Octopamine neuron dependent aggression requires dVGLUT from dual-transmitting neurons

Abstract

Neuromodulators such as monoamines are often expressed in neurons that also release at least one fast-acting neurotransmitter. The release of a combination of transmitters provides both “classical” and “modulatory” signals that could produce diverse and/or complementary effects in associated circuits. Here, we establish that the majority of Drosophila octopamine (OA) neurons are also glutamatergic and identify the individual contributions of each neurotransmitter on sex-specific behaviors. Males without OA display low levels of aggression and high levels of inter-male courtship. Males deficient for dVGLUT solely in OA-glutamate neurons (OGNs) also exhibit a reduction in aggression, but without a concurrent increase in inter-male courtship. Within OGNs, a portion of VMAT and dVGLUT puncta differ in localization suggesting spatial differences in OA signaling. Our findings establish a previously undetermined role for dVGLUT in OA neurons and suggests that glutamate uncouples aggression from OA-dependent courtship-related behavior. These results indicate that dual neurotransmission can increase the efficacy of individual neurotransmitters while maintaining unique functions within a multi-functional social behavior neuronal network.

About the Authors:

Lewis M. Sherer

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

Affiliation: Cellular, Molecular and Microbial Biology Graduate Program, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5875-1737

Elizabeth Catudio Garrett

Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

Affiliation: Cellular, Molecular and Microbial Biology Graduate Program, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5210-2688

Hannah R. Morgan

Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

Affiliation: Division of Biological Sciences, Center for Structural and Functional Neuroscience, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1370-9444

Edmond D. Brewer

Roles Data curation

Affiliation: Division of Biological Sciences, Center for Structural and Functional Neuroscience, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9761-0806

Lucy A. Sirrs

Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

Affiliation: Division of Biological Sciences, Center for Structural and Functional Neuroscience, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-3062

Harold K. Shearin

Roles Resources

Affiliation: Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-8807

Jessica L. Williams

Roles Resources

Affiliation: Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6924-7982

Brian D. McCabe

Roles Resources

Affiliation: Brain Mind Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-0501

R. Steven Stowers

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America

Sarah J. Certel

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Cellular, Molecular and Microbial Biology Graduate Program, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America, Division of Biological Sciences, Center for Structural and Functional Neuroscience, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-2657

Introduction

The classical view of information transfer for many decades was that each neuron released a single neurotransmitter, leading to the ‘one neuron, one transmitter’ hypothesis [1], formalized by John Eccles as Dale’s Principle [2]. Dale himself, however, recognized the possibility that neurons can release more than one molecule [3] and indeed, research from multiple systems and neuronal populations have established that many if not most, neurons release more than one neurotransmitter [4–7]. Dual neurotransmission has the potential to transform the way we consider the computation and transmission of information by neurons, circuits and networks. Presynaptically, the release of two neurotransmitters could impact information transfer by several mechanisms that are not mutually exclusive including; attenuating signals by modulating presynaptic autoreceptors, transmitting spatially distinct signals by segregating specific vesicle populations to different axon terminals, or conveying similar information through the release of both neurotransmitters from the same synaptic vesicle [8–11]. In addition, one vesicular neurotransmitter transporter can increase the packaging of the other neurotransmitter into the same synaptic vesicle (SV), a process called vesicular synergy [4, 12, 13]. At post-synaptic targets, the release of two transmitters can enhance the strength of the same signal and/or convey unique signals through spatially-restricted receptor expression and second messenger cascades [7, 14]. While recent studies have provided insight into these phenomena at the cellular level [11, 12, 15, 16], the behavioral relevance of co-transmission in normal as well as pathological conditions is an area of considerable complexity and interest.

The genetic tools of Drosophila provide the ability to genetically dissect the signaling properties of dual transmission on behavioral networks in general and upon the circuits that control aggression in particular. Aggression is a hardwired behavior that has evolved in the framework of defending or obtaining resources [17, 18]. Monoamines such as serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE) and octopamine (OA), the invertebrate homologue of NE, have powerful modulatory effects on aggression in systems ranging from insects and crustaceans to humans [19–23]. In humans, aggressive behavior can be expressed at extreme levels and out of context due to medical, neurologic and or psychiatric disorders including depression and schizophrenia [24–26]. Pharmacological agents that selectively manipulate monoamine signaling are used to treat anxiety and depression, yet these drugs are often ineffective, and in the case of serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) can induce side effects including increased aggression and impulsivity [25, 27–29].

At least two difficulties arise in targeting monoamines to achieve successful outcomes. First, monoamines can be released from synaptic vesicles (SVs) into the presynaptic cleft and by extrasynaptic release from large dense core vesicles (LDCVs) [30–33]. Thus, monoamines are recognized both as neurotransmitters and as neuromodulators that signal via diffusion [34, 35]. The second difficulty is that their effects are likely exerted through interactions with neuropeptides (neuropeptide Y and oxytocin are two examples) and with neurotransmitters including GABA and glutamate [5, 14, 36, 37]. Due in part to recent studies suggesting the expression of vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUTs) can be altered by psychiatric medications [38–41] and the importance of dopamine neuron glutamate co-transmission on the schizophrenia resilience phenotype in mice [42], we generated new tools to identify and manipulate glutamate function in monoamine-expressing neurons.

We found that the majority of OA neurons within the Drosophila nervous system also express the vesicular neurotransmitter transporter for glutamate (dVGlut). Functionally, glutamate (GLU) co-expression could convey the same information by promoting the synaptic vesicle packing of OA or GLU may convey distinct information that is separate from the function of OA. In Drosophila, OA synthesis and release are essential for conserved social behaviors; males without OA display low levels of aggression and high levels of inter-male courtship [43–47]. We demonstrate that males deficient for dVGLUT solely in OA-glutamate neurons (OGNs) also exhibit a reduction in aggression, but without a concurrent increase in inter-male courtship. These results indicate both OA and dVGLUT are required in dual-transmitting neurons to promote aggression. However, only OA is required for the suppression of inter-male courtship and thus the function of dVGLUT in OGNs is not limited to vesicular synergy.

To ask if the separable effects of OA on courtship circuitry may be attributable to spatially distinct OA signals, we conditionally expressed a new epitope-tagged version of the Drosophila vesicular neurotransmitter transporter for monoamines (V5-tagged VMAT) in OGNs. While the majority of V5-VMAT and dVGLUT expression colocalize, VMAT is detected in distinct puncta without dVGLUT suggesting the possibility of separable signal transmission. Together, these results demonstrate the complex behavior of aggression requires both dVGLUT and OA in dual-transmitting neurons and suggests within monoamine neurons, GLU may provide a therapeutic target to modulate aggression in pathological conditions.

Results

dVGLUT is co-expressed in OA neurons

The co-expression of vesicular neurotransmitter transporters has been primarily used to identify dual-transmitting neurons[48–52]. To examine glutamatergic transmitter expression, we generated a monoclonal dVGLUT antibody and validated its specificity using a new dVGlut allele, dVGlutSS1. In homozygous dVGlutSS1 progeny, dVGLUT protein is not detectable (S1 Fig, Methods), thus demonstrating the specificity of the dVGLUT antibody. As dVGLUT expression is widespread and mainly found in synaptic terminals (S1 Fig), we used the Gal4-UAS system to identify monoamine neurons that express GLU. In this study, we focused specifically on OA neurons that co-express dVGLUT (OA-glutamate neurons (OGNs)).

Cell bodies of OGNs were visualized by a UAS-dsRed.NLS reporter under control of dVGlut-gal4 (hereafter referred to as dVGlut>dsRed). OGNs were identified by antibodies to tyrosine decarboxylase 2 (TDC2) and tyramine β-hydroxylase (TβH) as OA is synthesized from the amino acid tyrosine via the action of Tdc and Tβh in invertebrates [46]. OGNs from 10 dVGlut>dsRed Tdc2-labeled male brains were quantified by the multi-point ImageJ tool followed by manual verification of each optical section. Within the brain, OA neurons that co-express glutamate are found in the subesophageal zone (SEZ), the periesophageal neuropils (PENP), the anterior (ASMP) and posterior superior medial protocerebrum (PSMP), and the protocerebral bridge (Fig 1A–1E, S1 Table). Co-expression occurs in each region of interest (Fig 1A–1E). Tβh and dVGlut>dsRed co-localization (S2 Fig) provides further support that glutamate is found in OA-expressing neurons.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. OA neurons co-express glutamate.

