It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) is a non-renewable resource which may be depleted within next few decades; hence high P use efficiency is need of time. Plants have evolved an array of adaptive mechanisms to enhance external P acquisition and reprioritize internal utilization under P deficiency. Tissue specific biomass and P allocation patterns may affect the P use efficiency in plants. six rice cultivars were grown in solution culture for 20 days and then were divided into two groups to receive either adequate P or no P that were harvested at 30, 40 and 50 days. Plants were dissected into various tissues/organs. Two rice cultivars viz Super Basmati (P-inefficient) and PS-2 (P-efficient) were grown in soil with no or 50 mg P kg−1 soil till maturity. Rice cultivars PS-2 and Basmati-2000 had higher P uptake, utilization efficiency and internal remobilization than other tested cultivars after P omission. Young leaves and roots were the major sinks while stems and mature leaves were the sources of P during P omission. In conclusion, biomass allocation and P accumulation among various tissues and P remobilization were major factors responsible for P efficiency.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Agriculture, Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Faisalabad, Pakistan (GRID:grid.413016.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0607 1563); Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Soil and Environmental Sciences Division, Tandojam, Pakistan (GRID:grid.413016.1)
2 University of Agriculture, Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Faisalabad, Pakistan (GRID:grid.413016.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0607 1563); The University of Western Australia, The UWA Institute of Agriculture and UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, Perth, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)
3 University of Agriculture, Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Faisalabad, Pakistan (GRID:grid.413016.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0607 1563)
4 University of Agriculture, Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Faisalabad, Pakistan (GRID:grid.413016.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0607 1563); University of Okara, Department of Environmental Sciences, Okara, Pakistan (GRID:grid.413016.1)
5 The University of Western Australia, The UWA Institute of Agriculture and UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, Perth, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)
6 Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land, Institute of Agri. Resources and Regional Planning, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410727.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0526 1937)