About the Authors:
RaoRao Mo
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliations Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agric-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, Agricultural College, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China, Department of Plant Protection, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan, China
Maribet Gamboa
Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3744-1339
Kozo Watanabe
Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
GuoQuan Wang
Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected] (GQW); [email protected] (WHL); [email protected] (DM)
Affiliation: Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agric-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, Agricultural College, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
WeiHai Li
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected] (GQW); [email protected] (WHL); [email protected] (DM)
Affiliation: Department of Plant Protection, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan, China
Ding Yang
Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
Dávid Murányi
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected] (GQW); [email protected] (WHL); [email protected] (DM)
Affiliations Department of Zoology, Eszterházy Károly University, Eger, Hungary, Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary
ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-5590
Introduction
The forestfly genus Nemoura Latreille, 1796 [1] is one of the most species-rich genera among the stoneflies (Plecoptera), and is widely distributed in running waters of Holarctic and Oriental regions. Approximately 200 valid species are known [2]. During the 19th century, almost all Nemouridae species were included in this genus, along with many other species of different stonefly groups (even species that belong to Antarctoperlaria a second suborder of the Plecoptera). At the turn of the 20th century, Peter Kempny’s new diagnosis of the genus and the descriptions of two subgenera [3], brought the supraspecific classification of the Nemouridae into a debate. During the following decades, the genus Paranemoura Needham & Claassen, 1925 [4] and ten further subgenera [5,6] were described, and Illies [7] elevated all twelve subgenera of Nemoura to generic level. However, Nemoura remained as a poorly defined assemblage with paraphyletic taxa in agreement with molecular analyses [8].
A generic revision of the Nemouridae was performed in the seventies [9] and the family was divided in two well supported subfamilies. Among these, the proposed generic system of the Amphinemurinae became accepted and later completed with the descriptions of two additional genera [10,11]. In the Nemourinae, the less speciose and well defined group of genera that lack lateral knobs on the male epiproct raise few questions of higher classification. However, delimitation of the Nemourinae genera that display lateral knobs on the male epiproct still pose several unanswered questions in stonefly systematics. At present, three genera with lateral knobs are distinguished. Among them, the validity of Illiesonemoura Baumann, 1975 [9] has been challenged [12]. Zapada Ricker, 1952 [6] was considered a Nearctic genus whose presence in the Palaearctic was just recently recognized [13]. And Nemoura contains many species or species groups that differ from the concept of the genus (e.g. [14–16]).
Currently, the subfamily Nemourinae includes 13 known genera, 264 valid species, and five extinct species [2]. A total of 42 species of two genera, Illiesonemoura and Nemoura, are known from China and have been previously studied by Chen & Du [17,18], Chu [19], Du, Zhou & Wang [20], Illies [7], Kawai [21], Klapálek [22,23], Li & Yang [24–29], Li, Feng & Yang [30], Li, Wang et Yang [31], Li, Murányi, Pan & Yang [32], Qian, Qian, Chen & Du [16], Shimizu [33], Sivec [34], Sivec & Stark [35], Uéno [36], Wang & Du [37], Wang, Du, Sivec & Li [38], Wang, Li & Yang [39], Wu [40–47], Yang, Li & Zhu [48], Zhiltzova [49], Zhu & Yang [50], Zwick [51–53].
In August 2013, a male and female of a peculiar new nemourid were collected in Sichuan Province of Southwest China. We determined that an assignment of this new species to either Nemoura, Illiesonemoura, or Zapada would necessitate broadening of morphological diagnoses of these genera. Morphological studies are based on previously published extensive molecular analysis [8]. In addition to raise several other questions about the systematics of the Nemourinae, the molecular studies already supported the new species as a well separated lineage within the related genera [8]. Herein, we describe a new genus, and compare to other Nemourinae that possess lateral knobs and a basal cushion on the epiproct.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All type specimens of the new taxa described herein, were collected in a governmental, unprotected area (Balangshan, Sichuan Province, China), where no permission was required. Specimens used as comparative materials (S1 File) were acquired from authorized museum collections. Species of the family Nemouridae are not protected in the countries where the type materials or the comparative materials originated.
Material examined
The type specimens were collected by aerial net and preserved in 75% ethanol. All specimens are deposited at the Entomological Museum of China Agricultural University, Beijing (CAU), the Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang (HIST) and the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest (HNHM). Collecting event are provided for all these specimens in the S1 File. Specimens were examined with the aid of a Leica M420 dissecting microscope. Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube, and the color illustrations were made with the aid of Imaging Source CCD attached to Leica S8APO. Both male and female terminalia were cleared in 10% KOH solution for ten minutes and dissected with insect pins for the study of internal structures, e.g. sperm duct or oviduct. Illustrations on the male epiproct structures (Figs 3, 5 and 6) were compiled from draft drawings from the intact KOH cleared specimens and from dissected genitalia.
Terminology follows Baumann [9], Zwick [53] and Zwick & Baumann [54] with modifications. The morphological analysis was performed on the dissected genitalia of KOH cleared specimens. Molecular studies and analysis related to the present work were published by Gamboa et al. [8] and the sequences were deposited to GenBank (accession number: MK132446, MK132447).
Maps presented in Fig 7 are original drafts prepared on semitransparent paper and figures were finished by Adobe Photoshop CC 2019. Administrative borders and elevation lines above 2000 meters were drew on the semitransparent paper based on maps on pages 102–103 and 117 in The World Atlas, Second Edition, Chief Administration of Geodesy and Cartograhy Under the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Moscow, 1967. Current administrative division of Sichuan Province was corrected manually.
