Usefulness of real-time PCR during follow-up of patients treated with Benznidazole for chronic Chagas disease: Experience in two referral centers in Barcelona

Abstract

Background

Antitrypanosomal treatment with Benznidazole (BZ) or Nifurtimox may be recommended for patients with chronic Chagas disease (CD) to reduce the onset or progression of symptoms. However, such treatment has limited efficacy and high level of toxic effects. In addition, the current cure biomarker (serology conversion) precludes any treatment assessment unless a prolonged follow-up is arranged. PCR is thus the most useful, alternative surrogate marker for evaluating responses to treatment.

The aim of this study is to describe the usefulness of real-time PCR in monitoring BZ treatment within a large cohort of chronic CD cases in Barcelona.

Methodology/Principal findings

A total of 370 chronic CD patients were monitored with real-time PCR post-BZ treatment. The median follow-up was 4 years (IQR 2.2–5.3y), with a median of 3 clinical visits (IQR 2–4). Only 8 patients (2.2%) presented with at least one incident of positive real-time PCR after treatment and were therefore considered as treatment failure. Four of those failure patients had completed full course treatment, whereas the remaining cases had defaulted with a statistical difference between both groups (p = 0.02). Half of the failure patients had undergone less than 4 years of follow-up monitoring all presented with parasitemia before treatment.

Conclusions/Significance

BZ treatment failure was highly infrequent in our cohort. BZ discontinuation was a risk factor for positive real-time PCR results during clinical follow-up. Regular testing with real-time PCR during follow-up allows for early detection of treatment failure in patients with chronic CD.

About the Authors:

Elena Sulleiro

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9783-6060

Aroa Silgado

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Núria Serre-Delcor

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Tropical Medicine Unit Vall d´Hebron-Drassanes, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Fernando Salvador

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Maykon Tavares de Oliveira

Roles Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Departamento de Clínica médica, Unidade de Cardiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Zaira Moure

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Augusto Sao-Aviles

Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Inés Oliveira

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Tropical Medicine Unit Vall d´Hebron-Drassanes, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Begoña Treviño

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Tropical Medicine Unit Vall d´Hebron-Drassanes, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Lidia Goterris

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-4461

Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Diana Pou

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Tropical Medicine Unit Vall d´Hebron-Drassanes, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Israel Molina

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Infectious Diseases, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Tomàs Pumarola

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PROSICS, Barcelona, Spain

Introduction

Chagas disease (CD) is one of the most predominantly neglected diseases, particularly in Latin America where it is endemic [1]. It is estimated that 6–7 million people are infected by Trypanosoma cruzi globally, and between 68 000 and 120 000 of such individuals are living in Europe [2,3]. In Spain, CD has become a national health problem, as the country is the leading destination in Europe for Latin American migrants and the second in frequency worldwide [4].

The disease holds a varying clinical presentation, including a short acute phase characterized by high parasitemia and mild symptoms. Parasitological tests such as microscopic examination (including concentration methods like microhaematocrit and Strout test), blood culture, xenodiagnoses, or molecular techniques based on nucleic acid amplification (PCR) are the most commonly used techniques during this phase.

After acute phase, untreated patients experience the chronic phase with low and intermittent parasitemia. The clinical course is unpredictable, ranging from asymptomatic to severe disease with cardiac and/or gastrointestinal involvement. During such stage, diagnosis relies on serological techniques [5].

Specific treatment is always recommended for cases of acute CD, congenital transmission, reactivated infections, and children younger than 18 years [6]. Similarly, in spite of its varying efficacy and high level of toxic effects, treatment may be still indicated during the chronic phase to prevent the onset or progression of cardiopathy, as well as mother-to-child transmission [7–9].

For more than 40 years, only two nitroimidazole compounds, Benznidazole (BZ) and Nifurtimox, have been used as specific treatment for CD. BZ has considerable efficacy during the acute phase; however, cure rates during the chronic phase are lower and the number of treatment failures are incremental over time. In addition, BZ has an importantly broad spectrum of side effects, requiring the possible cessation of treatment [10]. In response to such fact, noteworthy efforts have been undertaken to develop new drugs. Yet, preliminary results based on randomized clinical trials, with PCR as a final endpoint, have discouraged their use and reinforced the effectiveness of BZ [11–13].