(A) OA-glutamate co-expression in a dVGlut>dsRed male brain labeled with anti-Tdc2 (green). Anti-brp (nc82, blue) labels the neuropil. Scale bar = 10 μm. (B-B’) Dorsal (B) and ventral (B’) confocal sections of neurons co-expressing OA and dVGlut in the SEZ. Non-dVGlut positive neurons are indicated (B inset, arrowhead). (B”) Quantification of OGN SEZ co-expression. (C-C’) OGNs in the PENP and quantification. (D-D’) dVGlut>dsRed neurons expressing Tdc2 in the ASMP and quantification. (E-E’) Neurons co-expressing OA and glutamate in the PSMP and quantification. Scale bar = 20 μm for panels B-E.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g001

In the adult ventral nervous system (VNS), the thoracic Tdc2+ neurons that innervate skeletal muscles express glutamate (S3 Fig). In the abdominal ganglia, all but 2–3 Tdc2+ neurons express dVGlut (S3 Fig) consistent with the previous finding of OA-glutamate co-expression in abdominal neurons [53]. After detecting no reporter expression from a Tβh-gal4 driver, dVGLUT cell body expression in OGNs was detected in brains from tdc2-gal4;UAS-dsRed adults (S4 Fig). In total, this analysis reveals that of the ~100 OA neurons in the Drosophila adult nervous system, about 70% express dVGLUT.

dVGLUT is not required for OA neuron identity

To reduce glutamate function solely in OGNs, a UAS-driven inverted repeat transgene targeting dVGlut (UAS-dVGlut-RNAi) was expressed under control of the tdc2-gal4 driver (hereafter tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi) (Fig 2A and 2B). The effectiveness of this UAS-dVGlut-RNAi line has been verified at the transcript level through RT-qPCR ([12] and S5 Fig) and functionally as the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic potentials (mEPSP) were reduced by this dVGlut RNAi in presynaptic glutamatergic larval motor neurons [12]. As the loss of VGLUT2 in vertebrate dopamine-glutamate dual transmitting neurons impairs survival and differentiation in vitro [49, 54], we examined OGNs in tdc2>dsRed>dVGlut-RNAi adults and did not observe obvious changes in OGN survival nor distribution (S5 Fig). In addition, OGN neurotransmitter differentiation was retained as tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi>dsRed neurons express Tdc2 (S5 Fig). Neurons labeled by this tdc2-gal4 whether in the brain or VNS are all Tdc2+ (S6A and S6B Fig).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Male aggression requires dVGLUT function in OGNs.

(A) dVGLUT reduction in OGNs through RNAi. (B) Behaviors for control and experimental male pairs were scored for thirty minutes beginning with the first lunge. (C) Schematic illustrating the brain and VNS OGNs. (D) Latency to lunge increased in tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males (all statistical tests are Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). (E) tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males displayed a decrease in the average number of lunges. (F) Wing threats were reduced in tdc2-dVGlut-RNAi males. (G) tdc2-dVGlut-RNAi males did not exhibit inter-male courtship (unilateral wing extensions = UWE). (H) Schematic illustrating the addition of tsh>Gal80 limits dVGLUT reduction to brain OGNs. (I) Latency to lunge by tdc2-gal4/tsh>Gal80;UAS-dVGlut-RNAi males is significantly longer than controls. (J) Lunge number by tdc2-gal4/tsh>Gal80;UAS-dVGlut-RNAi males decreases as compared to controls. (K) Wing threat number was rescued to UAS-dVGlut-RNAi control levels. (L) Male-male UWE was rescued to control levels. N values for each genotype, panels D, I. Error bars denote s.e.m.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g002

Reducing glutamate in OGNs decreases male aggression and inter-male courtship

We and others previously demonstrated OA is required for two distinct social male behaviors; the promotion of aggression, and the inhibition of intermale courtship [43, 46, 55, 56]. To address whether dVGLUT performs a related or separable role in these OA-dependent behaviors, we quantified changes in aggression and intermale courtship. Fights between pairs of tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males, and transgenic controls were recorded and multiple agonistic parameters quantified including: latency to the first lunge, number of lunges, and number of agonistic wing threats (Fig 2A, [57, 58]). As behavioral patterns are scored for 30 minutes after the first lunge, each male pair has the same amount of time to exhibit aggressive events or inter-male courtship (Fig 2B).

Males with decreased dVGLUT in OGNs neurons exhibited a significant reduction in aggression as measured by lower numbers of lunges and wing threats, and an increase in the latency to initiate aggression (Fig 2D–2F). These aggression deficits are the same as in males that lack OA [43, 46, 47]. Importantly, the locomotor activity of tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi adults during the aggression assay did not differ from dVGlut-RNAi controls (S7A Fig).

Interactions between control male pairings within a fight can include low levels of intermale courtship as measured by unilateral wing extensions (UWE, the courtship song motor pattern). Males without OA exhibit high levels of inter-male courtship[43, 55, 56] and previously, we determined the function of three OA-FruM+ neurons is required to suppress intermale courtship [55]. If dVGLUT is only needed to enhance monoamine vesicular packaging and thus modulate OA function, we would expect males with reduced dVGlut levels to display the same behavioral deficits, i.e. high levels of inter-male courtship. However, tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males did not exhibit inter-male courtship (Fig 2G). These results suggest; 1) dVGLUT is required in OGNs to promote aggression, and 2) dVGLUT is not required to suppress inter-male courtship.

Aggression requires dVGLUT function in OA-GLU brain neurons

In the adult, motor neurons innervating leg and wing muscles express glutamate [59]. Therefore, the observed behavioral deficits in tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males may reflect impairments at the neuromuscular junction. To address this possibility, we spatially restricted expression of the dVGlut-RNAi transgene to the brain using the teashirt-lexA 8xlexAop2-IVS-Gal80 (hereafter tsh>Gal80) transgenic combination (Fig 2H). The tsh>Gal80 transgenic combination was effective at blocking Gal4-mediated transcription in the entire VNS including in OGNs that innervate muscles required for courtship and wing threat behaviors (S8 Fig).

With dVGlut function maintained in motor neurons, it was possible all aggressive behaviors would return to control levels. However, latency to initiate aggression remained longer in males with reduced dVGLUT in brain OGNs (tdc2>tsh>Gal80>dVGlut-RNAi) and lunge number remained lower when compared to controls (Fig 2I and 2J). Wing threat numbers were at levels lower than one control (Fig 2K) which likely reflects the incompleteness of dVGlut RNAi interference. In contrast, providing dVGLUT function in OGN VNS neurons restored intermale courtship to control levels (Fig 2L). Although total behavioral events by experimental males (lunges, wing threats, intermale courtship) per minute decreased, overall activity did not (S7 Fig) nor did male-female courtship (Fig 3). These results indicating GLU transport in brain OGNs is required to initiate aggression and for the lunge pattern itself may reflect deficits in the detection of male pheromones as we previously described for OA [43]. Specifically, the suppression of intermale courtship requires the function of three OA-FruM+ neurons located in the brain [55] and, aggression requires pheromonal information from Gr32a-expressing chemosensory neurons located in the mouth to OA SEZ neurons [43].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. dVGLUT function is required in VNS OGNs for male-female courtship.

(A) Male (arrow) to female courtship. (B) Schematic illustrating the addition of tsh>Gal80 limits dVGLUT reduction to brain OGNs. (C-F) All parameters of male to female courtship were rescued by restoring glutamate function to OGNs within the VNC. (C) The latency to initiate courtship towards a female returned to control levels in males with reduced dVGLUT in brain OGNs. (D) The courtship index was restored to control levels in tdc2-gal4/tsh>Gal80;dVGlut-RNAi males. (E) tdc2-gal4/tsh>Gal80;dVGlut-RNAi males exhibited the same latency to copulation as controls. (F) The copulation success of males with a dVGLUT reduction in brain OGNs was not significantly different from controls. N values for each genotype located on panel A. All statistical tests are Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g003

Finally, males with reduced dVGLUT in brain OGNs (tdc2>tsh>Gal80>dVGlut-RNAi) performed all measured male-female courtship parameters including latency to court, courtship index, latency to copulation and copulation success at levels indistinguishable from controls (Fig 3). Together, these results indicate dVGlut in OGNs is required in males both for aggression and courtship toward a female and at the behavioral level, the functional requirement for dVGLUT in OGN motor neurons vs. central brain neurons is spatially separable.

Removal of glutamate in OGNs using the B3RT-vGlut conditional allele

The experiments above used two different approaches to reduce neurotransmitter levels, but not eliminate dVGLUT. To completely remove glutamate transporter function in OGNs, a conditional allele of dVGlut, B3RT-dVGlut-LexA (hereafter B3RT-dVGlut), was developed via genome editing. Genome edits to the dVGlut locus included flanking the dVGlut coding exons with B3 recombination target sites (B3RTs) [60] in the same orientation and inserting the coding sequences of the LexA transcription factor immediately downstream of the 3’ B3RT (Fig 4A). With B3RT-dVGlut, glutamate function can be temporally and spatially controlled using Gal4 drivers of interest to express the B3 recombinase that in turn catalyzes the in vivo excision of DNA between the B3RTs (Fig 4B). Two outcomes result after B3 recombinase-mediated excision; 1) a dVGlut null allele is generated solely in the neurons of interest, and 2) a dVGlut-LexA driver is created that allows visualization of glutamatergic neurons when a LexAop reporter is present.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. B3-mediated elimination of dVGLUT in OGNs reduces male aggression.

(A,B) Schematic of the B3RT-dVGlut-LexA conditional allele. B3RTs flank dVGlut coding exons (A) and excise the entire dVGlut coding sequence in a specific subset of neurons upon expression of the B3 recombinase (B). After excision, a dVGlut null loss-of-function allele and dVGlut-LexA driver is created (B). (C) Control brain demonstrating without a source of Gal4-driven B3 recombinase, excision and therefore LexA expression does not occur. (D-D’) tdc2-gal4 driven B3 recombinase-mediated excision effectively removes dVGlut resulting in B3RT-LexA-driven mCherry expression is in the majority of OA neurons (yellow). As expected, a few Tdc2+ neurons do not express dVGLUT (arrowhead, green). LexAop reporter expression that does not also show UAS expression may be observed as a result of excisions that occurred during development in former Tdc2+ neurons. (E) Latency to lunge increased in males lacking dVGLUT function (B3RT-dVGlut tsh>Gal80/dVGlutSS1;UAS-B3) in OGNs. (F) Males without dVGLUT function lunged significantly less when compared to controls. (G) Wing threat number decreased in experimental males. (H) No significant differences in male-male courtship. (I) Aggression is significantly reduced by the complete loss of dVGLUT in OGNs as compared to the RNAi-based dVGLUT reduction. All statistical tests are Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Error bars denote s.e.m. N values for each genotype, panel E.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g004

To assess the functionality of dVGlut within the B3RT-dVGlut chromosome pre- and post-excision, the B3RT-dVGlut chromosome was crossed with the null allele, dVGlutSS1 (S1 Fig). In the absence of a Gal4 driver, vGlutSS1/B3RT-vGlut progeny are fully viable and no LexAop-driven reporter gene expression is detected (Fig 4C). In contrast, when B3 recombinase (UAS-B3) is expressed in the nervous system by the pan-neuronal driver, n-syb-Gal4, dVGLUT expression is eliminated and vGlutSS1/B3RT-dVGlut;UAS-B3/n-syb-Gal4 progeny are inviable (data not shown). These results establish that the B3RT-dVGlut genome edits preserve dVGLUT function prior to excision, but after excision, as expected with removal of the entire dVGLUT protein-coding sequence, a dVGlut null allele is generated.