Nomenclatural acts
The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under the Code from electronic edition of this article. This published work and their nomenclatural acts have been registered in ZooBank, under the ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers, http://zoobank.org/; LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 2F1F7055-DB5D-4F93-AEB9-0CF26287F717).
Results
Taxonomy
Sinonemura Mo, Li & Murányi gen. n.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F01C58CA-DA54-4920-AF39-5DB3E651143D.
Type species. Sinonemura balangshana, new species (here designated by monotypy).
Diagnosis. Both sexes have a unique pair of unbranched, finger-like gills on both sides of the cervical sclerite. Male tergum X consists of a divided medio-apical plate armed with a mediobasal projection. Male epiproct with basal cushion, lateral knobs and rows of ventral spines, lateral arms run from apex over midlength, ring of ventral sclerite lacks apical sclerites but connected to parallel medial sclerites. Female is defined by the presence of large and bilobed pregenital plate, raising from posterior margin of sternum VII and reaching sternum IX. Subgenital plate needle-like, with large vaginal lobes; inner sclerite lacking.
Description. Small-sized Nemourinae. Cervical gills present, consisting of single gill on each side of the cervical sclerite. Macropterous in both sexes; sexual dimorphism only in size and genitalia. Setation generally short and dense, longer on terminal segments. General color dark besides pale basal abdominal segments, forewings distinctly mottled. Legs of usual length for the family, tibiae longer than femora; claws symmetrical, arolium small.
Ventral sclerites of thorax (Fig 1C): prothorax with backwards directed single gill on either side of cervical sclerites; outer gill curved and robust while inner gill thin and straight, both with setae (Fig 1B). Basisternum triangular, lightly sclerotized and separated from other sclerites; eutrochantin stripe-like, furcasternum small and divided, partially covered by the large coxae, postfurcasternum lacking. Mesothorax with stripe-like spinasternum fused with presternum, not touching the large basisternum; trochantin stripe-like. Furcasternum rectangular, fused with basisternum and continuing in large furcasternal pit; paired postfurcasternum small and rounded, fused with both furcasternum and furcasternal pit. Metathorax with small and lightly sclerotized presternum, spinasternum is lacking; basisternum large, trochantin stripe-like. Furcasternum transverse, fused with basisternum; furcal pit and postfurcasternum are lacking.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 1. Sinonemura balangshana gen. n., sp. n.
(A) Head and pronotum, dorsal view. (B) Gills, ventral view. (C) Ventral sclerites of thorax. (D) Forewing. (E) Hindwing. (F) Male paraproct, lateral view. (G) Male terminalia, ventral view. Scale 1 mm for Figs A, C-E, 0.5 mm for Figs B, F-G. Abbreviations: Figs D-E: A: anal vein; a: anal crossvein; arc: arculus; C: costa; Cu: cubital vein; h: humeral crossvein; M: medial vein; m-cu: mediocubital crossvein; R: radial vein; r: radial crossvein; r-m: radiomedial crossvein; Sc: subcosta; Fig C: P: prothoracic; Me: mesothoracic; M: metathoracic; Bs: basisternum; Cs: cervical sclerite; Cx: coxa; Etn: eutrochantin; Fs: furcasternum; Fsp: furcasternal pit; Pfs: postfurcasternum; Prs: presternum; Ss: spinasternum; St1: Sternite 1; Tn: trochantin; Tr: trochanter.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.g001
Wing venation (Fig 1D and 1E): forewing at cord clearly with an X-shaped pattern typical of the family. Forewing C strong and setose; Sc run close to C at apical third, joins R before r. Single crossvein between C and Sc besides h; h equidistant distance between wing base and arc. R1 slightly curved, terminal costal crossvein is joining R after r. R2+3 and R4+5 branching shortly after r. M branches out to M1+2 and M3+4 with r-m nearly joining to r; r-m and M1+2 are interrupted near junction. Five or six crossveins between M and Cu1 in addition to arc and m-cu. Crossveins between Cu1 and Cu2 numerous; Cu2 ends before 1/2 of wing length, cu-a lacking. A1 ends near branching of R, slightly curved beyond a; A2 reaches as far as arc. Hindwing C, Sc, R and crossveins similar to the forewing but the X-shaped pattern lacking. M branching to M1+2 and M3+4 far after r-m; M1+2 is more backwards directed than on forewing; No crossvein between M and Cu1 between arc and m-cu. Single crossvein between Cu1 and Cu2 after arc; Cu2 parallel to A1 and ending beyond r, cu-a lacking. Anal field large, the fold of the wing extending between the parallel Cu2 and A1. All A veins straight; A1 reaches about the same distance as Cu2, A2 ends in r, A3 reaches near Sc, A4 ends halfway between h and r, and A5 reaches near arc. Longitudinally directed a reaches base of A5 that gives a basal crossvein ventrally.
Male abdomen (Figs 1F, 1G, 2A, 2B and 3): terga I–IX without notable modification, but dark lateral sclerites and entire antecosta present and increasing in size towards the apical segments. Tergum X with small medial membranous field, medio-apical portion separated to a distinct bald plate that bears mediobasal projection; the projection weakly separated medially. Sterna I–VIII without notable modification. Hypoproct typical of Nemouridae, bearing an elongated vesicle. Paraproct inner lobe simple, well separated from large outer lobe that ends in an acute, hook-like apex. Cercus elongated and lightly sclerotized, lacking hooks or other modifications. Epiproct with large basal cushion above small basal sclerite, lateral arms run from the apex over midlength and end in strongly sclerotized horns. Ventral sclerite with small lateral knobs and two parallel rows of ventral spines. Ring of the ventral sclerite lacks apical sclerites but connected to two parallel sclerites, apically elevated above the dorsal sclerite.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 2. Sinonemura balangshana gen. n., sp. n.
