This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer among children and is characterized by overproduction and accumulation of immature lymphoid cells [1, 2, 3]. The cure rate of ALL has exceeded 80% due to the development of therapeutic approaches, of which L-asparaginase (ASNase) played a prominent role [4, 5]. ASNase exerts its antileukemic activity by catalyzing the hydrolysis of L-asparagine (ASN), which is a nonessential amino acid that normal cells are able to synthesize, while leukemic cells have to uptake from the intercellular fluid. The depletion of ASN leads to inhibition of protein and RNA synthesis in leukemic cells, eventually inducing apoptosis [4, 6]. Reports have shown that the normal ASN level in the human serum is 40–80 μM and ASN depletion of over 90% or a serum ASN level below 3 μM is considered to be effective for the treatment of ALL [7, 8, 9]. Although the incidence of adverse events such as hypersensitivity reactions has been reduced significantly since the polyethylene glycol- (PEG-) conjugated ASNase was used clinically, drug resistance of ASNase continues to provide challenges for continuing ASNase treatment [10, 11, 12].
Much progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms involved in the drug resistance of ASNase. Besides high expression and activity of ASN, host factors, especially ASNase antibody production, were also reported to be associated with the drug resistance of ASNase. However, it has been reported that the host factors would eventually result in high expression and activity of ASN [10, 13, 14]. Therefore, to guide the decision of switching preparations or dose escalation of ASNase, the monitoring of drug concentration or therapeutic markers were necessary for ALL patients. The ASNase level, ASNase antibody titer, and ASN level are all available for monitoring during ASNase treatment. Of these, measurement of the ASN level is the most ideal means for applying due to its superiority in reflecting the final outcome of all variables including dietary supplementation of the amino acid [15].
Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) with fluorescence detection and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are two alternative methods with high sensitivity and selectivity to be used for quantitative analysis of ASN concentrations in biological samples including plasma, serum, and cerebrospinal fluid [16, 17, 18]. However, the widespread use of RP-HPLC with fluorescence for measuring the ASN level is hampered by the complexity process since ASN has to be precolumn derivatized with o-phthaldialdehyde, while the use of LC-MS/MS would encounter the hurdle of the high matrix effect because the strongly polar ASN is difficult to separate from endogenous components through the commonly used RP-HPLC column. Therefore, there is an urgent demand for a rapid, simple, and convenient method for ASN determination in ALL patients treated with ASNase. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) is an alternative HPLC method based on the strong hydrophilic interaction of the hydrophilic polar stationary phase with highly polar compounds such as amino acids. HILIC could overcome the drawback of poor solubility, poor analytical reproducibility, and limited compatibility with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry that are often encountered in normal-phase HPLC. It was observed that analytes can be eluted similarly to normal phase liquid chromatography in the mobile phase of a reversed-phase system [19, 20, 21]. Therefore, HILIC may hold promise as an alternative method for quantitative analysis of ASN concentrations.
In the present study, a rapid, simple, and convenient method was developed for determination of ASN in the human serum using one-step sample protein precipitation and analysis by HILIC-MS/MS. A complete validation was conducted, including assessment of linearity, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), specificity, carryover, matrix effect, recovery, accuracy, precision, and stability. Furthermore, this method was successfully applied to the determination of ASN in the serum of ALL patients and was effectively used to guide the rational clinical use of ASNase. The method may have potential application for serum ASN determination in ALL patients treated with ASNase.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Standards and Chemicals
L-Asparagine monohydrate (chemical purity 98%) and L-asparagine-D3 (ASN-D3, isotope-labeled internal standard of asparagine, chemical purity 98%, isotopic purity 98.3%) were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals Inc. (Toronto, Canada). Ammonium formate (MS grade) and activated charcoal were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC (St. Louis, MO, USA). Formic acid (HPLC grade) was provided by Dikma Technologies Inc. (Lake Forest, CA, USA). Pegaspargase injection (5 mL: 3750 IU) was purchased from Hengrui Medicine (Jiangsu, China). Methanol (HPLC grade) was obtained from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Purified water (resistivity 18 MΩ) was prepared using a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Human serum was obtained from consenting healthy volunteers at the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.