To verify the functionality of the B3RT-dVGlut chromosome in Tdc2+ neurons, we crossed tdc2-gal4 with B3RT-dVGlut;UAS-B3. Following B3-mediated excision in Tdc2+ neurons, the resulting dVGlut-lexA driver is active in OGNs demonstrating the dVGlut coding region was removed. The excision of dVGlut and substitution with LexA in the adult nervous system was confirmed by co-localization of nuclear markers (Fig 4D and 4D’). This result provides additional confirmation the majority of Tdc2+ neurons are glutamatergic. In addition, nuclear reporters were used to confirm the loss of dVGLUT does not obviously alter OGN differentiation (S9 Fig).

To completely remove dVGLUT function, we used the dVGlutSS1 null allele in combination with the B3RT-dVGlut conditional null allele. Due to the requirements for GLU in OA-GLU motor neurons, we crossed the tsh>Gal80 transgenes onto the B3RT-dVGlut chromosome. Males with homozygous null dVGlut mutations in brain OGNs were generated by driving B3 recombinase with tdc2-gal4 (dVGlutSS1/B3RT-dVGlut tsh>Gal80;UAS-B3/tdc2-gal4). As expected, the complete loss of GLU in brain OGNs reduced male aggression. Specifically, the latency to initiate aggression increased, and lunge numbers decreased (Fig 4E and 4F). Not unexpectedly, the complete elimination of dVGLUT function resulted in aggression deficits significantly worse when compared to the RNAi approach (Fig 4I) including now a reduction in wing threat number (Fig 4G) which demonstrates an advantage in using the conditional null B3RT-dVGlut allele. Finally, and significantly, the number of inter-male wing extensions did not differ from controls (Fig 4H) nor from males with a reduction of dVGlut in brain OGNs (Fig 2K). In summation, the dVGlutSS1/B3RT-dVGlut null combination elegantly and independently validates the aggression phenotypes based on dVGlut RNAi-based reduction, demonstrates the applicability of a powerful new conditional genetic tool, and confirms that dVGLUT function in OGNs is not required to regulate intermale courtship.

Reducing GLU by EAAT1 overexpression recapitulates the decrease in aggression

At this point, GLU function within OGNs has been altered by reducing glutamate transport into synaptic vesicles. Whether the aggression phenotypes of OGN dVGLUT mutant males are due to deficits in the concentration of GLU into synaptic vesicles, the packaging of OA, or a reduction of released GLU is not clear. After release, glutamate is rapidly removed from synapses by excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) [61, 62]. Therefore, to reduce GLU signaling after release, we increased expression of the only high-affinity glutamate transporter in Drosophila, EAAT1 (Fig 5A) [63, 64].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. Reducing glutamate function through EAAT1 overexpression decreases male aggression.

(A) Glutamate function was reduced by increasing EAAT1 expression in EAAT1-expressing glia. (B, C) GFP-expressing EAAT1 glia (hs-flp; EAAT1-gal4/UAS>stop>CD8:GFP) enwrap Tdc2+ neuron cell bodies (arrowhead) and endings (arrow). Higher magnification of dashed box in C. Scale bar = 30 um. (D) The latency to lunge by EAAT1>Eaat1 males was increased as compared to controls. (E) A decrease in lunge number was exhibited by EAAT1>Eaat1 males as compared to controls. (F) Locomotor activity during the aggression assay did not differ. All statistical tests are Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests. N values for each genotype are in panel D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g005

EAAT1 is expressed in glia throughout the nervous system [64]. By examining 2–10 individual EAAT1-GFP clones in ~40 brains, we determined OGN neuronal cell bodies and arborizations are consistently enmeshed by EAAT1-expressing glia (Fig 5B and 5C). To reduce glutamate signaling after release, EAAT1 expression was increased via a transgene (EAAT1-gal4;UAS-EAAT1). While a loss of EAAT1 impairs larval movement [65], overexpression of EAAT1 has been used in adult long-term memory formation assays which requires locomotion [66]. Similar to the dVGLUT loss-of-function results above, the aggressive behavior of males with reduced GLU signaling by EAAT1 overexpression (EAAT1-gal4;UAS-EAAT1) was altered in two parameters: the latency to initiate lunging increased and lunge number decreased (Fig 5D and 5E). Locomotor activity during the aggression assay did not differ (Fig 5F). Although future experiments will be needed to determine if the promotion of aggression requires dVGLUT packaging of OA in synaptic vesicles and OGN glutamate signaling to downstream targets, results from this section support the hypothesis that OGN-mediated aggression requires GLU.

OA and Glu signal to a shared aggression-promoting circuit

If Glu and OA convey signals to separable aggression-promoting circuits, a loss of both neurotransmitters would reduce aggression greater than the loss of either alone (Fig 6A). If, however, Glu and OA signal to a shared circuit or circuits that converge, a loss of both transmitters would reduce aggression to the same levels as the loss of one alone. To address this question, we incorporated the previously described null allele TβhnM18 [67] and generated TβhnM18;tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males. Additive deficits did not occur when males without OA and dVGLUT in OGNs were compared to males lacking only OA (Fig 6B–6D) indicating that both signals, at least partially, converge onto a shared aggression-promoting pathway.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 6. OA and Glu signal to a shared aggression-promoting circuit.

(A) OGNs could signal to separate aggression-promoting circuits (resulting in aggression deficits greater than the single mutant) or to a shared or converged circuit. (B-E) dVGlut was reduced in OGNs of TβhM18 males (TβhM18;tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi). (B) Latency to lunge increased in TβhM18;tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males compared to the transgenic control but not TβhM18 males. (C) Lunge number by males with reduced dVGLUT and lacking OA was not significantly different than TβhM18 males. (D) TβhM18;tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males displayed lower wing threat numbers compared to the transgenic control but not TβhM18 males. (E) Males with reduced dVGLUT and lacking OA (blue column) displayed an increase in inter-male courtship at levels higher than the control but not significantly different from TβhM18 mutants (green column). All statistical tests are Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Error bars denote s.e.m.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g006

TβhnM18;tdc2>vGlut-RNAi males displayed levels of male-male courtship that are not significantly different from TβhnM18 males (blue column, Fig 6E). This result further supports previously published data that OA is required to suppress intermale courtship [43, 55, 56]. Here, increased levels of inter-male courtship due to the absence of OA supersedes or relieves the lack of UWE due to a reduction in dVGlut function (Fig 2). At this point, it is possible the UWE phenotype occurs via OA-modulated circuitry that involves other neurotransmitters [56] or the actions of OA occur at spatially distinct locations.

Spatial segregation of VMAT and dVGLUT within OGN

To compare localization of the two transporters within OGNs, we generated a conditionally expressible epitope-tagged version of VMAT, RSRT>STOP>RSRT-6XV5-VMAT, via genome editing. RSRT>STOP>RSRT-6XV5-VMAT has two insertions: 1) a STOP cassette between VMAT coding exons 5 and 6 and, 2) six in-frame tandem copies of a V5 epitope tag within exon 8 which is common to both VMAT-A and VMAT-B isoforms (Fig 7A). The effectiveness of the STOP cassette is confirmed by the lack of V5 expression prior to STOP cassette excision by Gal4-driven R recombinase (S11 Fig) and the effectiveness of the epitope multimerization strategy has also been determined [68]. The conditionality of the RSRT>STOP>RSRT-6XV5-VMAT allele permits visualization of VMAT in subsets of neurons at expression levels driven by the endogenous promoter.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 7. Spatial segregation of VMAT and dVGLUT within OGNs.

