Evaluation of antiviral T cell responses and TSCM cells in volunteers enrolled in a phase I HIV-1 subtype C prophylactic vaccine trial in India

Abstract

T cells play an important role in controlling viral replication during HIV infection. An effective vaccine should, therefore, lead to the induction of a strong and early viral-specific CD8+ T cell response. While polyfunctional T cell responses are thought to be important contributors to the antiviral response, there is evidence to show that polyfunctional HIV- specific CD8+ T cells are just a small fraction of the total HIV-specific CD8+ T cells and may be absent in many individuals who control HIV replication, suggesting that other HIV-1 specific CD8+ effector T cell subsets may be key players in HIV control. Stem cell-like memory T cells (TSCM) are a subset of T cells with a long half-life and self-renewal capacity. They serve as key reservoirs for HIV and contribute a significant barrier to HIV eradication. The present study evaluated vaccine-induced antiviral responses and TSCM cells in volunteers vaccinated with a subtype C prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine candidate administered in a prime-boost regimen. We found that ADVAX DNA prime followed by MVA boost induced significantly more peripheral CD8+ TSCM cells and higher levels of CD8+ T cell-mediated inhibition of replication of different HIV-1 clades as compared to MVA alone and placebo. These findings are novel and provide encouraging evidence to demonstrate the induction of TSCM and cytotoxic immune responses by a subtype C HIV-1 prophylactic vaccine administered using a prime-boost strategy.

About the Authors:

Sivasankaran Munusamy Ponnan

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Peter Hayes

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: IAVI Human Immunology Laboratory, Imperial College, London, England, United Kingdom

Natalia Fernandez

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: IAVI Human Immunology Laboratory, Imperial College, London, England, United Kingdom

Kannan Thiruvengadam

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Software

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Sathyamurthi Pattabiram

Roles Investigation

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Manohar Nesakumar

Roles Investigation

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Ashokkumar Srinivasan

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Sujitha Kathirvel

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Janani Shankar

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Rajat Goyal

Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration

Affiliation: International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New Delhi, India

Nikhil Singla

Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision

Affiliation: International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New Delhi, India

Joyeeta Mukherjee

Roles Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision

Affiliation: International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New Delhi, India

Shweta Chatrath

Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision

Affiliation: International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New Delhi, India

Jill Gilmour

Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation

Affiliation: IAVI Human Immunology Laboratory, Imperial College, London, England, United Kingdom

Sudha Subramanyam

Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Srikanth Prasad Tripathy

Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Soumya Swaminathan

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

Luke Elizabeth Hanna

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Current address: Department of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India

Affiliation: National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (Indian Council of Medical Research), Chennai, India

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-8211

Introduction

HIV/AIDS continues to be a significant challenge for global public health even after 35 years of its discovery, with HIV’s sequence diversity and rapid evolution being major obstacles for successful vaccine development [1]. Though several significant advances have been made with respect to the design and development of HIV vaccines, there have not been any major breakthroughs in the field [2]. To date, only one candidate vaccine tested in the RV144 trial in Thailand, demonstrated the ability to significantly reduce the risk of HIV-1 acquisition, giving a modest protective efficacy of 31%, providing new hope for antibody-based vaccine development [3].

There is strong evidence to suggest that T cell-mediated responses play an important role in suppression of virus replication and clearance of infected cells from the host [4–6]. Several cohort studies have reported that generation and proliferation of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells correlate inversely with viral load [7–10]. Thus, CD8+ T cell-mediated immune responses are clearly capable of modulating the course of HIV infection and therefore constitute an important dimension for vaccine research. Persistence and maintenance of the CD8+ T cell response are dependent on CD4+ T cell help [11]. However, a recent study reported that naturally activated CD8+ T cells may persist in the absence of CD4+ T cells [12] and that a persistent memory CD8+ T cell response is important for viral control [13–17]. Long-lived memory CTLs can directly kill cells infected with intracellular pathogens by producing cytokines, chemokines (IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MIP-1) and cytotoxins (perforin, granzymes and granulysin). CTLs can also use the Fas ligand that binds to the Fas receptors present on the surface of many cell types and induce cellular apoptosis [18].

Recent studies have identified a subset of memory T cells that possess stem cell-like properties, called stem-like memory T cells (TSCM) [19–21]. TSCM cells are the least differentiated among the distinct memory populations. They differentiate into different types of memory T cells that play vital roles in controlling the immune response [19]. TSCM cells have been well characterized in cancers and other autoimmune diseases. CD8+ TSCM cells have been proposed as therapeutic targets in acquired aplastic anaemia [22]. However, the role of CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM cells in HIV infection and vaccination, and their contribution to antiviral immune defence remains unclear. Earlier studies reported that the frequency of CD8+ memory T cells (central and effector memory cells) correlates with lower viral load in chronic HIV infection [23–25] and that lower levels of expression of PD-1 on these cells [26–28] indicate that long-lived memory cells may be derived from TSCM cells. Thus, measuring vaccine-induced TSCM cells could provide key insights into the ability of the vaccine to elicit robust and persistent cellular immune responses.

Characterization of the nature of the antiviral response elicited by vaccination would provide the most critical clues to understanding the exact mechanisms that contribute to vaccine efficacy. Assays that measure CD8+ T cell-mediated inhibition of replication of diverse HIV-1 isolates (viral inhibition assay/VIA) may be used to assess the breadth of the direct antiviral function of these cells [29].

Previously, we examined vaccine-induced humoral and cell-mediated responses to the same subtype C HIV-1 vaccine (ADVAX DNA prime and MVA boost) tested in a phase I clinical trial in India (P001 trial) and reported encouraging findings [30, 31]. In the current study, we investigated vaccine-induced peripheral TSCM cells and in vitro viral inhibitory capacity of vaccine-induced CD8+ T cells in the same cohort.