2.2. Instrument and Conditions
Chromatographic analysis was performed using a Shimadzu 20A HPLC system consisting of two LC-20AD pumps, a DGU-20A3R degassing unit, an SIL-20A autosampler, and a CTO-20A column oven (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Separations were conducted at 40°C on an HILIC Plus analytical column (4.6 × 100 mm, particle size 3.5 μm, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a mobile phase of methanol-water (95 : 5, v/v, containing 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The total run time was 6 min, and the injection volume was 5 μL.
MS detection was carried out using a Shimadzu LCMS-8040 triple-quad mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation) equipped with an electrospray ionization source operating in the positive mode (ESI+). Quantification was performed using the multiple-reaction monitoring mode. The interface voltage and conversion dynode voltage were 4.5 kV and 6 kV, respectively. DL temperature and heat block temperature were 250°C and 400°C, respectively. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizing and drying gas at flow rates of 3 and 15 L/min, respectively, while argon was employed as the collision gas at a pressure of 230 kPa. The ion transitions were m/z 133.00 ⟶ 73.95 and m/z 136.00 ⟶ 74.95 for ASN and ASN-D3, respectively (Figure 1).
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
Shimadzu LabSolutions Workstation (edition 1.0.5036.31919, Shimadzu Corporation) was used for data acquisition and processing, and Microsoft Office Excel 2007 (Redmond, WA, USA) was used to calculate means, standard deviations (SDs), relative standard deviations (RSDs), and coefficients of variation (CVs).
2.3. Preparation of ASN-Free Serum
ASN-free serum was prepared by charcoal stripping [22, 23]. In brief, activated charcoal was added to the human serum at a ratio of 0.2 g/mL and stored at 4°C for 6 h. The mixture was then centrifuged at 20,000
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
2.4. Standard Solutions
Stock solutions of ASN (100 mM) were prepared in water and stored at −20°C. Standard solutions for the calibration curve were prepared by serial dilution of the ASN stock solution with 50% methanol. The standard solutions were used to spike the ASN-free (charcoal-stripped) human serum to provide mimic serum samples containing ASN at final concentrations of 2, 4, 20, 40, 100, 160, and 200 μM. Quality control (QC) samples were prepared in the same way at ASN concentrations of 6, 80, and 150 μM.
2.5. Serum Sample Preparation
ASN was extracted from the serum by protein precipitation. In brief, blood samples were collected into a blood collection tube containing the coagulant. After shaking gently, blood samples were placed at 4°C for 5 min and then centrifuged at 4°C and 3000
2.6. Method Validation
The HILIC-MS/MS method was validated for the determination of ASN according to the recommendations issued by the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (Edition 2015) and in compliance with the principles of guidance of the US FDA and European Medicines Agency. A complete validation, including assessment of linearity, LLOQ, selectivity, carryover, matrix effect, recovery, accuracy, precision, and stability, was carried out.
2.6.1. Specificity, Sensitivity, and Linearity
Selectivity for ASN and isotope-labeled IS (ASN-D3) relative to the endogenous matrix was tested in the ASN-free (charcoal-stripped) human serum. Blank samples were prepared and analyzed as described in Section 2.3. Interfering substances at the retention time of ASN should be undetectable or less than 20% and 5% of the peak areas for the LLOQ (2 μM) of the analyte and IS, respectively. The sensitivity was defined by the LLOQ of ASN, with acceptable precision (RSD ≤ 20%), accuracy (within ±20%), and signal-to-noise ratio (S/N ≥ 10). The calibration curve was designed according to the normal range of ASN concentrations in the human serum (40–80 μM). The linearity range for ASN was 2–200 μM. Peak area ratios of ASN and IS against the concentration ratios at 2, 4, 20, 40, 100, 160, and 200 μM were plotted to establish the calibration curve using the least-squares regression equation, with a weighting factor of 1/x2.
2.6.2. Precision and Accuracy
The intra- and interbatch precision and accuracy for ASN were investigated on three different occasions by analysis of spiked charcoal-stripped serum samples at the LLOQ (2 μM) and three QC levels (6, 80, and 150 μM) in six replicates. The CV was used to evaluate intra- and interbatch precision, with acceptance criteria ≤15% for low, medium, and high QC (LQC, MQC, and HQC) samples and ≤20% at the LLOQ concentration. The accuracy values should be 85%–115% of the nominal concentrations, except for the LLOQ, which was extended to 80%–120% of the nominal value.