(A) Schematic of the RSRT>STOP>RSRT-6XV5-VMAT conditional allele. RSRTs flank a STOP cassette inserted between VMAT coding exon 5 and 6. Upon Gal4-driven expression of the R recombinase enzyme, the STOP cassette is excised and V5-tagged VMAT expression under control of the endogenous promoter is expressed. (B) Representative brain showing V5-VMAT expression in OGNs after excision by tdc2-dVGlut-gal4 driven R recombinase. The brain is labeled with anti-V5 (magenta) and mAb dVGLUT (green in panels C,D). Scale bar is 30 μm. (C) Higher magnification of the antennal lobe region showing dVGLUT expression (green) with V5-VMAT (magenta). Scale bar is 10 μm. (D) The region in the dashed box in C showing puncta with dVGLUT and V5-VMAT colocalization (arrowheads) and puncta with only V5-VMAT (arrows). (E) Schematic showing the regions of the brain that are depicted in C and F. (F) Antennal lobe region of a representative brain with a synaptic marker incorporated (UAS-synaptotagmin;HA, tdc2-dVGlut split gal4/UAS-R RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT). The brain is labeled with anti-HA (blue), anti-V5 (magenta), and mAb dVGLUT (green). Scale bar is 20 μm. (G-J”’) Higher magnification of the SEZ region of the AL in F showing dVGLUT expression (green), V5-VMAT (red), and Syt:HA (blue). Arrowheads indicate puncta with dVGLUT, V5-VMAT and Syt:HA and arrows indicate puncta with only V5-VMAT and Syt:HA. The stack for panels C and D contains two optical sections at 0.45 μm. Stacks for panels G-J contain 7 optical sections at 0.5 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g007

To focus on transporter distribution within OGNs, we expressed RSRT>STOP>RSRT-6XV5-VMAT under control of the split Gal4 combination of tdc2-Gal4-AD and dVGlut-Gal4-DBD (tdc2-dVGlut-gal4) which drives expression in OGNs (Fig 7B, S6C–S6F Fig). V5-VMAT was visualized in tdc2-dVGlut-gal4; V5-VMAT UAS-R by an antibody to V5 and dVGLUT using mAb dVGLUT (S10 Fig). Fig 7C illustrates that as expected, a large fraction of the V5-VMAT puncta in the AL or SEZ (S11 Fig) either co-localize with dVGLUT or are in close proximity (arrowheads). High resolution images in Fig 7D and 7H, however, reveal V5-VMAT puncta without dVGLUT (arrows). As OA can be found in SVs as well as LDCVs [69, 70], we incorporated a synaptic marker (UAS-Synaptotagmin (Syt):HA) and re-examined V5-VMAT and dVGLUT expression in the AL and SEZ (Fig 7F, S11D Fig). We found V5-VMAT puncta that either co-localize or are in close proximity to Syt:HA and dVGLUT (Fig 7F–7J, S11D–S11H Fig). While the behavioral significance of potential OA synaptic release on aggression circuitry remains to be determined, previous work has demonstrated amine-dependent behaviors can be altered by shifting the balance of OA release from SVs to LDCVs [70]. In addition, as mentioned above, we have previously shown that three OA-FruM+ neurons are required to suppress intermale courtship and recent work has identified a small subset of OA receptor OAMB-expressing neurons that when silenced, decrease aggression and increase intermale courtship [56]. The SEZ areas of V5-VMAT and dVGLUT puncta highlighted in Figs 7 and 8 are consistent with projections made by OA-FruM+ neurons which are also OGNs (S12 Fig) raising the possibility of distinct OA and GLU inputs to key downstream targets.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 8. Spatial segregation of VMAT and dVGLUT within two OGNs.

(A-A’) Representative brain showing V5-VMAT expression in two OGNs after excision by MB113C-split-gal4 driven R recombinase. The brain is labeled with anti-V5 (magenta) and mAb dVGLUT (green). Scale bar is 50 μm. The inlet in A which is from a separate brain demonstrates this OA neuron driver also expresses dVGLUT (green). (B-E) Higher magnification of the SEZ boxed region in A’. Arrowheads point to puncta with V5-VMAT and dVGLUT, arrows indicate V5-VMAT only puncta. Scale bar is 10 μm. (C-E) The regions in the dashed boxes in B showing puncta with dVGLUT and V5-VMAT colocalization (arrowheads) and puncta with only V5-VMAT (arrows). Panels B-E contain stacks of four optical sections at 0.45 μm. Scale bar for panels C-E is 5 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.g008

Due to the large number of tdc2-dVGlut-gal4 neurons, we repeated the experiment using the OA-specific MB113C-split-gal4 to drive V5-VMAT in ~2 OGNs (Fig 8A and 8B) [71]. Fig 8C illustrates that as expected, many V5-VMAT puncta in the SEZ either co-localize with dVGLUT or are in close proximity (arrowheads). High resolution images in Fig 8D and 8H, however, indicate small, but distinct regions that contain V5-VMAT puncta without dVGLUT (arrows). Within the areas of dVGLUT and V5-VMAT possible colocalization, this level of analysis does not indicate whether the two transporters segregate into adjacent but distinct puncta, nor are questions of transporter colocalization on the same vesicles addressed. Nevertheless, our results demonstrate that within OGNs, V5-VMAT and dVGLUT puncta can differ in localization suggesting the aggression vs. intermale courtship phenotype differences may be due to spatial differences in signaling by glutamate and octopamine.

Discussion

Addressing the functional complexities of ‘‘one neuron, multiple transmitters” is critical to understanding how neuron communication, circuit computation, and behavior can be regulated by a single neuron. Over many decades, significant progress has been made elucidating the functional properties of neurons co-expressing neuropeptides and small molecule neurotransmitters, where the neuropeptide acts as a co-transmitter and modulates the action of the neurotransmitter [5, 6, 72]. Only recently have studies begun to examine the functional significance of co-transmission by a fast-acting neurotransmitter and a slow-acting monoamine.

In this study, we demonstrated that OA neurons express dVGLUT and utilized a new genetic tool to remove dVGLUT in OA-glutamate neurons. Quantifying changes in the complex social behaviors of aggression and courtship revealed that dVGLUT in brain OGNs is required to promote aggressive behavior and a specific behavioral pattern, the lunge. In contrast, males deficient for dVGLUT function do not exhibit an increase in inter-male courtship. These results establish a previously undetermined role for dVGLUT in OA neurons located in the adult brain and reveal glutamate uncouples aggression from inter-male courtship. It has been suggested that classical neurotransmitters and monoamines present in the same neuron modulate each other’s packaging into synaptic vesicles or after release via autoreceptors [9, 49, 73–75]. For example, a reduction of dVGLUT in DA-glutamate neurons resulted in decreased AMPH-stimulated hyperlocomotion in Drosophila and mice suggesting a key function of dVGLUT is the mediation of vesicular DA content [12, 49, 76]. In this study, the independent behavioral changes suggests enhancing the packaging of OA into vesicles is not the sole function of dVGLUT co-expression and suggests differences in signaling by OA from OGNs on courtship-related circuitry.

Co-transmission can generate distinct circuit-level effects via multiple mechanisms. One mechanism includes spatial segregation; the release of two neurotransmitters or a neurotransmitter and monoamine from a single neuron occurring at different axon terminals or presynaptic zones. Recent studies examining this possible mechanism have described; (i) the release of GLU and DA from different synaptic vesicles in midbrain dopamine neurons[15, 77] and (ii) the presence of VMAT and VGLUT microdomains in a subset of rodent mesoaccumbens DA neurons[78]. In this study, we expressed a new conditionally expressed epitope-tagged version of VMAT in OGNs and visualized endogenous dVGLUT via antibody labeling. Within OGNs, the colocalization of VMAT and dVGLUT puncta was not complete suggesting the observed behavioral phenotype differences may be due to spatial differences in OA signaling.

A second mechanism by which co-transmission may generate unique functional properties relies on activating distinct postsynaptic receptors. In Drosophila, recent work has identified a small population of male-specific neurons that express the alpha-like adrenergic receptor, OAMB, as aggression-promoting circuit-level neuronal targets of OA modulation independent of any effect on arousal[56] and separately knockdown of the Rdl GABAa receptor in a specific doublesex+ population stimulated male aggression [79]. Future experiments identifying downstream targets that express both glutamate and octopamine receptors would be informative, as well as using additional split-Gal4 lines to determine if segregation of transporters is a hallmark of the majority of OGNs. Finally, a third possible mechanism is Glu may be co-released from OGNs and act on autoreceptors to regulate presynaptic OA release (reviewed in [75]).

Deciphering the signaling complexity that allows neural networks to integrate external stimuli with internal states to generate context-appropriate social behavior is a challenging endeavor. Neuromodulators including monoamines are released to signal changes in an animal’s environment and positively or negatively reinforce network output. In invertebrates, a role for OA in responding to external chemosensory cues as well as promoting aggression has been well-established [43, 47, 56, 80–83]. In terms of identifying specific aggression circuit-components that utilize OA, previous results determined OA neurons directly receive male-specific pheromone information [43] and the aSP2 neurons serve as a hub through which OA can bias output from a multi-functional social behavior network towards aggression[56]. The ability of OA to bias behavioral decisions based on positive and negative reinforcement was also recently described for food odors [84]. In vertebrates, it has been proposed that DA-GLU cotransmission in the NAc medial shell might facilitate behavioral switching [85]. Our finding that the majority of OA neurons are glutamatergic, suggests that the complex social behavior of aggression may rely on small subsets of neurons that both signal the rapid temporal coding of critical external stimuli as well as the frequency coding of such stimuli resulting in the enhancement of this behavioral network. One implication of our finding regarding the separable OA-dependent inhibition of inter-male courtship is the possibility of identifying specific synapses or axon terminals that when activated gate two different behavioral outcomes. A second implication is that aggressive behavior in other systems may be modified by targeting GLU function in monoamine neurons.

Finally, monoamine-expressing neurons play key roles in human behavior including aggression and illnesses that have an aggressive component such as depression, addiction, anxiety, and Alzheimer’s [86, 87]. While progress is being made in addressing the functional complexities of dual transmission, the possible pathological implications of glutamate co-release by monoamine neurons remains virtually unknown. Analyzing the synaptic vesicle and release properties of monoamine-glutamate neurons could offer new possibilities for therapeutic interventions aimed at controlling out-of-context aggression.

Methods

Drosophila husbandry and stocks

All flies were reared on standard cornmeal-based fly food. Unless noted otherwise, during developmental and post-eclosion, flies were raised at 25°C, ~50% humidity and a 12:12hr light-dark cycle (1400±200 lx white fluorescent light) in humidity and temperature-controlled incubators. A list of stocks can be found in S1 Data.