On a similar note, one of the main concerns concerning the follow-up of patients treated is the absence of an early cure biomarker. Serological clearance is the only cure biomarker as it stands; nevertheless, a decrease in antibodies is slow and requires an extensive follow-up [14]. Moreover, while the clearance of a parasitological test, including PCR, does not ensure the absence of infection, a positive result in treated patients does indicate treatment failure. As a result of its better accessibility in comparison to other parasitological tests, PCR is optimal for early detection of treatment failure and a reduction in follow-up time [15]. Detection of T. cruzi DNA by real-time PCR is currently the most useful surrogate marker for assessing response to treatment in both clinical practice and trials [16–17].

The aim of this study was to describe the usefulness of real- time PCR in monitoring BZ treatment within a large cohort of chronic CD patients outside of endemic area.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective observational study performed in the Department of Microbiology at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital. The study population comprises patients with chronic CD visited between 2009 and 2016 in two referral centers: Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and the International Health Unit Vall d’Hebron-Drassanes. Patients were monitored every six months or annually with T.cruzi serology and real-time PCR. Follow-up data was collected until December 2018.

Inclusion criteria were: adults over the age of 18 with positive T. cruzi serology and treated with BZ. Real-time PCR was performed prior to the initiation of BZ treatment. Specific clinical contraindications including advanced cardiomyopathy, immunosuppressive condition, and pregnancy were considered as exclusion criteria.

BZ was administered orally in dosages of 5 mg/kg/day for 60 days, divided into three doses per day and with a maximum of 300 mg/day. All patients taking at least one dose of BZ were included in analysis.

Patients should have undergone at least 2 months of follow-up and provided at least one blood sample since the end of treatment.

DNA detection of T.cruzi by real-time PCR at any point after two months of BZ treatment was considered treatment failure.

Microbiology procedures

For serological diagnosis, serum samples were analyzed in parallel for one recombinant antigen EIA (Bioelisa Chagas. Biokit, Lliçà d’Amunt, Spain from 2010 to 2015, and CHAGAS ELISA IgG+IgM. Vircell, Granada, Spain from 2015 to 2018) and one lysate antigen EIA (Ortho T.cruzi ELISA, Johnson & Johnson, High Wycombe, United Kingdom). For real-time PCR, blood samples were diluted at a 1:1 ratio with guanidine hydrochloride 6M and EDTA 0.2 M, pH 8.00 (Sigma Aldrich) at room temperature for 24 hours. DNA extraction was carried out with 200 μl through silica–membrane technology (NucliSens easyMAG. Biomerieux. France) and eluted in 50 μl according to manufacturer´s instructions.

A duplex real-time PCR targeted to T. cruzi SatDNA and human RNase P gene (Taq Man Human RNase P detection reagent; Applied Biosystems) was constantly performed in duplicate. From 2010 to 2013, real-time PCR reactions were carried out as described by Piron et al [18], using the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix. Amplifications were performed in a SmartCycler Real-Time PCR system (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Cycling conditions were a first step of 15 minutes at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds and 58°C for 1 minute.

From 2013 onwards, a protocol modification was introduced. The final concentrations in the real- time PCR mixture were 400 nM both primers and 100 nM TaqMan probe, using 5 μL of eluted DNA in 25 μL final volume. Polymerase was switched to Quantitec Multiplex PCR kit (Qiagen, Manchester, United Kingdom) and CFX Real–Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used for amplification.

In all cases, a sample was considered positive for T. cruzi when the threshold cycle (Ct) for the T. cruzi target was<40. If only one of the DNA targets amplified within > 40 and <45, a third amplification was carried out. It was considered positive when two out of three measurements were <40 Ct. A sample was considered valid when the internal control (RNase P human gene) was efficiently amplified (mean Ct 26 ±2).