2.6.3. Matrix Effect and Recovery
The effect of the endogenous matrix in the serum on the ionization of ASN or IS was evaluated by comparing the relative responses of postspiked samples (analytes and IS solutions were added to postextracted ASN-free (charcoal-stripped) biological matrix residues) and unextracted samples (analytes and IS solutions were directly diluted using 50% methanol) at three QC levels. The matrix effect was expressed as the matrix factor normalized to IS. The evaluation of the matrix effect in the serum was processed in four replicates. The recovery rates of ASN and IS were measured by comparing the peak areas of the extracted samples, which were prepared as described in Section 2.5, with those of the unextracted samples at three QC levels with six replicates.
2.6.4. Carryover
The carryover effect was investigated by injecting a blank sample (charcoal-stripped human serum) following an upper limit of quantification (ULOQ, 200 μM) sample. The evaluation of carryover was processed in three replicates, and the peak areas of blank samples should not exceed 20% of the LLOQ and 5% of IS.
2.6.5. Stability
Mimic charcoal-stripped human serum samples at the LQC and HQC, which were deproteinized by methanol, were analyzed together with freshly prepared calibration samples to obtain actual concentrations. The mean concentrations should be 85%–115% of the nominal concentrations to prove stability over different storage periods.
Stability of the stock solution was evaluated by comparing the response of an ASN solution stored at −20°C for 92 days with that of a freshly prepared solution. The physical and chemical properties of IS (ASN-D3) were considered to be similar to those of ASN, so the stock solution stability of IS was not assessed in this study. Benchtop stability of ASN was evaluated by storing QC samples prepared with the charcoal-stripped human serum at room temperature for 48 h prior to preparation. Long-term stability was assessed by storing QC samples at −70°C for 87 days. To evaluate whether reinjection or delayed injection of prepared samples would lead to degradation, processed QC samples were stored in the autosampler (room temperature) or refrigerator (4°C) for 48 h. To confirm whether the presence of ASNase in the human serum confounds the determination of ASN, ASNase was added to LQC and HQC charcoal-stripped human serum samples to a final activity of 2 IU/mL (Cmax of ASNase under the therapeutic dose was 1-2 IU/mL). The mixtures were then immediately deproteinized by methanol and stored at room temperature for 48 h. The actual concentrations of these QC samples were determined using a freshly prepared calibration curve, and mean concentrations that were 85%–115% of the nominal concentrations at each level were considered to demonstrate stability.
2.7. Serum ASN Concentrations in ALL Patients
The validated HILIC-MS/MS method was used to monitor serum ASN concentrations in ALL patients. Serum samples (85) from consenting ALL patients at the Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University were analyzed. Forty-nine of the 85 samples were from patients receiving ASNase therapy. Prior to analysis, an informed consent form was signed by each patient giving the right to use their serum sample for the research purpose.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. LC-MS/MS Method Development
Several C18 and C8 columns were initially investigated for RP-HPLC during the optimization process. Regardless of whether ammonium formate or formic acid was added, acetonitrile offered a low response and poor peak shape for ASN using both C8 and C18 columns. Noticeably, the response and peak shape for ASN were greatly improved in the methanol-water system. However, in the methanol-water system, ASN was eluted quickly irrespective of pH, resulting in a significant matrix effect and that the retention time was barely changed and even the proportion of methanol was varied between 60% and 95% (data not shown). In conclusion, commonly used RP-HPLC was not available for determination of ASN concentration because of its high polarity.