Materials and methods

Samples

The study was performed using cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained from volunteers who participated in the IAVI sponsored P001 trial conducted during the period 2009–2010 [31]. The trial had enrolled a total of 32 HIV-uninfected healthy volunteers at two sites in India: 16 volunteers at the National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis (NIRT), Chennai, and 16 volunteers at the National AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune. The present analysis was confined to samples stored at NIRT alone and focuses on Chennai participants. The 16 individuals (9 males and 7 females) were randomly assigned to either Group A or B, with eight participants in each Group. Group A participants received two intramuscular (I.M.) injections of ADVAX or placebo at baseline (time ‘0’) and 1 month, followed by two I.M. injections of TBC-M4 or placebo at months 3 and 6. Group B participants received three I.M. injections of TBC-M4 or placebo at time 0, months 1 and 6. Among the 8 volunteers in each Group, 6 received the vaccine and 2 received placebo (Fig 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Vaccination schedule followed in the IAVI Phase-I prime-boost HIV-1 subtype C prophylactic vaccine trial (P001 trial).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.g001

Candidate vaccines

ADVAX is a DNA vaccine formulated by the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (ADARC), New York, USA, and manufactured by Vical Inc., San Diego, CA, USA (Lot# 04030248), utilizing the structural features of the commercial plasmid backbone pVAX1 [32, 33]. The vaccine contains two plasmid constructs (one plasmid cloned with the coding sequences of gag and env genes of the Chinese HIV-1 clade B/C strain and the other one cloned with the coding sequences of nef/tat and pol, intended to express a fusion protein) mixed in a 1:1 ratio. The candidate vaccine was suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline with 0.01M sodium phosphate and 150 mM sodium chloride and was formulated to contain 4 mg of the DNA in a total volume of 1mL.

TBC-M4 is a vaccine manufactured by Therion Biologics Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA (Lot# 1B). It is a recombinant Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus containing the coding sequences of gag, env, reverse transcriptase (RT), tat, rev and nef of an Indian HIV-1 clade C strain [34]. The vaccine was suspended in phosphate-buffered saline and 10% glycerol to contain 5x106 PFU in a total volume of 0.5 mL. The amino acid sequence homology between the two vector inserts was found to be greater than 85% (ENV: 87.1%; GAG: 95%; POL/RT: 96.4%).

Virus inhibition assay

Viruses.

HIV-1 subtype A (U455), subtype B (IIIB), subtype C (247FV2), subtype D (CBL4) and subtype AD (ELI) isolates were used in the VIA. U455 and CBL-4 were obtained from NIBSC, UK, ELI and IIIB were obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (Bethesda, MD), 247FV2 was kindly provided by George Shaw (University of Pennsylvania, PA). The titer of each viral isolate was determined by end-point dilution and defined as 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) using the TZM-bl cell line [29] obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program.

Expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

PBMC were thawed and resuspended at 1–1.5×106 cells/ml in RPMI containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 50 units IL-2 (R10/50) and 0.5μg/ml CD3+/CD4+ or CD3+/CD8+ bi-specific antibody for expansion of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell sub-populations respectively. Culture volumes were doubled at days 3 and 6 with R10/50 medium. Overall, the cell numbers increased by a factor of mean 5, and the typical purity of day 7 cultures was 97 and 87% for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells respectively, demonstrating positive expansion and enrichment (≥90% of the CD3+ T cells in culture) of the required T cell sub-population [29].

Viral inhibition assay.

Viral inhibition assay was performed as described by Spentzou et al., 2010. Briefly, separate cultures of 7 day-expanded CD4+ T cells infected with different HIV-1 isolates at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 were established. To limit variation due to the possible effects of the vaccine regimen on CD4+ target cells, a single population of target CD4+ T cells was generated for each subject; wherever available, this cell population was generated from the baseline pre-vaccination sample. Virus-infected target cells were co-cultured with autologous CD8+ T cells obtained at the pre-vaccination time point and at two post-vaccination time points. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were co cultured in 1:1 ratio. In our assay, 0.5 million viral infected CD4+ T cells were co cultured with 0.5 million CD8+ T cells. Every 3 to 4 days, half of the culture supernatant was removed and replaced with fresh R10/50 medium and assessed for Gag p24 content using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (PerkinElmer, United Kingdom). CD8+ T cell-mediated inhibition was expressed as log10 reduction in the p24 content of day 13 supernatants from CD8+ and CD4+ T cell co-cultures as compared to that of CD4+ T cells alone.

Cut-offs were defined by the 97.5th percentile of the baseline VIA response as estimated using PROC QUANTREG in SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). VIA response for each virus was defined as positive if the following three criteria were fulfilled: (i) log10 inhibition is greater than 1.5 for all HIV-1 isolates, (ii) pre-vaccination response for the same virus is negative, and (iii) the difference between the post-vaccination and pre-vaccination response is ≥0.6 log10 inhibition [29].

Polychromatic flow cytometric analysis of memory T cells and TSCM cells

Cryopreserved PBMC obtained at pre-vaccination, on the day of second MVA vaccination (VAC II), one week after second vaccination, on the day of last MVA vaccination (VAC III) and 1, 2 and 48 weeks after last MVA vaccination, were analyzed for memory T cell subset phenotypes. PBMC at pre-vaccination, one week after VAC II, one week after VAC III, and 2 and 48 weeks after last MVA vaccination were analyzed for TSCM cell phenotype. Two million PBMC were washed with FACS buffer and stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua blue dye (Invitrogen). The following cocktail of monoclonal antibodies were used to enumerate the different cell types: T Memory and TSCM cell panel: anti-CD3-APCH7, anti-CD122-PE, anti-CD4-PERCP, anti-CD28-FITC, anti-CD95-PECF594, anti-CD45RA-APC, anti-CCR7-PECY7, and anti-CD8-APCR700. All antibodies were procured from Becton-Dickinson, India (S1 Table). Cells were stained for 30 minutes in the dark, washed and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 minutes, and acquired on a FACS ARIA SORP flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). A minimum of 1,000,000 total events were acquired and data were analyzed using FlowJo software, version 10.4 (Treestar, Ashland, OR).