Aggression assays

Male pupae were isolated and aged individually in 16 x 100mm borosilicate glass tubes containing 1.5ml of standard food medium as previously described [88]. A dab of white or blue acrylic paint was applied to the thorax of two-day old males under CO2 anesthesia for identification purposes. Flies were returned to their respective isolation tubes for a period of at least 24 hours to allow recovery. For aggression testing, pairs of 3–5 day old, socially naïve adult males were placed in 12-well polystyrene plates (VWR #82050–930) as described previously [43]. All assays were run at 25°C and ~45–50% humidity levels.

Scoring and statistics

All aggression was assayed within first two hours of lights ON time (Zeitgeber hours 0–2) and scored manually using iMovie version 8.0.6. Total number of lunges, wing threats, and unilateral wing extensions were scored for a period of 30 minutes after the first lunge according to the criteria established previously [43, 88]. The time between the aspiration of the flies into the chamber and the first lunge was used for calculating the latency to lunge. Male-male courtship was the number of unilateral wing extensions (singing) followed by abdomen bends or repeated wing extensions. All graphs were generated with Graphpad Prism and Adobe Illustrator CS6. For data that did not meet parametric assumptions, Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn’s multiple comparison was used unless otherwise specified. A standard unpaired t-test was performed in the case of only two comparisons and a modified chi-square test to compare copulation success.

Activity levels

Activity levels were measured by tracking the flies in each assay using the OpenCV module in the Python programming language to analyze the video and then output XY-coordinate and distance data. The distance traveled was calculated for each fly by determining the starting location followed by the second location after a 250-ms time interval and then taking the sum of the distance traveled in each interval. To calculate pixels moved per second, the distance data was divided by the total time spent tracking.

Immunohistochemistry

Adult male dissected brains were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 25 minutes and labeled using a modification of protocols previously described [55]. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-bruchpilot (mAb nc82, 1:30, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by the Department of Biology, University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA).), monoclonal rabbit anti-GFP (1:200, Molecular Probes), rat anti-HA 3F10 (1:100, Roche), mAb dVGLUT (1:15), anti-TβH (1:400, [89]), rat anti-V5 (1:200, Biorbyt), and rabbit anti-TDC2 (1:100, Covalab). Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa 488, Alexa 594, or Alexa 647 (Molecular Probes) were used at a concentration of 1:200. Labeled brains were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Labs, #H1000). Images were collected on an Olympus Fluoview FV1000 laser scanning confocal mounted on an inverted IX81 microscope and processed using ImageJ (NIH) and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe, CA).

qPCR

Total RNA from ~40 heads using Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Pluskit (Zymo Research)and treated with DNase I per the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentrations were measured with a ND-1000 nanodrop spectrometer. Reverse transcription was accomplished using iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). RT-PCR was performed using 300 ng cDNA added to iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and primers in a 20 μL reaction volume. All samples were run in triplicate using a Stratagene Mx3005P qPCR System(Agilent Technologies). Expression of ribosomal protein 49 (Rp49) was used as the reference control to normalize expression between genotypes. Expression levels were determined using the ΔΔCT method and results from control (UAS-dVGlut-RNAi/+) and experimental (nsyb-Gal4/UAS-dVGlut-RNAi) groups were normalized relative to a transgenic control (nsyb-Gal4/+). The following primers were used: Rp49 Forward: 50-CATCCGCCCAGCATACAG-3’ Rp49 Reverse: 5’-CCATTTGTGCGACAGCTTAG-3’ dVGlut Forward: 5’-GCACGGTCATGTGGTGATTTG-3’ dVGlut Reverse: 5’-CCAGAAACGCCAGATACCATGG-3’. Primer designs for all Rp49 and dVGlut primers used have been described previously [12].

Construction of 20XUAS-His2A-GFP, 13XLexAop2-His2B-mCherry and 20XUAS-R

The 20XUAS-His2A-GFP, 13XLexAop2-His2B-mCherry, and 20XUAS-R expression clones were assembled using Gateway MultiSite LR reactions as previously described[90] and as indicated in S2 Table. The L1-20XUAS-DSCP-L4 and L1-13XLexAop2-DSCP-L4 entry clones contain 20 copies of UAS and 13 copies of LexAop2 upstream of the Drosophila synthetic core promoter (DSCP) [91], respectively. The R4-His2A-R3 and R4-His2B-R3 entry clones were generated as previously described [90] using genomic DNA as templates. The L3-GFP-L2 entry clone was generated from template pJFRC165[60] except the PEST sequence is omitted. The L3-GFP-L2 and L3-mCherry-HA-L2 entry clones were previously described [92]. The L1-20XUAS-DSCP-R5 entry clone was previously described [90]. The pDESTp10aw destination vector was previously described[93]. Injections were performed by Bestgene, Inc.

Construction of UAS-B3

B3 recombinase derived from pJFRC157 [60] was PCR amplified using primers designed to add the syn21 translational enhancer sequence [94] and remove the PEST domain. The verified PCR product was cloned into pENTR (Invtrogen) and subsequently transferred to pBID20xUAS, a derivative of the pBID vector [95] with 20 copies of the UAS binding sequence. Injection of UAS-B3 was performed by Genetivision into landing site VK31.

Generation of B3RT-vGlut

The B3RT-dVGlut-LexA chromosome was generated via CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Both guide RNAs were incorporated into pCFD4 using previously described methods [96] to produce the double guide RNA plasmid pCFD4-vGlut1. The donor plasmid B3RT-dVGlut-LexA used the pHSG298 backbone (Takara Bio) and was generated using NEBuilder HiFi (New England Biolabs). The complete annotated sequence of B3RT-dVGlut-LexA is shown in Supplementary Information. pCFD4-vGlut1/B3RT-dVGlut-LexA injections were performed by Bestgene, Inc.

To assess the functionality of dVGlut on the B3RT-dVGlut chromosome pre- and post-excision, the B3RT-dVGlut chromosome was crossed with the homozygous lethal dVGlut null allele, dVGlutSS1 in the presence and absence of the pan-neuronal driver n-syb-Gal4. In the absence of a Gal4 driver, dVGlutSS1/B3RT-dVGlut progeny are fully viable and no LexAop-driven reporter gene expression is detected (Fig 2). When B3 recombinase (UAS-B3) is expressed in the nervous system by n-syb-Gal4, dVGlutSS1/B3RT-dVGlut;UAS-B3/n-syb-Gal4 progeny are inviable, therefore after excision, as expected with removal of the entire dVGlut protein-coding sequence, a dVGlut null allele results.

Generation of dVGlutSS1

The dVGlutSS1 allele was generated by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with the same guide RNAs used to generate B3RT-dVGlut LexA. dVGlutSS1 was identified based on failed complementation with the existing dVGlut2 allele[97]. Sequencing of PCR products from this allele indicated a deletion of 2442bp that includes dVGlut amino acids 53–523. Genomic DNA sequence at the breakpoints of the dVGlutSS1 allele are indicated with the deleted region in bold: GGACCAGGCGGCGGCCACGC. . . . . .AACCTCCGGCCGAGGAGCAA.

Generation of the RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT chromosome

RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT was generated via CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Both upstream guide RNAs were incorporated into pCFD4-vMAT1 and both downstream guide RNAs were incorporated into pCFD4-vMAT2 as previously described [96]. The RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT donor plasmid used the pHSG298 backbone (Takara Bio) and was generated using NEBuilder HiFi (New England Biolabs). The complete annotated sequence of RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT is shown in Supplementary Information. pCFD4-vMAT1/pCFD4-vMAT2/RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT injections into the nos-Cas9 strain TH_attP2[98] were performed by Bestgene, Inc.

The R and B3 recombinases from yeast recognize sequence-specific recombination target sites, RSRTs and B3RTs, respectively [60]. These recombinases are highly efficient and highly specific as they exhibit virtually no cross-reactivity with each other’s recombinase target sites. When pairs of recombinase target sites are in the same orientation, as is the case for both B3RT-vGlut-LexA and RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT, the recombinases catalyze excision of the intervening DNA and leave behind a single recombinase target site.

dVGlut antibody

Drosophila anti-dVGLUT mouse monoclonal antibodies (10D6G) were generated (Life Technologies Europe) using the C-terminal peptide sequence TQGQMPSYDPQGYQQQ of dVGLUT coupled to KLH.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Verification of mAb dVGLUT specificity using the null dVGlutSS1 allele.

(A) dVGLUT expression detected by mAb dVGLUT in a heterozygous yw, dVGlutSS1/+ late stage embryo. (B) dVGLUT expression is not detectable by mAb dVGLUT in a homozygous yw, dVGlutSS1/ dVGlutSS1 late stage embryo.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Multiple optical sections from dVGlut>dsRed male brains labeled with anti-Tβh.

(A-B) Although the Tβh shows weaker immunoreactivity than the anti-Tdc2 antibody, Tβh is mainly detected in dVGlut>dsRed neurons at dorsal and ventral positions (A’, A”, B’ and B”). Scale bar = 20 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig.

(A-A’) Schematic showing the regions (boxes) of the VNS imaged in panels B and C. (B-C) A male dVGlut>dsRed adult VNS labeled with anti-Tdc2. The majority of dVGLUT+ neurons within the thoracic VNS (B) and abdominal VNS (C) express Tdc2 with a few exceptions (arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig.

(A) Schematic showing the regions imaged in panels B and C (colored boxes). (B-C) The majority of OA neurons within the PENP (B) and SEZ (C) regions co-express dVGLUT as visualized in a male tdc2>dsRed adult brain labeled with anti-dVGLUT. Scale bar = 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig.

