 7-d-old cultures grown on PDA by gently blending the mycelium with the agar to obtain an inoculum paste. Inoculation was carried out 48 h after EEeu applications, by transferring the tomato plants into new pots containing infested soil-perlite (3:1, v:v). The soil was infected by setting 2.5 g of R. solani inoculum paste at the bottom of a hole made at mid-depth in each pot (Logemann et al., 1992). The tomato plants were carefully uprooted from their previous pots, partially cut at their root ends and transferred into the inoculated pots, so that the inoculum paste became in contact with the wounded roots. The pots were then arranged in a completely randomized design in a greenhouse maintained at 27°C, under a 16 h photoperiod each day and at 70% relative humidity, and were watered appropriately. The experimental design considered four experimental treatments: i) plants sprayed with EEeu (TE); ii) plants inoculated with R. solani (TR); iii) plants sprayed with EEeu, followed by inoculation with R. solani (TE+R); or iv) untreated tomato plants, as the experimental control (TC). Ten replicate plants were used for each treatment, experiments were repeated three times independently.
Evaluation of tomato plant growth promotion and disease
For each treatment, the heights of the treated plants were measured at 7, 14, and 21 d after extract application, to evaluate effects of the extract on plant growth.
Disease severity was recorded for TR and TE+R treatments at 5, 10, 15, and 20 d after inoculation. Severity was scored using a 0-5 scale, were: 0 = healthy plant, 1 = 1-10% of leaves with initial wilts, 2 = 11- 25% of leaves with wilts, 3 = 26-49% of leaves showing wilting and chlorosis, 4 = 50-74% of leaves showing pronounced wilting and development of necrotic areas, and 5 = whole leaves wilting. Severity was calculated according to the following equation:
...
where, d = severity score; n = number of disease plants with the same severity score; N = total number of the examined plants, and D = the greatest severity score.
Disease reduction was calculated by comparing disease severity observed on plants using the following equation:
...
where, S = disease severity on tomato inoculated with R. solani (treatment TR), and s = disease severity on tomato treated with EEeu then inoculated with R. solani (treatment TE+R).
Analyses of phytochemical contents and antioxidant potential
Preliminary analyses of crude plant extracts were performed to assess their phytochemical compositions. Each extract was analyzed for: i) total phenolic content using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, using the method of Singleton et al. (1999); ii) total flavonoid content, using the method of Zhishen et al. (1999); iii) total tannin content, using the method described by Verzelloni et al. (2010); iv) total alkaloid content, using bromocresol green reagent and the method described by Tabasum et al. (2016); v) total polysaccharides content using phenolsulfuric acid after mild acid hydrolysis, using the method of Dubois et al. (1956); and vi) total protein content using Bradford's reagent, and Bradford's method (Bradford, 1976).
Antioxidant activity of the plant extracts was measured using the free radical cation 2,2-azinobis-3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid, using the method described by Re et al. (1999).
Statistical analyses
All data were statistically analyzed using the MaxStat Lite software, version 3.60 (available at: https://maxstatlite.soft112.com/). Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the means comparison carried out using Tukey's multiple range test at P< 0.05. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed using the software package Solo, version 8.6.1, (Eigenvector Research, Inc. Manson, WA, USA), considering the analytical properties as variables.
RESULTS
Characteristics of plants extracts
The mean yields of the extracts, based on initial dry biomass of leaves, varied between 5 and 8% (w/w). More precisely, extraction productivity for the different plant extracts was: WEox, 6.2%; EEox, 5.1%; West, 7.4%; EEst, 5.3%; WEeu, 8.2%; and EEeu, 5.6%.
Extracts differed in colour: water extracts were dark brown, and the ethanol extracts were grayish-green.
Antifungal activity of plant extracts
The addition of the plant extracts to PDA medium at all concentrations did not affect medium consistency, but only its colour. Growth of the three phytopathogenic fungi on PDA medium, without addition of plant extracts, reached the following mean colony diameters after 1 week: 8.50 cm for R. solani, 7.50 cm for F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum and 7.38 cm for A. solani. Addition of the plant extracts to PDA medium inhibited fungus growth in all of the substrate/fungus combinations, and inhibition was related to extract concentration in the medium (Figure 2A). Increasing concentration of EEeu led to complete inhibition of F. oxysporum. The same concentration of WEeu also inhibited growth of F. oxysporum, but to a lesser extent than for EEeu (Figure 2B). The tested plant extracts consistently reduced mycelium growth of R. solani, F. oxysporum, and A. solani.