To overcome these drawbacks, HILIC, an alternative method for the separation of polar compounds such as amino acids, was used. High polar compounds not only would have better retention and separation in the HILIC method but also do not require the traditional derivatization steps or ion-pairing separations [21]. The liquid chromatography was optimized on an HILIC column. An Agilent HILIC Plus column (4.6 × 100 mm, particle size 3.5 μm) was employed with a mobile phase of methanol-water. At the initial stage of development, ammonium formate (5 mM) was added to the mobile phase. However, it was observed that the peak shape was broad with a little trailing, which was probably because ASN is an amphoteric compound. Both molecular and ionic forms of ASN, which have different polarities, were found to be present in the mobile phase. Therefore, 0.1% formic acid (v/v) was added to the mobile phase to transform all ASN into the ionic form. In the presence of acid, the peak shape was improved and the signal was enhanced. In addition, the flow rate of the mobile phase is another factor affecting spray efficiency and impacts the signal response in MS. Although a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min is recommended for the MS detector used in this study, a low flow rate usually leads to broad peak shapes and long analysis times (10 min for 0.2 mL/min in this research). Flow rates of 0.2–0.5 mL/min were evaluated, and, as expected, the signal response was higher at a low flow rate. However, at 0.3 mL/min, the ASN peak area was similar to that at 0.2 mL/min and the analysis time was shortened to 6 min. In consequence, 0.3 mL/min was the optimal flow rate of the mobile phase for determination of ASN.
3.2. Extraction Method Development
Traditional precipitation (PPT), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), and solid-phase extraction (SPE) are three commonly used effective extraction methods of biological samples [24, 25, 26]. Of these, LLE is inappropriate for this study because ASN is highly water soluble and is difficult to extract using organic solvents such as ethyl acetate or chloroform. SPE has been favored for analysis of amino acids in the biological matrix because of its efficient enrichment of analytes and clearance of matrix components. However, preparation of biological samples using SPE is always costly and time-consuming. The current study aimed to develop a simple and rapid method which could be applied to serum ASN determination of ALL patients treated with ASNase. PPT was a quick and convenient extraction method and thus employed for the pretreatment of serum samples. Methanol and acetonitrile were evaluated as precipitation agents, and the baselines of samples treated with both agents were similar. It was observed that, in both cases, the peaks were branched and trailing, probably because of differences in pH between the sample media and the mobile phase. To adjust the pH of the sample media, 10 μL 5% formic acid was added after the addition of IS. In the presence of formic acid, the peaks were smooth and symmetrical, and the signal response after methanol precipitation was higher. Therefore, methanol was selected as the precipitation agent in the current method.
Since ASNase is present in the serum of ALL patients, ASN in serum samples would be degraded during storage and preparation. In previous research, sulfosalicylic acid was reported to be capable of inactivating ASNase by nonspecific precipitation and thus widely used to precipitate the serum proteins after the serum sample was separated from whole blood [18]. Nevertheless, sulfosalicylic acid strongly impacted the peak shapes of ASN in HILIC, probably due to the change of pH. Methanol, another commonly used precipitation agent, is able to provide a similar function as sulfosalicylic acid. Therefore, in this research, methanol could play a dual role by inactivating ASNase and preparing the serum sample, and based on this, 500 μL methanol was added to 100 μL serum sample immediately after separation from whole blood. After methanol addition, the sample could be stored at −70°C or be further processed. It was shown that methanol provided a similar peak shape to ASN water solution. Under such circumstances, the LLOQ of ASN was 2 μM, which is lower than the concentration (3 μM) considered to be effective for the treatment of ALL. Besides, accuracy and precision were 99.44 ± 13.52% and 15.02% at the LLOQ, respectively. In summary, the rapid and convenient method that has been developed in this research, with a low LLOQ, is applicable to serum ASN quantification in ALL patients.
3.3. Method Validation
3.3.1. Specificity, Sensitivity, Linearity, and Carryover
The specificity of the assay method was assessed by evaluating potential interference or background noise at the LC retention times (tR) for analytes and IS from endogenous compounds. The chromatograms of the ASN-free human serum, spiked charcoal-stripped serum, and normal serum from ALL patients were compared (Figure 2). The figure shows that tR of ASN and IS was both approximately 4.7 min and that no chromatographic peak attributable to the matrix component was observed at the retention time of the analytes. Sensitivity was satisfactory in the determination of ASN, with signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) over 10.
Good linearity was observed over the range of 2–200 μM, with correlation coefficients (R2) greater than 0.99 for all routine calibration curves, which was applicable to serum ASN determination in ALL patients. The slope and intercept were 2.2631 ± 0.7621 and −0.0095 ± 0.0083, respectively, and the calibration accuracy of all seven calibrated levels was less than ±15% bias. No carryover was observed in the charcoal-stripped samples after injections of ULOQ (200 μM).