The following panels were used to identify the different memory subsets [19]. Naïve cells—CD45RO- CCR7+ CD28+ CD95-, Stem cell-like memory cells—CD45RO- CCR7+ CD28+ CD95+, Central memory cells—CD45RO+ CCR7+ CD28+ CD95+, Effector memory cells—CD45RO+ CCR7- CD28- CD95+, Terminal Memory cells—CD45RO+CCR7- CD28+ CD95+, and terminal effector cells—CD45RO-CCR7- CD28- CD122-CD95+.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 7.05 (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA). Values are presented as median and interquartile ranges. The percentage frequency of Memory T cells and TSCM cells were compared within the placebo and Group A and Group B vaccinees at different time points using Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by subgroup analysis using Dunn’s multiple comparison test to identify differences between the groups. For all analyses, differences were considered significant if p value was <0.05.

Ethics statement

The present study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of NIRT (NIRT IEC No. 2015013). During the trial, written statements of informed consent were obtained from the study volunteers. The trial was supervised by the research personnel of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and the study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki [16], Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) framed in the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), and Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) outlined by the Research Quality Association (RQA), UK, were adhered to during the conduct of the study.

Results

Assessment of viral inhibition activity

Viral inhibition activity was assessed with five HIV-1 isolates belonging to different clades, at three-time points (baseline, two weeks post 1st MVA vaccination and two weeks post last MVA vaccination). VIA response was absent in the placebo group at all-time points and in the vaccinated individuals at baseline/pre-vaccination. Positive VIA responses were observed in Group A and B vaccinees post-vaccination. The VIA responses were more frequent in Group A as compared to Group B at two weeks post 1st MVA vaccination; 4 of the 6 Group A volunteers inhibited the U455 isolate (>1.5log inhibition), 2 volunteers inhibited 247FV2, one individual inhibited IIIB and one individual inhibited ELI-1 with log10 reduction in p24 level of >1.5. In contrast, only one individual in Group B demonstrated VIA activity against the U455 isolate. At two weeks post last MVA vaccination, Group A volunteers exhibited VIA activity against all 5 HIV isolates tested; 3 individuals inhibited the U455 isolate, 2 individuals inhibited IIIB, and 3 individuals inhibited the 247FV2, CBL4 and ELI-1 isolates at >1.5log. However, in Group B, VIA activity was seen only against two of the HIV isolates; 2 volunteers inhibited U455 and 1 volunteer inhibited CBL4 at >1.5log. Overall, we observed much better VIA responses in group A volunteers as compared to group B and placebo. These observations suggest that the heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimen was more potent in eliciting a CD8+ T cell-dependent antiviral response against different HIV isolates (Fig 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Viral inhibition activity in terms of log10 reduction in p24 level at pre-vaccination, two weeks post first MVA vaccination and two weeks post last MVA vaccination against the five HIV-1 subtypes: 247FV2 (clade C), CBL-4 (clade D), ELI (clade A/D), IIIB (clade B) and U455 (clade A).

(A) Viral inhibition activity at the pre-vaccination time point. (B) Viral inhibition activity at two weeks post first MVA vaccination. (C) Viral inhibition activity at two weeks post last MVA booster. The box and whisker plots summarize the distribution of positive responses (median, 1st and 3rd quartile). The y-axis represents log10 reduction in P24 antigen level. Shaded boxes represent placebo values, white boxes represent Group A and black boxes represent group B values. The mean log10 values were compared at different time points within the 3 groups for the 5 different viral clades using Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by subgroup analysis using Dunn’s multiple comparison test to identify differences between the three groups. For all analyses, differences were considered significant if p value was <0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.g002

Induction of memory T cells subsets by vaccination

PBMC were analysed by multicolour flow cytometry to determine vaccine-induced alterations in the frequency of memory T cell subsets [central memory T cells (CM), effector memory T cells (EM), terminal effector T cells (TE), and naïve T cells (TN)]. Among CD4+ T cells, CM cells were defined as CD3+CD4+CD45RO+CCR7+, EM cells as CD3+CD4+CD45RO+CCR7-, TE cells as CD3+CD4+CD45RO-CCR7- and TN cells as CD3+CD4+CD45RO-CCR7+. Among the CD8+ T cells, CM cells were defined as CD3+CD8+CD45RO+CCR7+, EM cells as CD3+CD8+CD45RO+CCR7-, TE cells as CD3+CD8+CD45RO-CCR7- and TN cells as CD3+CD8+CD45RO-CCR7+ (S1 Fig).

The proportion of CD4+ TN cells was found to be lower in Groups A and B at 1st week post VAC-II, VAC-III, 1st week post VAC-III and 2nd week post VAC-III time points as compared to the placebo. Similarly, decreased frequency of CD8+ TN cells was observed in the vaccine recipients at post-vaccination time points (S2 and S3 Tables). In contrast, the frequency of CD4+ CM cells was higher in the vaccinated groups at VAC-II, 1st week post VAC-II and 1st week post VAC-III time points as compared to the control group, while there was no difference in the frequency of CD8+ CM cells in any of the three groups.