The ethanol extracts gave greater antifungal activity than the water extracts. As little as 1.25 mg mL-1 of ethanol extracts from the three plants were sufficient to inhibit fungus growth from 10 to 28% (depending on fungus). Between 10 to 20 mg mL-1 of ethanol extract, growth inhibition was 90-100% (Figures 3A, 4A, and 5A). Therefore, the ethanol extracts in sufficient concentration completely inhibited growth of all three fungi. At low doses, water extracts from all three plants also inhibited fungus growth by 2 to 28% (depending on fungus) but differently from the ethanol extracts. Growth inhibition from the water extracts was never as great as with the ethanol extracts (Figures 3B, 4B and 5B). This confirms the greater antifungal activity of the ethanol than water extracts.
Fungus growth inhibition was dose dependent for all the fungus/extract combinations, but the inhibitory effects of extracts varied for extracts from the different plants. In general, extracts from E. hirta gave greater inhibition than those from S. cayennensis, which were more active than the extracts from O. barrelieri.
An effect was observed on the morphology of F. oxysporum grown on PDA plates amended with WEs. Mycelium colour and texture were greatly modified on amended PDA plates, as shown in Figure 6. These changes in morphology were not apparent for the other two fungi growing on WEs-amended media.
Effects of Euphorbia hirta ethanol extract on tomato plant height
The height of all tomato plants sprayed with EEeu (TE) was significantly increased after 7 d (Figure 7). Plant size increased during the following weeks and was greater (P< 0.05) in EEeu-treated plots, when compared to controls. Three weeks after spraying with EEeu, mean plant heights from the different extract treatments were: TE, 20.4 cm; TC, 14.5 cm; TE+R, 12.3 cm; and TR. 11.2 cm.
Disease reduction by Euphorbia hirta ethanol extract
Data of disease severity and reduction are summarized in Table 1. Tomato plants infected with R. solani (TR) showed greater disease severity, when compared to EEeu-treated plants inoculated with R. solani (TE+R). The final disease severity estimates gave 56.7 ± 5% from the TE+R treatment and 80 ± 2% from the TR treatment. This demonstrated that the E. hirta ethanol extract efficiently protected tomato plants from R. solani infections.
Phytochemical content and antioxidant capacity of the plant extracts
Means values of total phenolic, flavonoid, alkaloid, tannin, protein, and sugar contents and radical antioxidant activity of all the tested plant extracts are presented in Table 2. Except for the alkaloids, whose contents in plant extracts were very similar, the quantification of other chemical components was different for all tested plant extracts. EEst had the greatest amounts of phenolics (101.7 ± 11.8 mg gallic acid g-1), flavonoids (33.5 ± 0.7 mg catechin g-1), and tannins (7 ± 1.9 mg catechin g-1). WEox had the greatest amount of proteins (8.1 ± 0.8 mg BSA g-1). The polysaccharide components were greater in water extracts compared to the ethanol extracts, except for EEst (179 ± 27.3 mg glucose g-1) and WEst (94.8 ± 18.9 mg glucose g-1).
Table 2 shows that WEox and WEst were more effective in scavenging ABTS radical cation, with values, respectively, of 262.67 ± 41.48 and 250.33 ± 40.54 mg of L-ascorbic acid g-1. Mean values for the other extracts were: for EEst, 168.33 ± 2.36; for EEox, 157.22 ± 4.46; for WEeu, 112.53 ± 8.01, and for EEeu, 83 ± 26.40 mg of Lascorbic acid g-1.
The chemical nature of the extracts correlated with the extraction procedures. For instance, O. barrelieri was quite productive for total phenolics, when extracted with water (more than double the quantity of phenolics in WE than in EE), whereas S. cayennensis and E. hirta were much more productive when extracted with ethanol. Euphorbia hirta gave the maximum productivity using ethanol for all components, other than total polysaccharides. Total polysaccharides were more abundant in WEs of all three plants. This was expected, since polysaccharides are more soluble in water than in ethanol solutions (Guo et al., 2017). Conversely, total alkaloids and total flavonoids were better extracted with ethanol than water from all three plants: in particular, E. hirta was very productive in total flavonoids when extracted with ethanol, compared to water extraction.