3.3.2. Matrix Effects and Recovery
The matrix effect was assessed to evaluate the possible enhancement or suppression of ionization caused by endogenous components in the biological matrices. The peak area ratios of ASN and IS in postextracted samples and solvent samples were compared at equivalent concentrations. The IS-normalized matrix effects at three QC levels are summarized in Table 1. The mean IS-normalized matrix effects were 94.64%–100.91% and the CVs were less than 15%, indicating that the endogenous matrix did not affect the determination of ASN under the validated conditions.
Table 1
Matrix effect for the determination of ASN (n = 4).
| Nominal conc. (μM) | Matrix effect (%) | IS-normalized matrix effect |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 63.49 ± 4.94 | 100.91 ± 13.19 |
| 80 | 63.34 ± 1.16 | 94.64 ± 4.73 |
| 150 | 65.83 ± 0.53 | 96.10 ± 2.09 |
The overall process recoveries (also known as absolute recoveries) of ASN at 6, 80, and 150 μM were 60.32 ± 5.10%, 61.37 ± 0.91%, and 63.17 ± 1.57%, respectively, while the recovery of IS was 63.83 ± 2.12%. Collectively, the overall process recoveries of the method were acceptable.
3.3.3. Precision and Accuracy
Six replicates of charcoal-stripped serum samples at the LLOQ and three QC levels were used to evaluate the precision and accuracy for ASN. The intra- and interbatch precisions were 5.03%–15.02% and 3.89%–14.74%, respectively, and the deviations from nominal values were 0.07%–8.20% (Table 2). Both precision and accuracy values satisfied the criteria in the guidelines, demonstrating that the validated method was reliable and reproducible for the determination of ASN.
Table 2
Precision and accuracy for the determination of ASN (n = 6).
| Nominal conc. (μM) | Backcalculated conc. (μM) | Accuracy (%) | Precision (CV, %) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intrabatch | Interbatch | |||
| 2 | 1.99 ± 0.27 | 99.44 ± 13.52 | 15.02 | 14.74 |
| 6 | 5.51 ± 0.45 | 91.80 ± 7.48 | 8.54 | 11.21 |
| 80 | 79.94 ± 4.15 | 99.93 ± 5.18 | 5.96 | 3.89 |
| 150 | 145.24 ± 6.83 | 96.82 ± 4.55 | 5.03 | 6.02 |
3.3.4. Stability
The recovery of ASN from the stock solution was 102.70% ± 4.08% after storage at −20°C for 92 days. The stability of ASN in precipitated charcoal-stripped serum samples is summarized in Table 3. After precipitation with methanol, ASN was stable for at least 48 h during benchtop preparation and after 87 days of storage at −70°C. Prepared samples also exhibited good stability after storage in the autosampler (room temperature) or when refrigerated at 4°C for 48 h. With the presence of high levels of ASNase in the charcoal-stripped human serum, no significant degradation was found at room temperature for 48 h with the addition of methanol, indicating that methanol could inhibit the activity of ASNase. Methanol-precipitated human serum samples can thus be accurately analyzed under laboratory conditions without significant degradation of ASN.
Table 3
Stability of ASN in precipitated human serum samples under different storage conditions (n = 3).