Positive and negative samples were included in each real- time PCR run as external controls.

Ethical clearance

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the HUVH Ethics Committee. Procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards established by the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2013.

Statistical analysis

Categorical data is presented as absolute numbers and proportions, and continuous variables are expressed as means and standard deviations (SD), or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) depending on distribution. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normal distribution of variables. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used when deemed appropriate to compare the distribution of categorical variables; the t-Student test was employed to compare continuous variables. Results were considered statistically significant if the 2-tailed P value was <0.05. SPSS software for Windows (Version 19.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) was chosen for statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 370 chronic CD patients who had previously undergone BZ treatment were monitored with real-time PCR. Seventy percent of those patients (258/370) were women, and 95.4% (268/281) of them came from Bolivia. Forty-eight patients (48/280, 17%) presented gastrointestinal involvement, 21% (67/318) patients had a cardiac lesion, and 7% (19/272) present both gastrointestinal and cardiac involvements. Real- time PCR was performed before the initiation of specific treatment, testing positive in 39.7% (147/370) of all cases. The Ct values for the RNase P gene detection remained quite constant and had an acceptable signal.

The median follow-up time was 4 years (IQR 2.2–5.3y). The number of clinical attendance varied, with a median of 3 visits (IQR 2–4) per patient.

With respect to follow-up time, patients were divided into two groups: short term (<4 years) and long term (≥4 years). In the first group, 171 (46.2%) patients had a median of two visits (IQR 1–3), with a median follow-up time of 2.15 years (IQR 1.18–3.10 y). In the long-term follow-up group, 199 (53.8%) patients had a median of 4 visits (IQR 3–5), with a median follow-up time of 5.2 years (IQR 4.5–7.14 y).

BZ treatment was achieved in 84% (300/357) of the patients involved. Cutaneous symptoms accounted for the major cause of treatment discontinuation.

During the study period, only 8 patients (2.2%) were considered as treatment failure after testing positive for least one T.cruzi real-time PCR. A flow diagram of the included patients is shown in Fig 1.

Half of the failure patients had undergone a short-term follow-up (4/171, 2.3%) while the other half had been monitored during a longer period (4/199, 2%). Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of reported failure patients are summarized in Fig 2.

Five patients were followed after the detection of treatment failure. In three of them (cases 1, 3, and 4), post-treatment parasitemia was detected in several determinations intermittently. In the other two cases (cases 2 and 8), sustained real-time PCR positive result was recorded. The chronogram of real-time PCR follow-up in patients with treatment failure is represented in Fig 3.

Case 1 was included in the Chagasazol clinical trial (CHAGASAZOL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01162967). Patient was randomized into the low-dose posaconazole arm (100 mg twice daily), with parasitemia being detected one year after treatment with posaconazole (11). A second treatment with BZ was administered. Unfortunately, two years after BZ treatment, parasitemia was detected once again. Patient is currently undergoing treatment with Nifurtimox.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Flow diagram of the real- time PCR during follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008067.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with treatment failure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008067.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Chronogram of real- time PCR follow-ups in patients with treatment failure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008067.g003

Four failure patients (4/300, 1.3%) had completed correct treatment with BZ, while the remaining ones had an uncompleted treatment (4/57, 7%). Statistical difference was significant between both groups (p = 0.02).

Two hundred and seventy-five patients were monitored during follow-up with serology and real-time PCR simultaneously. Negative serology was only detected in 4 of those patients (4/275, 1.5%). No patient who tested positive for post-treatment parasitaemia showed negative serology during follow-up.

Discussion

This study shows the results of 370 cases of treated chronic CD patients monitored with T. cruzi DNA detection by real-time PCR as a surrogate biomarker of treatment failure. Epidemiological and clinical features of our population were similar to other studies previously performed outside of the endemic area [19].