We observed that both group A and group B vaccines had significantly higher TE cell frequencies in the CD4+ as well as CD8+ T cell compartments at all post-vaccination time points as compared to the placebo subjects. The increase in CD8+ TE cells was found to be significant in Group A at all post-vaccination time points as compared to group B (p = 0.003 to 0.022) (Fig 3; S2 Table). In the CD4 compartment, the frequency of TE cells was found to be significantly higher in group A than in group B at VAC-III and 1st week post VAC-III time points only (p = 0.009; p = 0.001) (Fig 4; S3 Table).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. CD8+ memory T cell subsets in placebo, Group A and Group B volunteers.

Frequency (%) of total CD8+ memory T cell subsets in Placebo, Group A and Group B volunteers at Pre-vaccination, one week post VAC-II, and one, two and 48 weeks post VAC-III. The superimposed dot plots summarize the % frequency of total vaccine-induced CD8+ memory T cell subsets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.g003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. CD4+ Memory T cell subsets in placebo, Group A and Group B volunteers.

Frequency (%) of total CD4+ memory T cell subsets in Placebo, Group A and Group B at Pre-vaccination, one week post VAC-II, and one, two and 48 weeks post VAC-III. The superimposed dot plots summarize the % frequency of total CD4+ memory T cell subsets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.g004

Similarly, significantly elevated numbers of EM T cells was seen in Group A as compared to Group B and placebo controls. The increase in CD8+ EM cells was found to be significantly higher in Group A at all post-vaccination time points when compared to placebo as well as group B (Group A vs Placebo: p<0.001 to 0.009; Group A vs group B: p = 0.002 to 0.039) (Fig 3; S2 Table). CD4+ EM cells were significantly higher in group A at all post-vaccination time points except VAC III and 2nd week post VAC-III as compared to placebo (p = 0.019 to 0.007). However, when compared to group B, the increase was significant only at the VAC-II time point (p = 0.019). Group B volunteers had increased frequency of CD4+ EM cells at 1st week post VAC-II, 2nd week post VAC-III and 48th week post VAC-III as compared to placebo (p = 0.002; p = 0.0006; p = 0.008 respectively) (Fig 4; S3 Table). Difference in the number of total CD8+ and CD4+ memory T cell subsets is presented in S4 and S5 Tables respectively. These observations indicate that both the heterologous and homologous prime-boost vaccination regimens resulted in increased frequencies of peripheral effector and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, with the increase being significantly higher in group A as compared to group B.

Induction of TSCM cells by vaccination

CD4+ TSCM cells were defined as CD3+CD4+CD45RO-CCR7+CD28+CD95+ cells and CD8+ TSCM cells were defined and identified as CD3+CD8+CD45RO-CCR7+CD28+CD95+ cells (S1 Fig). The percentage of circulating CD4+ or CD8+ TSCM cells were relatively small (0.15 to 0.22%) in the placebo group as well as at baseline in the vaccinated groups. Vaccination resulted in a significant increase in the frequency of TSCM cells in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell compartments in both Groups A and B (Table 1A; Figs 5 and 6). CD8+ TSCM cell frequency was significantly higher in Group A at all post-vaccination time points as compared to the placebo group (p<0.001 to 0.003), at one week post VAC-II and III, and 48 weeks post VAC-III, as compared to Group B (p = 0.005 to 0.025) (Fig 6). CD4+ TSCM cell frequencies were significantly higher in Group A at one week post VAC-II and one week post VAC-III time points as compared to placebo (p≤0.002), and at one week post VAC-II when compared to Group B volunteers (p = 0.025) (Table 1B; Fig 6). There was a clear trend towards increased frequencies of this sub-population of cells in Group A volunteers during the period of vaccination (Fig 5), suggesting that the ADVAX/MVA prime-boost regimen induced high frequencies of CD8+ and CD4+ TSCM cells.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. CD4+ TSCM cell subsets in placebo, Group A and Group B volunteers.

Frequency (%) of total circulating CD4+ TSCM cells in Placebo, Group A and Group B at Pre-vaccination, one week post VAC-II, and one, two and 48 weeks post VAC-III. The box and whisker plots summarize the % frequency of circulating CD4+ TSCM cells (median, 1st and 3rd quartiles). K-Wallis test was performed to analyze differences within the individual groups, and Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed to identify differences between the 3 groups. P—Placebo; A—Group A; B—Group B; *- p<0.05; **- p<0.01; **—p<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.g005

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 6. CD8+ TSCM cell subsets in placebo, Group A and Group B volunteers.

Frequency (%) of total circulating CD8+ TSCM cells in Placebo, Group A and Group B at Pre-vaccination, one week post VAC-II, and one, two and 48 weeks post VAC-III. The box and whisker plots summarize the % frequency of circulating CD8+ TSCM cells (median, 1st and 3rd quartiles). K-Wallis test was performed to analyze differences within the individual groups, and Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed to identify differences between the 3 groups. P—Placebo; A—Group A; B—Group B; *- p<0.05; **- p<0.01; ***- p<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.g006

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Induction of TSCM cells by vaccination.

A) Comparison of mean frequency (%) of CD4+ TSCM cells in Placebo, Group A and Group B volunteers. B) Comparison of mean frequency of CD8+ TSCM cells in Placebo, Group A and Group B volunteers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.t001

Discussion

The ultimate solution to the HIV epidemic is a vaccine that will substantially reduce transmission [35–37]. The risk of transmission is associated with high levels of viremia seen in acute and uncontrolled chronic infection. Though several studies have documented an inverse correlation between activated immune cells and viral load [3, 38, 39], their successful incorporation into vaccine design has not been achieved so far [37, 40]. Adaptive T cell immunity provides the individual with a specialized defence against intracellular pathogens. CD8+ T cells were first implicated in suppressing HIV replication when reductions in viral load were found to correlate with the appearance of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells [41, 42]. Subsequent studies showed that long term non-progressors (LTNP) possess relatively high CTL and CD4+ T cell proliferative responses despite low viral loads [42]. In SIV infection, removal of CTLs correlated with an increased life span of productively infected CD4+ T cells and increased viral load, demonstrating clearly the importance of CTLs in viral control [43]. Ongoing efforts to develop an effective HIV vaccine are partly based on the principle that a specific antiviral CTL response is crucial for immune control of viral replication. This principle applies to various chronic and persistent viral infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, CMV and Epstein-Barr virus [3].