(A) Male terminalia, dorsal view. (B) Male terminalia, lateral view. (C) Female terminalia, ventral view. (D) Female terminalia, lateral view. Scale 0.5 mm. Arrow indicates mediobasal projection of medioapical plate of Tergum X.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.g002
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 3. Sinonemura balangshana gen. n., sp. n.
(male epiproct) (A) Ventral view. (B) Dorsal view. (C) Caudal view. (D) Lateral view. Scale 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: al: apical lobe; bc: basal cushion; bp: basal plate; df: dorsal fold; la: lateral arm; lk: lateral knob; ms: medial sclerite; r: ring; sr: spine row; va: ventral arm; vf: ventral fold. Colors: blue: basal sclerite; green: ventral sclerite; pink: dorsal sclerite.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.g003
Female abdomen (Fig 2C and 2D): terga I–IX unmodified, tergum X entirely sclerotized; epiproct separated from tergite X, simple and rounded. Sterna I–VI without notable modification. Sternum VII with large, bilobed pregenital plate arising from the posterior margin of the segment, overhanging entire sternum VIII and reaching anterior portion of sternum IX. Sternum VIII with small, needle-like subgenital plate totally covered by pregenital plate, and bear two large, completely hairy vaginal lobes. Sternum IX fully sclerotized but with lightly colored medial field. Sternum X unmodified, paraproct with blunt tip; cercus stout, unmodified.
Female inner genitalia (Fig 4A): genital opening wide, positioned at posterior margin of the pregenital plate. After short narrowing section, genital opening continued in wide, membranous atrium but lacks inner sclerite. The atrium continuing in a short ductus connected to a large, membranous spermatheca.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 4. Female inner genitalia of Nemourinae genera.
(A) Sinonemura balangshana gen. n., sp. n. (B) Zapada cinctipes (Banks, 1897). (C) Illiesonemoura pakistani (Aubert, 1959). (D) Illiesonemoura polystigma (Aubert, 1959). (E) Nemoura cinerea cinerea (Retzius, 1783). (F) Nemoura flexuosa Aubert, 1949. Scale 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: Go: Genital opening; Is: Inner sclerite; Pg: pregenital plate; Sg: subgenital plate; Vl: vaginal lobe.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.g004
Larva: unknown.
Comparative notes. The structure of the gills, the wings, the male and female genital characters place the new genus within the subfamily Nemourinae, in the sense of Baumann [9]. The molecular analysis indicated the new genus belonged to the paraphyletic assemblage of Nemoura sensu lato. The specimens of Illiesonemoura were not available for molecular studies [8]. Thus, the phylogenetic position is not completely clear, because similarities of male genitalia would place the new genus close to the pakistani group of Illiesonemoura.
The presence of one unbranched gill on both sides of cervical sclerites is a character typical for adults and larva of the Nemourinae genus Zapada, and also for the Amphinemurinae genus Sphaeronemoura Shimizu & Sivec, 2001 [10]. However, gills of these genera are of the same size on both sides of the cervical sclerites, while outer gill of the new genus is curved and more robust than the thinner, straight inner gill (Fig 1B).
The wing venation of the new genus is typical for the family and shows no any special characteristics. A distinctly mottled wing patterns was observed in the new genus (Fig 1D). These patterns are only common within the genus Illiesonemoura, and characteristic for some Asian Nemoura, Amphinemura (Ris, 1902) [5] and Protonemura Kempny, 1898 [3] species groups among the Palaearctic Nemouridae. The Nearctic genera Prostoia (Ricker, 1952) [6] and Shipsa (Ricker, 1952) [6], Nearctic species of Zapada and some southwestern Nearctic species of Amphinemura also shown mottled or striped wing patterns. The Asian Nemouridae with mottled wings are all high montane insects, with the exception of the A. megaloba species group from Japan [55].
The female terminalia superficially resembles to the Amphinemurinae, as shape of the apically positioned pregenital plate is similar to the subgenital plate of most Amphinemurinae genera (Fig 2C). However, it is just an unusual modification and the pregenital plate entirely covers a well-developed subgenital plate that can be seen only in cleared specimens from the ventral surface (Fig 4A). The shape of the subgenital plate is similar to the Holoarctic genus Podmosta [6, 56]. Presence of large vaginal lobes, together with exceptionally enlarged and apically positioned pregenital plate and the long but narrow subgenital plate readily distinguish the female from all other known Nemouridae, with no similar female genitalia structure apparent in other known genera.
The presence of lateral knobs and row of spines on the ventral sclerite of male epiproct would place the new genus close to the genera Nemoura, Illiesonemoura, and Zapada. Among these genera, the male terminalia is most similar to those of the I. pakistani species group sensu Aubert [57], as the presence of two parallel stick-like sclerites attached to the apex of the ring of ventral sclerite, lacking an apical sclerite, and the paraproct’s outer lobe terminates in a hook-like apex (Fig 3). This group was described in Nemoura sensu stricto, later transferred to Illiesonemoura, but Zwick & Sivec [12] questioned the validity of that genus and described further species of the group assigned to Nemoura. The new genus can be distinguished from the pakistani species group by the apically extending lateral arm of the epiproct and completely separated lobes of the paraproct (Figs 1F and 3D). In addition, complete separation of medio-apical portion of tergum X that bears distinct mediobasal projection can be found only in case of a single member of the pakistani species group, N. unicornis Jewett, 1975 [58], but that species lacks the single gills, characteristic of other species in the pakistani species group, and having shortened, uniformly brown wings. Besides the pakistani species group and the typical species assigned to Illiesonemoura, the male terminalia of the new genus differs from sensu stricto Nemoura males (based on the type species, N. cinerea (Retzius, 1783) [59], and most European, Asian and North American species) by lacking apical sclerites of the epiproct and lacking cercal hooks. As for Zapada, it can be distinguished by the short ring of the ventral sclerite of the epiproct and by the elongated cercus.