Real-time PCR was performed before the initiation of treatment in all patients, resulting positive in 40% of those individuals. Similar rates of positivity have been previously reported for untreated CD chronic patients outside of endemic areas [20–21]. Moreover, PCR sensitivity reported in several studies performed in Latin America achieved results higher than 60% in chronic patients [22]. The use of different PCR protocols; the likelihood of re-infection episodes; or parasitological factors such as heterogeneous distribution of different strains could explain this difference.

In our study case, only 2.1% of CD-treated patients had a positive real-time PCR result after BZ treatment. More than half of our patients had four-year follow-ups with regular clinical visits, strengthening our data. Similar results were observed in other study performed in Spain, where the positivity rate was 3.3% with a follow-up period of seven years [23].

Like pre-treatment PCR sensitivity data, our results show lower positivity rates after treatment in comparison to those of studies performed in endemic areas, with figures between 6% and 30% [24]. In two specific clinical trials carried out in Latin America, the level of failure reached was 46% in cardiopathy patients and 39.6% in children. In spite of this, the rate of failure results higher in the placebo group in both clinical trial [25–26].

It is known that the possibility for parasitemia detection after treatment increases over time. During treatment or even up to one year later, parasite clearance can reach to 100% [21]. However, after this early parasitemia decrease, an increase in real-time PCR could be detected over time [16]. Half of our patients had a positive real-time PCR result after four years, underscoring the importance of a long-term follow-up. An important difference was noted between patients treated with ergosterol inhibitors such as Posaconazole or E-1224, a ravuconazole prodrug. Some clinical trials performed with these promising drugs recorded failure rates around 90% for both posaconazole and E-1224 after a one-year follow-up [11–13]. Real-time PCR can thereby be also used to discard non-effective drugs in short-term follow-up.

Fifty-six percent of our patients had at least three clinical controls including real-time PCR in the follow-up. As real-time PCR is not a dynamic measure and only provides sampling information, serial monitoring increases the likelihood of detecting parasitemia. However, a sustained negative result of real-time PCR cannot discard failure over time.

Three failure patients presented with a negative real-time PCR result before treatment. This fact, could suggest that a pre-treatment negative real-time PCR result is not a good predictor of favorable response to treatment, mainly in areas with lower baseline PCR positive. However, in data reported by Torrico et al, patients with lower parasitic loads were more prone to present negative PCR after treatment [13].

These data are consistent with the low percentage of failures detected in our series, since all the patients presented high Ct. Nevertheless, this fact would not explain the cases of failure in patients with negative pre-treatment real-time PCR.

In our cohort, 16% of patients under BZ treatment were stopped due to adverse events. This result is similar to the 12.7% previously reported [27]. When considering the subgroup of patients who did not complete treatment, the rate of treatment failure increases from 2.2% to 7%: the difference is statistically significant with respect to the group of patients who did complete treatment. This data is in accordance with that reported in the cohort of Murcia et al [23]. In contrast, 20% of 81 Argentinean patients who discontinued BZ treatment showed a negative serology in a separate study [28].

Other factors could explain the treatment’s failure. The natural resistance of T. cruzi strains to the two drugs used to treat Chagas disease are known [29], as well as the pharmacokinetics of BZ in organic fluids, which may hinder a correct tissue biodistribution [30–31].

Some clinical trials are being performed using short dosage or duration of BZ therapy, or even intermittent treatment [32]. Optimizing BZ scheme in monotherapy or in combination with other antitrypanosomal drugs is one of the main goals in the current research surrounding chronic CD after the failure of ergosterol inhibitors.

In our cohort, only four patients (1%) achieved anti-T.cruzi antibody clearance during follow-up. Serological response monitoring can be useful to detect the proneness of antibodies to disappear. A good response to treatment could be considered when a sustained negative PCR result is detected and a decrease in antibody level is observed [23].

Clinical procedures and other treatment regimens after BZ failure are unclear; it poses as a challenge in the clinical management of these patients.

This study has some limitations. First of all, due to the retrospective nature of this study, clinical follow-ups were not regular. However, the use of real clinical practice data was an advantage in evaluating treatment efficiency. Real-time PCR protocol and serology test were changed during the study, but all controls and comparative studies reflected good correlation. Finally, the median time of follow-up is four years; a longer follow-up is needed to strengthen our findings.