(A) dVGlut transcript levels were decreased in n-syb-gal4>dVGLUT-RNAi males as compared to the n-syb-gal4 control (n = 3; p<0.01). (B-C) Representative images of ventral sections of the SEZ from a tdc2-gal4>dVGLUT-RNAi;UAS-dsRed male brain labeled with anti-Tdc2. OGN differentiation as measured by Tdc2 expression is not altered by a reduction of dVGLUT. Scale bar = 10 μm. (D-E) Dorsal sections of the SEZ, PENP and protocerebral bridge region from the same brain as in B. There are no obvious changes in ventral OGN survival and differentiation as measured by Tdc2 expression. Scale bar = 20 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig.

(A) Verification that each tdc2>GFP neuron in the brain and VNS is Tdc2+. The stack for panel A contains 30 optical sections at 1.0 μm. Scale bar = 20 μm. (B) The stack for panel B contains 34 optical sections at 1.0 μm. Scale bar = 20 μm. (C-E) Verification that each tdc2-dVGlut-split>GFP neuron is Tdc2+. The stack for panels C-E contains 56 optical sections at 0.5 μm. Scale bar = 20 μm. (F) Schematic showing the locations of Tdc+ clusters in C-E.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig.

(A) The activity levels of controls and tdc2>dVGlut-RNAi males did not differ during the aggression assay as measured by pixels moved/second. (B) Total behavioral events (lunges, wing threats, inter-male courtship) per minute was calculated. The average number of behavioral events per minute exhibited by experimental males (tdc2>tsh>Gal80>dVGlut-RNAi) was slightly higher than controls (**p<0.01)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig.

(A) The VNS of a tdc2>mtd:HA male, note the Tdc2+ cell bodies. (B) The addition of tsh>Gal80 blocked the Gal4-mediated expression of mtd:HA in the majority of Tdc2+ VNS neurons (tdc2/tsh>Gal80;dsRed). Axonal projections from brain Tdc2+ neurons are visualized in the VNS. (C) Significantly less Tdc2+ VNS neurons are detected in tdc2/tsh>Gal80;dsRed vs. tdc2>dsRed males. (Mann Whitney, P = 0.001). (D) The addition of tsh>Gal80 does not alter brain tdc2-gal4 reporter driven expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s008

(TIF)

S9 Fig.

Neuron survival or distribution is not altered by the complete loss of dVGLUT in OGNs (A-D) Representative images of dorsal (A-B) and ventral (C-D) optical sections of the SEZ region from tdc2-gal4;B3RT-dVGlut/dVGLUTSS1;UAS-B3 lexAop-His2B-mCherry UAS-His2A-GFP males. OGNs are visualized by the mCherry reporter and white co-colocalization in the merged channel. Scale bar = 20 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s009

(TIF)

S10 Fig. RSRT>stop>6xV5-VMAT is not expressed without Gal4-mediated excision of the stop cassette.

(A-A’) In the presence of a Gal4 driver (tdc2-Gal4-AD dVGlut-Gal4-DBD) to drive R recombinase (UAS-R) expression, the stop cassette of RSRT>stop>6XV5-VMAT is excised and V5-VMAT (magenta) is expressed and visualized by anti-V5. dVGLUT (green) is visualized by mAb dVGLUT. (B-B’) Without the presence of a Gal4 driver, dVGLUT expression is apparent while expression from RSRT>stop>6XV5-VMAT is not detected by anti-V5. Scale bar = 30 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s010

(TIF)

S11 Fig.

(A) Higher magnification of the SEZ region showing V5-VMAT expression in OGNs after excision by tdc2-dVGlut-gal4 driven R recombinase. The brain is labeled with anti-V5 (magenta) and mAb dVGLUT (green). Scale bar = 15 μm. (B-B”) Higher magnification of the SEZ region of the region in the dashed box in panel B. Arrowheads indicate puncta with dVGLUT and V5-VMAT colocalization. Arrows indicate puncta with only V5-VMAT (arrows). (C) Schematic indicating the location of the SEZ region. (D) SEZ region of a representative brain with a synaptic marker incorporated (UAS-synaptotagmin;HA, tdc2-dVGlut-gal4/UAS-R RSRT-STOP-RSRT-6XV5-vMAT). The brain is labeled with anti-HA (blue), anti-V5 (magenta), and mAb dVGLUT (green). Scale bar = 20 μm. (E) Higher magnification of the SEZ region in D. Scale bar = 10 μm. (F-H) Regions of interest from E showing puncta with dVGLUT, V5-VMAT and Syt:HA. The stack for panel B contains two optical sections at 0.45 μm. Six optical sections at 0.45 μm were stacked in panels E-H.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s011

(TIF)

S12 Fig. OGNs include the three OA-FruM+ neurons.

(A-C) Brains from tdc2-dVGlut-split-gal4/UAS>stop>CD8:GFP;fru-flp males demonstrate OA-FruM+ neurons are also dVGlut+. (D) No OGNs in the VNS are FruM+ although as expected the OGN-FruM+ neurons project into the VNS. Scale bar = 20 μm. (E-G) OGN-FruM+ neurons (arrow) were also identified in dVGlut-gal4/UAS>stop>CD8:GFP;fru-flp male brains labeled with anti-Tdc2 (magenta). Scale bar = 20 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s012

(TIF)

S1 Table. Identified OGNs based on OA neuron nomenclature.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s013

(TIF)

S2 Table. Cloning components used for the construction of the 20XUAS-His2A-GFP and 13XLexAop2-His2B-mCherry lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s014

(TIF)

S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609.s015

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Julie Simpson and Vivian Budnik for kindly providing stocks and reagents as well as the Bloomington Stock Center for additional Drosophila lines. We thank the University of Montana Biospectroscopy and Fluorescence Imaging Core and Lou Herritt for technical expertise.

Citation: Sherer LM, Catudio Garrett E, Morgan HR, Brewer ED, Sirrs LA, Shearin HK, et al. (2020) Octopamine neuron dependent aggression requires dVGLUT from dual-transmitting neurons. PLoS Genet 16(2): e1008609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008609

References

1. Dale H. Pharmacology and Nerve-endings (Walter Ernest Dixon Memorial Lecture): (Section of Therapeutics and Pharmacology). Proc R Soc Med. 1935;28(3):319–32. Epub 1935/01/01. pmid:19990108; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2205701.

2. Eccles JC, Fatt P, Koketsu K. Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor-axon collaterals to motoneurones. J Physiol. 1954;126(3):524–62. Epub 1954/12/10. pmid:13222354; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1365877.

3. Strata P, Harvey R. Dale's principle. Brain Res Bull. 1999;50(5–6):349–50. Epub 2000/01/22. pmid:10643431.

4. Hnasko TS, Edwards RH. Neurotransmitter corelease: mechanism and physiological role. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:225–43. Epub 2011/11/08. pmid:22054239; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4090038.

5. Nassel DR. Substrates for Neuronal Cotransmission With Neuropeptides and Small Molecule Neurotransmitters in Drosophila. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:83. Epub 2018/04/14. pmid:29651236; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5885757.

6. Nusbaum MP, Blitz DM, Marder E. Functional consequences of neuropeptide and small-molecule co-transmission. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(7):389–403. Epub 2017/06/09. pmid:28592905; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5547741.

7. Vaaga CE, Borisovska M, Westbrook GL. Dual-transmitter neurons: functional implications of co-release and co-transmission. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;29:25–32. Epub 2014/05/13. pmid:24816154; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4231002.

8. El Mestikawy S, Wallen-Mackenzie A, Fortin GM, Descarries L, Trudeau LE. From glutamate co-release to vesicular synergy: vesicular glutamate transporters. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(4):204–16. Epub 2011/03/19. pmid:21415847.

9. Gras C, Herzog E, Bellenchi GC, Bernard V, Ravassard P, Pohl M, et al. A third vesicular glutamate transporter expressed by cholinergic and serotoninergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22(13):5442–51. Epub 2002/07/05. pmid:12097496.

10. Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathisen J. Glutamate- and GABA-containing neurons in the mouse and rat brain, as demonstrated with a new immunocytochemical technique. J Comp Neurol. 1984;229(3):374–92. Epub 1984/11/01. pmid:6150049.

11. Root DH, Zhang S, Barker DJ, Miranda-Barrientos J, Liu B, Wang HL, et al. Selective Brain Distribution and Distinctive Synaptic Architecture of Dual Glutamatergic-GABAergic Neurons. Cell Rep. 2018;23(12):3465–79. Epub 2018/06/21. pmid:29924991.

12. Aguilar JI, Dunn M, Mingote S, Karam CS, Farino ZJ, Sonders MS, et al. Neuronal Depolarization Drives Increased Dopamine Synaptic Vesicle Loading via VGLUT. Neuron. 2017;95(5):1074–88 e7. Epub 2017/08/22. pmid:28823729; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5760215.

13. Lohr KM, Bernstein AI, Stout KA, Dunn AR, Lazo CR, Alter SP, et al. Increased vesicular monoamine transporter enhances dopamine release and opposes Parkinson disease-related neurodegeneration in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(27):9977–82. Epub 2014/07/01. pmid:24979780; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4103325.

14. Trudeau LE, El Mestikawy S. Glutamate Cotransmission in Cholinergic, GABAergic and Monoamine Systems: Contrasts and Commonalities. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:113. Epub 2019/01/09. pmid:30618649; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6305298.

15. Silm K, Yang J, Marcott PF, Asensio CS, Eriksen J, Guthrie DA, et al. Synaptic Vesicle Recycling Pathway Determines Neurotransmitter Content and Release Properties. Neuron. 2019;102(4):786–800 e5. Epub 2019/04/21. pmid:31003725; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6541489.

16. Zhang Q, Liu B, Wu Q, Liu B, Li Y, Sun S, et al. Differential Co-release of Two Neurotransmitters from a Vesicle Fusion Pore in Mammalian Adrenal Chromaffin Cells. Neuron. 2019;102(1):173–83 e4. Epub 2019/02/19. pmid:30773347.