The IAVI-sponsored Phase I P001 trial conducted in India explored the ability of an HIV-1 subtype C prophylactic vaccine candidate to influence the frequencies of different types of peripheral memory T cells (CM, EM and TE) and TSCM cells in volunteers. We observed that both the heterologous and homologous prime-boost vaccine regimens induced changes in proportions of CM, EM and TE cells in the CD4+ as well as CD8+ T cell compartments. Changes in the frequency of memory subsets were more pronounced in the CD8+ T cell compartment as compared to the CD4+ T cell compartment in both vaccinee groups, suggesting that both the ADVAX/MVA and MVA regimens were capable of eliciting memory CD8+ T cells responses. These responses were maintained up to 48 weeks post last vaccination, implying that the vaccine-induced memory CD8+ T cell response was long-lasting, and could potentially provide long term virological control.

TSCM cells are a subset of T cells that give rise to different populations of memory T cells (CM, EM and TE cells) [44]. Functional cellular responses of CMV, Flu, SIV and melanoma-specific CD8+ TSCM have been previously reported [20]. Though the role of TSCM cells in HIV infection and antiviral response has not been completely elucidated, earlier studies have reported that elite controllers have a higher percentage of effector cells and immature memory HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cells [45–47]. These studies suggest a role for HIV-1-specific TSCM cells in HIV-1 infection. Interestingly, the proportion of total CD8+ TSCM cells was observed to correlate inversely with levels of plasma viremia in untreated HIV-1 infected individuals [48]. On the other hand, CD4+ TSCM cells, in addition to giving rise to different subsets of memory T cells, also constitute reservoirs for HIV-1 infection. Hence, it may be considered that the generation of CD8+ TSCM cells may be a better correlate of protection against HIV infection, as these cells would not be infected with HIV-1. Our study identified a significantly higher proportion of circulating CD8+ TSCM cells in volunteers who received the ADVAX and MVA or MVA alone as compared to placebo. The overall frequency of CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM cells was higher in group A at two weeks post last MVA vaccination as compared to the pre-vaccination time point, suggesting that DNA priming and MVA boosting was more effective in inducing TSCM cells and was capable of generating a long lasting memory and effector response.

CTLs are functionally defined as either polyfunctional CD8+ T cells that secrete multiple cytokines [49], or highly proliferative CD8+ T cells that kill HIV-infected target cells [50] and suppress HIV replication in vitro [51, 52]. Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and IFN-γ ELISPOT assays are routinely employed to evaluate vaccine-induced cellular immune responses. Though these responses do not correlate with in vivo virus control, they are helpful in demonstrating magnitudes and specificities of the T cell response. Hence, an assay that directly assesses the breadth of T cell-mediated antiviral activity against different HIV-1 isolates would be best suited to evaluate the potential ability of the vaccine to induce a T cell response that can control virus in vivo [29].

Previously, we evaluated vaccine-induced T cell responses in these groups of individuals using IFN-γ ELISPOT and ICS assays and reported increased IFN-γ ELISPOT responses in Group A as compared to Group B [31, 53]. We also observed significantly elevated Env and Gag-specific mono- and bi-functional T cell responses in vaccinated individuals, with the magnitude of responses being significantly higher in Group A as compared to Group B [53]. In the present study, we analyzed the antiviral response of the vaccine-induced CD8+ T cells using the Virus Inhibition Assay. A similar vaccine trial, the P002 trial conducted in the UK with the same vaccine constructs, had reported that CD8+ T cell-mediated VIA activity was detected only in Group A against three HIV isolates tested: 247FV2 (clade C), 97ZA012 (clade C), and IIIB (clade B). Further, they reported an increase in the magnitude of the ICS response to HIV proteins in Group A as compared to Group B.

In the present study, CD8+ T cell-mediated VIA activity was studied against five HIV isolates, 247FV2 (clade C), ELI-1 (clade A/D), CBL4 (clade D), U455 (clade A) and IIIB (clade B). VIA activity was detected in Group A against four isolates: 247FV2, ELI-1, U455 and IIIB, whereas in Group B VIA activity was observed only against two isolates: U455 and IIIB. Four volunteers exhibited viral inhibition activity at two weeks post first MVA vaccination and 5 volunteers showed viral inhibition activity at two weeks post last MVA vaccination in Group A, while in Group B only 3 volunteers showed VIA response at two weeks post last MVA vaccination alone. Our findings reveal elevated CD8+ T cell-mediated VIA activity in terms of breadth as well as magnitude in Group A as compared to Group B. These observations support our earlier findings of significantly higher ICS and IFN-γ ELISPOT responses in Group A volunteers and also reflect the findings of the P002 vaccine trial. Findings of other studies also suggest that the quality of the immune response was enhanced by the DNA prime, when adenovirus or poxvirus vectors were used as the boost [54–56]. Polyfunctionality of the T cells and increased numbers of terminally differentiated T cells with a cytotoxic effector potential have been reported in prime-boost vaccine regimens [57, 58]. However, VIA activity is generally not detected after DNA, MVA or canarypox virus prime and protein-boost but may be observed with adenovirus vectors [29, 59].