Conclusions

Currently, BZ is the most effective drug in treating chronic CD, with real-time PCR being the optimal surrogate marker for monitoring treatment failure over time. In our experience, regular testing with real-time PCR during follow-up allows clinicians to detect parasitemia both easily and early, and show treatment failure. Despite the four years of follow-ups, BZ treatment failure was infrequent in our cohort. Parasitemia was primarily detected years after treatment; BZ discontinuation is a risk factor of failure.

Important efforts should be undertaken in order to find both optimal CD treatment schemes with good effectiveness and fewer adverse effects, and better cure markers.

Acknowledgments

We thank Luis Perez for his assistance with the English syntax and language of the manuscript, as well as Pilar Alcubilla for her technical assistance.

Citation: Sulleiro E, Silgado A, Serre-Delcor N, Salvador F, Tavares de Oliveira M, Moure Z, et al. (2020) Usefulness of real-time PCR during follow-up of patients treated with Benznidazole for chronic Chagas disease: Experience in two referral centers in Barcelona. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(2): e0008067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008067

References

1. Hotez PJ, Molyneux DH, Fenwick A, Kumaresan J, Ehrlich Sachs S, Sachs JD, et al. Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol. 357, N Engl J Med. 2007.

2. WHO. https://www.who.int/chagas/epidemiology/en/.

3. Monge-Maillo B L Opez-V Elez R. Challenges in the management of Chagas disease in Latin-American migrants in Europe. 2017;

4. Schmunis GA, Yadon ZE. Chagas disease: A Latin American health problem becoming a world health problem. Acta Trop. 2010;115(1–2):14–21. pmid:19932071

5. Pérez-Molina J, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2018; 391:82–94. pmid:28673423

6. World Health Organization. CONTROL OF CHAGAS DISEASE Second report of the WHO Expert Committee World Health Organization. W H O T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t S e r i e s. 2002;905:1–109.

7. Coura JR. Present situation and new strategies for chagas disease chemotherapy—A proposal. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(4):549–54. pmid:19722074

8. Guedes PMM, Silva GK, Gutierrez FRS, Silva JS. Current status of Chagas disease chemotherapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011; 9(5):609–20. pmid:21609270

9. Murcia L, Carrilero B, Munoz-Davila MJ, Thomas MC, López MC, Segovia M. Risk factors and primary prevention of congenital chagas disease in a nonendemic country. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 56(4):496–502. pmid:23097582

10. Urbina JA. Specific chemotherapy of Chagas disease: Relevance, current limitations and new approaches. Acta Trop. 2010;115:55–68. pmid:19900395

11. Molina I, Gómez i Prat J, Salvador F, Treviño B, Sulleiro E, Serre N, et al. Randomized Trial of Posaconazole and Benznidazole for Chronic Chagas’ Disease. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(20):1899–908. pmid:24827034

12. Morillo CA, Waskin H, Sosa-Estani S, del Carmen Bangher M, Cuneo C, Milesi R, et al. Benznidazole and Posaconazole in Eliminating Parasites in Asymptomatic T. cruzi Carriers: The STOP-CHAGAS Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(8):939–47. pmid:28231946

13. Torrico F, Gascon J, Ortiz L, Alonso-Vega C, Pinazo MJ, Schijman A, et al. Treatment of adult chronic indeterminate Chagas disease with benznidazole and three E1224 dosing regimens: a proof-of-concept, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(4):419–30. pmid:29352704

14. Gomes YM, Lorena V, Luquetti AO. Diagnosis of Chagas disease: what has been achieved? What remains to be done with regard to diagnosis and follow up studies? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:115–121. pmid:19753466

15. Britto CC. Usefulness of PCR-based assays to assess drug efficacy in Chagas disease chemotherapy: Value and limitations. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(SUPPL. 1):122–35.

