It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Targeted insertion of transgenes at pre-determined plant genomic safe harbors provides a desirable alternative to insertions at random sites achieved through conventional methods. Most existing cases of targeted gene insertion in plants have either relied on the presence of a selectable marker gene in the insertion cassette or occurred at low frequency with relatively small DNA fragments (<1.8 kb). Here, we report the use of an optimized CRISPR-Cas9-based method to achieve the targeted insertion of a 5.2 kb carotenoid biosynthesis cassette at two genomic safe harbors in rice. We obtain marker-free rice plants with high carotenoid content in the seeds and no detectable penalty in morphology or yield. Whole-genome sequencing reveals the absence of off-target mutations by Cas9 in the engineered plants. These results demonstrate targeted gene insertion of marker-free DNA in rice using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, and offer a promising strategy for genetic improvement of rice and other crops.
Existing examples of targeted gene insertion in plants either rely on a selectable marker gene or result in short DNA inserts. Here, the authors use an optimized CRISPR-Cas9 method to insert a 5.2 kb carotenoid biosynthesis cassette into genomic safe harbors in rice, and obtain marker-free lines with high carotenoid content.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 University of California, Department of Plant Pathology and the Genome Center, Davis, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9684); Innovative Genomics Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b); The Joint Bioenergy Institute, Feedstocks Division, Emeryville, USA (GRID:grid.451372.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 8980)
2 University of California, Department of Plant Sciences, Davis, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9684)
3 University of California, Department of Plant Pathology and the Genome Center, Davis, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9684)
4 Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.451309.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0449 479X)