17. Wrangham RW. Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(2):245–53. Epub 2017/12/28. pmid:29279379; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5777045.

18. Thomas AL, Davis SM, Dierick HA. Of Fighting Flies, Mice, and Men: Are Some of the Molecular and Neuronal Mechanisms of Aggression Universal in the Animal Kingdom? PLoS Genet. 2015;11(8):e1005416. Epub 2015/08/28. pmid:26312756; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4551476.

19. Craig IW, Halton KE. Genetics of human aggressive behaviour. Hum Genet. 2009;126(1):101–13. Epub 2009/06/10. pmid:19506905.

20. Hoopfer ED. Neural control of aggression in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016;38:109–18. Epub 2016/05/18. pmid:27179788.

21. Kravitz EA, Fernandez Mde L. Aggression in Drosophila. Behav Neurosci. 2015;129(5):549–63. pmid:26348714.

22. Nelson RJ, Trainor BC. Neural mechanisms of aggression. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(7):536–46. pmid:17585306.

23. Rillich J, Rillich B, Stevenson PA. Differential modulation of courtship behavior and subsequent aggression by octopamine, dopamine and serotonin in male crickets. Horm Behav. 2019. Epub 2019/06/22. pmid:31226329.

24. Bruno V, Mancini D, Ghoche R, Arshinoff R, Miyasaki JM. High prevalence of physical and sexual aggression to caregivers in advanced Parkinson's disease. Experience in the Palliative Care Program. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;24:141–2. Epub 2016/01/21. pmid:26786755.

25. Liu CS, Ruthirakuhan M, Chau SA, Herrmann N, Carvalho AF, Lanctot KL. Pharmacological Management of Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Current and Novel Treatments. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2016;13(10):1134–44. Epub 2016/05/04. pmid:27137221.

26. Stigler KA, McDougle CJ. Pharmacotherapy of irritability in pervasive developmental disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2008;17(4):739–52, vii-viii. Epub 2008/09/09. pmid:18775367.

27. Kim S, Boylan K. Effectiveness of Antidepressant Medications for Symptoms of Irritability and Disruptive Behaviors in Children and Adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016;26(8):694–704. Epub 2016/08/03. pmid:27482998.

28. Moret C, Briley M. The importance of norepinephrine in depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7(Suppl 1):9–13. Epub 2011/07/14. pmid:21750623; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3131098.

29. Sharma T, Guski LS, Freund N, Gotzsche PC. Suicidality and aggression during antidepressant treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses based on clinical study reports. BMJ. 2016;352:i65. Epub 2016/01/29. pmid:26819231; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4729837.

30. Agnati LF, Guidolin D, Guescini M, Genedani S, Fuxe K. Understanding wiring and volume transmission. Brain Res Rev. 2010;64(1):137–59. Epub 2010/03/30. pmid:20347870.

31. Beaudet A, Descarries L. The monoamine innervation of rat cerebral cortex: synaptic and nonsynaptic axon terminals. Neuroscience. 1978;3(10):851–60. Epub 1978/01/01. pmid:215936.

32. Descarries L, Berube-Carriere N, Riad M, Bo GD, Mendez JA, Trudeau LE. Glutamate in dopamine neurons: synaptic versus diffuse transmission. Brain Res Rev. 2008;58(2):290–302. Epub 2007/11/29. pmid:18042492.

33. Descarries L, Watkins KC, Lapierre Y. Noradrenergic axon terminals in the cerebral cortex of rat. III. Topometric ultrastructural analysis. Brain Res. 1977;133(2):197–222. Epub 1977/09/16. pmid:902092.

34. De-Miguel FF, Trueta C. Synaptic and extrasynaptic secretion of serotonin. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2005;25(2):297–312. pmid:16047543.

35. Fuxe K, Agnati LF, Marcoli M, Borroto-Escuela DO. Volume Transmission in Central Dopamine and Noradrenaline Neurons and Its Astroglial Targets. Neurochem Res. 2015;40(12):2600–14. Epub 2015/04/22. pmid:25894681.

36. Marder E, Thirumalai V. Cellular, synaptic and network effects of neuromodulation. Neural Netw. 2002;15(4–6):479–93. pmid:12371506.

37. Takahashi A, Quadros IM, de Almeida RM, Miczek KA. Behavioral and pharmacogenetics of aggressive behavior. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2012;12:73–138. pmid:22297576; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3864145.

38. Moutsimilli L, Farley S, El Khoury MA, Chamot C, Sibarita JB, Racine V, et al. Antipsychotics increase vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2) expression in thalamolimbic pathways. Neuropharmacology. 2008;54(3):497–508. Epub 2007/12/25. pmid:18155072.

39. Uezato A, Meador-Woodruff JH, McCullumsmith RE. Vesicular glutamate transporter mRNA expression in the medial temporal lobe in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11(7):711–25. Epub 2009/10/21. pmid:19839996.

40. Tordera RM, Pei Q, Sharp T. Evidence for increased expression of the vesicular glutamate transporter, VGLUT1, by a course of antidepressant treatment. J Neurochem. 2005;94(4):875–83. Epub 2005/07/05. pmid:15992385.

41. Shan D, Lucas EK, Drummond JB, Haroutunian V, Meador-Woodruff JH, McCullumsmith RE. Abnormal expression of glutamate transporters in temporal lobe areas in elderly patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013;144(1–3):1–8. Epub 2013/01/30. pmid:23356950; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3572263.

42. Mingote S, Chuhma N, Kalmbach A, Thomsen GM, Wang Y, Mihali A, et al. Dopamine neuron dependent behaviors mediated by glutamate cotransmission. Elife. 2017;6. Epub 2017/07/14. pmid:28703706; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5599237.

43. Andrews JC, Fernandez MP, Yu Q, Leary GP, Leung AK, Kavanaugh MP, et al. Octopamine neuromodulation regulates Gr32a-linked aggression and courtship pathways in Drosophila males. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(5):e1004356. Epub 2014/05/24. pmid:24852170; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4031044.

44. Baier A, Wittek B, Brembs B. Drosophila as a new model organism for the neurobiology of aggression? J Exp Biol. 2002;205(Pt 9):1233–40. pmid:11948200.

45. Certel SJ, Savella MG, Schlegel DC, Kravitz EA. Modulation of Drosophila male behavioral choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(11):4706–11. pmid:17360588.

46. Hoyer SC, Eckart A, Herrel A, Zars T, Fischer SA, Hardie SL, et al. Octopamine in male aggression of Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2008;18(3):159–67. pmid:18249112.

47. Zhou C, Rao Y, Rao Y. A subset of octopaminergic neurons are important for Drosophila aggression. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(9):1059–67. pmid:19160504.

48. Chaudhry FA, Reimer RJ, Bellocchio EE, Danbolt NC, Osen KK, Edwards RH, et al. The vesicular GABA transporter, VGAT, localizes to synaptic vesicles in sets of glycinergic as well as GABAergic neurons. J Neurosci. 1998;18(23):9733–50. Epub 1998/11/21. pmid:9822734.

49. Hnasko TS, Chuhma N, Zhang H, Goh GY, Sulzer D, Palmiter RD, et al. Vesicular glutamate transport promotes dopamine storage and glutamate corelease in vivo. Neuron. 2010;65(5):643–56. Epub 2010/03/13. pmid:20223200; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2846457.

50. Jonas P, Bischofberger J, Sandkuhler J. Corelease of two fast neurotransmitters at a central synapse. Science. 1998;281(5375):419–24. Epub 1998/07/17. pmid:9665886.

51. Ren J, Qin C, Hu F, Tan J, Qiu L, Zhao S, et al. Habenula "cholinergic" neurons co-release glutamate and acetylcholine and activate postsynaptic neurons via distinct transmission modes. Neuron. 2011;69(3):445–52. Epub 2011/02/15. pmid:21315256.

52. Tritsch NX, Ding JB, Sabatini BL. Dopaminergic neurons inhibit striatal output through non-canonical release of GABA. Nature. 2012;490(7419):262–6. Epub 2012/10/05. pmid:23034651; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3944587.

53. Rodriguez-Valentin R, Lopez-Gonzalez I, Jorquera R, Labarca P, Zurita M, Reynaud E. Oviduct contraction in Drosophila is modulated by a neural network that is both, octopaminergic and glutamatergic. J Cell Physiol. 2006;209(1):183–98. pmid:16826564.

54. Stuber GD, Hnasko TS, Britt JP, Edwards RH, Bonci A. Dopaminergic terminals in the nucleus accumbens but not the dorsal striatum corelease glutamate. J Neurosci. 2010;30(24):8229–33. Epub 2010/06/18. pmid:20554874; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2918390.

55. Certel SJ, Leung A, Lin CY, Perez P, Chiang AS, Kravitz EA. Octopamine neuromodulatory effects on a social behavior decision-making network in Drosophila males. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13248. Epub 2010/10/23. pmid:20967276; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2953509.

56. Watanabe K, Chiu H, Pfeiffer BD, Wong AM, Hoopfer ED, Rubin GM, et al. A Circuit Node that Integrates Convergent Input from Neuromodulatory and Social Behavior-Promoting Neurons to Control Aggression in Drosophila. Neuron. 2017;95(5):1112–28 e7. Epub 2017/09/01. pmid:28858617; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5588916.

57. Chen S, Lee AY, Bowens NM, Huber R, Kravitz EA. Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(8):5664–8. pmid:11960020.

58. Dierick HA. A method for quantifying aggression in male Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(11):2712–8. pmid:18007606.