Etymology. The genus name is derived from the composition of the words Sino and Nemoura. The first refers to China, as the hitherto known single species is probably endemic to the country, while the second correspond to the family where the new genus belongs. Nemoura is simplified as nemura, to prevent homonymy with the doubtful fossil genus Sinonemoura Ping, 1928 [60]. Used as a noun, gender feminine.
Remarks. The female and larva of a probable congener were found in Sichuan Province by the colleague Heather Fair, Ohio State University (pers. comm.). Ongoing molecular and morphological studies will clarify if the specimens belong to Sinonemura.
Sinonemura balangshana Mo, Li & Murányi sp. n.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 767E761A-2668-4420-B028-49D864245D21.
Type material (1 ♂, 3 ♀). Holotype ♂ (CAU), CHINA, Sichuan Province, Tibetan Qiang Autonomous Prefecture of Ngawa, Wenchuan County, Balangshan, N 30.89905, E 102.91166, 3993m, 2013.VIII.6, Leg. X.Y. Liu. Paratypes: 2 ♀ (HIST), 1 ♀ (HNHM), same data as holotype.
Diagnosis. As for the genus.
Description. Macropterous in both sexes, measurements: male holotype forewing length 6.2 mm; female paratypes forewing length 7.8 mm. Head uniformly black, tentorial callosities and M-line hardly visible; scape and pedicel dark brown, rest of antenna and palpi brown (Fig 1A). Pronotum brown with numerous dark brown rugosities; wider than long, shape rectangular but with edges rounded (Fig 1A). Other sclerites of the thorax are evenly dark brown. Femora brown, apical portion darker; tibiae brown in their basal 1/5, rest are light brown. Tarsi and claws are brown. Forewing with distinct mottled pattern, hindwing hyaline besides upper portion of its apex that is darker; venation dark brown (Fig 1D and 1E).
Male abdomen: terga I–II unmodified, terga III–VIII with paired anterolateral dark sclerites increasing in size towards apical segments; antecosta entire on terga VI–VIII. Tergum IX similar to previous terga but lateral sclerites joined to the well sclerotized sternum IX (Fig 2A). Tergum X with entire antecosta, medial fifth of the segment with a rounded membranous field that bear short sensilla-like setae; the field asymmetrical on the only available male (Fig 2A). Medio-apical portion of tergum X is separated to a large, bald plate that bear paired mediobasal projection (Fig 2A); the projection appears as a single large spine in lateral view (Fig 2B). Sternum I with small medial sclerite, sterna II–VIII with small, paired anterolateral sclerites. Hypoproct one and 1/2X longer than wide, oval, apical part gradually tapering and blunt; vesicle elongated, 3X longer than wide (Fig 1G). Paraproct inner lobe L-shaped, dark brown and well separated from outer lobe (Fig 1F and 1G). Outer lobe large and with wide base, inner portion of the base lightly sclerotized; apical half dorsally curved around the cercal base, ends in an acute apex that bears small, membranous inner lobe (Figs 1F and 2A). Cercus light brown, elongated and strongly dorsal curved; apex slightly bulbose, terminal wart can be seen only from dorsal view (Figs 1G, 2A and 2B). Epiproct short and broad in dorsal, high in lateral view (Fig 3). Dorsal sclerite with large basal cushion above the small basal sclerite, pair of dark, apically elongated ventral arms delimitate it ventrally; surface of the basal cushion is covered with sharp triangular scales (Fig 3A, 3B and 3D). Lateral arms originate from the apex of dorsal sclerite and run lateral sides of the epiproct over midlength (separating the ventral and dorsal folds), then directed dorsal and end in strongly sclerotized horns, pointed outwards and backwards (Fig 3B, 3C and 3D). Ventral sclerite basally with pair of small lateral knobs, after the broad base continued in a stout basal plate that bears two parallel rows of ten stout spines (Fig 3A). Apically continued in short and thin ring; the ring lacks apical sclerites but dorsal tip of the two arms of the ring connected to a pair of parallel medial sclerites elevated above the dorsal lateral arms of the sclerite and dorsal fold in the apical third of the epiproct, and stretching the apical lobe (Fig 3B, 3C and 3D). These medial sclerites are stick-like, curved in lateral view and their basal end are dorsal raised.
Female abdomen: terga I–IX unmodified, tergum X entirely sclerotized, dark brown; epiproct separated from tergite X, simple and rounded. Sternum I with small medial sclerite, sterna II–III mostly membranous but with paired anterior sclerites, sterna IV–VI unmodified. Sternum VII with large, bilobed pregenital plate that is raising from the posterior margin of the segment, besides pregenital plate the sternum is membranous (Fig 2C and 2D). The pregenital plate is overhanging all sternum VIII and reaching anterior portion of sternum IX; width of the plate is half of segment VIII’s width. Lateral sides of pregenital plate sinuous, lobes are slightly diverging, separated by a wide V-shaped indention; lobes and sides of the plate are dark brown, medial portion light brown. Sternum VIII with small, needle-like subgenital plate totally covered by pregenital plate, seen as a longitudinal dark stripe by transparency; two large, light brown, completely hairy and spherical vaginal lobes set by the sides of the overhanging pregenital plate (Fig 2C and 2D). Sternum IX fully sclerotized but with lightly colored medial field, anteriorly delimited by the overhanging lobes of the pregenital plate (Fig 2C). Sternum X unmodified, dark brown; paraproct wide and with blunt tip, cercus stout, lightly sclerotized.