| Storage condition | Recovery (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| LQC (6 μM) | HQC (150 μM) | |
| Benchtop stability (48 h) | 101.89 ± 0.59 | 102.87 ± 0.98 |
| Long-term stability (−70°C, 87 days) | 96.83 ± 1.48 | 99.90 ± 9.22 |
| Processed stability (autosampler, 48 h) | 107.78 ± 11.05 | 101.54 ± 3.42 |
| Processed stability (4°C, 48 h) | 100.61 ± 4.02 | 97.39 ± 6.07 |
| Benchtop stability (2 IU/mL ASNase, 48 h) | 98.56 ± 0.54 | 93.76 ± 3.56 |
3.4. Method Application
By employing the developed HILIC-MS/MS method, we determined the concentrations of ASN in the serum sample collected from 49 ALL patients. Before administration of ASNase, the serum ASN concentration was 52.06 ± 13.11 μM (36 samples, range 36.16–90.32 μM). After ASNase therapy, ASN concentrations in 46 of the 49 serum samples were below the detection limit of this method, suggesting that the therapies for these 46 patients were effective. Residual ASN was still detected in the sera of three patients treated with ASNase (42.63, 17.60, and 23.60 μM), indicating that the curative effects of ASNase in these three patients was unsatisfactory and that the clinical treatment should be optimized (Table 4). It was found that the ASN level was in correlation with the effectiveness of ASNase treatment. To meet satisfactory effects in the treatment of ALL, a serum ASN level should be below 3 μM and ASNase should be higher than 0.1 IU/mL [27]. However, the ASNase activity of three patients with residual ASN (Nos. 21, 30, and 31) was found to be 0.017 IU/mL, 0.082 IU/mL, and 0.015 IU/mL, respectively, which were less than 0.1 IU/mL. Therefore, the above results suggested that the detection of serum ASN concentration contributes to assess ASNase activity in ALL patients treated with ASNase.
Table 4
ASN concentrations in serum samples of ALL patients treated with ASNase.
| No. | ASN concentration (μM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | |
| 1 | 45.86 | <2 |
| 2 | 39.52 | <2 |
| 3 | 36.83 | <2 |
| 4 | 69.72 | <2 |
| 5 | 59.18 | <2 |
| 6 | 45.52 | <2 |
| 7 | 54.12 | <2 |
| 8 | 66.14 | <2 |
| 9 | 52.76 | <2 |
| 10 | 46.51 | <2 |
| 11 | 90.32 | <2 |
| 12 | 44.22 | <2 |
| 13 | 66.60 | <2 |
| 14 | 64.34 | <2 |
| 15 | 59.80 | <2 |
| 16 | 41.95 | <2 |
| 17 | 52.65 | <2 |
| 18 | 51.04 | <2 |
| 19 | 46.83 | <2 |
| 20 | 38.37 | <2 |
| 21 | 46.79 | 42.63 |
| 22 | 77.35 | <2 |
| 23 | 42.41 | <2 |
| 24 | 53.70 | <2 |
| 25 | 36.16 | <2 |
| 26 | 47.85 | <2 |
| 27 | 60.55 | <2 |
| 28 | 41.40 | <2 |
| 29 | 43.47 | <2 |
| 30 | 43.55 | 17.60 |
| 31 | 79.48 | 23.60 |
| 32 | 54.62 | <2 |
| 33 | 38.25 | <2 |
| 34 | 39.82 | <2 |
| 35 | 38.39 | <2 |
| 36 | 58.06 | <2 |
| 37 | NA | <2 |
| 38 | NA | <2 |
| 39 | NA | <2 |
| 40 | NA | <2 |
| 41 | NA | <2 |
| 42 | NA | <2 |
| 43 | NA | <2 |
| 44 | NA | <2 |
| 45 | NA | <2 |
| 46 | NA | <2 |
| 47 | NA | <2 |
| 48 | NA | <2 |
| 49 | NA | <2 |
NA: serum samples were not collected before administration.
4. Conclusion
A novel, rapid, and convenient LC-MS/MS method for analysis of ASN has been successfully developed and validated in the human serum. A one-step protein precipitation process using methanol was a convenient sample preparation method employed to prepare serum samples for LC-MS/MS analysis. The HILIC column allowed for excellent separation of the analytes, and symmetrical peak responses were obtained using a mobile phase of methanol-water (95 : 5, v/v) containing 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM ammonium formate. The total run time was 6 min, and no carryover was observed with an injection volume of 5 μL. The method has been validated, demonstrating good specificity and sensitivity, appropriate recovery, and absence of matrix interference. The accuracy and precision over the concentration range of 2–200 μM satisfied the guidelines. The robustness of the developed method was confirmed by monitoring ASN concentrations in serum samples from ALL patients. Therefore, the method employed herein is a simple, rapid, and selective analytical option, finding a potential utility for quantification of ASN in ALL patients treated with ASNase.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Guangdong Hospital Pharmacy Foundation (grant nos. 2016A28 and 2019A01), Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou Health and Family Planning Commission (20181A010039), Guangzhou Municipal Key Discipline in Medicine (2017–2019), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81901328), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A030313821), and Guangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine and Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Science and Technology Project (No. 20192A010012).