The cumulative percentage (74.7%) of the total variance explained by the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) allowed designing the bidimensional plot represented in Figure 8. The distribution of extracts along PC1 and PC2 shows a clear distinction between ethanol and water extracts, respectively, positive and negative scores on PC1. In order to understand which variables accounted most for this distribution, they were added to the bidimensional plot. The water extracts had negative scores on PC 1 and were characterized by greater polysaccharide contents than the respective ethanol extracts, and the greatest antioxidant activities (WEox and WEst, with positive scores on PC 2). Otherwise, ethanol extracts, which were positively linked to PC 1, were characterized by the greatest phenolic, tannin and flavonoid contents (particularly EEst and EEeu), and were more effective for growth inhibition of the fungi than the respective water extracts, depicted by the positive scores and positive correlation on PC 1.
DISCUSSION
The potential of plant-derived molecules as effective compounds for management of plant pests and diseases raised considerable attention during the last 10-15 years (Reignault and Walters, 2007; Martinez, 2012). This has been particularly important in areas where chemical pesticides may have deleterious impacts on the sustainability of agricultural systems and on food safety (Tripathi and Dubey, 2004; Shuping and Eloff, 2017).
In the present study, leaves from three pan-tropical plants, O. barrelieri, S. cayennensis, and E. hirta, were used as potential sources of bioactive molecules against three important phytopathogenic fungi, affecting tomato in Cameroon and worldwide. The three plant species were chosen as sources of possible bioactive/antimicrobial compounds, since they are very common as ruderal herbs in young fallows (Tchiengué, 2012). Additionally, preliminary ethnopharmacological studies showed that these species are relevant as medicinal plants (FAO, 1999).
Our results highlighted the potential fungicidal/ fungistatic activity of these plant extracts in vitro. Antifungal effects were always more pronounced using hydro-ethanol extracts (EEs) than water extracts (WEs), and were concentration and extract-pathogen-interaction dependent. This confirms the results of Kotze and Eloff (2002), who reported that, in most cases, water extracts had a low antimicrobial efficacy. Therefore, for several plant species, the use of less polar solvents increases the extraction efficiency and concentration of antimicrobial molecules (Eloff, 1998), such as flavonoids and phenolics (Table 2). The complete inhibition of fungal growth was recorded using a concentration ranging from 10 to 20 mg mL-1 of EEs obtained from the three plants tested. The antifungal efficacy of such extracts increased linearly (P< 0.05) in relation to the concentration used, both for EEs and for WEs. This indicates the presence of antifungal molecules in both extracts. The preliminary phytochemical composition of WEs and EEs of the three plants species used in our experiments showed various concentrations of active biomolecules. The concentration of phenolics was greatest in EEst and EEeu and least in WEeu. Conversely, for O. barrelieri, more phenolics were found in WEox than EEox. This is possibly due to the diverse nature of phenolics produced by O. barrelieri compared, for instance, with E. hirta (Mekam et al., 2019). Phenolics (or phenols) are a large class of compounds classified as simple phenols or polyphenols. They are found in all plants and consist of simple phenols, benzoic and cinnamic acids, coumarins, tannins, lignins, lignans and flavonoids (Khoddami et al., 2013). Therefore, it is expected that different plants may produce phenolics in different quantities and of different chemical structures. Phenolics are frequently synthesized in plants in response (or as protection) to stress, such as pathogen infection, insect attack, UV radiation or wounding. Therefore, these compounds have important roles in plant defense (Mandal et al., 2010). In most plant species, the key step in phenolic syntheses is the conversion of phenylalanine. This reaction, catalyzed by the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase enzymes, leads to the production of various hydroxycinnamic acids, benzoic acids and derivatives of polyphenols, which are important antifungal biomolecules often found in plants (Raymond Chia and Dykes, 2010).