16. Sguassero Y, Cuesta CB, Roberts KN, Hicks E, Comandé D, Ciapponi A, et al. Course of Chronic Trypanosoma cruzi Infection after Treatment Based on Parasitological and Serological Tests: A Systematic Review of Follow-Up Studies. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(10)

17. Villar JC, Villar LA, Marin-Neto JA, Ebrahim S, Yusuf S. Trypanocidal drugs for chronic asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(5).

18. Piron M, Fisa R, Casamitjana N, López-Chejade P, Puig L, Vergés M, et al. Development of a real-time PCR assay for Trypanosoma cruzi detection in blood samples. Acta Trop. 2007;103(3):195–200. pmid:17662227

19. Salvador F, Treviño B, Sulleiro E, Pou D, Sánchez-Montalvá A, Cabezos J, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a non-endemic country: Epidemiological and clinical profile. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(7):706–12. pmid:24329884

20. Muñoz J, Prat JG i., Gállego M, Gimeno F, Treviño B, López-Chejade P, et al. Clinical profile of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a non-endemic setting: Immigration and Chagas disease in Barcelona (Spain). Acta Trop. 2009;111(1):51–5. pmid:19426663

21. Murcia L, Carrilero B, Muñoz MJ, Iborra MA, Segovia M. Usefulness of PCR for monitoring benznidazole response in patients with chronic Chagas’ disease: A prospective study in a non-disease-endemic country. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(8):1759–64. pmid:20542903

22. Schijman AG. Molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop [Internet]. 2018;184:59–66. Available from: pmid:29476727

23. Murcia L, Carrilero B, Ferrer F, Roig M, Franco F, Segovia M. Success of benznidazole chemotherapy in chronic Trypanosoma cruzi-infected patients with a sustained negative PCR result. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(11):1819–27. pmid:27488437

24. Chatelain E. Chagas disease research and development: Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Comput Struct Biotechnol J [Internet]. 2017;15:98–103. Available from: pmid:28066534

25. Moreira OC, Ramírez JD, Velázquez E, Melo MFAD, Lima-Ferreira C, Guhl F, et al. Towards the establishment of a consensus real-time qPCR to monitor Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia in patients with chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy: A substudy from the BENEFIT trial. Acta Trop. 2013;125(1):23–31. pmid:22982466

26. Galvão LMC, Chiari E, Macedo AM, Luquetti AO, Silva SA, Lúcia A, et al. PCR Assay for Monitoring Trypanosoma cruzi Parasitemia in Childhood after Specific Chemotherapy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):5066–70. pmid:14605140

27. Molina I, Salvador F, Sánchez-Montalvá A, Treviño B, Serre N, Avilés AS, et al. Toxic Profile of Benznidazole in Patients with Chronic Chagas Disease: Risk Factors and Comparison of the Product from Two Different Manufacturers. 2015;

28. Alvarez MG, Vigliano C, Lococo B, Petti M, Bertocchi G, Viotti R. Seronegative conversion after incomplete benznidazole treatment in chronic Chagas disease. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;106(10):636–8. pmid:22898619

29. Filardi LS, Brener Z. A rapid method for testing in vivo the susceptibility of different strains of Trypanosoma cruzi to active chemotherapeutic agents. Vol. 79, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1984. p. 221–5. pmid:6443014

30. Da Silva RM, Oliveira LT, Barcellos NMS, De Souza J, De Lana M. Preclinical monitoring of drug association in experimental chemotherapy of Chagas’ disease by a new HPLC-UV method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(6):3344–8. pmid:22450981

31. Davanço MG, Campos ML, Rosa TA, Padilha EC, Alzate AH, Rolim LA, et al. Benznidazole Extended-Release tablets for improved treatment of chagas disease: Preclinical pharmacokinetic study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(4):2492–8. pmid:26883698

32. Álvarez MG, Hernández Y, Bertocchi G, Fernández M, Lococo B, Ramírez JC, et al. New scheme of intermittent benznidazole administration in patients chronically infected with Trypanosoma cruzi: A pilot short-term follow-up study with adult patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(2):833–7. pmid:26596935