[1] S. P. Hunger, C. G. Mullighan, "Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373 no. 16, pp. 1541-1552, DOI: 10.1056/nejmra1400972, 2015.
[2] S. Janczar, K. Janczar, A. Pastorczak, "The role of histone protein modifications and mutations in histone modifiers in pediatric B-cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia," Cancers, vol. 9 no. 12,DOI: 10.3390/cancers9010002, 2017.
[3] H. X. Peng, X. D. Liu, Z. Y. Luo, "Upregulation of the proto-oncogene Bmi-1 predicts a poor prognosis in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia," BMC Cancer, vol. 17 no. 1,DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3049-3, 2017.
[4] K. Kumar, J. Kaur, S. Walia, T. Pathak, D. Aggarwal, "L-asparaginase: an effective agent in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia," Leukemia & Lymphoma, vol. 55 no. 2, pp. 256-262, DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.803224, 2014.
[5] O. Zajac-Spychala, M. Pawlak, K. Karmelita-Katulska, "Anti-leukemic treatment-induced neurotoxicity in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: impact of reduced central nervous system radiotherapy and intermediate- to high-dose methotrexate," Leukemia & Lymphoma, vol. 59 no. 10, pp. 2342-2351, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1434879, 2018.
[6] V. I. Avramis, P. N. Tiwari, "Asparaginase (native ASNase or pegylated ASNase) in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia," International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 1 no. 3, pp. 241-254, 2006.
[7] V. I. Avramis, E. H. Panosyan, "Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of asparaginase formulations," Clinical Pharmacokinetics, vol. 44 no. 4, pp. 367-393, DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544040-00003, 2005.
[8] J. D. Kawedia, M. E. Rytting, "Asparaginase in acute lymphoblastic leukemia," Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, vol. 14, pp. S14-S17, DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.06.017, 2014.
[9] W. H. Tong, R. Pieters, G. J. L. Kaspers, "A prospective study on drug monitoring of PEGasparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase and asparaginase antibodies in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia," Blood, vol. 123 no. 13, pp. 2026-2033, DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-534347, 2014.
[10] S.-H. Chen, "Asparaginase therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a focus on the mode of drug resistance," Pediatrics & Neonatology, vol. 56 no. 5, pp. 287-293, DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2014.10.006, 2015.
[11] R. E. Rau, Z. Dreyer, M. R. Choi, "Outcome of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma with hypersensitivity to pegaspargase treated with PEGylated Erwinia asparaginase, pegcrisantaspase: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group," Pediatric Blood & Cancer, vol. 65 no. 3,DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26873, 2018.
[12] W. Zheng, X. Ke, H. Ren, "PEG-asparaginase in BFM-90 regimen improves outcomes in adults with newly diagnosed lymphoblastic lymphoma," Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 29 no. 1, pp. 66-74, DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.01.08, 2017.
[13] B. Asselin, C. Rizzari, "Asparaginase pharmacokinetics and implications of therapeutic drug monitoring," Leukemia & Lymphoma, vol. 56 no. 8, pp. 2273-2280, DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.1003056, 2015.
[14] S. M. Kang, J. L. Rosales, V. Meier-Stephenson, S. Kim, K. Y. Lee, A. Narendran, "Genome-wide loss-of-function genetic screening identifies opioid receptor μ 1 as a key regulator of L-asparaginase resistance in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia," Oncogene, vol. 36 no. 42, pp. 5910-5913, DOI: 10.1038/onc.2017.211, 2017.
[15] S. Patil, J. Coutsouvelis, A. Spencer, "Asparaginase in the management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: is it used appropriately?," Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 37 no. 3, pp. 202-207, DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.08.002, 2011.
[16] R. MacNeill, T. Sangster, M. Moussallie, V. Trinh, R. Stromeyer, E. Daley, "Stable-labeled analogues and reliable quantification of nonprotein biomarkers by LC-MS/MS," Bioanalysis, vol. 2 no. 1, pp. 69-80, DOI: 10.4155/bio.09.166, 2010.