As highlighted in Table 2, phenolic contents of the different plant extracts were: EEst < EEeu < WEox < WEst < EEox < WEeu. Nevertheless, their antifungal activities did not follow this order, since the EEs gave greater antifungal activity than WEs, when tested at equivalent concentrations. EEeu gave the greatest antifungal activity, completely inhibiting mycelium growth of F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum and A. solani, at a concentration of 10 mg mL-1. At the same concentration, WEeu exhibited moderate antifungal activity, inhibiting mycelium growth of F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum by 18% and A. solani by 57%. In general, hydro-ethanol treatments extracted more (and possibly more diverse) antifungal compounds than water, and this may be related to the less polar nature of ethanol as an extractant, when compared to water. Considering the minimum effective concentration of EEs that completely inhibited fungal growth, the measured EE activity was twice to three times greater than for WEs. These results agree with those of other reports that have showed the efficiency of some hydro-ethanolic plant extracts have the greatest and widest range of in vitro activities, resulting in complete inhibition of fungal growth. Galani et al. (2013) reported that the EEs of Ageratum conyzoides and Callistemon citrinus completely inhibited Phythophthora infestans at 5,000 ppm, and that of Ocimum gratissimum at 10,000 ppm. Dakole et al. (2016) reported that the EEs of Ageratum conyzoides and Callistemon citrinus were the most active for inhibiting radial growth of Phytophthora infestans. Cymbopogon citratus and Ocimum gratissimum were the most active against radial growth and conidia germination of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici at a concentration of 6,250 pg mL-1. This variability in antifungal activity of extracts suggested that a correlation exist between the nature of plant extracts and their concentrations of active phytochemicals. The amounts, biochemical nature and activity of phenolics (including flavonoids and tannins) and alkaloids contained in the present study extracts was dependent on: i) their solubility in water or ethanol; ii) the absence of inhibitors; iii) their synergism with polysaccharides and proteins present in the extracts; iv) the differences in modes of action; and, v) the structure and biology of the phytopathogenic fungi (Lapornik et al., 2005). Therefore, the phenolics present in these plant extracts displayed important and direct inhibition of growth of three tomato pathogens and may be considered as prospective compounds for management of plant diseases. In particular, the extracts from E. hirta used in our experiments showed the greatest amounts of phenolic compounds, mainly gallotannins, and hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids (Mekam et al., 2019). These phenolics are known bioactive molecules with antifungal properties (Alves Breda et al., 2016).
Plant-derived alkaloids were extensively studied for their antifungal properties against human pathogenic fungi, such as Candida albicans (Mollataghi et al., 2012). Plant alkaloids are also reported to have activity against phytopathogenic fungi. For instance, allosecurinine from Phyllanthus amarus (Euphorbiaceae) was able to inhibit the growth of Alternaria spp. (including A. solani), Fusarium spp. and other important fungi affecting crop plants (Singh et al., 2008). Liu et al., (2009) found that sanguinaine, an isoquinoline alkaloid from Macleaya cordata (Papaveraceae) reduced the growth of R. solani at a concentration of 0.45 pg mL-1. Nonetheless, the specific roles of alkaloids extracted from the tested plants remain uncertain, as compared to the possible inhibitory role of phenolics present in the same extracts. This role (if any) does not appear to be important since no significant difference in content was found among the three tested plants.
Regarding polysaccharides, one of the best known with confirmed antifungal effects is laminarin (or laminaran), a glucan with different degrees of molecular branching at ß-1,3 and ß-1,6. For instance, grey mold (Botrytis cinerea) and downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) of grapevine were inhibited by spraying laminarin onto vine canopies (Copping, 2004). Laminarin-based products are commercially available as biopesticides (Environmental Protection Agency, 2010). Activity of laminarin in plant tissues is more related to induced resistance than from direct antifungal effects (Aziz et al., 2003). In the present study, polysaccharides were particularly abundant in the WE of S. cayennensis, but WE was not more active than EE from this plant. This suggests that polysaccharides may not have inhibitory effects on fungal growth as great as other compounds in the tested extracts - especially the EEs.
The greater antioxidant capability of a plant extract may be correlated with phenolic composition and concentration. The greater the phenolic content the greater is the antioxidant activity. This is due to the phenolic hydroxyl groups, which stop radical chain reactions via radical scavenging (Shahidi and Chandrasekara, 2010).
Principal component analyses for exploration of relationships between plant extracts and biochemical properties assisted description of variance in the set of multivariate data we obtained (polyphenol, tannin, alkaloid contents and associated fungal growth inhibition). Sample splitting showed in the PC bi-plot clearly reflected the main differences due to extraction method, the plant origins, and the phenolic and alkaloid compositions, which influenced antifungal activity of the different extracts.
