It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We performed an independent comparison of neutralizing and cross-neutralizing antibody (ab) levels seven months after initiation of three-dose, six-month vaccination schedules with the bivalent and quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in adolescent Finnish and Indian females, respectively. We used a semi-automated Pseudovirion-Based Neutralization Assay and observed significantly higher HPV16/18 peak ab-levels in bivalent as compared to quadrivalent vaccine recipients. Bivalent vaccine induced cross-neutralizing HPV31/33/45/52/58 antibodies significantly more frequently and to higher levels than the quadrivalent vaccine. The correlation of bivalent vaccine-induced HPV45 ab-levels with HPV16/18 ab-levels was stronger than that of corresponding quadrivalent vaccine-induced ab-levels, suggesting a qualitatively different cross-reactive response. Our findings on the comparison of the immunogenicity of two HPV vaccine tested in two different populations indicate that further head-to-head studies are warranted.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Tumorvirus-Specific Vaccination Strategies, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7497.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 0584)
2 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7497.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 0584)
3 Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram, India (GRID:grid.418917.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0177 8509)
4 Screening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France (GRID:grid.17703.32) (ISNI:0000000405980095)
5 All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.413618.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1767 6103)
6 Research Triangle Institute International India, 6th Floor, Pullman Commercial Tower, Aero City, India (GRID:grid.418917.2)
7 Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.4714.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0626)
8 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, EMBL-DKFZ Chemical Biology Core Facility, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.4709.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0495 846X)
9 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany (GRID:grid.7497.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 0584); Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.4714.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0626)