59. Baek M, Mann RS. Lineage and birth date specify motor neuron targeting and dendritic architecture in adult Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2009;29(21):6904–16. Epub 2009/05/29. pmid:19474317.

60. Nern A, Pfeiffer BD, Svoboda K, Rubin GM. Multiple new site-specific recombinases for use in manipulating animal genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(34):14198–203. Epub 2011/08/13. pmid:21831835; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3161616.

61. Jensen AA, Fahlke C, Bjorn-Yoshimoto WE, Bunch L. Excitatory amino acid transporters: recent insights into molecular mechanisms, novel modes of modulation and new therapeutic possibilities. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015;20:116–23. Epub 2014/12/04. pmid:25466154.

62. Martin CA, Krantz DE. Drosophila melanogaster as a genetic model system to study neurotransmitter transporters. Neurochem Int. 2014;73:71–88. Epub 2014/04/08. pmid:24704795; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4264877.

63. Seal RP, Daniels GM, Wolfgang WJ, Forte MA, Amara SG. Identification and characterization of a cDNA encoding a neuronal glutamate transporter from Drosophila melanogaster. Receptors Channels. 1998;6(1):51–64. Epub 1998/07/17. pmid:9664622.

64. Soustelle L, Besson MT, Rival T, Birman S. Terminal glial differentiation involves regulated expression of the excitatory amino acid transporters in the Drosophila embryonic CNS. Dev Biol. 2002;248(2):294–306. Epub 2002/08/09. pmid:12167405.

65. Stacey SM, Muraro NI, Peco E, Labbe A, Thomas GB, Baines RA, et al. Drosophila glial glutamate transporter Eaat1 is regulated by fringe-mediated notch signaling and is essential for larval locomotion. J Neurosci. 2010;30(43):14446–57. Epub 2010/10/29. pmid:20980602.

66. Matsuno M, Horiuchi J, Ofusa K, Masuda T, Saitoe M. Inhibiting Glutamate Activity during Consolidation Suppresses Age-Related Long-Term Memory Impairment in Drosophila. iScience. 2019;15:55–65. Epub 2019/04/29. pmid:31030182; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6487374.

67. Monastirioti M, Linn CE Jr., White K. Characterization of Drosophila tyramine beta-hydroxylase gene and isolation of mutant flies lacking octopamine. J Neurosci. 1996;16(12):3900–11. pmid:8656284.

68. Tison KV, McKinney HM, Stowers RS. Demonstration of a Simple Epitope Tag Multimerization Strategy for Enhancing the Sensitivity of Protein Detection Using Drosophila vAChT. G3 (Bethesda). 2019. Epub 2019/11/27. pmid:31767639.

69. Atwood HL, Govind CK, Wu CF. Differential ultrastructure of synaptic terminals on ventral longitudinal abdominal muscles in Drosophila larvae. J Neurobiol. 1993;24(8):1008–24. Epub 1993/08/01. pmid:8409966.

70. Grygoruk A, Chen A, Martin CA, Lawal HO, Fei H, Gutierrez G, et al. The redistribution of Drosophila vesicular monoamine transporter mutants from synaptic vesicles to large dense-core vesicles impairs amine-dependent behaviors. J Neurosci. 2014;34(20):6924–37. Epub 2014/05/16. pmid:24828646; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4019805.

71. Sujkowski A, Ramesh D, Brockmann A, Wessells R. Octopamine Drives Endurance Exercise Adaptations in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 2017;21(7):1809–23. Epub 2017/11/16. pmid:29141215; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5693351.

72. Brewer JC, Olson AC, Collins KM, Koelle MR. Serotonin and neuropeptides are both released by the HSN command neuron to initiate Caenorhabditis elegans egg laying. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(1):e1007896. Epub 2019/01/25. pmid:30677018; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6363226.

73. Amilhon B, Lepicard E, Renoir T, Mongeau R, Popa D, Poirel O, et al. VGLUT3 (vesicular glutamate transporter type 3) contribution to the regulation of serotonergic transmission and anxiety. J Neurosci. 2010;30(6):2198–210. Epub 2010/02/12. pmid:20147547.

74. Ciranna L. Serotonin as a modulator of glutamate- and GABA-mediated neurotransmission: implications in physiological functions and in pathology. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2006;4(2):101–14. Epub 2008/07/11. pmid:18615128; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2430669.

75. Pittaluga A. Presynaptic Release-Regulating mGlu1 Receptors in Central Nervous System. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:295. Epub 2016/09/16. pmid:27630571; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5006178.

76. Birgner C, Nordenankar K, Lundblad M, Mendez JA, Smith C, le Greves M, et al. VGLUT2 in dopamine neurons is required for psychostimulant-induced behavioral activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(1):389–94. Epub 2009/12/19. pmid:20018672; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2806710.

77. Fortin GM, Ducrot C, Giguere N, Kouwenhoven WM, Bourque MJ, Pacelli C, et al. Segregation of dopamine and glutamate release sites in dopamine neuron axons: regulation by striatal target cells. FASEB J. 2019;33(1):400–17. Epub 2018/07/17. pmid:30011230.

78. Zhang S, Qi J, Li X, Wang HL, Britt JP, Hoffman AF, et al. Dopaminergic and glutamatergic microdomains in a subset of rodent mesoaccumbens axons. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(3):386–92. Epub 2015/02/11. pmid:25664911; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4340758.

79. Koganezawa M, Kimura K, Yamamoto D. The Neural Circuitry that Functions as a Switch for Courtship versus Aggression in Drosophila Males. Curr Biol. 2016;26(11):1395–403. Epub 2016/05/18. pmid:27185554.

80. Crocker A, Sehgal A. Octopamine regulates sleep in Drosophila through protein kinase A-dependent mechanisms. J Neurosci. 2008;28(38):9377–85. pmid:18799671.

81. Scheiner R, Steinbach A, Classen G, Strudthoff N, Scholz H. Octopamine indirectly affects proboscis extension response habituation in Drosophila melanogaster by controlling sucrose responsiveness. J Insect Physiol. 2014;69:107–17. Epub 2014/05/14. pmid:24819202.

82. Stevenson PA, Dyakonova V, Rillich J, Schildberger K. Octopamine and experience-dependent modulation of aggression in crickets. J Neurosci. 2005;25(6):1431–41. pmid:15703397.

83. Youn H, Kirkhart C, Chia J, Scott K. A subset of octopaminergic neurons that promotes feeding initiation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198362. Epub 2018/06/28. pmid:29949586; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6021039.

84. Classen G, Scholz H. Octopamine Shifts the Behavioral Response From Indecision to Approach or Aversion in Drosophila melanogaster. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:131. Epub 2018/07/19. pmid:30018540; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6037846.

85. Mingote S, Amsellem A, Kempf A, Rayport S, Chuhma N. Dopamine-glutamate neuron projections to the nucleus accumbens medial shell and behavioral switching. Neurochem Int. 2019;129:104482. Epub 2019/06/07. pmid:31170424.

86. Manchia M, Carpiniello B, Valtorta F, Comai S. Serotonin Dysfunction, Aggressive Behavior, and Mental Illness: Exploring the Link Using a Dimensional Approach. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017;8(5):961–72. Epub 2017/04/06. pmid:28378993.

87. Vermeiren Y, Van Dam D, Aerts T, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP. Monoaminergic neurotransmitter alterations in postmortem brain regions of depressed and aggressive patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(12):2691–700. Epub 2014/07/07. pmid:24997673.

88. Certel SJ, Kravitz EA. Scoring and analyzing aggression in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2012;2012(3):319–25. Epub 2012/03/03. pmid:22383642.

89. Koon AC, Ashley J, Barria R, DasGupta S, Brain R, Waddell S, et al. Autoregulatory and paracrine control of synaptic and behavioral plasticity by octopaminergic signaling. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(2):190–9. Epub 2010/12/28. nn.2716 [pii] pmid:21186359.

90. Petersen LK, Stowers RS. A Gateway MultiSite recombination cloning toolkit. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24531. Epub 2011/09/21. pmid:21931740; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3170369.

91. Pfeiffer BD, Jenett A, Hammonds AS, Ngo TT, Misra S, Murphy C, et al. Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(28):9715–20. pmid:18621688.

92. Williams JL, Shearin HK, Stowers RS. Conditional Synaptic Vesicle Markers for Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda). 2019. Epub 2019/01/13. pmid:30635441.

93. Shearin HK, Dvarishkis AR, Kozeluh CD, Stowers RS. Expansion of the gateway multisite recombination cloning toolkit. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77724. Epub 2013/11/10. pmid:24204935; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3799639.

94. Pfeiffer BD, Truman JW, Rubin GM. Using translational enhancers to increase transgene expression in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(17):6626–31. Epub 2012/04/12. pmid:22493255; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3340069.

95. Wang JW, Beck ES, McCabe BD. A modular toolset for recombination transgenesis and neurogenetic analysis of Drosophila. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42102. Epub 2012/08/01. pmid:22848718; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3405054.

96. Port F, Chen HM, Lee T, Bullock SL. Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(29):E2967–76. Epub 2014/07/09. pmid:25002478; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4115528.

97. Daniels RW, Collins CA, Chen K, Gelfand MV, Featherstone DE, DiAntonio A. A single vesicular glutamate transporter is sufficient to fill a synaptic vesicle. Neuron. 2006;49(1):11–6. Epub 2006/01/03. pmid:16387635; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2248602.

98. Ren X, Sun J, Housden BE, Hu Y, Roesel C, Lin S, et al. Optimized gene editing technology for Drosophila melanogaster using germ line-specific Cas9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(47):19012–7. Epub 2013/11/06. pmid:24191015; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3839733.