Under greenhouse condition, foliar application of EEeu on tomato before a challenge pathogen inoculation resulted in increased plant height and the reduction of disease severity caused by R. solani. Increased plant height was a beneficial effect of foliar application of EEeu during the in planta experiments. EEeu stimulated plant height more than water in treated tomato plants (Figure 7). This growth promoting activity of EEeu was possibly attributable to low molecular weight components, such as plant hormones (gibberellic acids), and to major components such as polysaccharides, amino acids and polyphenols that are involved in many aspects of plant physiology and development. These include seed germination, stem and leaf elongation, flower induction, and fruit and seed development (Kamiya and GarciaMartinez, 1999). This result is similar to those of Nguefack et al. (2013), who reported that spraying rice plants with a 2% ethanol extract, followed by a 2% (w/v) aqueous extract of Callistemon citrinus or Cymbopogum citratus, increased seedling emergence, tillering, panicles/plant and the grain yields by 25-55%. Zakiah et al. (2017) reported that low concentrations of a crude extract of Cassava asiatica (25 mg L-1) increased height and leaf area of soybean plants. However, in the present study the tomato-EEeu-R. solani interaction showed less plant height increase, when compared to the tomatowater interaction. Infection by a root/stem pathogen probably interfered with host metabolism and contributed to reduced plant development.
Management of tomato fungal diseases is primarily achieved through breeding resistant cultivars. Many recently developed cultivars are moderately or very resistant to Fusarium wilt, whereas no tomato variety is currently available that shows acceptable tolerance to damping-off/crown rot. Therefore, we chose R. solani as the challenging pathogen for the in vivo experiments. Disease reduction reached 29 ± 5% in the tomato-EEeuR. solani interaction, in comparison to the tomato-waterR. solani interaction, at 20 d after inoculation (Table 1). This suggests that EEeu contained natural compounds that possibly act alone or in synergy, stimulating plant defense to provide disease control through induced systemic resistance in tomato against damping-off. This is particularly important since damping-off cannot be easily managed, especially in areas where appropriate crop rotations are not followed. Although extracts from tropical plants are reported to provide crop disease control through stimulation of plant defense systems (Baraka et al., 2011; Nashwa and Abo-Elyousr, 2012), E. hirta extracts have not been previously examined.
CONCLUSIONS
Natural flora is a source of several biologically active compounds, and some of these have been formulated as botanical agrochemicals and are currently used in the management of agricultural pests (Dubey et al., 2011). The present study established that water and hydroethanol extracts obtained from leaves of O. barrelieri, S. cayennensis, and E. hirta are sources of phytochemicals, and these molecules demonstrated inhibitory activity against phytopathogenic fungi. Application of these extracts is, therefore, a promising and environmentally friendly strategy for crop disease control that could contribute to minimizing the risks and hazards of posed by conventional fungicides.
Economic advantages from the use of plant extracts could be particularly relevant in African rural areas, where these pan-tropical plants are common and adapted. Biomolecules may be developed into commercial products by local companies, thus contributing to rural and agro-industrial development, together with increased sustainability for local cropping systems. Current research is devoted to identifying the most effective phenolics and other antifungal compounds (Mekam et al., 2019), and compounds showing effective plant growth promotion, to develop and implement innovative plant disease biocontrol strategies.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research has been supported in part by the European Commission, under the Erasmus+ KA107 mobility project between the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy) and the University of Yaoundé I (Cameroon).
Citation: P.N. Mekam, S. Martini, J. Nguefack, D. Tagliazucchi, G.N. Mangoumou, E. Stefani (2019) Activity of extracts from three tropical plants towards fungi pathogenic to tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Phytopathologia Mediterranea 58(3): 573-586. doi: 10.13128/Phyto-10891
Accepted: October 11,2019
Published: December 30, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 P.N. Mekam, S. Martini, J. Nguefack, D. Tagliazucchi, G.N. Mangoumou, E. Stefani. This is an open access, peer-reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.com/pm) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Competing Interests: The Author(s) declare(s) no conflict of interest.
Editor: Jean-Michel Savoie, INRA Villenave d'Ornon, France.