It is critical that a T cell-based vaccine generates an effective pool of memory CD8+ T cells that can respond to acute HIV infection or effectively control chronic HIV replication [60]. Our earlier studies reported ADVAX and MVA vaccination-induced both HIV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In the present study, we demonstrated the induction of CD8+ T cell-mediated HIV-1 inhibition activity pointing to a potentially protective nature of the CD8+ T cell response generated by the DNA prime and MVA boost vaccine regimen. Various studies have reported that TSCM cells are critical for the generation of mature CE, EM and TE cells [19, 21, 61, 62]; however, the potential role of these cells in HIV infection and vaccination remains unclear. In the present study, we demonstrated a significant increase in the frequency of both peripheral CD4+ and more prominently CD8+ TSCM cells following vaccination with a greater increase elicited by the heterologous DNA/MVA prime-boost regimen, thus clearly demonstrating the further scope for testing the prime-boost vaccine regimen.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Fig. Representative pseudocolor FACS plot of circulating T stem like memory cells.

CD4+ TSCM and CD8+ TSCM cells were gated sequentially on singlets, lymphocyte-sized cells, live CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and then on memory T cells. Central Memory T cells were defined as CD3+CD4+/CD8+CD45RO+CCR7+, Effector Memory cells as CD3+CD4+/CD8+CD45RO+CCR7-, Terminal Effector cells as CD3+CD4+CD45RO-CCR7- and Naïve T cells as CD3+CD4+/CD8+ CD45RO-CCR7+. TSCM cells were defined as CD3+CD4+/CD8+CD45RO-CCR7+CD28+CD95+.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.s001

(PPTX)

S1 Table. Commercial reagents used for multicolour flow cytometry.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Frequency of memory CD8+ T cell subsets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.s003

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Frequency of memory CD4+ T cell subsets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.s004

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Total count of memory CD8+ T cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.s005

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Total count of memory CD4+ T cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Dr. V. D. Ramanathan who was the Principal Investigator of the P001 trial at the National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, as well as the volunteers and staff who were part of the trial. We wish to particularly thank the research team for making this study possible through carefully preserving the samples collected during the conduct of the Phase I trial.

The following reagents were obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: HIV-1 ELI from Dr. Jean-Marie Bechet and Dr. Luc Montagnier; HIV-1 IIIB and H9 cell line from Dr. Robert Gallo; TZM-bl from Dr. John C. Kappes, Dr. Xiaoyun Wu and Tranzyme Inc; We thank Professor Johnson Wong and Dr. Galit Alter, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA, for providing CD3/4 and CD3/8 bi-specific antibodies.

Citation: Munusamy Ponnan S, Hayes P, Fernandez N, Thiruvengadam K, Pattabiram S, Nesakumar M, et al. (2020) Evaluation of antiviral T cell responses and TSCM cells in volunteers enrolled in a phase I HIV-1 subtype C prophylactic vaccine trial in India. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0229461. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229461

References

1. Andrews SM, Rowland-Jones S. Recent advances in understanding HIV evolution. F1000Res. 2017;6:597. pmid:28529718

2. Koup RA, Douek DC. Vaccine design for CD8 T lymphocyte responses. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2011;1(1):a007252. pmid:22229122

3. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J, Paris R, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;361(23):2209–20. pmid:19843557

4. Takahashi H. [Protective immunity against HIV infection]. Nihon Rinsho. 2002;60(4):717–23. pmid:11968778

5. Migueles SA, Weeks KA, Nou E, Berkley AM, Rood JE, Osborne CM, et al. Defective human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD8+ T-cell polyfunctionality, proliferation, and cytotoxicity are not restored by antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2009;83(22):11876–89. pmid:19726501

6. Migueles SA, Mendoza D, Zimmerman MG, Martins KM, Toulmin SA, Kelly EP, et al. CD8(+) T-cell Cytotoxic Capacity Associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Control Can Be Mediated through Various Epitopes and Human Leukocyte Antigen Types. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(1):46–58. pmid:26137533

7. Callaway DS, Ribeiro RM, Nowak MA. Virus phenotype switching and disease progression in HIV‐1 infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1999;266(1437):2523–30.

8. Gumbi PP, Nkwanyana NN, Bere A, Burgers WA, Gray CM, Williamson A-L, et al. Impact of Mucosal Inflammation on Cervical Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1)-Specific CD8 T-Cell Responses in the Female Genital Tract during Chronic HIV Infection. Journal of Virology. 2008;82(17):8529–36. pmid:18562528

9. Altfeld M, Rosenberg ES, Shankarappa R, Mukherjee JS, Hecht FM, Eldridge RL, et al. Cellular immune responses and viral diversity in individuals treated during acute and early HIV-1 infection. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2001;193(2):169–80. pmid:11148221

10. Koup R, Safrit JT, Cao Y, Andrews CA, McLeod G, Borkowsky W, et al. Temporal association of cellular immune responses with the initial control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 syndrome. Journal of virology. 1994;68(7):4650–5. pmid:8207839

11. Kalams SA, Buchbinder S, Rosenberg E, Billingsley J, Colbert D, Jones N, et al. Association between virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and helper responses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Journal of virology. 1999;73(8):6715–20. pmid:10400769

12. McMichael AJ, Rowland-Jones SL. Cellular immune responses to HIV. Nature. 2001;410(6831):980. pmid:11309628

13. Wodarz D, Jansen VA. The role of T cell help for anti-viral CTL responses. Journal of theoretical biology. 2001;211(4):419–32. pmid:11476625

14. Jamieson BD, Ahmed R. T cell memory. Long-term persistence of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1989;169(6):1993–2005. pmid:2471771

15. Oehen S, Waldner H, Kündig T, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. Antivirally protective cytotoxic T cell memory to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus is governed by persisting antigen. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1992;176(5):1273–81. pmid:1402673

16. Hou S, Hyland L, Ryan KW, Portner A, Doherty PC. Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell memory determined by clonal burst size. Nature. 1994;369(6482):652. pmid:7516039

17. Wodarz D, Page KM, Arnaout RA, Thomsen AR, Lifson JD, Nowak MA. A new theory of cytotoxic T–lymphocyte memory: implications for HIV treatment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2000;355(1395):329–43. pmid:10794051

18. Phillips RE, Rowland-Jones S, Nixon DF, Gotch FM, Edwards JP, Ogunlesi AO, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus genetic variation that can escape cytotoxic T cell recognition. Nature. 1991;354(6353):453. pmid:1721107

19. Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, Quigley MF, et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell–like properties. Nature medicine. 2011;17(10):1290. pmid:21926977

20. Lugli E, Dominguez MH, Gattinoni L, Chattopadhyay PK, Bolton DL, Song K, et al. Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports long-lived T cell memory. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123(2).