Female inner genitalia (Fig 4A): inner tip of vaginal lobes is positioned beneath the overhanging pregenital plate. Genital opening wide and intruding far from the lobes inner tip, ventrally connected by the slightly forking posterior margin of the needle-like subgenital plate. After short and laterally well delimited narrowing section, genital opening continued in a wide, membranous atrium that is situated beneath anterior half of segment VIII and posterior half of segment VII. The atrium is continuing in a short ductus connected to a large, membranous spermatheca, situated above sterna V–VI.
Larva: unknown.
Comparative notes. As for the genus.
Etymology. The new species is named after its type locality, Balangshan, Sichuan Province, China. Used as a possessive noun, gender feminine.
Distribution and ecology. China (Sichuan Province). Known only from the type locality, a high mountain area in the Balangshan Range. The specimens were collected on tall herbs and bush, probably emerged from small brooks nearby.
Key to the adults of the genera of the Nemoura genus group. The following keys are for males and females of Nemoura genus group as defined above. The genus Nemoura includes only the Nemoura sensu stricto group based on the type species, N. cinerea.
Males
1. Paraproct divided into inner, median and outer lobes. Lobes can be armed with spines or prongs. Amphinemurinae (not keyed further)
* Paraproct undivided, or divided into inner and outer lobes only. Lobes can have apical hooks but never armed with spines. Nemourinae 2
2. Epiproct lacking lateral knobs and a basal cushion. If vestigial knobs and cushion present, then the epiproct asymmetrical. .Lednia, Nanonemoura, Nemurella, Ostrocerca, Paranemoura, Podmosta, Prostoia, Shipsa, Soyedina, Visoka
* Epiproct symmetrical, with lateral knobs and basal cushion. Nemoura genus group. 3
3. Epiproct with apical sclerite (Fig 5A–5C). Cercus usually with apical hook. Nemoura s.s.
* Epiproct lacking apical sclerite. Cercus lacking apical hook. .4
4. Cercus shorter or just slightly longer than wide. Ring of the ventral sclerite elongated (Fig 5E and 5F). .Zapada
* Cercus at least twice longer than wide. Ring of the ventral sclerite rounded. 5
5. Epiproct having medial sclerite, and the lateral arm is apically extending (Fig 3). Paraproct lobes completely separated. Sinonemura
* Epiproct lacks medial sclerite, or the lateral arm is not extending apically (Fig 6). Paraproct lobes basally fused. .Illiesonemoura
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 5. Male epiproct of genera Nemoura Latreille, 1796 s.s. and Zapada Ricker, 1952.
(A) Nemoura cinerea cinerea (Retzius, 1783), lateral view. (B) same, dorsal view. (C) same, ventral view. (D) Nemoura flexuosa Aubert, 1949, lateral view. (E) Zapada cinctipes (Banks, 1897), dorsal view. (F) same, lateral view. Scale 0.5 mm for Figs A-D, 0.25 mm for Figs E-F. Abbreviations: al: apical lobe; as: apical sclerite.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.g005
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 6. Male epiproct of genus Illiesonemoura Baumann, 1975.
(A) Illiesonemoura lilami (Aubert, 1959), dorsal view. (B) same, lateral view. (C) Illiesonemoura battakundi (Aubert, 1959), dorsal view. (D) Illiesonemoura polystigma (Aubert, 1959), dorsal view. (E) I. battakundi, lateral view. (F) I. polystigma, ventral view. Scale 0.25 mm. Abbreviations: df: dorsal fold; ms: medial sclerite.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.g006
Females
1. Subgenital plate usually distinct and large, if moderately developed, then cervical gills highly branched. Amphinemurinae (not keyed further)
* Subgenital plate usually small, if well developed, then gills reduced to small nubs. Nemourinae 2
2. Pregenital plate usually poorly developed, if well developed, then with distinct vaginal lobes, submental gills or forewing veins A1 and A2 joined. Lednia, Nanonemoura, Nemurella, Ostrocerca, Paranemoura, Podmosta, Prostoia, Shipsa, Soyedina, Visoka
* Pregenital plate distinct and large. If vaginal lobes present, then partly covered by subgenital plate. Lacks submental gills, forewing veins A1 and A2 not joining. Nemoura genus group 3
3. Small subgenital plate present (usually covered by pregenital plate but seen in cleared specimens). 4
* Lacks subgenital plate. Vaginal sclerites usually present, vaginal lobes may present (Fig 4E). Nemoura s.s.
4. Pregenital plate bilobed, reaching sternum IX (Fig 4A). .Sinonemura
* Pregenital plate rounded or quadrangular, not reaching sternum IX. 5
5. Cervical gills well developed on both sides of cervical sclerite. Zapada
* Cervical gills developed only on outer side of cervical sclerite, or both reduced to small nubs. Illiesonemoura
Comparative functional morphology of male epiproct. Comparative analyses of the genitalia of several species belonging to Nemoura and the related genera, documented several paths of sperm transmission in the group.
Sinonemura: The sperm passes through the apical lobe of ventral sclerite that is stretched by the medial sclerites (Fig 3B, 3C and 3D).
Zapada: The sperm passes through the apical lobe of ventral sclerite without any supporting sclerites, but a central ductus can be seen in cleared specimens (Fig 5E and 5F).
Illiesonemoura: The two species groups clearly differ in type of sperm transfer: in case of the pakistani species group (Fig 6A and 6B), sperm transfer occurs similar to that of Sinonemura, whereas in the polystigma group, the sperm passes through the dorsal fold of the dorsal sclerite without any supporting sclerites (Fig 6C, 6D, 6E and 6F).
Nemoura: In the type species and those that have an apical sclerite (sensu stricto groups), the sperm passes through the apical lobe of ventral sclerite that is erected by the apical sclerites (Fig 5A, 5B, 5C and 5D). Among those species lacking an apical sclerite (sensu lato groups), sperm transfer is again different, though incompletely studied among its members. One special case is the N. ovocercia species group where sperm passes through a special modification called the cone-shaped projection [33].
In regard to the female inner genitalia, there is less variability and there appears no lock-and-key agreement with the male epiproct structure, but females of Nemoura s.s. have an inner sclerite that may connect with the apical sclerite of the epiproct during mating (Fig 4E and 4F).
Zoogeography
Among the four Asian genera belonging to the Nemoura genus group studied here, the Holarctic and Oriental genus Nemoura is widely distributed both in the Palaearctic and Oriental realm of the continent, but the Nemoura s.s. species are mostly distributed in the Palaearctic [2]. Alternatively, the Nearctic and East Palaearctic Zapada is known only from the Russian Far East and Korea in Asia [53], and Sinonemura is hitherto known only from Sichuan Province of southwest China, on the northern border of the Oriental realm. The genus Illiesonemoura, as currently understood comprised of the polystigma and pakistani species groups, is distributed in the Himalayan system, ranging from the Hindu Kush to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. An additional species from Taiwan was also assigned to the genus [9], but belongs to the N. ovocercia species group, and we reassign it to Nemoura herein: Nemoura bispinosa Kawai, 1968 [21] comb. rev. The Asian distribution of the four genera is displayed on Fig 7A.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 7. Asian distribution of genera Illiesonemoura Baumann, 1975, Nemoura Latreille, 1796, Sinonemura gen. n. and Zapada Ricker, 1952.
(A) Distribution in Asia: blue: Illesonemoura; pink: Nemoura; red: Sinonemura; green: Zapada. Areas above 2000 meters shaded in grey. (B) Species number of Nemoura in provinces, regions and municipalities of China. Provinces and municipalities without records shaded in paler grey. (C) Known Nemourinae occurences in Sichuan Province: 1: I. tuberosa, N. cochlocercia, N. furcocauda, N. janeti; 2: N. sichuanensis, N. stellata; 3: S. balangshana. Cities and prefectures without records shaded in paler grey.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.g007
Species assigned to the genus Nemoura (both in sensu stricto and sensu lato) can be found in most provinces of China (Fig 7B), while Illiesonemoura and Sinonemoura are currently known only from Sichuan Province (Fig 7C). This Province is located in southwestern of China occupying most of the Sichuan Basin and the easternmost part of the Tibetan Plateau between the Jinsha River on the west, the Daba Mountains in the north, and the Yungui Plateau to the south. Eastern Sichuan Province borders the Chinese city of Chongqing, and borders Yunnan and Guizhou provinces in the south. Tibet borders Sichuan Province to the west and to the north by Shaanxi, Gansu, and Qinghai provinces [61]. Three genera and seven species of subfamily Nemourinae are known to occur in Sichuan Province. The first study on the subfamily Nemourinae from Sichuan Province was by Wu, describing I. tuberostyla (Wu, 1962) [46] from Qingyin Pavillion of Mount Emei. Nemoura cochleocercia Wu, 1962 [46], N. janeti Wu, 1938 [43] and N. furcocauda Wu, 1973 [47] were reported from the same site [28,30,62]. Later, two new species N. sichuanensis Li & Yang, 2006 [25] and N. stellata Li & Yang, 2008 [27] were described from Luding County in Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Garzê. Sinonemura balangshana is the seventh Nemourinae species reported from Sichuan Province herein.
Discussion
Recent molecular analyses and comparative functional morphology studies indicated that the Holarctic and Oriental genus Nemoura is paraphyletic, containing several different lineages [8]. We argued that the variability of the Nemoura terminalia is derived from different development of structures responsible for sperm transfer. To generate our generic concept about the Nemoura genus group, we used primarily genital characters that are directly involved in mating. Somatic characters that can be used for generic distinction in most Nemouridae, e.g. gill arrangement, seems to be of less use in this group.
Both morphological and molecular studies supported the distinction of the new genus Sinonemura that is herein described as a monotypic taxon. Possibly, the pakistani species group of the disputed genus Illiesonemoura may also belongs to Sinonemura, however, due no specimens of the pakistani group were available for molecular analyses, we left this question open. Though, Illiesonemoura is synonymous with Nemoura or not, it’s type species, I. punctata (Jewett, 1958) [63] belongs to the polystigma species group sensu Aubert [56], and this species can be well differentiated from the pakistani species group by lacking the parallel stick-like sclerites.
A sensu stricto diagnosis is applied for Nemoura, referring on the presence of apical sclerite in the male epiproct. Several Asian and a few Mediterranean species groups will require new generic placement, but herein we retrain these in Nemoura sensu lato. The Asian distribution of Nemourinae outlines is the center of genus level diversity in broad sense in the Himalayan region (Fig 7).
Supporting information
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
S1 File. Materials examined for comparative morphological analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120.s001
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Dr. Liu Xiao Yan (Wuhan, Huazhong Agricultural University) for providing the specimens of the new taxon. We are also indebted to Dr. R. Edward DeWalt (Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois) and an anonymous reviewer for their comments and corrections on the manuscript.
Citation: Mo R, Gamboa M, Watanabe K, Wang G, Li W, Yang D, et al. (2020) A remarkable new genus and species of Nemourinae (Plecoptera, Nemouridae) from Sichuan, China, with systematic notes on the related genera. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0229120. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229120
1. Latreille PA. Précis des caractères génériques des insectes, disposés dans un ordre naturel. Bordeaux: Brive; 1796.
2. DeWalt RE, Maehr MD, Neu–Becker U, Stueber G. Plecoptera Species File Online. Version 5.0/5.0. 2019; http://Plecoptera.SpeciesFile.org
3. Kempny P. Zur kenntniss der Plecopteren. I. Über Nemura Latr. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien. 1898; 48:37–68.
4. Needham JG, Claassen PW. A monograph of the Plecoptera or stoneflies of America north of Mexico. The Thomas Say Foundation of the Entomological Society of America, 1925; 2:1–397.
5. Ris F. Die schweizerischen arten der Perliden-gattung Nemura. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen entomologischen Gesellschaft. 1902; 10:378–405.
6. Ricker WE. Systematic studies in Plecoptera. Indiana University Publications, Science Series. 1952; 18:1–200.
7. Illies J. Katalog der Rezenten Plecoptera. Das Tierreich, Berlin. 1966; 82:1–632.
8. Gamboa M, Muranyi D, Kanmori S, Watanabe K. Molecular phylogeny and diversification timing of the Nemouridae family (Insecta, Plecoptera) in the Japanese Archipelago. PLoSONE; 14(1):e0210269. pmid:30633758
9. Baumann RW. Revision of the stonefly family Nemouridae (Plecoptera): A study of the World fauna at the generic level. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 1975; 211:1–74.
10. Shimizu T, Sivec I. Sphaeronemoura, a new genus of the Amphinemurinae (Nemouridae, Plecoptera) from Asia. In: Dominguez E, editor. Trends in Research in Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera. New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers; 2001. p. 393–399.
11. Sivec I, Stark BP. Tominemoura, a new stonefly genus from Sabah, East Malaysia (Plecoptera: Nemouridae). Illiesia. 2009; 5(20):199–203.
12. Zwick P, Sivec I. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Plecoptera des Himalaja. Entomologica Basiliensia. 1980; 5:59–138.
13. Zhiltzova LA, Teslenko VA. Zapada Ricker, a new genus of the Nemourinae (Nemouridae: Plecoptera) for Asia. Russian Entomological Journal. 2001; 11(2):2–7.
14. Zwick P. Ergebnisse der Bhutan-Expedition 1972 des Naturhistorischen Museums in Basel Plecoptera. Entomologica Basiliensia. 1977; 2:85–134.
15. Errochdi S, El Alami M, Vinçon G, Abdaoui A, Ghamizi M. Contribution to the knowledge of Moroccan and Maghrebin stoneflies (Plecoptera). Zootaxa. 2014; 3838(1):46–76. pmid:25081758
16. Qian YH, Qian X, Chen ZT, Du YZ. A remarkable new species of Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Yunnan Province, China. Zootaxa. 2018; 4375(2):281–286. pmid:29689775
17. Chen ZT, Du YZ. A new species of Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from Jiangsu Province, China, with new illustrations for Nemoura nankinensis Wu. Zootaxa. 2017; 4254(2):294–300. pmid:28609978
18. Chen ZT, Du YZ. A checklist and adult key to the Chinese stonefly (Plecoptera) genera. Zootaxa. 2018; 4375(1):059–074.
19. Chu YT. Description of a new nemourid stonefly from Hangchow. The China Journal of Science and Arts. 1928; 8:332–333.
20. Du YZ, Zhou P, Wang ZJ. Four new species of the genus Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from China. Entomological News. 2008; 119:67–76.
21. Kawai T. Stoneflies (Plecoptera) from Taiwan in the Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Pacific Insects. 1968; 10:241–248.
22. Klapálek F. Plecoptera. In: Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Expedition Filchner nach China und Tibet 1903–1905. Wissenschaftliche Zoologische Botanische Ergebnisse, vol. 10; 1907. p. 59–64.
23. Klapálek FH. Sauter’s Formosa-Ausbeute. Plecoptera. Supplementa Entomologica. 1912; 1(11):342–351.
24. Li WH, Yang D. Two new species of Indonemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from Fujian, China. Zootaxa. 2005; 1001:59–63.
25. Li WH, Yang D. New species of Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from China. Zootaxa. 2006; 1137:53–61.
26. Li WH, Yang D. Two new species of Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from China. Zootaxa. 2007; 1511:65–68.
27. Li WH, Yang D. New species of Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from China. Zootaxa. 2008; 1783:61–68.
28. Li WH, Yang D. New species of Nemouridae (Plecoptera) from China. Aquatic Insects. 2008; 30(3):205–221.
29. Li WH, Yang D. Two new species and two new records of stonefly family Nemouridae from Henan (Plecoptera: Nemouroidea). The Fauna and Taxonomy of Insects in Henan. 2008; 6:11–16.
30. Li WH, Feng GW, Yang D. Redescription of Nemoura cochleocercia (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from China. Illiesia. 2008; 4(19):205–207.
31. Li WH, Wang GQ, Yang D. Two new species of Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from China. Zootaxa. 2012; 3427:63–68.