LITERATURE CITED
Ademe A., Ayalev A., Woldetsadik K., 2013. Evaluation of antifungal activity of plant extracts against papaya anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides). Journal of Plant Pathology and Microbiology 4: 1-4.
Alves B.C., Marcon G.A., Garcia V.L., Monteiro K.M., Bataglion G.A., Eberlin M.N., Teixeira D.M.C., 2016. Phytochemical analysis and antifungal activity of extracts from leaves and fruit residues of Brazilian savanna plants aiming its use as safe fungicides. Natural Products and Bioprospecting 6: 195-204.
Aziz A., Poinssot B., Daire X., Adrian M., Bezier A., ... Pugin A., 2003. Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. Molecular PlantMicrobe Interactions 16: 1118-1128.
Baraka M.A., Fatma M.R., Shaban W.I., Arafat K.H., 2011. Efficiency of some plant extracts, natural oils, biofungicides and fungicides against root rot disease of date palm. Journal of Biology Chemical and Environment Sciences 6: 405-429.
Bradford M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantization of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
Copping L.G., 2004. The Manual of Biocontrol Agents. 3rd ed. British Crop Protection Council Publications, Alton, Hampshire, UK, 702 pp.
Dakole D.C., Nguefack J., Dongmo L.J.B., Galani Y.J.H., Azah U.R., ... Amvam Z.P.H., 2016. Antifungal potential of essential oils, aqueous and ethanol extracts of thirteen plants against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and Phytophtora infestans (Mont.) de Bary as major tomato pathogens in Cameroon. International Journal of Current Science 19: 128-145.
Dubey N.K., Ravindra S., Ashok K., Priyanka S., Bhanu P, 2011. Global scenario on the application of natural products in integrated pest management programmers. In: Natural Products in Plant Pest Management (N.K. Dubey, ed.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1-20.
Dubois M., Gille K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., F. Smith, 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Annals of Chemistry 28: 350-356.
Eloff J.N., 1998. Which extractant should be used for the screening and isolation of antimicrobial components from plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 60: 1-8.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Biopesticide Registration Action Document: Laminarin - PC Code: 123200. U.S., 2010. Available at: http://www.talunecoproducts.com/ wp-content/uploads/2017/01/EPA-Laminarin.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2018.
FAO, 1999. Données statistiques des produits forestiers non-ligneux du Cameroun. Programme de partenariat CE-FAO (1998-2001) - GCP/INT/679/EC. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/X6699F/X6699F00. htm#TopOfPage. Accessed August 12, 2019.
FAO, 2017. Faostat. Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/ download/Q/QC/E. Accessed August 29, 2018.
Fontem D.A., Gumedzoe M. , Nono-Womdim R., 1999. Biological constraints in tomato production in the western highlands of Cameroon. Tropicultura 16: 89-92.
Galani Y.J.H., Nguefack J., Dakole D.C., Fotio D., Petchayo T.S., ... Amvam Z.PH., 2013. Antifungal potential and phytochemical analysis of extracts from seven Cameroonian plants against late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Application Science 2: 140-154.
Guo M.Q., Hu X., Wang C., Ai L., 2017. Polysaccharides: Structure and Solubility. IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/ intechopen.71570. https://www.intechopen.com/ books/solubility-of-polysaccharides/polysaccharidesstructure-and-solubility.
Ishii H., Hollomon D.W., 2015. Fungicide resistance in plant pathogens: Principles and a guide to practical management. Springer Japan, IX + 490 pp.
Ji P, Momol T.M, Olson S.M., Pradhanang P.M., Jones J.B., 2005. Evaluation of thymol as biofumigant for control of bacterial wilt of tomato under field conditions. Plant Disease 89: 497-500.
Jones J.B, Zitter T.A., Momol T.M., Miller S.A., 2014. Compendium of tomato diseases and pests. 2nd ed.. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, 168 pp.
Kamiya Y., Garcia-Martinez J.L., 1999. Regulation of gibberellin biosynthesis by light. Current Opinions in Plant Biology 2: 398-403.
Karanga Y., Ilboudo O., Bonzi S., Tapsoba I., Somda I., Bonzi-Coulibaly Y.L., 2017. Phytochemical and antifungal properties of Euphorbia hirta L. against Fusarium moliniforme and Phoma sorghina. Natural Products: an Indian Journal 13: 105-114.