21. Zhang Y, Joe G, Hexner E, Zhu J, Emerson SG. Host-reactive CD8+ memory stem cells in graft-versus-host disease. Nature medicine. 2005;11(12):1299. pmid:16288282

22. Hosokawa K, Muranski P, Feng X, Townsley DM, Liu B, Knickelbein J, et al. Memory stem T cells in autoimmune disease: high frequency of circulating CD8+ memory stem cells in acquired aplastic anemia. The Journal of Immunology. 2016:1501739.

23. Burgers WA, Riou C, Mlotshwa M, Maenetje P, de Assis Rosa D, Brenchley J, et al. Association of HIV-specific and total CD8+ T memory phenotypes in subtype C HIV-1 infection with viral set point. The Journal of Immunology. 2009;182(8):4751–61. pmid:19342652

24. Hess C, Altfeld M, Thomas SY, Addo MM, Rosenberg ES, Allen TM, et al. HIV-1 specific CD8+ T cells with an effector phenotype and control of viral replication. The Lancet. 2004;363(9412):863–6.

25. Addo MM, Draenert R, Rathod A, Verrill CL, Davis BT, Gandhi RT, et al. Fully differentiated HIV-1 specific CD8+ T effector cells are more frequently detectable in controlled than in progressive HIV-1 infection. PloS one. 2007;2(3):e321. pmid:17389912

26. Day CL, Kiepiela P, Leslie AJ, van der Stok M, Nair K, Ismail N, et al. Proliferative capacity of epitope-specific CD8 T-cell responses is inversely related to viral load in chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Journal of virology. 2007;81(1):434–8. pmid:17050606

27. Petrovas C, Casazza JP, Brenchley JM, Price DA, Gostick E, Adams WC, et al. PD-1 is a regulator of virus-specific CD8+ T cell survival in HIV infection. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2006;203(10):2281–92. pmid:16954372

28. Trautmann L, Janbazian L, Chomont N, Said EA, Gimmig S, Bessette B, et al. Upregulation of PD-1 expression on HIV-specific CD8+ T cells leads to reversible immune dysfunction. Nature medicine. 2006;12(10):1198. pmid:16917489

29. Spentzou A, Bergin P, Gill D, Cheeseman H, Ashraf A, Kaltsidis H, et al. Viral inhibition assay: a CD8 T cell neutralization assay for use in clinical trials of HIV-1 vaccine candidates. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2010;201(5):720–9. pmid:20132004

30. Ponnan SM, Swaminathan S, Tiruvengadam K, Vidyavijayan K, Cheedarla N, Nesakumar M, et al. Induction of circulating T follicular helper cells and regulatory T cells correlating with HIV-1 gp120 variable loop antibodies by a subtype C prophylactic vaccine tested in a Phase I trial in India. PloS one. 2018;13(8):e0203037. pmid:30157242

31. Mehendale S, Thakar M, Makeshkumar M, Sahay S, Satyamurthy P, Verma A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of DNA and MVA HIV‑1 subtype C vaccine prime‑boost regimens: A Phase I trial in HIV‑uninfected Indian volunteers. AIDS Vaccine. 2011:160.

32. Huang Y, Chen Z, Zhang W, Gurner D, Song Y, Gardiner DF, et al. Design, construction, and characterization of a dual-promoter multigenic DNA vaccine directed against an HIV-1 subtype C/B′ recombinant. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2008;47(4):403–11. pmid:18209683

33. Vasan S, Schlesinger SJ, Huang Y, Hurley A, Lombardo A, Chen Z, et al. Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity evaluation of ADVAX, a multigenic, DNA-based clade C/B’HIV-1 candidate vaccine. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8617. pmid:20111582

34. Ramanathan VD, Kumar M, Mahalingam J, Sathyamoorthy P, Narayanan PR, Solomon S, et al. A Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant HIV type 1 subtype C-modified vaccinia Ankara virus vaccine candidate in Indian volunteers. AIDS research and human retroviruses. 2009;25(11):1107–16. pmid:19943789

35. Hsu DC, O’Connell RJ. Progress in HIV vaccine development. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2017;13(5):1018–30.