[17] C. E. Nath, L. Dallapozza, A. E. Eslick, A. Misra, D. Carr, J. W. Earl, "An isocratic fluorescence HPLC assay for the monitoring of l-asparaginase activity and l-asparagine depletion in children receivingE.colil-asparaginase for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia," Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 23 no. 2, pp. 152-159, DOI: 10.1002/bmc.1096, 2009.
[18] W. H. Tong, R. Pieters, W. C. J. Hop, C. Lanvers-Kaminsky, J. Boos, I. M. van der Sluis, "No evidence of increased asparagine levels in the bone marrow of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during asparaginase therapy," Pediatric Blood & Cancer, vol. 60 no. 2, pp. 258-261, DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24292, 2013.
[19] B. Buszewski, S. Noga, "Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)-a powerful separation technique," Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 402 no. 1, pp. 231-247, DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5308-, 2012.
[20] D. Sangaraju, S. K. Shahidi-Latham, B. L. Burgess, B. Dean, X. Ding, "A multi-matrix HILIC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of endogenous small molecule neurological biomarker N- acetyl aspartic acid (NAA)," Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 140, pp. 11-19, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.03, 2017.
[21] Y. Wen, X. Yuan, F. Qin, L. Zhao, Z. Xiong, "Development and validation of a hydrophilic interaction ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for rapid simultaneous determination of 19 free amino acids in rat plasma and urine," Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 33 no. 1, 2018.
[22] Y. Huang, A. Louie, Q. Y. Yang, "A simple LC-MS/MS method for determination of kynurenine and tryptophan concentrations in human plasma from HIV-infected patients," Bioanalysis, vol. 5 no. 11, pp. 1397-1407, DOI: 10.4155/bio.13.74, 2013.
[23] A. Meinitzer, A. Tomaschitz, S. Pilz, "Development of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of the neurotoxic quinolinic acid in human serum," Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 436, pp. 268-272, DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.06.010, 2014.
[24] D. Luque-Córdoba, M. Calderón-Santiago, M. D. Luque de Castro, F. Priego-Capote, "Study of sample preparation for determination of endocannabinoids and analogous compounds in human serum by LC-MS/MS in MRM mode," Talanta, vol. 185, pp. 602-610, DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.04.033, 2018.
[25] L. Nováková, "Challenges in the development of bioanalytical liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method with emphasis on fast analysis," Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1292, pp. 25-37, DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.087, 2013.
[26] B. Ramesh, N. Manjula, S. Ramakrishna, P. S. Devi, "Direct injection HILIC-MS/MS analysis of darunavir in rat plasma applying supported liquid extraction," Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, vol. 5 no. 1, pp. 43-50, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2014.05.001, 2015.
[27] V. Avramis, S. Sencer, "A randomized comparison of native Escherichia coli asparaginase and polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase for treatment of children with newly diagnosed standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a children’s cancer group study," Blood, vol. 99 no. 6, pp. 1986-1994, DOI: 10.1182/blood.v99.6.1986, 2002.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2020 Haoyang Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
L-Asparagine (ASN) is the catalyze substrate of L-asparaginase (ASNase), which is an important drug for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. The ASN level is found to be closely associated with the effectiveness of ASNase treatment. In this study, a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS) method was developed for the determination of ASN in the human serum using a stable isotope-labeled internal standard (ASN-D3). Serum samples were prepared by a one-step precipitation procedure using methanol and separated by an Agilent HILIC Plus column with the mobile phase of methanol-water (95 : 5, v/v, containing 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid), at a constant flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted using multiple-reaction monitoring in the positive electrospray ionization mode. Serum ASN concentrations were determined over a linear calibration curve range of 2–200 μM, with acceptable accuracies and precisions. The validated HILIC-MS/MS method was successfully applied to the quantification of ASN levels in the serum from patients with ALL. Collectively, the research may shed new light on an alternative rapid, simple, and convenient quantitative method for determination of serum ASN in ALL patients treated with ASNase.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), No. 36, Mingxin Road, Guangzhou 510370, China
2 The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), No. 36, Mingxin Road, Guangzhou 510370, China; Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
3 Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, No. 253, Industrial Avenue, Guangzhou 501280, China