Kharchoufi S., Parafati L., Licciardello F., Muratore G., Hamdi M., . Restuccia C., 2018. Edible coatings incorporating pomegranate peel extract and biocontrol yeast to reduce Penicillium digitatum postharvest decay of oranges. Food Microbiology, 74: 107-112.
Khoddami A., Wilkes M.A., Roberts T.H., 2013. Techniques for analysis of plant phenolic compounds. Molecules 18: 2328-2375.
Kotze M., Eloff J.N., 2002. Extraction of antibacterial compounds from Combretum microphyllum (Combretaceae). South African Journal of Botany 68: 62-67.
Lapornik B., Prošek M., Wondra A.G., 2005. Comparison of extracts prepared from plant by products using different solvents and extraction time. Journal of Food Engineering 71: 214-222.
Liu H., Wang J., Zhao J., Lu S., Wang J., ... Zhou L., 2009. Isoquinoline alkaloids from Macleaya cordata active against plant microbial pathogens. Natural Products Communications 4: 1557-1560.
Logemann J., Jach G., Tommerup H., Mundy J., Schell J., 1992. Expression of a barley ribosome-inactivating protein leads to increased fungal protection in transgenic tobacco plants. Nature Biotechnology 10: 305-308.
Lucas J.A., Hawkins N.J., Fraajie B.A., 2015. The evolution of fungicide resistance. Advances in Applied Microbiology 90: 29-92.
Mandal S.M., Chakraborty D., Day S., 2010. Phenolic acids act as signaling molecules in plant-microbe symbioses. Plant Signal Behaviour 5: 359-368.
Martinez J.A., 2012. Natural Fungicides Obtained from Plants. In: Fungicides for Plant and Animal Diseases (Dhanasekeran D., Thajuddin N., Panneerselvam A., ed.). Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/ books/fungicides-for-plant-and-animal-diseases/natural-fungicides-obtained-from-plants.
Mekam P.N., Martini S., Nguefack J., Tagliazucchi D., Stefani E., 2019. Phenolic compounds profile of water and ethanol extracts from Euphorbia hirta L. leaves showing antioxidant and antifungal properties. South African Journal of Botany 127: 319-332.
Mollataghi A., Coudiere E., Hadi A.H.A., Mukhtar M.R., Awang K., ... Ata A., 2012. Anti-acetylcholinesterase, anti-a-glucosidase, anti-leishmanial and anti-fungal activities of chemical constituents of Beilschmiedia species. Fitoterapia 83: 298-302.
Nashwa S.M.A., Abo-Elyousr K.A.M., 2012. Evaluation of various plant extracts against the early blight disease of tomato plants under greenhouse and field conditions. Plant Protection Sciences 48: 74-79.
Nguefack J., Wulff E.G., Dongmo L.J.B., Fouelefack F.R., Fotio D., ... Torp J., 2013. Effect of plant extracts and an essential oil on the control of brown spot disease, tillering, number of panicles and yield increase in rice. European Journal of Plant Pathology 137: 871-882.
Okoye T.C., Akah P.A., Okoli C.O., Ezike A.C., Mbaoji F.M., 2010. Antimicrobial and antispasmodic activity of leaf extracts and fractions of Stachytarpheta cayennensis. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 3(3): 189-192.
Pusztahelyi T., Holb I.J., Pócsi I., 2015. Secondary metabolites in fungus-plant interactions. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00573. https://www. frontiersin.org/
Raymond Chia T.W., Dykes G.A., 2010. Antimicrobial activity of crude epicarp and seed extracts from mature avocado fruit (Persea americana) of three cultivars. Pharmaceutical Biology 48: 753-756.
Re R., Pellegrini N., Proteggente A., Pannala A., Yang M., Evans R.C.A., 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 26: 12311237.
Reignault P., Walters D., 2007. Topical induction of inducers for disease control. In: Induced resistance for plant disease control: A sustainable approach to crop protection (Walters D., Newton A., Lyon G., ed.) Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 272 pp.
Ribera A.E., Zuñiga G., 2012. Induced plant secondary metabolites for phytopathogenic fungi control: a review. Journal of Soil Sciences and Plant Nutrition 12: 893-911.