36. O’Connell RJ, Kim JH, Corey L, Michael NL. Human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trials. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2012;2(12):a007351. pmid:23209178

37. Shin SY. Recent update in HIV vaccine development. Clinical and experimental vaccine research. 2016;5(1):6–11. pmid:26866018

38. Blankson J. Control of HIV-1 replication in elite suppressors. Discovery medicine. 2010;9(46):261–6. pmid:20350494

39. Casado C, Marrero-Hernández S, Márquez-Arce D, Pernas M, Marfil S, Borràs-Grañana F, et al. Viral Characteristics Associated with the Clinical Nonprogressor Phenotype Are Inherited by Viruses from a Cluster of HIV-1 Elite Controllers. mBio. 2018;9(2):e02338–17. pmid:29636433

40. Makedonas G, Betts MR. Living in a house of cards: re‐evaluating CD8+ T‐cell immune correlates against HIV. Immunological reviews. 2011;239(1):109–24. pmid:21198668

41. Borrow P, Lewicki H, Hahn BH, Shaw GM, Oldstone M. Virus-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity associated with control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Journal of virology. 1994;68(9):6103–10. pmid:8057491

42. Wodarz D. Helper-dependent vs. helper-independent CTL responses in HIV infection: implications for drug therapy and resistance. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2001;213(3):447–59. pmid:11735291

43. Swigut T, Alexander L, Morgan J, Lifson J, Mansfield KG, Lang S, et al. Impact of Nef-mediated downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I on immune response to simian immunodeficiency virus. Journal of Virology. 2004;78(23):13335–44. pmid:15542684

44. Vigano S, Negron J, Ouyang Z, Rosenberg ES, Walker BD, Lichterfeld M, et al. Prolonged antiretroviral therapy preserves HIV-1-specific CD8 T cells with stem cell-like properties. Journal of virology. 2015:JVI. 00789–15.

45. Chahroudi A, Silvestri G, Lichterfeld M. T memory stem cells and HIV: a long-term relationship. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2015;12(1):33–40. pmid:25578055

46. Ndhlovu ZM, Proudfoot J, Cesa K, Alvino DM, McMullen A, Vine S, et al. Elite controllers with low to absent effector CD8+ T cell responses maintain highly functional, broadly directed central memory responses. Journal of virology. 2012:JVI. 00531–12.

47. Papatriantafyllou M. T cell memory: the stem of T cell memory. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011;11(11):716.

48. Ribeiro SP, Milush JM, Cunha-Neto E, Kallas EG, Kalil J, Somsouk M, et al. The CD8+ memory stem T cell (TSCM) subset is associated with improved prognosis in chronic HIV-1 infection. Journal of virology. 2014:JVI. 01948–14.

49. Betts MR, Nason MC, West SM, De Rosa SC, Migueles SA, Abraham J, et al. HIV nonprogressors preferentially maintain highly functional HIV-specific CD8+ T cells. Blood. 2006;107(12):4781–9. pmid:16467198

50. Hersperger AR, Pereyra F, Nason M, Demers K, Sheth P, Shin LY, et al. Perforin expression directly ex vivo by HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells is a correlate of HIV elite control. PLoS pathogens. 2010;6(5):e1000917. pmid:20523897

51. Blackbourn DJ, Mackewicz CE, Barker E, Hunt TK, Herndier B, Haase AT, et al. Suppression of HIV replication by lymphoid tissue CD8+ cells correlates with the clinical state of HIV-infected individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996;93(23):13125–30.

52. Yang OO, Kalams SA, Trocha A, Cao H, Luster A, Johnson RP, et al. Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by CD8+ cells: evidence for HLA class I-restricted triggering of cytolytic and noncytolytic mechanisms. J Virol. 1997;71(4):3120–8. pmid:9060675

53. Munusamy Ponnan S, Pattabiram S, Thiruvengadam K, Goyal R, Singla N, Mukherjee J, et al. Induction and maintenance of bi-functional (IFN-γ + IL-2+ and IL-2+ TNF-α+) T cell responses by DNA prime MVA boosted subtype C prophylactic vaccine tested in a Phase I trial in India. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0213911. pmid:30921340

54. Bakari M, Aboud S, Nilsson C, Francis J, Buma D, Moshiro C, et al. Broad and potent immune responses to a low dose intradermal HIV-1 DNA boosted with HIV-1 recombinant MVA among healthy adults in Tanzania. Vaccine. 2011;29(46):8417–28. pmid:21864626

55. Koup RA, Roederer M, Lamoreaux L, Fischer J, Novik L, Nason MC, et al. Priming immunization with DNA augments immunogenicity of recombinant adenoviral vectors for both HIV-1 specific antibody and T-cell responses. PloS one. 2010;5(2):e9015. pmid:20126394

56. Sandström E, Nilsson C, Hejdeman B, Bråve A, Bratt G, Robb M, et al. Broad immunogenicity of a multigene, multiclade HIV-1 DNA vaccine boosted with heterologous HIV-1 recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2008;198(10):1482–90. pmid:18808335

57. De Rosa SC, Thomas EP, Bui J, Huang Y, Morgan C, Kalams SA, et al. HIV-DNA priming alters T cell responses to HIV-adenovirus vaccine even when responses to DNA are undetectable. The Journal of Immunology. 2011:1101421.

58. Harari A, Bart P-A, Stöhr W, Tapia G, Garcia M, Medjitna-Rais E, et al. An HIV-1 clade C DNA prime, NYVAC boost vaccine regimen induces reliable, polyfunctional, and long-lasting T cell responses. Journal of experimental medicine. 2008;205(1):63–77. pmid:18195071

59. Freel SA, Lamoreaux L, Chattopadhyay PK, Saunders K, Zarkowsky D, Overman RG, et al. Phenotypic and functional profile of HIV-inhibitory CD8 T cells elicited by natural infection and heterologous prime/boost vaccination. Journal of virology. 2010;84(10):4998–5006. pmid:20200250

60. Burton DR, Desrosiers RC, Doms RW, Koff WC, Kwong PD, Moore JP, et al. HIV vaccine design and the neutralizing antibody problem. Nature immunology. 2004;5(3):233. pmid:14985706

61. Buzon MJ, Sun H, Li C, Shaw A, Seiss K, Ouyang Z, et al. HIV-1 persistence in CD4+ T cells with stem cell–like properties. Nature medicine. 2014;20(2):139. pmid:24412925

62. Gattinoni L. Memory T cells officially join the stem cell club. Immunity. 2014;41(1):7–9. pmid:25035947