It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Much evidence points to a dramatic thinning of East Asian lithosphere during the Mesozoic, but with little precision on when, or over what time scale. Using geochemical constraints, we examine an extensive compilation of dated volcanic samples from Russia, Mongolia and North China to determine when the lithosphere thinned and how long that process took. Geochemical results suggest that magmatism before 107 Ma derived from metasomatised subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM), whereas after 107 Ma, melt predominantly derived from an asthenospheric source. The switch to an asthenospheric magma source at ~107 Ma occurred in both Mongolia and North China (>1600 km apart), whereas in eastern Russia the switch occurred a little later (~85 Ma). Such a dramatic change to an asthenospheric contribution appears to have taken, from beginning to end, just ~30 Myrs, suggesting this is the duration for lithospheric mantle weakening and removal. Subsequent volcanism, through the Cenozoic in Mongolia and North China does not appear to include any contribution from the removed SCLM, despite melts predominantly deriving from the asthenosphere.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Barfod, Dan N 5 ; Halton, Alison M 6
1 University of Leicester, University Road, School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Leicester, UK (GRID:grid.9918.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8411)
2 Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Department of Geology, Ulaan Baatar, Mongolia (GRID:grid.440461.3)
3 Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geodynamics and Geohazards, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.12981.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2360 039X)
4 NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK (GRID:grid.8682.4) (ISNI:0000000094781573)
5 Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, NERC Argon Isotope Facility, East Kilbride, UK (GRID:grid.224137.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9762 0345)
6 The Open University, Walton Hall, School of Physical Sciences, Milton Keynes, UK (GRID:grid.10837.3d) (ISNI:0000000096069301)