Rios J.L., Recio M.C., Villar A., 1988. Screening methods for natural products with antimicrobial activity: a review of the literature. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 23: 127-149.
Scavo A., Pandino G., Restuccia C., Parafati C., Cirvilleri G., Mauromicale G., 2019. Antimicrobial activity of cultivated cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L. var. altilis DC.) leaf extracts against bacterial species of agricultural and food interest. Industrial Crops and Products 129: 206-211.
Senthikumar S., 2018. A review of pharmacology with medicinal plants. International Journal of Universal Pharmacology and Bioscience 7: 45-192.
Sesan T.E., Enache E., Iacomi B.M., Oprea M., Oancea F., Iacomi C., 2015. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against Botrytis cinerea Pers. in the blackcurrant crop (Ribes nigrum L.). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 14: 29-43.
Shahidi F., Chandrasekara A., 2010. Hydroxycinnamates and their in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities. Phytochemistry Review 9: 147-170.
Shuping D.S.S., Eloff J.N., 2017. The use of plants to protect plants and food against fungal pathogens: A review. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine 14: 120-127.
Singh A.K., Pandey M.B., Singh S., Singh A.K., Singh U.P, 2008. Antifungal activity of securinine against some plant pathogenic fungi. Mycobiology 36: 99-101.
Singleton V.L., Orthofer R., Lamuela-Raventos R.M., 1999. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology 229: 152-178.
Suprapta D.N, 2016. Review of tropical plants with antifungal activities against plant fungal pathogens. Preprints 2016, doi: 10.20944/preprints201610.0049.v1. https://www.preprints.org/
Tabasum S., Khare S., Jain K., 2016. Spectrophotometric quantification of total phenolic, flavonoid, and alkaloid contents of Abrus precatorius L. seeds. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 9(2): 371-374..
Tchiengué B., 2012. Secondary successions after shifting cultivation in a dense tropical forest of southern Cameroon (Central Africa). PhD Thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. 274 pp.
Tripathi P, Dubey N.K., 2004. Exploitation of natural products as alternative strategy to control post-harvest fungal rotting of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology 32: 235-245.
Verzelloni E., Tagliazucchi D., Conte A., 2010. Changes in major antioxidant compounds during aging of traditional balsamic vinegar. Journal of Food Biochemistry 34: 152-171.
Wink M., 2010. Functions and biotechnology of plant secondary metabolites. In: Annual Plant Reviews. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 424 pp.
Yang B., Jiang Y., Shi J., Chen F., Ashraf M., 2011. Extraction and pharmacological properties of bioactive compounds from longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) fruit. Food Research International 44: 1837-1842.
Zakiah Z., Suliansyah I., Bakhtiar A., Mansyurdin M., 2017. Effect of crude extracts of six plants on vegetative growth of soybean (Glycine max Merr.). International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology 4: 1-12.
Zhishen J., Mengcheng T., Jianming W., 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry 64: 555-559.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Antifungal properties were assessed of water and ethanol extracts from the pan-tropical plants Oxalis barrelieri L., Stachytarpheta cayennensis L., and Euphorbia hirta L. against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, Alternaría solani Sorauer, and Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. The plant extracts inhibited fungal growth in vitro at 1.25-20 mg mL-1, and the degrees of inhibition increased in a dose-dependent manner. Ethanol extracts from the plants inhibited fungal growth by 80-100%, while water extracts showed less antifungal activity, with maximum growth inhibition of 62%. Growth inhibition from ethanol extracts was two- to three-fold greater than for water extracts at equivalent concentrations. Antifungal activity of the extracts varied with their content and composition of phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, and alkaloids. In greenhouse experiments, spraying tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) with ethanol extract from E. hirta at 2.5 mg mL-1 did not cause phytotoxicity, and increased plant size, when compared to untreated plants. Spraying E. hirta ethanol extract on tomato plants infected by R. solani reduced disease severity up to 80%, when compared to non-sprayed plants. These results demonstrate potential of leaf extracts from E. hirta, O. barrelieri, and S. cayennensis as biofungicides for the control of R. solani, A. solani, and F. oxysporum, which are among the most important causal agents of tomato diseases.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde 1, PO. BOX 812 Yaounde, Cameroon
2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy