It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Factors predicting allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes in myelofibrosis in the early post-HCT period have not been defined thus far. We attempt to study such factors that can help identify patients at a higher risk of relapse or death. This retrospective study included 79 patients who underwent first HCT for myelofibrosis at three centers between 2005 and 2016. Univariate analysis showed that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence (HR 9.02, 95% CI 4.0–20.35), platelet transfusion dependence (HR 8.17, 95%CI 3.83–17.37), 100% donor chimerism in CD33 + cells (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.07–0.62), unfavorable molecular status (HR 4.41, 95%CI 1.87–10.39), normal spleen size (HR 0.42, 95%CI 0.19–0.94), grade ≥ 2 bone marrow fibrosis (vs. grade ≤ 1; HR 2.7, 95%CI 1.1–6.93) and poor graft function (HR 2.6, 95%CI 1.22–5.53) at day +100 were statistically significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS). RBC transfusion dependence and unfavorable molecular status were also statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. Patients in whom both of these factors were present had a significantly worse RFS when compared to those with one or none. While limited by a small sample size, we demonstrate the significance of transfusion dependence and molecular status at day +100 in predicting outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Phoenix, USA (GRID:grid.417468.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8875 6339); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Hematologic Malignancies and Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311)
2 Division of Biomedical Statistical and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, USA (GRID:grid.417468.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8875 6339)
3 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Phoenix, USA (GRID:grid.417468.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8875 6339)
4 Mayo Clinic, Division of General Internal Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X); Mayo Clinic, Center for Palliative Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
5 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
6 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jacksonville, USA (GRID:grid.417467.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0443 9942)
7 Honor Health Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, USA (GRID:grid.417468.8)
8 University of Texas Health San Antonio Cancer Center, San Antonio, USA (GRID:grid.215352.2) (ISNI:0000000121845633)