32. Li WH, Murányi D, Pan JJ, Yang D. New and little known species of Nemouridae (Plecoptera) from Inner Mongolia of China. Zootaxa. 2013; 3746(3):473–480.
33. Shimizu T. The species of the Nemoura ovocercia group (Plecoptera: Nemouridae). Aquatic Insects. 1997; 19(4):193–218.
34. Sivec I. A new species of Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from China. Aquatic Insects. 1981; 3:79–80.
35. Sivec I, Stark BP. Eight new species of the genus Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from Thailand and Vietnam. Illiesia. 2010; 6:277–287.
36. Uéno M. Reports on the Insect fauna of Manchuria V. Manchurian stoneflies. Kontyû, Tokyo. 1941; 15:21–27.
37. Wang ZJ, Du YZ. A new species of the genus Nemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from Xinjiang, China. Zootaxa. 2008; 1879:18–20.
38. Wang ZJ, Du YZ, Sivec I, Li ZZ. Records and descriptions of some Nemouridae species (Order: Plecoptera) from Leigong Mountain, Guizhou province, China. Illiesia. 2006; 2:50–56.
39. Wang GQ, Li WH, Yang D. Species of the family Nemouridae (Plecoptera) from Taihang Mountains of Northern China, with description of Nemoura taihangshana sp. n. Zootaxa. 2013; 3637(5):561–568.
40. Wu CF. Two new species of stoneflies from Nanking. The China Journal of Science and Arts. 1926; 5(6):331–332.
41. Wu CF. A second species of stonefly from Peiping (Order Plecoptera, Family Nemouridae). The China Journal of Science and Arts. 1929; 10(4):200.
42. Wu CF. Aquatic insects of China. Article XXI. New species of stoneflies from East and South China (Order Plecoptera). Peking Natural History Bulletin. 1935; 9(3):227–243.
43. Wu CF. Plecopterorum sinensium: A monograph of stoneflies of China (Order Plecoptera). Yenching University. 1938; 225 pp.
44. Wu CF. First supplement to the stoneflies of China (Order Plecoptera). Peking Natural History Bulletin. 1940; 14:153–156.
45. Wu CF. Sixth supplement to the stoneflies of China (Order Plecoptera). Peking Natural History Bulletin. 1949; 17:251–256.
46. Wu CF. Results of the Zoologico-Botanical expedition to Southwest China, 1955–1957 (Plecoptera). Acta Entomologica Sinica. 1962; 11(Supplement):139–153.
47. Wu CF. New species of Chinese stoneflies (Order Plecoptera). Acta Entomologica Sinica. 1973; 16:97–118.
48. Yang D, Li WH, Zhu F. Fauna Sinica, Insecta Vol. 58, Plecoptera: Nemouroidea. Beijing: Science Press; 2015.
49. Zhiltzova LA. Fauna of Russia and neighbouring countries. Insecta, Plecoptera, gruppe Euholognata. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2003.
50. Zhu F, Yang D. Two new species of Nemoura from China (Plecoptera, Nemouridae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica. 2003; 28:474–477.
51. Zwick P. Insecta Plecoptera. Phylogenetisches System und Katalog. Das Tierreich, Berlin. 1973; 94:1–465.
52. Zwick P. The stonefly collection of F. Klapálek in Prague, with notes on the Nemouridae (Plecoptera). Aquatic Insects. 1982; 4:39–48.
53. Zwick P. New species and new records of Plecoptera from Korea and the Russian Far East. Illiesia. 2010; 6(9):75–97.
54. Zwick P, Baumann RW. Nemoura jejudoensis a new species of stonefly and the redescription of Amphinemura baei Ham and Lee (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from Jeju Island, Korea. Illiesia. 2011; 7(15):148–155.
55. Shimizu T. The group of Amphinemura megaloba (Plecoptera, Nemouridae). Japanese Journal of Systematic Entomology. 1998; 4(2):227–236.
56. Chen ZT. Females of the genus Podmosta (Plecoptera: Nemouridae): comparison of terminalia and a new female record in Baltic Amber. Zootaxa. 2018; 4407(2):293–297. pmid:29690201
57. Aubert J. Plécoptères du Pakistan. Mémoires de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles. 1959; 12(3):65–91.
58. Jewett SG. Records and descriptions of stoneflies from the Northwest (Punjab) Himalaya and Mt. Makalu, Nepal Himalaya. Oriental Insects. 1975; 9(1):1–7.
59. Retzius AJ. Caroli de Geer genera et species insectorum. Lipsiae: Cruse; 1783.
60. Ping C. Cretaceous fossil Insects of China. Palaeontologia Sinica. 1928; 13(1):5–49.
61. Chen L, Song YL, Xu SF. The boundary of Palaearctic and Oriental realms in western China. Progress in Natural Science. 2008; 18:833–841.
62. Yang D, Li WH. Plecoptera. Species Catalogue of China. Vol. 2. Animals, Insecta (III). Beijing: Science Press; 2018.
63. Jewett SG. Entomological survey of the Himalaya Part XXIII.—Stoneflies (Plecoptera) from the North-West (Punjab) Himalaya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (India), Allahabad, 1958; 28(4):320–329.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020 Mo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
A remarkable new genus and species of Nemourinae, Sinonemura balangshana gen. et sp. n., is described from Balang Mountains, Sichuan, southwestern China. The description is based on morphology and molecular data. The Nemourinae genera related to the new taxon are re-evaluated on the basis of comparative functional morphology of male epiproct. Notes on the Asian distribution of the Nemourinae are also given.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer